Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
I Do Not Think That Means What You Think It Means

I Do Not Think That Means What You Think It Means

Last updated on: January 9, 2017 at 4:16 pm by Libby Anne

I Do Not Think That Means What You Think It Means 2017-01-09T16:16:39-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

World Magazine has published a piece titled No Middle Ground. It is an excerpt from a book by Erick Erickson. It begins as follows:

When the state of Indiana passed legislation to protect religious freedom in 2015, corporate America, which tends to worship a green god of its own, threatened to pull out of economic activity in Indiana. And the media ginned up a hypothetical case of discrimination. A reporter asked the owners of Memories Pizza, a family restaurant that does not even cater weddings, whether they would cater a same-sex wedding. When the owners said that to do so would violate their conscience, the media firestorm erupted—inspiring fake orders and death threats that forced Memories Pizza temporarily out of business. Governor Pence and the legislature quickly caved to the bullies on the Left and modified the legislation, and people of faith in Indiana found their religious liberties more at risk than ever. And we still did not have one case of actual discrimination to illustrate the rabid fears of discrimination against gay people.

Memories Pizza may have jumped to the top of media attention, but evangelical publications like the one this is printed in actively encourage wedding providers to deny services to gay and lesbian couples and have covered numerous cases of discrimination against gay people, each time championing those who are doing the discriminating. Surely Erickson is not ignorant of that?

This section is titled “Live-and-Let-Live Legislation.”

I do not think that is how it works.

As we’ve seen throughout this book, we need live-and-let-live legislation to protect religious liberty. For-profit businesses can’t discriminate based on race, gender, or sexual orientation, but they do reserve the right not to provide goods and services for events or engage in acts that offend the conscience of the business owner.

Wait wait wait wait wait. Those two things are contradictory. Businesses can’t discriminate based on sexual orientation—but they do have the right to refuse to provide goods and services for events that offend their consciences. Such as gay weddings. But that’s somehow not discrimination.

Except that it absolutely and totally is.

People should be free to live and work according to their faith without fear of being punished by government. That freedom of conscience is a basic human right that deserves protection under the law. Live-and-let-live legislation like RFRA simply ensures that religious liberty gets a fair hearing in court and protects every person’s freedom from government intrusion, regardless of party, religion, race, orientation, or any other aspect of someone’s identity.

I’ve got news for you, bro. Sometimes “government intrusion” is necessary to protect the rights of various groups. Those who champion “freedom from government intrusion” tend to be those whose rights are not under threat from private individuals. Those with a long history and continuing presence of private discrimination tend to want government intrusion. Consider how school desegregation worked. Add to that that those talking about “freedom from government intrusion” are extremely selective when doing so—consider that in the 1970s conservatives in many locales banned gay people from working as teachers.

Some “freedom from government intrusion” you got there.

When Pence and Indiana Republicans went back and included a discrimination prohibition in RFRA, they essentially gutted it, leaving churches and believers in the state in a worse position than they were before. It was a complete cave-in in Indiana, brought about by outrage orchestrated by gay-marriage-friendly businesses and the media.

In other words, when Pence et al. amended the legislation to prevent it from being used to justify discrimination against other groups, this change “gutted” the bill. Meaning, of course, that the entire purpose of the RFRA, according to Erickson, was to allow evangelical Christians to discriminate against gay and lesbian couples by refusing them services.

Erickson describes the RFRA as “live-and-let-live legislation.” But how is refusing service to gay couples living and letting live? Wouldn’t living and letting live involve saying “I believe in traditional marriage and that won’t change, but you disagree, no big deal, enjoy your cake”? Isn’t that the very definition of live and let live?

Erickson isn’t describing live and let live, he’s describing live and discriminate.

Marvin Olasky, World’s edit0r-in-chief, offered this note in the intro:

Its crucial takeaway concerning the battle to preserve religious liberty: “There will be no middle ground. Many people would like to find middle ground. Many churches would like to find middle ground. But there will be none, because homosexuals and their culture war warriors on the Left are unwilling to have a middle ground.”

I do not think “middle ground” means what he thinks it does either.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

Politics

LGBTQ

wedding

Previous Post

January 9, 2017

Failing Schools or High Child Poverty?

Next Post

January 10, 2017 The Gospel Coalition Goes Full Evo-Psych

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who danced with all his might before the LORD as the Ark was brought to Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Nathan Jonathan Samuel