Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Love, Joy, Feminism

Anonymous Tip: The Creep Factor Goes off the Rails

Last updated on: July 1, 2016 at 11:24 am   by Libby Anne

Anonymous Tip: The Creep Factor Goes off the Rails 2016-07-01T11:24:39-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Review Series of Anonymous Tip, by Michael Farris

Pp. 323-326

Today’s installment begins as follows:

Sally had never seen the tall, blond, bleary-eyed man standing at her reception desk before.

“I’d like to see Peter Barron, please,” he said.

“May I tell him whose calling?”

“Gordon.”

“I’m sorry, Gordon. May I ask your last name? We don’t seem to have you on the appointment calendar right now.”

“Just tell him Gordon is here. He’ll know.”

If you read the above carefully, you’ll see more evidence that this book didn’t have an editor. That aside, I think we can all tell that this section is off to an ominous start.

Sally got up, walked around to the reception desk, went slowly behind the stranger, and slipped into Peter’s office. She didn’t see the bulge in the left pocket of his rumpled slacks as she passed by.

A very ominous start.

Anyway, Sally tells Peter that some man named Gordon is here. She says she has a strange feeling about him. Peter guesses who he is immediately, of course—“It sounds like Gordon Landis—Gwen’s ex-husband”—and says he’ll see him. He asks if he appears to be drunk, and Sally says no, and Peter says it should be okay, then.

Sally shows Gordon in, and then hovers, not wanting to leave the doorway. Peter sends her to get Gordon some coffee, and when she gets back with the coffee she closes the door and leaves the two alone “as was her normal practice.” And then their conversation commences.

“What brings you here for a visit today Gordon? I’m surprised to see you, but not too surprised.”

“You shouldn’t be surprised—the way you’ve been acting lately.”

“Pardon me?” Peter said.

“The way you’ve been acting. I mean there you are on page one, with your arm around my wife. If you are doing that in public, in front of the cameras, what are you doing in private?”

Oh boy. Are there any men in this book who don’t feel entitled to ownership of Gwen? I mean for serious.

Peter signed heavily. “Oh, so that’s it.” He wished he could simply assure Gordon that he had the wrong idea totally and send him on his way, but he knew that such a story would fall short of the whole truth. On the other hand, Gordon’s apparently conclusions were vastly different from the reality of his relationship with Gwen.

First, that’s a guilty conscious you hear speaking there, Peter. You’re Gwen’s lawyer. You should be able to tell Gordon he has the wrong idea entirely and send him on his way.

Second, though, note how Peter differentiates between his relationship with Gwen and what Gordon thinks is actually going on. Peter presumably figures that since he’s not having sex with Gwen, things are completely different, but what he doesn’t realize is that an open, honest, equal relationship with Gwen in which the two are having consensual sex would be arguably more ethical than the mind games, twisted seduction, and power tripping he’s been playing with Gwen.

“Yeah, that’s it, bub. I want to know what is going on between you and my wife.”

“I hate to be technical with you, but she is your ex-wife. Right?”

“Not in my heart she isn’t. I’m trying to win her back.”

Peter’s theology hit him squarely in the face. According to Peter’s long-held view of Scripture, Gordon had the lessens of the right point.

Oh look! This is how evangelicals use Christianity to buttress and support abusive husbands! And not just husbands, exes! Your got divorced and your ex is erratic, threatening, and possibly dangerous, and he says you’re still his wife? Well guess what! You are! And if he wants you back, it’s your Christian duty to go back to him! I can’t even with how disgusted I am right now.

Look, Peter’s actions with Gwen are completely inappropriate given his position as her lawyer and, well, how he’s carried out the whole thing. But any halfway-decent man would respond to Gordon’s claim above by informing Gordon that no, Gwen is not his wife, Gwen has chosen to divorce him and he needs to abide by that claim. As Gwen’s lawyer, Peter should also tell Gordon that if Gordon keeps doing creepy things like threatening men he thinks Gwen might be seeing, he (Peter) is going to advise Gwen to take out a restraining order.

But what makes all this complicated is that if Gordon were a halfway-decent person himself, and not obsessing creepily (and dangerously) over his ex, he should be justifiably worried about Peter’s unethical involvement with Gwen, not because Gwen is still his—she isn’t—but because Peter is acting unethically and preying on Gwen. But because every single man in this entire book is a creep, there’s no one to actually stand up for Gwen and tell off the other creeps. And that is maddening. If this is the world Farris lives in, I don’t want it for second.

As Peter prepares to answer, Gordon pats his pocket, where Farris tells us he has a knife. He’s ready to use it, Farris says, but is waiting for Peter’s confession first. Here is how Peter responds:

“The reality is, Gordon, that this morning and every morning for the last several weeks, I have been praying that you would be reconciled with Gwen. Specifically, I have bene praying you would make the changes in your life that would allow Gwen to love you again. Right now, it seems it’s not possible for you to win her back, But if you would change, maybe it could happen.”

WTF, Farris, WTF. Gwen is starting to feel as much like a toy in other characters’ hands as Casey did in the first half of the book. Does what Gwen wants not matter? Are you freaking serious?! But of course, Farris is putting this bit in here because this is what is going to keep Gordon from stabbing Peter to death. See what an honorable man Peter is! Watch his strong Christian values save his life! Because yes, that’s the message you’re supposed to take away here.

Gordon is shocked. Peter says he’s completely serious and explains that he’s “a born-again Christian.”

“That means I have asked Jesus to come into my life and forgive my sins. And I do my best to live my life according to the principles of His Word, the Bible.”

“One of those principles,” Peter continued, “is that it is God’s best for families to be reconciled. God hates divorce, the Bible says. And I believe that God’s best for you and for Gwen, and especially for Casey, would be for you to change so that your family can be made whole again.”

OMG. Yeah Farris, that’s a great idea—have Peter feed Gordon’s delusion that Gwen belongs to him, and his creepy stalker fantasies, that’s awesome. Great idea. Except not. This is like “how to enable abusers 101.” I’m frankly shocked that Gwen divorced Gordon only over his inability to get a job, and not over his increasingly apparent creepy possessiveness. Except no I’m not, because Farris doesn’t see Gordon’s possessiveness as wrong or a problem. WTF.

Gordon says he doesn’t believe Peter.

“You have got the hots for Gwen and don’t try to pretend you don’t.”

And then, creepily, Peter admits that’s partly true.

“There is no question about my admiring Gwen greatly. And if she were free to marry, I would definitely be interested in her. . . . But I can assure you there is absolutely no romantic and certainly no physical relationship going on between the two of us.”

Wait wait wait. What about all those moments of romantic and sexual tension, and the times he’s held her hands in a way they both recognized was inappropriate? How about the fact that he asked Gwen to wait for him for three months while he decides if he can change his religious views on divorce? Nothing to see there, folks! I mean honestly, given that Gwen is currently waiting for him, she’s actually not open to go back to Gordon—she told Peter as much, and he freaking asked that much! This is a whole lot of disingenuous BS going on right here.

Peter tells Gordon that Gwen has accepted Jesus as a savior, and that it has changed her life. That seems like an awfully private thing for him to tell Gordon, without checking with Gwen first.

“Would you like me to show you how you can become a Christian, Gordon? There are some basic principles from God’s Word I could share with you in a couple of minutes.”

This is starting to read like a horror story. I can almost imagine the creepy dim lighting and the robotic way in which these words were intoned, the result of their apparent frequent use.

Peter stood to take a Bible from a bookshelf in his office, but Gordon had had enough.

“I didn’t come here to hear Bible talk. I came here to tell you to keep your hands off my wife.”

“I can assure—”

“Shut up,” Gordon hissed. “I don’t want to hear anymore.” Peter’s answers had thrown him off. He did not know how to respond. His plan swirled in his head, and the confusion was growing.

“Listen buster, I don’t want to hear anymore of your God junk. I just want you to keep your filthy hands off my wife.

“OK, no problem, Gordon. I have and I will.”

“You’re a nut. A freakin’ nut.” He spun on his heel, lunged for the door—and half-ran, half-staggered out of the office and slammed the outer door with vengeance.”

And I ask, once again—why are there no good men in this book? For serious? Why are they all creeps and pervs? Both of the men in this passage are guilty of behaving shamefully toward Gwen, and as a result of that, neither of them can call the other out for their behavior. Instead, they feed on each other, engaged in some sort of grotesque dance in a contest of ownership over Gwen. This book stopped being about CPS malpractice a long time ago, and became something much, much darker entirely.

We all know what Peter should do next—phone Gwen immediately, tell her what happened, and suggest that she take out a restraining order. Peter may not have known Gordon brought a knife with him, but it should be patiently obvious from this interaction that Gordon is dangerous. But given that Peter still hasn’t reported Bill Walinski to the bar for his actions, I’m not putting my money on him doing what he should here, either. When it comes down to it, Peter doesn’t appear to care a damn about Gwen’s safety.

Uncategorized

Anonymous Tip

Previous Post



June 30, 2016

The Anti-Abortion Movement's Fetal Imaginings

Next Post



July 2, 2016 Saturday Link Love: Lin-Manuel Miranda on Parenting, Hillary on The Toast, and Brexit


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many chapters are in Proverbs?

Select your answer to see how you score.

27 31 22 50

Related posts from Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Anonymous Tip: The (Actual) End

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Anonymous Tip: The (Almost) End

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Anonymous Tip: Some Accountability You Got There

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Anonymous Tip: Instant Distrust

Love, Joy, Feminism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious

Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself

Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...

Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians

I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...

Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process

Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....

To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others

The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....

Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow

The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...

view all Nonreligious blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube