Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Anonymous Tip: The Seattle Stranger

Anonymous Tip: The Seattle Stranger

Last updated on: July 17, 2015 at 1:07 am by Libby Anne

Anonymous Tip: The Seattle Stranger 2015-07-17T01:07:09-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Review Series of Anonymous Tip, by Michael Farris

Pp. 92-95

This week we have the ex parte hearing with Judge Romer, in which Lawyer Peter Barron asks the judge to order Casey to be examined by a psychologist of his choosing in addition to the CPS-selected psychologist. During a conversation between Peter and Prosecutor Gail Willet in the last section, we learned that the defense is entitled to their own exam “under JCR 23.2” but only for “good cause shown.” This afternoon’s hearing will resolve the issue.

As the scene opens we get a bunch of front matter about where the judge’s chambers are, and about the clerk pulling the file and taking it in to Judge Romer while Peter waits for Gail to arrive, etc. etc. Gail arrives with Donna in tow. We’re not told why, but presumably Donna is worried about Gail going into the hearing alone given that Gail’s not in on the plot to falsify evidence that Donna has cooked up with Blackburn. Peter introduces himself to Gail, whom he has not yet met in person, but Gail does not introduce Peter to Donna. Finally, they are called into the judge’s chambers.

“Mr. Barron, I guess I’m a little surprised that there was such a quick substitution of counsel. But, of course, that’s really none of my business,” the judge said. If it had been two longtime Spokane attorneys before him, Romer would have asked what happened and Peter would have told the story. The whole conversation would have been off the record. But with a Seattle stranger and a CPS worker in their midst, such a discussion was simply not going to happen.

I’m honestly not sure of what to make of this bit. Farris takes the opportunity to reiterate that Gail is a “Seattle stranger” and is not yet trusted by those in Spokane. But honestly, I’m a bit bothered that Peter would have told the judge and opposing attorney about Bill Walinski’s attempt to solicit sex from Gwen, his client, without first getting permission from Gwen to do so. From what we’ve seen so far, Gwen finds the situation very embarrassing, and I doubt she would want it public. Peter ought to be helping Gwen report what happened to the bar association, but he has yet to do so.

“Why are you here to see me? This looks so routine. Ms. Willet, I take it you are resisting this motion? Tell me why,” the judge said, placing all the papers back on his desk, leaning his elbows on the desk and cradling his chin in both hands.

“Your Honor, the state believes this is just too many examinations for one little girl in such a short time,” Willet replied.

Perhaps it’s just me, but haven’t we been told that the burden is on Peter to show cause? Gail’s response makes it sound like the burden is on her to raise an objection, and not the other way around. I suppose it could simply be that the judge is wanting to weigh Peter’s cause argument, as presumably outlined in the papers on the judge’s desk, against any reason not to appoint a second psychologist.

“Your honor, if the court had selected a neutral expert, we probably wouldn’t be making this motion for an additional psychological examination. In fact, my client raised the same concern about too many exams in one week. But my understanding of the court’s order is that this examination is by a CPS-chosen psychologist. It is simply not appropriate to have one side obtain an exam while the other side has nothing. Of course, if the state was willing to cancel the appointment with their expert and allow the court to appoint an independent psychologist chosen by the court, then maybe we could forego a second examination.”

I have to say, Peter sounds completely reasonable here. Of course, this isn’t going to fly with Donna, because Blackburn has already bribed the CPS-appointed psychologist—but Gail does not know that.

“That’s not a bad idea,” the judge said, rocking gently back and forth in his chair. “What about that, Ms. Willet?”

Willet did not care about choosing the psychologist. She didn’t know who was good and who was bad in Spokane. And she was unaware of CPS’s special arrangement with Dr. McGuire. But she cared a great deal about losing her first encounter with Peter Barron.

“Your Honor, psychologists are busy. I doubt that it will be possible to find a so-called ‘neutral expert’ on such short notice who can do the examinations, write a report, and appear next Tuesday.”

There is such a think as picking your battles, is there not? Gail seems to care more about winning the battle at hand than she does about taking the long view—or considering how she may look if she picks small battles and then loses them.

The judge replied before Peter could speak. “Well, here in Spokane we’ve got the psychological community a bit more attentive to the needs of judges than perhaps is the case in Seattle. I am sure that with two or three phone calls I can find an appropriate psychologist to meet our schedule. What do you say?”

Gee golly, Farris really wants to keep up this Spokane v. Seattle thing. Ouch.

Corliss was about to panic. She tugged on Willet’s jacket sleeve as unobtrusively as possible and pointedly shook her head “no” when Willet turned to look.

Farris tells us that “partly because of Corliss’s gesture and partly out of personal stubbornness” Gail restated her position and refused to budge. Judge Romer responds by allowing Peter’s motion to appoint a second psychologist.

Embarrassed at losing even the most minor of arguments,

Like I said . . .

Willet said, “Your honor, we want it clear that Mrs. Landis should not be taking this child to the psychologist alone. She may take off for all we know.”

Wait-what? Why is Gwen taking Casey to the psychologist in the first place? Isn’t that something the foster family would do? This sent me flipping back to the earlier hearing trying to see if this had been stated anywhere before. Not only was it not, but Gwen and Casey’s existing psychologist appointments aren’t even scheduled consecutively, and Casey was taken to the doctor by her foster mother. I’m not sure why there is any assumption that things would be different with the second psychologist.

Peter quickly countered, “Your Honor, I would be happy to accompany my client and her daughter to the interview. And I or one of my staff will stay with them through the whole interview. I would be reluctant to drive this little girl alone myself.”

First of all, of course you would, Peter, of course you would. It gives you another chance to spend time with hot gorgeous sweet Gwen. But second of all, why is Peter assuming that the alternative to Gwen taking Casey to the psychologist is him taking Casey to the psychologist? Once again, wouldn’t her foster mother take her?

Before the prosecutor could bog him down in any more trivial arguments, the judge replied, “Fine, Peter. If you give me your assurance, that’s good enough for me.”

And with that, the hearing is over.

And now, bonus section!

Before leaving for work, Gwen placed her second call to Casey.

“Mommy, where are you?”
“I’m at home, Casey doll.”
“Mommy, come get me.”
“Casey, are you OK? Are they nice to you?”
“Mommy, I wanna come home. Come get me.”
“Casey, are you playing with their children?”
“Sometimes.”
“Are they nice to you?”
“Uh-huh.”
“Did you go to the doctor today?”
“Uh-huh . . . Mommy, I wanna go home. Come get me.”
“Casey, I’ll get you as soon as I can. Real soon.”

Casey began to cry, unable to understand why her mommy wouldn’t come. Gwen’s tears were soft but very bitter.

That conversation actually sounds very realistic. I could get into all of the things Gwen could have done to improve Casey’s mood—say, ask her about specific fun things she’d done that day, or start planning what they’d do the first day she got back—but Gwen’s been through a bit of an emotional roller coaster at this point, so I’ll cut her some slack.

Uncategorized

Anonymous Tip

Previous Post

July 16, 2015

When Love Is Abuse

Next Post

July 18, 2015 On Intersectionality and Bibles in Hotel Rooms

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many books is the Book of Psalms divided into?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Five Ten Three Seven