Rejecting Witch Hunts and Embracing Criticism

Last updated on: January 26, 2016 at 10:18 pm by Libby Anne

Rejecting Witch Hunts and Embracing Criticism 2016-01-26T22:18:03-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I was raised in an evangelical home. I embraced my parents’ and church’s beliefs wholeheartedly. I was the sort of evangelical teen who hung out in the church library looking for new apologetics books to read. I was dedicated, and passionate, and wholehearted in my beliefs. As a young adult, these beliefs crumbled and fell through my fingers and I looked around, bewildered. How could I have been so very wrong, I wondered? That experience taught me something important—that I could be completely sure I was correct about something and yet be completely wrong.

Over the years, I’ve tried to grapple with this understanding—i.e., that I can be wrong about something I’m sure I’m right about—by working to actively embrace criticism. In other words, if someone says I’ve got something wrong, or that there’s something wrong about the way I’m presenting or talking about this issue or that, I try very hard to listen to their criticism, and with an interest in understanding it, before I mount any defense of my actions. In fact, I try to fight that defensive instinct altogether. I work very hard to be willing to be wrong.

There was a time when criticism triggered a flight or fight response in me, and it sometimes still does. I grew up in an authoritarian household and went through a very traumatic break with my parents while in college. In the years immediately following this, being criticized often triggered flashbacks of this trauma. While this has lessened over the years, embracing criticism often still takes active effort on my part.

With this background out there, I want to mention a trend I’ve noticed within social justice circles over the past few years. It goes like this: Person A says something (generally online) that Person B finds concerning. Person B patiently explains their concerns to Person A, either online or a private message. Person A responds by rejecting their criticism off the cuff, perhaps treating it as a personal attack or smear campaign. Persons C and D see what happens and respond with disappointment, hurt, and anger. Person A accuses Persons B, C, and D of carrying out a “witch hunt.”

I want to be very clear that I am not saying that every criticism is merited, or that being willing to be wrong means being always wrong. I’m also not saying that there aren’t actual witch hunts. (There are, though that’s a topic for another post.) What I am saying is that I have seen allegations of “witch hunts” used to shut down well-meant and thoughtful criticism without equally well-meant and thoughtful consideration. I’ve seen allegations of “witch hunts” used to discredit honest attempts at communication. And that’s a problem.

Last week I wrote an article summarizing the ongoing lawsuit against IBLP and Bill Gothard. In that article, I referred to the plaintiffs as “heroes” and “brave” for coming forward to file this lawsuit. Several days after posting this article, an individual contacted me to let me know that they were uncomfortable with this framing because they felt that, without context, it suggested implicitly that the various survivors not willing to go public and pursue a lawsuit were somehow not heroes or not brave.

I responded to this criticism by listening, and after rereading the paragraph in question with her words in mind I realized that I could have phrased that section better. I thanked her for pointing this out and edited the paragraph to add some consideration for the women not willing or able to go public at this time.

But I could have responded to her criticism by taking it as a personal attack and getting angry and telling her that I’d never meant any such thing when I wrote that paragraph (I hadn’t) and wasn’t going to change it thank you very much. And if I had responded in that way, I would have missed a valuable opportunity to learn something new and she would have been perfectly within her rights to tell others about how I had responded and to express concern that I wasn’t receptive to criticism or willing to listen.

Of course, it helped that the person who contacted me did so without assuming that I had meant to say anything negative. I have a much easier time embracing criticism when it is given positively than when it is given confrontationally—though I try very hard to embrace it just the same either way, and that’s an important point in and of itself. In my experience a gentler tone is less likely to trigger someone’s fight or flight response, and that means that, particularly when dealing with allies (who are more likely than others to listen), taking a less-confrontational tone is typically more effective. However, tone should never be an excuse for not listening, and no one owes it to anyone else to use a certain tone.

What I find really interesting about tone, though, is that I’ve seem people reject criticism based on tone when in fact the tone was fine. Or, I’ve seen cases where someone defends a person being defensive by claiming that they were “ganged up on” or “attacked” when in fact, if you go back and look, they weren’t. Usually, people use a friendly tone with good assumptions when initially making a criticism, and only take a more confrontational tone later, when they aren’t listened too—similarly, even when there are multiple people pointing out the same thing, they’re often each drawing from their individual experiences and adding helpful information rather than “ganging up.” So while I do try to use a gentler, less confrontational tone myself, I’m also very skeptical of those who say they would have listened if only the criticism had been made more “nicely” or if only people hadn’t “ganged up” on them.

Now mind you, I’m not saying everyone has to agree with every criticism someone else makes of their actions or words. I could have responded to the person who contacted me about my use of the words “heroes” and “brave” by letting her know that I’d read her concerns, and I’d thought about it, and I’d read back through the paragraph, and that while I understood her concerns I didn’t think what I’d written implied anything at all about the other women, and that I was therefore going to leave the wording as it was. Had I done so, she may still have disagreed with my phrasing, but she would at least have known that I had listened to her.

We need to not underestimate the importance of feeling (and being) listened to. I know I myself am much happier to disagree with someone if I know they at least tried to understand my perspective, and cared about what I had to say.

I would argue that we need to give allies a certain amount of grace—i.e., we shouldn’t immediately assume the worst of them or their words—but also that we need to hold allies to a greater level of responsibility—i.e., we should be able to expect allies to listen and to not reject criticism out of hand, especially when it’s a member of a minority or disadvantaged group making the critique. Similarly, we need to give allies room to learn from mistakes, but it is perfectly normal to feel wary while trust is being rebuilt, or to decide that you’ve been hurt enough times and need to sever bridges.

In the end, I’m not saying there are never witch hunts, or that no one ever gets on the wrong side of an online pile-up. What I am saying is that when faced with criticism, we all need to pause, breath, listen, and think before responding.

Social Justice

Previous Post

January 12, 2016

Hi! Married Feminist Mother Here!

Next Post

January 14, 2016 Sexual Assault in Cologne and Sexual Assault at Home

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Naked I came from my mother’s womb, and naked I shall return"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Elijah Solomon Job David