Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Anonymous Tip: In Which Peter Is Condescending

Anonymous Tip: In Which Peter Is Condescending

Last updated on: July 3, 2015 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

Anonymous Tip: In Which Peter Is Condescending 2015-07-02T16:56:37-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Review Series of Anonymous Tip, by Michael Farris

Pp. 88-89

This week we’re still with Gwen, who last week contemplated kidnapping her four-year-old daughter, Casey, out of her temporary foster home—a foster home that we have heard almost nothing about. We know next to nothing about how Casey is faring, though we do know that Farris presented the foster parents in a fairly positive light when Casey was handed over. Today we get to see Gwen hand over the account of the social worker visits that lawyer Peter asked her to write up for him.

Gwen started and sat straight up in bed when the alarm sounded at 7:00 a.m. She felt as if she hadn’t slept at all. After showering and dressing quickly she headed down the South Hill to Peter’s office downtown. She arrived early but was not surprised Peter was already there. Nor was she surprised when she was ushered into his office immediately. For whatever reason, Peter was obviously going out of his way to place her case as the highest priority on his schedule. She both appreciated and was puzzled by this fact.

I’ve been trying to figure out how I would respond if I were in Gwen’s shoes. I feel like appreciation and puzzlement would be accompanied by suspicion, especially if I had already been sexually harassed by my previous lawyer. After all, why would this lawyer be dropping everything—and I do mean everything—to work her case practically for free if he wasn’t looking for something in return?

Here, as with elsewhere, I feel like Farris has to struggle to put himself in his characters’ shoes. He can’t put together believable motives for social worker Donna because he honestly doesn’t know what makes social workers tick. He can’t get into Gwen’s head either, and in trying what he actually does is insert what he thinks she should be thinking. And so we have a Gwen who is puzzled and grateful, but not at all suspicious or concerned.

Peter starts by introducing Gwen to Sally.

“Sally, this is Gwen Landis, our newest client, and Gwen, this is Sally Finley, the best legal secretary in Spokane.”

Sally blushed modestly. She had heard the line before but was glad of Peter’s praise. She wasn’t sure she was the best in Spokane, but she was very content to have a boss who made her feel that way on a regular basis.

Oh awesome, Farris finds a way to make Peter’s attempt to praise Sally all about Peter and how awesome he is. Everyone adores him! Peter the great! Peter the magnificent! Teenage girls giggle as he passes and flower petals cover the ground behind him. Oh wait, Farris only said one of those two things. My bad.

I also want to point, again, to the head hopping going on here. Rather than picking a character and sticking with that character’s point of view, Farris hops from head to head to head in essentially every passage.

“I’m happy to meet you, Gwen,” Sally replied. “Please feel free to call me any time. I can usually locate Peter anywhere in the world.”

“Thanks, that’s reassuring,” Gwen said, a bit uncomfortable with all the attention.

I’m trying to figure out what Farris is trying to say about Gwen’s character here. Is it that she’s demure? Shy? Unassuming? Look, Gwen is a nurse. She spends her day interacting with a large array of people. I am a bit at a loss as to why her lawyer introducing her to his secretary would make her feel “uncomfortable with all the attention.”

Anyway, Gwen hands over “a nine-page handwritten document,” her account of what happened during the two social worker visits, and Peter responds by telling her that “if the microfiche ever goes on the blink at the law library, you could get a job.” Farris mentions Gwen’s “tiny, precise penmanship,” and Gwen laughs at Peter’s quip. I feel like Gwen’s ability to laugh at Peter’s joke is meant to say something about her character as well—she’s able to laugh at men’s jokes, unlike someone like Donna (presumably).

Anyway, Peter tells Gwen that he’ll read her account once she’s gone, which surprises Gwen as she expected him to ask her questions about it on the spot.

Next comes this exchange:

“Well, today I’m going to get Gordon’s affidavit signed, pick up the tape of yesterday’s hearing, and see if I can get Judge Romer to sign an order allowing us to take Casey to Dr. Schram for our own examination.”

“Wont’ that be a lot of exams for a four-year-old? Two psychologists and a physician in one week,” Gwen said with real concern in her voice.

“You’re right,” Peter said shaking his head. “But I’m afraid it can’t be avoided. You never know how their exam is going to come out and we must be prepared.”

“But the psychological tests they give are so routine. Couldn’t we just have our doctor review the test results and not give a whole separate battery?” Gwen asked.

“Well, I’ll talk with Dr. Schram. We’ll do whatever we can to limit the examination time and yet still do a thorough job,” Peter replied. It was obvious that Gwen had a mind of her own and he would have to be ready to explain decisions in clear terms and not simply to to blow past her with a stuffy “it’s-my-professional-opinion” kind of answer.

And that’s it. Gwen leaves, giving Peter a “genuine and warm” smile. Peter is “surprised at her suddenness” and notes that “normally clients like to chat all day.”

I am quite honestly really horrified by this section. Could Peter be more condescending? He supposedly realizes that he has to actually explain his decisions to Gwen, but then he does not explain anything. Would it be so hard for him to explain why they need an independent evaluation, and why they can’t just have their psychologist look at the other psychologist’s report? There are reasons for these things, after all! Is explaining these reasons so hard?

And frankly, Peter’s use of “in clear terms” sounds like code for “in ways lady brains can understand,” though I could be wrong given that he contrasts this to giving a stuffy “it’s-my-professional-opinion” answer. At the very least “in clear terms” appears to mean “allay the client’s fears without actually telling them anything.”

And so, according to Farris, Peter now recognizes that Gwen wants to know why he’s doing things and making the decisions he is, and yet he does nothing to actually meet this desire. Instead he pats her on the head. This makes me really upset. Peter has an opportunity here to actually explain things to Gwen, to bring her on board in a way, and he recognizes this opportunity but then drops the ball entirely.

I’m not sure whether I’m more frustrated by Peter’s condescension toward Gwen or by Farris’s inability to get inside his characters’ heads. Or perhaps the two are related. Perhaps Farris is able to get inside Peter’s head and Peter’s only.

Uncategorized

Anonymous Tip

Previous Post

July 2, 2015

Talking to Kids about the News

Next Post

July 4, 2015 Being Patriotic on the Fourth of July

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What nation took Israel into captivity in 722 BC?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Egypt Babylon Persia Assyria