Catholic Sex Ed: “all a guy really wants from you is sex”

Last updated on: April 20, 2016 at 8:02 am by Libby Anne

Catholic Sex Ed: “all a guy really wants from you is sex” 2016-04-20T08:02:58-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I recently received the following email:

Dear Libby Anne,

Hi I’m Kim, a student at a all-girls Catholic school (though I am from an Evangelical family), and recently we have had a very popular Catholic chastity/purity speaker come speak at our school by the name of Jason Evert. When I was younger, my older sister rejected a guy after reading Harris’ book I Kissed Dating Goodbye, and I secretly read it and realized how wrong the purity culture of Evangelicals, even at that age. But until recently, I hadn’t seen the problem with the Catholic purity movement.

Basically during this seminar, Evert said he wasn’t going to try to scare us, but convince us that “real love” is better. However in the end he left me with the overwhelming feeling that all a guy really wants from you is sex. If a guy says he loves you he just wants sex, and basically the only way tell if a guy loves you is if he wants until marriage. That’s it. He says lots of other stuff like you become completely attached to everyone you have sex with. Also he states that the only way to get respect out of a guys is to dress modesty.

I know you’ve talked a lot about the purity culture with evangelicals, but not with Catholics (as far as I know), and I think it’s important. Its very similar to evangelical purity culture, but yet different enough to make it seem all good and “perfect”

Much Thanks,

Kim

There is a lot of overlap between evangelical and Catholic ideas about sex and marriage. Catholics, of course, tend to use the word “chastity” while evangelicals tend to use the term “purity.” For a brief period in college and early graduate school, I became Catholic. I went through the official conversion process, and I found many Catholic teachings much more relatable and compassionate than their evangelical counterparts. And while some absolutely are this—see Catholic social teaching, for instance—others present the same basic concepts wrapped in slightly more appealing packaging.

This is not to diss any Catholics in my readership. I understand the reasons people stay and work to reform their tradition from within. I no longer identify as Catholic because I gradually stopped believing in God, though I have since come to have serious problems with a number of the church’s positions, including its fight against lengthening the statute of limitations for sexual abuse victims and its position on birth control. Before we get off track, though, let’s return to the issues Kim raised—the problems with Catholic teachings about chastity a la those she heard at her Catholic high school.

Let’s start with Kim’s description. She states:

. . . he left me with the overwhelming feeling that all a guy really wants from you is sex. If a guy says he loves you he just wants sex, and basically the only way tell if a guy loves you is if he wants until marriage. That’s it. He says lots of other stuff like you become completely attached to everyone you have sex with. Also he states that the only way to get respect out of a guys is to dress modesty.

Let’s go down these point by point.

First, I remember being told that guys “only want one thing” before I knew what that one thing was. I just knew it was bad, from the way it was talked about, and that this made me extremely uncomfortable around boys my own age. More than uncomfortable—I was afraid of guys my own age. Needless to say, this was not a good thing. It made me see guys as a dangerous other rather than as people like me, individuals just as likely to be kind and caring, or selfish and bullying, as anyone else.

But let’s get down to the actual argument here. The real issue is whether a guy is willing to respect a woman’s boundaries, not whether he wants to wait until marriage to have sex. (And for the record, this should go both ways.) In other words, if you’re dating a guy and you’re not ready to take any clothes off yet, you’d prefer to make out while still clothed, and he badgers you and badgers you and whines and tries to get you to take your clothes off, that should be a very definite red flag. But if you’re into it and he’s into it and you both want to go all the way? That’s not a red flag.

I would be remiss if I didn’t address the most unfortunate side effect of this teaching, though—I have watched couples rush into marriage because they want to have sex and believe they have to wait until marriage. This is only compounded by further problems. For example, the claim that if you truly love each other you will wait until marriage to have sex can lead couples to mistake a desire to wait for love. And similarly, this focus on sex can detract from a focus on actual compatibility. Altogether, you have a recipe for disaster.

New let’s move on to the next point—re. becoming completely attached to everyone you have sex with, there are lots of things we do that release oxytocin. It is by no means limited to sex. And you know what? I’ve seen this idea that you have got to stay with the first person you have sex with make women stay with boyfriends who raped them, because they figured since they’d had sex with them, they couldn’t exactly leave. This is what happens when we tell people they’ve got to stay with the first person they have sex with or else they’ve messed up their lives. This is what happens when we elevate sex this high in importance. You know what? Lots of people date (and have sex with) multiple guys before finding someone they feel compatible with and marrying them, and they do just fine. I promise.

Third, modesty. It’s true that there are guys who only “respect” women who are dressed “modestly.” And do you know why? Because that’s what they were taught to do by speakers and religious leaders like this guy. In other words, it’s true that sexist guys only respect women who are dressed in a certain way. But you know what? This is only an issue for women who want to date (or marry) sexist men. Actually, I take that back. It’s an issue for everyone because it’s freaking dangerous to teach young men to de facto devalue and disrespect women who don’t dress this way or that. Sexist men don’t simply leave “immodest” women alone, they too often assume they’re there for the taking and the using. And that’s wrong, and disgusting, and, frankly, dangerous.

I’d like to finish by inviting anyone interested to share their own experiences with Catholic sex education. Tomorrow I will look in more depth at the particular speaker Kim heard, and at his ministry. I’m interested in drawing some comparisons between Catholic and evangelical sex education, because the above points raised by Kim are all things I’ve experienced in evangelical purity teachings as well. For the moment though, I’m interested in hearing my readers’ experiences with Catholic sex education and comparisons between it and evangelical versions. Do share!

Purity

politics

Previous Post

April 19, 2016

Children's Cowboy Chaps and Big Government

Next Post

April 21, 2016 Catholics, Evangelicals, and Sexual "Purity"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the strongest man in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Adam Samson John