“Burkini” Bans Shut Women out of Public Space

Last updated on: August 18, 2016 at 9:35 am by Libby Anne

“Burkini” Bans Shut Women out of Public Space 2016-08-18T09:35:30-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“Mr. Anderson, Mr. Anderson!” I called, trying to get his attention. Mr. Anderson was the church youth group leader. I was in middle school, and I was considering joining. I was from a large, conservative homeschool family, and at our hip, upbeat evangelical megachurch, that meant I didn’t fit in with the other children. I had attended Sunday School only sporadically, and youth group would be a different experience—it would bring me face-to-face with my church’s public school children and their world. I was nervous, but I wanted to give it a try.

But I was encountering a problem. I had a question for Mr. Anderson, but he was ignoring me. He wasn’t even acknowledging that I was there. Why? Because—being a young, hip, evangelical youth pastor—he required the children attending youth group to call him by his first name, Dan. I wasn’t allowed to do so. My more conservative parents considered it disrespectful to address an adult by their first name, and I couldn’t have brought myself to do so if I’d tried. Disheartened by my experience with Mr. Anderson’s inflexibility (he never did respond to my attempts to get his attention) I dropped out of youth group before I’d even really begun attending.

I sometimes wonder how different my life would have been if I’d attended that youth group. My parents were concerned that it was too “worldly” and “fun-oriented” and yet they were willing to let me at least give it a test-run, to see. If I’d attended, my college experience might have been very different, in a good way—it wouldn’t have been my first real exposure to children who weren’t homeschooled. I would have been able to related to public school (and private school) kids more easily, to fit in or at least not stick out so painfully. Yet that was not to be.

But what about burkinis? According to the New York Times:

Five [French] towns have banned [burkinis]. Three more are in the process of doing so. Prime Minister Manuel Valls supported the prohibitions on Wednesday, calling the garment part of “the enslavement of women.”

When I read this news, my mind went straight to Mr. Anderson. He, too, may have felt that he was taking a stand, but it didn’t matter. It was never just about my parents’ requirements. The norm of calling adults by their last names was so ingrained in me that I could not have brought myself to call him Dan even if I’d wanted to—and I didn’t. I probably could have called Mr. Anderson “Dan” without my parents knowing, but I didn’t want to, and I shouldn’t have had to. As a result, I found myself effectively shut out of a group that would have given me more exposure to the wider world than I received in my insular homeschool community.

What I’m trying to get at is this—banning burkinis won’t change what burkini-inclined women wear to the beach, it will just prevent them from going to the beach. It will shut them out of a public space they could otherwise have access to and deprive them of opportunities they might otherwise have had. And for what? To make the local government feel like they’ve struck a blow against repression and “the enslavement of women”? They haven’t. Regardless of what one thinks about the hijab and other forms of Muslim dress, barring women from wearing burkinis to the beach won’t change what these women wear any more than Mr. Anderson barring students from calling him by his last name changed what I called him.

I have another point of comparison, actually. I never did swim team as a child, but some of my younger sisters did. It was a community league, in the summer, at a local pool. My sisters practiced and competed while wearing shorts on over their swimsuits. It slowed their time—that’s how physics works. And yes, my sisters wore those shorts because of the modesty standards ingrained in them by my parents and their homeschool community. But barring my sisters from swimming in shorts wouldn’t have stuck it to my parents and their body shaming. Instead, it would have prevented my sisters from participating—not so much because of my parents might have objected as because my sisters, given their upbringing, wouldn’t have been able to bring themselves to swim publicly without shorts.

That last sentence is actually a really important point. I consider both my parents’ body shaming and the dress code shaped by our conservative homeschool community’s norms highly problematic and, yes, bad for women. But by the time we were teens, for most of us, there was no need for external enforcement of these norms—I could no more have swum in a public pool without shorts over my swimsuit than I could have stripped off all my clothes in Times Square. I would have felt naked, vulnerable, and wrong without those shorts.

We can promote body positivity and work to break down the troubling ideas that undergird oppressive dress codes wherever they occur, but banning women from wearing specific clothing is not going to work—and more than that, it ought to go against our feminist ideals of self-determination. Feminists often speak up against high school and middle school dress codes, which bar girls from wearing certain types of clothing that are considered too revealing. How is barring women from wearing clothing that is considered too concealing a good idea in any universe? We should focus on removing dress requirements, not imposing them.

We can and should stand up against laws requiring women to wear concealing clothing, such as Iran’s requirement that women cover their hair in public. But passing laws barring women from wearing these same types of clothing effectively does the same thing—it polices women’s clothing choices and dictates what they can and cannot wear, controlling their access to the public square.

Previous Post

August 17, 2016

Women Who Murder Their Husbands Are "Wicked" While Men Who Do the Same Are Ordinary Blokes

Next Post

August 19, 2016 Anonymous Tip: Late Night Tears

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which church did Martin Luther post his famous 95 Theses on?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Wittenberg Castle Church St. Peter's Notre Dame Canterbury Cathedral