Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Anonymous Tip: Serving Subpeonas to Witches

Anonymous Tip: Serving Subpeonas to Witches

Last updated on: August 14, 2015 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

Anonymous Tip: Serving Subpeonas to Witches 2015-08-05T11:10:54-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Review Series of Anonymous Tip, by Michael Farris

Pp. 109, 110-111

Remember Sheriff’s Deputy Wally Elrod, who delivered court papers to Gwen before Tuesday’s hearing way back when? Well, he’s back, and this time Peter sent him subpoenas to serve!

Sheriff’s Deputy Wally Elrod loved serving subpoenas on government employees. It was so easy.

It was easy because all Wally and to do was walk across the public safety building to various desks, rather than having to drive across town to people’s homes.

After Elrod gave Rita her subpoena (she was second after Officer Mark Donahue), we get this:

She did not resent being served, but when Elrod made the mistake of asking if she was Mrs. Coballo, her feminist ideology took over.

“I’ll thank you for leaving your sexist titles to yourself. It’s Ms. Coballo, if you don’t mind,” she fumed.

Elroy raised his eyebrows and said, “Hope your broom is working well to fly you to court on Tuesday.” He was two months from retirement and simply didn’t care anymore.

Um. Yeah.

Peter has Gwen call Donna and Rita witches, and then has the sheriff’s deputy do the same, and this is supposed to be some sort of coincidence? Also, feminists are witches. Apparently. But this goes back to what I’ve said before—Gwen is divorced, but still goes by “Mrs. Landis,” which appears to be a good and positive thing in Farris’s eyes. Rita is upset at being called “Mrs. Coballo” rather than “Ms. Coballo,” and that, for Farris, clarifies her status as bad bad and very bad. As a married woman who goes by “Ms.” instead of “Mrs.,” all I can say is no thanks.

Anyway, now we turn to Mark Donahue.

Corporal Donahue walked with his subpoena across the foyer of the Public Safety Building to the Office of the Prosecuting Attorney. The main floor of this huge building houses the Spokane City Police Department, the Sheriff’s Department, and the Clerk’s Office for the District Court.

And I’ll spare you the rest, but Farris goes on to explain the sorts of cases held in the district court and the layout of the building.

It seems that Gail Willet, the prosecutor, had summoned Mark after learning that he’d received a subpoena. How she found out about the subpoena is unclear, because Farris also tells us that “Peter had simply typed of the subpoena and had it delivered on the strength of his own signature as an officer of the court.” Regardless, Farris is at pains to make sure that we know that Mark is one of the good guys. “He would rather be out on patrol,” Farris tells us as he arrives at Gail’s office, “but he tolerated such matters as a necessary evil.”

Anyway, Gail asks for his subpoena, looks it over, and then wonders what Peter’s purpose was in sending it.

“What did you tell him during your interview?”

“I can’t think of anything he would be interested in. I pretty well just repeated my report. I reread it prior to the interview.”

“Did he seem to focus on any particular issues?”

“He asked a lot about bruises. Asked me if I heard the CPS workers say anything about bruises.”

“What did you tell him?” Willet asked.

“That I didn’t hear them say anything directly one way or another.”

“Is that it?” Willet asked.

“As far as I know. The only hard evidence I have about bruises is that I know nothing. I know nothing.” He intoned the last phrase with a mock Germany accent to do his best Sergeant Schultz imitation from the old Hogan’s Heroes television show. Willet didn’t get it and wouldn’t have cracked a smile even if she did.

Funny, because for me Mark’s statement brought this to mind:

Yes yes, I know, this book was published in 1996! What Mark was referring to, apparently, was this bit from Hogan’s Heroes. Either way, we are informed once again that Gail is both an elite ignorant of the culture and ways of the common people and entirely humorless. Yay.

Anyway, as regular readers will know, Peter issued a subpoena for Mark because Mark said he had thought Donna and Rita hadn’t found bruises, because Donna had told Gwen she would dismiss the case if Gwen would only cooperate with a few questions. As I noted at the time and as multiple readers pointed out, this is actually very weak evidence. Donna could say that she’d lied to Gwen to gain her cooperation, or that Mark misheard or misunderstood, and for his part Mark appears to be emphasizing his lack of knowledge one way or another.

And in another example of Farris’s tell-don’t-show style, Farris tells us that later that morning Gail called Dr. McGuire’s report and called Dr. McGuire to go over a few questions. “McGuire was impressed with her insight,” Farris tells us, without telling us what that insight was or what questions Gail asked. “Indeed she was a very competent lawyer.” Well, okay then.

Farris tells us that as Gail finished her preparations for the hearing she decided against writing a trial brief, because the determining facto would be what was in “the best interest of the child” and “the judge could reach that legal point automatically.” By the end of the day, all Gail had left to do was oversee “the exchange of the psychologists’ reports on Monday morning.” As Farris explains, Gail had arranged with Peter to give him Dr. McGuire’s report on Monday at 10:00, refusing to hand it over on Friday as Peter had asked. Farris tells us that Peter concluded from this that Gail “was hard-nosed about everything.”

It seems Gail is both “a very competent lawyer” and “hard-nosed about everything.” This has been Farris’s description of her throughout—whip smart, but stubborn. But as we saw at the ex parte hearing on Wednesday, when she refused to cede a position simply to spite Peter and looked foolish when she lost, her stubbornness sometimes comes back to bite her. I’m wondering how all this fits together, for Farris. For his part, Peter is described as a very good lawyer, but he also takes various ethical shortcuts, such as when he blackmailed Bill Walinski into signing paperwork making Peter Gwen’s lawyer without ever contacting Gwen as legally required. For Farris, it appears, neither unhelpful stubbornness nor ethical dubiousness gets in the way of one being a good lawyer.

Next week we turn to Gwen and Casey’s visit with Dr. Schram.

Uncategorized

Anonymous Tip

Previous Post

August 13, 2015

Dear Jesus: A Letter on Anger and Christianity

Next Post

August 15, 2015 Proponents of Marriage Generally Make Marriage Sound Horrible

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Revelation, what do the souls under the altar cry out for?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peace on earth Mercy for their persecutors Justice and vengeance for their blood The return of Christ