BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
Love, Joy, Feminism
-
More
- Home
- Nonreligious
- Anonymous Tip: Worst Accountability Partner Ever
Anonymous Tip: Worst Accountability Partner Ever
Last updated on: March 4, 2016 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne
Anonymous Tip: Worst Accountability Partner Ever 2016-03-03T20:30:56-04:00 Libby Anne
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
A Review Series of Anonymous Tip, by Michael Farris
Pp. 225-228
Just to mix things up, Peter and Aaron are meeting on Saturday this time, because they had to miss their Friday meeting so that Peter could meet with Gwen about the motion to dismiss. Of course, this also means they have to meet early—6 a.m.—because Aaron wants to spend his Saturday with his children.
Aaron starts out by asking Peter about Gwen.
“How’s your week been—especially with Gwen?” Aaron asked.
“You don’t beat around the bush, do you?” Peter responded with a slight smile. It was an increasingly sensitive subject—one he had begun to dread talking with Aaron about.
“Sorry,” Aaron said, looking hard at Peter, trying to discern his emotional condition. “But I’ve really been praying for you this week about all this, and I just want an update.”
Peter sighed. He knew Aaron was truly concerned for him.
“Well, on the personal front, things are going OK, I guess. It’s hard for me, but I haven’t changed my views.”
And that’s it. Really.
I’m starting to think Peter and Aaron may not understand how accountability partners are supposed to work. I mean good god, Peter flat out lied to Aaron. Things are not going “OK, I guess.” The previous day he greeted Gwen with a comment on her looks, potentially arranged for his office assistant to be out when Gwen had to come to the office, and sat and held her hands while praying with her, and then kept holding her hands for a good while afterwards. That is not “OK, I guess.”
Aaron next asks about how Gwen’s case is going. This makes me wonder about how confidentiality works for lawyers. But you know, Peter doesn’t care about ethics anyway, so I suppose that’s irrelevant. Peter says it’s not good, and mentions the motion to dismiss.
“Tell me about it,” Aaron said.
“I’m glad to,” Peter said, “but I thought we were supposed to be talking about spiritual issues.”
“Well, the way I figure, this is a spiritual issue. Handling your relationship with Gwen is the most important thing that is going on in your spiritual life right now, and I think it is good for me to get some idea of the context.”
“OK. That makes sense.”
No it doesn’t. It doesn’t make any sense at all. If Aaron is this concerned about Peter’s relationship with Gwen, he should be insisting that Peter pass Gwen’s case on to another lawyer—ideally someone more qualified. Peter can’t control himself around Gwen, and he has already seriously hurt her with his confusing advances, by acting like he’s interested in her—because he is—while telling her he can’t marry her because she’s divorced. He is engaging in sexual harassment and Aaron, his accountability partner, seems more interested in getting the latest scoop on one of Peter’s cases than he is in Gwen’s wellbeing.
Anyway, Peter gives Aaron the background of the case. Several commenters have suggested that Farris goes overboard using conversations between characters for exposition—in other words, to explain legal issues, etc., to the audience. But what’s weird here is that all of this has already been explained. I mean, Peter explains to Aaron what “exigent circumstances” are, and I’m pretty sure we’ve already had that explanation twice now.
The other thing is that Aaron plays vapid-Gwen during this conversation, at one point saying “go on, professor” and at another point failing to pronounce exigent circumstances. I get the feeling Farris is downplaying everyone around Peter in order to make Peter seem Extra Specially Intelligent and Smart. I really wish he would knock this off, because it’s getting more than a little bit annoying.
Oh, and there’s this rather strange exchange when Aaron is trying to understand how exigent circumstances work:
“Would bruises be enough?”
“Severe bruises? Probably.”
I’m sorry, but severe bruises would only “probably” give a social worker exigent circumstances? Peter is giving us some pretty serious insight into Farris’s mind here, and it’s not pretty. Peter also adds that he doesn’t think social services should be able to “rely solely on an anonymous call.” I understand that anonymous tips are given less weight than tips where the tipster is willing to give their name, but (a) he doesn’t know that this tip was anonymous and (b) it’s important to remember the various factors that might make someone afraid to give their name when making a report.
Next Aaron asks if there are any holes Peter can work with, and Peter explains that “the CPS lady” gave Gwen two different stories about when the tip came in, and why that’s significant. Peter mentions the hotline report, and tells Aaron he thinks “the report is phones” but has “no way to prove it.” Interestingly, he did not tell Gwen these suspicions the last time he spoke with her, and I know, because I was checking. He said he believed Gwen, but didn’t mention that he thought it possible that the hotline report record could have been tampered with.
Anyway, Aaron perks up at this.
“Is the report computer-generated?” Aaron asked.
“Sure,” Peter answered.
“Too bad I can’t see the hard disk of their computer,” Aaron said.
“Why? What good would that do?”
“I could tell if they made any changes in their report after the original information was keyed in,” Aaron replied.
“You could? How? I thought that once a file has been saved, it overwrites the old version of a file and only the new file is saved.”
“That’s what my fellow computer geeks and I want you to believe,” Aaron said, filing broadly.
And at this point, Aaron gets technical, but it’s nothing we don’t all know already. Aaron tells Peter he’d need “the actual hard disk,” not just a copy of the file, but that he could use that to check if the file had been changed at any point. Peter starts freaking out he’s so excited, and he declares this “an answer to prayer.”
“Gwen is going to be thrilled. I sat her down yesterday and prayed with her about this, and we asked God to open up a way to get the truth to vindicate her.”
“That’s great,” Aaron replied, “provided . . . ”
“Provided what?” Peter asked.
“Provided that they changed the records. There is a possibility that the hotline report has never been changed, isn’t there?”
Aaron Aaron Aaron. Some accountability partner you are! What he should be saying is “provided there was someone else in the room when you prayed with Gwen” or “provided you maintained some distance during the prayer.” Or, better yet, “You prayed with Gwen? Peter, I’m seriously concerned about your ability to maintain personal distance here, I think you need to hand her case over to another attorney.” As a number of commenters mentioned on last week’s post, this sort of prayer is actually a very intimate experience.
Anyway, Peter says he doesn’t think there’s any possibility that the record wasn’t changed, because (a) “I can’t believe that Gwen ever harmed Casey” and (b) “I can still smell a rotten fish” and (c) “those CPS workers are lying again. I can feel it.” In other words, Peter very much believes in going with his gut. We know, though, that Gwen isn’t the most stable person—but then, I suppose Peter doesn’t know about Gwen’s almost-kidnapping, or the time she almost ran away with Casey when he left her alone in Dr. Schram’s waiting room for a few minutes.
With all of this out of the way, Peter and Aaron finish their meeting.
They only had time to read the assigned chapter in Proverbs, have the briefest discussion and a quick prayer. As they walked together, Aaron said, “Would you like to come over and tell Gwen what we talked about?”
“To your house?” Peter responded with too much enthusiasm.
“Yes. Gwen is coming over for the day. I guess Casey’s dad is going to exercise visitation today and Lynn didn’t want Gwen to be alone. And she wants to ask Lynn all about homeschooling. She seems intrigued with our kids, and Casey is starting kindergarten this fall, so she’s got a ton of questions.”
“Sure, I’d love to come over and tell her.”
“And I can keep and eye on you when you do,” Aaron said, throwing his arm around his friend, giving him a quick jostling hug.
Oh dear. Aaron, you are so fired from this whole accountability partner gig, because you are doing a shit job of it. Seriously, this is a terrible idea. I understand that Peter is probably excited to tell Gwen about this development, but he really should wait until Monday or, if he must, pick up a phone and call her. He’s supposed to be keeping his interaction with her purely professional, and it is not professional to show up to your client’s friend’s house when she happens to be over so that you can talk to her.
It almost feels like Aaron is engaging in some match-making here. But then, given his earlier comment about Peter needing to book the church for a wedding “in six months” I shouldn’t be surprised. What Aaron has apparently not considered is that it’s not only Peter’s spiritual state that is at stake here—remember that Aaron doesn’t want Peter to change his interpretation of what the Bible says about marriage based on carnal desire rather than spiritual conviction—but also Peter’s ability to uphold the ethical standards of his profession. And if Aaron doesn’t know there are ethical no-nos involved in a lawyer dating his client, Peter really ought to tell him.
The other thing is that no one is considering Gwen’s wellbeing here at all. Did Aaron stop to consider that Gwen might not want Peter thrust in her face while spending the day with Lynn? That perhaps Gwen is looking for a safe place to relax, and that Peter is not a safe person for Gwen at this point? Nope. Nada. And that makes Aaron’s shit job at being an accountability partner only worse.
Previous Post

March 3, 2016
A Look at Yesterday's Supreme Court Abortion Hearings
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads
Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
What does the Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard teach about God?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Only the first are blessed He loves some more than others His grace is generous He is strict
Related posts from Love, Joy, Feminism
Anonymous Tip: The (Actual) End
Anonymous Tip: The (Almost) End
Anonymous Tip: Some Accountability You Got There
Anonymous Tip: Instant Distrust
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself
Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...
Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians
I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...
Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process
Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....
To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others
The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....
Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow
The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...
view all Nonreligious blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In










