Richard Dawkins’ Patronizing Paternalism

Last updated on: January 28, 2016 at 9:15 am by Libby Anne

Richard Dawkins’ Patronizing Paternalism 2016-01-28T09:15:17-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Richard Dawkins has stepped in it on twitter again. This time he tweeted a photo of the wife of a prominent Middle Eastern dictator who does not wear hijab, with the text “This is how a good Muslim speaks. And how she dresses. And wears her beautiful hair.” Can you say patronizing? Dawkins then deleted his tweet, not because he realized he’d said anything wrong but rather out of concerns that it might put this woman’s life in danger, but not before someone on twitter captured a screenshot.

We all know that Dawkins writes beautifully and passionately about science, but that he has some trouble expressing himself on twitter. And by that I mean, he says things that are sexist or ableist or racist, gets pushback, doubles down, and then everything goes to hell. Dawkins’ supporters have often insisted that he is not in fact sexist, etc., and that his tweets are simply misunderstood, and it’s true that Dawkins openly calls himself a feminist. So which is it? Is Dawkins well meaning but bumbling, or does he have a more fundamental problem that he somehow can’t see?

In thinking about this question, I came upon a Religious News Service article from November 2014 in which Dawkins attempted to explain some of his statements.

Here is what he said:

Dawkins, however, disagrees. He is, he said, not a misogynist, as some critics have called him, but “a passionate feminist.” The greatest threats to women, in his view, are Islamism and jihadism — and his concern over that sometimes leads him to speak off-the-cuff.

“I concentrate my attention on that menace and I confess I occasionally get a little impatient with American women who complain of being inappropriately touched by the water cooler or invited for coffee or something which I think is, by comparison, relatively trivial,” he said.

“And so I occasionally wax a little sarcastic, and I when I have done that, I then have subsequently discovered some truly horrific things, which is that some of the women who were the butt of my sarcasm then became the butt of really horrible or serious threats, which is totally disgusting and I know how horrible that is and that, of course, I absolutely abominate and absolutely repudiate and abhor.”

And here we reach the fundamental problem. Dawkins believes he knows what the real problems facing women are better than women themselves. He gets annoyed with American women worried about things like workplace or conference harassment because the real threat facing women is “Islamism and jihadism.” If they knew what was best for them, they would be focusing on Islamism rather than on things that are “by comparison, relatively trivial,” like workplace or conference harassment. This is not how being an ally works. You don’t get to talk over members of a marginalized group while claiming that you support their cause. You listen to them.

Dawkins’ statement about “American women who complain of being . . . invited for coffee” was a reference to a specific incident that occurred a number of years ago. In that incident, conference speaker Rebecca Watson was taking the elevator to her room in the wee hours of the morning. She was alone in that elevator with a male conference attender who, while they were in that closed space, invited Rebecca back to his room for coffee. This made Rebecca uncomfortable, and understandably so. She was in an enclosed space with this man, alone, in the wee hours of the morning. She knew that men sometimes turn violent when rebuffed, and she had no out—nowhere to go if things got ugly—because she was in a confined space. Rebecca later used this as an example of what not to do, in the context of making conference spaces more accessible to women. At the time, Dawkins made his infamous “Dear Muslima” comment.

In his comments quoted above, Dawkins seems to suggest that American women don’t know what’s best for them. Here they are concerned about things like workplace and conference harassment rather than the real danger facing them—Islamism. In making this argument, he is stating that he in fact knows better than these women what is best for them, and that is a profoundly anti-feminist position. It is paternalism at its worst. Perhaps not surprisingly, Muslim feminists have also pushed back against Dawkins.

This isn’t just a problem with Richard Dawkins, of course, it’s also a problem that can affect allies in a variety of arenas, as anyone who has ever had an ally tell point them to the “real” problems they should be focusing on knows. Male allies who want to join the push against sexism need to listen to women to understand the problems they face. White allies who want to join the push against racism need to listen to people of color to understand their priorities. And so on and so forth.

Any time an ally tells a marginalized person that they know better than they do what is best for them, that ally has ceased to be an ally. I am sure Dawkins means well, but meaning well is not enough.

Atheism

Feminism

Richard Dawkins

Previous Post

January 27, 2016

Young Earth Creationism's Important Scientific Veneer

Next Post

January 28, 2016 Bill Gothard's Disturbing Slavery Apology

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group uses "Meeting Houses" instead of traditional churches?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Baptists Methodists Lutherans Quakers