Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Anonymous Tip: The (Actual) End

Anonymous Tip: The (Actual) End

Last updated on: January 13, 2017 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

Anonymous Tip: The (Actual) End 2017-01-12T17:28:35-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Review Series of Anonymous Tip, by Michael Farris

Pp. 468-470

On the fourth night of their Hawaiian honeymoon, the phone rang in the dead of the night startling Peter and Gwen out of their sleep. Peter untangled Gwen where she had been sleeping in his arms and glanced at the clock. It was 4:30 a.m.

It’s Sally. She says nothing is wrong, but that Professor French tracked her down at home to tell her that the Supreme Court had ruled on their case—but that he wouldn’t tell her how it had ruled. Peter works out that it’s 9:30 a.m. in Washington, D.C. Look, I get being excited, but he didn’t just wake Peter in the middle of the night on his honeymoon in Hawaii, he also somehow found Peter’s secretary’s home phone number and called her there—for a non-emergency. Could this not have waited a few short hours?

Peter writes down Professor French’s number and calls him.

“We’re dying. What happened?”

“Five to four. The vote was five to four.”

“Which way? Did we win?”

“Peter, most lawyers never get to even argue a case in the Supreme Court; you should be proud of what you have already done.”

“We lost, didn’t we?” Peter asked, his heart falling to the floor.

“No, you impatient whippersnapper,” he said with a jovial laugh. “You won> I was just trying to give you some perspective on how important this really is.”

That’s right, Professor French is one of those people.

“We won!” Peter screamed. “We won!”

The professor heard the phone hit the bedside table and fall to the floor. laughing (sic) and shouting blared through the phone. The professor waited patiently and smiled.

Fifteen seconds later, Peter picked up the phone again. “Sorry, professor. We just got carried away.”

*ahem*

Anyway, Professor French says the Court ruled the search unconstitutional, and that CPS could be sued for the false information they used when they filed the case, and for the document tampering. Peter declares it “a miracle from God.” Because of course he does.

Gwen wonders if it’s on the news. They turn on CNN.

They didn’t have to wait long. The second story began with a graphic of the Supreme Court building. Their case was the lead decision of the day. The reporter on the scene gave a quick report of the vote and its meaning.

“And for a comment from one of the participants, we go to our live camera in Kansas City.”

A beaming David Humphrey suddenly appeared on their screen.

“What?” they cried out in unison.

“We here at Heart of America are very grateful for this landmark decision from the Supreme Court. Our organization was the sponsor of this important case, and we look forward to taking other cases to the high court to protect American families and American freedoms. If anyone would like to join Heart of America, our 800 number is—”

“Oh, pleeese!” Gwen yelped, throwing the remote control device at the image of David G. Humphrey. The TV clicked off when the control hit the floor.

Then Peter says he’d rather have Gwen than any five-to-four Supreme Court victor, and Gwen smiles, and then Peter says it might be different if it were an eight-to-one or seven-to-two decision.

Gwen hit him with a pillow as they laughed and tumbled back into each other’s willing arms.

The end.

No really, that’s it. The end.

There’s no indication that Peter is going to do anything to expose Humphrey. Frankly, his willingness to turn the financial documents Cindy gave him over to a Heart of America board member he’d just met reveals buckets about how evangelicals deal with abuses of power. Things are best handled in house. I’m sure they’ll sort it out themselves. Why expose the church to scandal by going public with it? And here is Humphrey, continuing to scam people. Fun.

Guess who else never got reported? Scumbag lawyer dude. Oh no I don’t mean Peter, I mean Bill Walinski, though I suppose that’s a bit ambiguous without clarification. Peter’s blasé attitude toward reporting Walinski’s actions and the ease with which he apparently forgot all about it suggests that Farris does not take things like sexual harassment and sexual extortion that seriously at all. Once again, he flouts the very system set up to catch and prevent abuse.

Oh and by the way, it has now been one year in-world since the beginning of this book. One year. In one year, Peter took a case from scratch all the way to the Supreme Court and received a decision. Within that same year, Gordon died and Gwen met Peter, sort of dated him, became engaged to him, and finally married him—all in a year’s time. That’s some breakneck speed right there.

When I began this review series I thought we’d be focusing primarily on competing ideas about the function of child protective services. That didn’t end up being the case. The social workers and their supervisor were complete cartoons, engaging in such rampant bribery, tampering, and arson that they were hard to take seriously. Meanwhile Peter, our protagonist, crossed all manner of ethical lines—remember when he told Walinski he would report Walinski’s harassment of Gwen unless he turned over Gwen’s case documents without Gwen’s explicit authorization as required by law? And then there was the way he treated Gwen—my god.

Peter does not come across as a sympathetic or positive character—at all. He’s self-absorbed, he still doesn’t understand why it was wrong for him to come on to Gwen what he was her lawyer, and his religious beliefs made him wish Gwen’s ex-husband dead—a wish that ultimately was fulfilled, leaving young Casey without her father. As for Gwen, her conversion to Peter’s church comes across almost as tragic. Did she dump her previous friends, or did she never have any before? How sad is that? And those who’ve suggested that Gwen’s going to have to leave her job and become a stay-at-home mom now—you’re right, that’s what happens.

No secular person is going to read this book and come away seeing evangelical Christianity a la Farris’ portrayal at all attractive. But then, this book wasn’t written for a secular audience—it was written for other evangelical Christians, who will believe that the bizarre behavior of the social workers represents reality, not notice Peter’s ethical lapses, and assume that Walinisky and Humphrey got their deserts without being reported for their crimes. And that, perhaps, is what makes this book a tragedy.

Stay tuned later today for a post listing options for future review series!

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Uncategorized

Anonymous Tip

Previous Post

January 12, 2017

Protestants and Catholics Overrepresented in Congress

Next Post

January 13, 2017 What Work of Christian Fiction Should I Review Next?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is the author of the Book of Revelation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter John Paul Ezekiel