Full Text of Megyn Kelly Japanese Internment Interview

Last updated on: November 17, 2016 at 9:43 am by Libby Anne

Full Text of Megyn Kelly Japanese Internment Interview 2016-11-17T09:43:27-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Megyn Kelly recently interviewed Carl Higbie, a Trump supporter and a spokesman for a pro-Trump PAC. Partway through the interview, Kelly interjected: “You can’t be citing Japanese internment camps for anything the president elect is going to do!” She was clearly horrified at Higbie’s suggestion. It should be shocking that such a comment should have to be made to begin with. And yet, here we are.

The rest of the video isn’t any better.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjCgb7K1ZQ&feature=share

I transcribed the full interview, in case you’d rather read than watch it. I’d recommend watching it regardless, though, because Megyn Kelly’s reactions speak volumes.

Kelly: When better screening certain Muslim immigrants first came up, one of the big defenders was Carl Higbie. He’s a former Navy Sean and a Trump supporter, and he joins us now. Carl, good to see you.

Higbie: Thanks for having me.

Kelly: So, you heard the mayor’s position, which is, we don’t do that kind of thing, we don’t create registries based on religion.

Higbie: Yeah. Well, we have in the past. We’ve done it based on race, we’ve done it based on religion, we’ve done it based on region, and the fact is, he also brings it back to a constitutionality issue. The problem is that people outside this country are not protected under the same constitutional rights as we are in America.

Kelly: So you think it’s a good idea, and you don’t care that this is some sort of a slippery slope, where Muslims may be lumped into some group where they get put on a registry, and some aggressive law enforcement actor in the future might abuse the list.

Higbie: Absolutely, look, there’s always case for abuse in this thing, but the fundamental problem here is, we have a large faction — look, being part of the Muslim faith is not a bad thing, and there’s plenty, there’s 1.6 billion Muslims out there, most of them are perfectly good people, but the fact is there is a small percentage of people that have chose to align with an extreme ideology within the faith, and they’re doing harm. So we would like to keep tabs on it until we can figure out what’s going on. Trump has said, look, it’s a regional based thing right now, if they’re coming into our country we need to know who they are where they are and what’s going on, because—

Kelly: He’s trying to stop immigration into the country from countries where there are major terrorist issues until we can figure out what is going on, but this seems like something else, which is, if you’re coming over, this is what I’m reading, this is that, again, the Kansas secretary of state Kris Kobach who helped write the immigration laws in Arizona said today that Trump’s policy advisors are drafting, they’re discussing drafting a proposal, to reinstate a registry for immigrants from Muslim countries.

Higbie: To be perfectly honest, it is legal, they say it will hold constitutional muster, I know the ACLU will challenge it, but I think it will pass, and we’ve done it with Iran back a while ago, we did it during WWII with Japanese, which, call it what you will, maybe it was wrong—

Kelly: Come on. You’r not proposing that we go back to the days of internment camps I hope?

Higbie: No, I’m not proposing that at all, Megan. But what I am saying—

Kelly: You know better than to suggest that.

Higbie: We need to protect America first—

Kelly: That’s the kind of stuff that gets people scared, Carl.

Higbie: Right. But I’m just saying, there is precedent for it, and I’m not saying I agree with it, but in this case I absolutely believe that a regional based—

Kelly: You can’t be citing Japanese internment camps for anything the president elect is going to do!

Higbie: Look, the president needs to protect America first, and if that means having people that are not protected under our Constitution have some sort of registry so we can understand, until we can identify the true threat and where it’s coming from, I support it.

Kelly: You get the protections once you come here. All right, thank you Carl.

Until we can identify the true threat . . . we need to keep tabs on them until we can figure out what’s going on . . . most of them are probably fine, but a small percentage are aligned with an extreme ideology . . . where have I heard these things before? I know precisely where. WWII. Japanese internment. The argument was that while many Japanese were surely loyal to the U.S., some few were not, and those few were dangerous. Better to intern them all until it could be sorted out then to allow them to remain at liberty and risk the threat of individual saboteurs—or so went the reasoning.

The problem with all of this—and something I haven’t seem discussed—is that Korematsu is still good law. It has never been overturned. What is Korematsu, you ask? During WWII the Supreme Court was asked to weigh in on the imprisonment of a Japanese American man who had been born int the U.S. and was therefore a U.S. citizen. Could he lawfully be imprisoned on no charges whatsoever, merely because of his ethnic heritage? Yes, the Court answered. Yes, he could.

Korematsu has never been overturned. It is still good law.

Under current legal precedent, a Trump administration could not only to require non-citizen Muslims to register but actually require all Muslims, including U.S. citizens, to register—or even to be rounded up and imprisoned. This is why Higbie was so interested in citing Japanese internment—it does indeed set a precedent. And that’s a bad thing. It’s a continued shame on our country, not something that should be appealed to to justify new registries or lists.

It’s ironic, in a very sad sense, that putting America “first” would mean abandoning what made it America to begin with.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Politics

Previous Post

November 16, 2016

Heroes

Next Post

November 18, 2016 Anonymous Tip: About That Cert Petition

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the last book of the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Exodus Matthew Revelation Genesis