Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Love, Joy, Feminism

Anonymous Tip: In Which Gwen Contemplates Running

Last updated on: June 26, 2015 at 3:08 pm   by Libby Anne

Anonymous Tip: In Which Gwen Contemplates Running 2015-06-26T15:08:47-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Review Series of Anonymous Tip, by Michael Farris

Pp. 87-88

If you remember from last week, we have finally reached the end of Tuesday, the day of the hearing. Yes, really—we’re still on Tuesday. We’ve been on Tuesday since March 27th. That’s right, we’ve spent three months on Tuesday.

Now that Peter has left the office and headed home, with a quick phone call to his mentor on the way, we turn to Gwen’s evening.

Gwen’s night had not been pleasant. The empty house worked strangely on her mind. The previous evening she was able to talk with Casey for about three minutes just before the MacArthurs put her to bed. It helped Casey a lot. For Gwen it accentuated her own helplessness.

And that’s it folks. That’s all we get. That is literally all we learn about how Casey is doing with her foster family. Farris tells us that the phone call “helped Casey a lot.” How? Was she not doing okay? Did she feel reassured to hear her mother’s voice? Did Gwen encourage her to try to enjoy her time with the MacArthurs? What did Gwen say? What did Casey say? This entire book pivots on child protective services’ removal of Casey, and yet Casey herself is basically invisible.

But frankly, there’s something else I’m becoming increasingly annoyed with, and that’s Farris’s writing. I’ve tried to go easy on this because writing is hard and I get that being a novelist isn’t Farris’s day job. But at some points things become just plain confusing.

After telling us that “Gwen’s night had not been pleasant” and that “the previous evening she was able to talk with Casey,” Farris tells us that “her responsibility to finish the written narrative of the events of May 11 and May 12 for Peter was good for her spirits” and that “after she finished her assignment, she stepped out on the back porch and fixed her eyes on the swing set.” Then he tells us that she thought of Casey and her mind started to wander (more on that in a moment) and then that “Gwen started and sat straight up in bed when the alarm sounded at 7:00 a.m.”

And so I am confused. Farris first makes it sound like it’s the next morning by speaking of “Gwen’s night” and “the previous evening,” then he makes it clear that the night has not yet happened and Gwen is up late working on writing out the narrative, because directly after the discussion of her writing the narrative and looking at the porch we are introduced to Gwen waking up to her alarm. I’m beginning to suspect that this book did not have a professional proof writer, because I feel like such an individual would have caught things like this.

Anyway, let’s turn back to Gwen’s mind wandering while looking at the swing set.

As she let her mind wander, a plan to kidnap her own daughter began to take shape in her clouded mind. Perhaps we could go to California and live with Pam and Josh, Gwen thought. She quickly rejected that idea, realizing it would put her sister and brother-in-law in jeopardy. She also correctly perceived that it would be one of the first places the authorities would look for her if she became a runaway “child abuser.” A better plan would have to be made.

Okay, first of all, Gwen has a sister?! I’m fairly certain this is the first mention of a sister. And so I’m left wondering, why has Gwen not called said sister? As someone with a sister, I can say for certain that she would be one of the first people I would call for solace should something terrible happen to me. Now maybe Gwen has a bad relationship with her sister, but she doesn’t make it sound like that here. And while I get that novelists sometimes introduce things like this bit by bit, this just seems a bit abrupt.

Note: A reader reminded me that Casey really should have been given to her father, Gordon, who appears to have joint custody. Gordon, of course, was not even brought up by anyone in Tuesday’s hearing—not by Gwen, not by her father, not by the judge, not by Gwen’s lawyer, not by the prosecutor, and not by the social worker. And perhaps in part because of that, I keep forgetting about Gordon myself. 

Besides, wouldn’t a sibling also be someone CPS would look at placing a child with when removing her from her parents’ custody? I mean I get that this sister is out of state and the grandparents are clearly a better option, but still, wouldn’t they at least ask? What other random family members does Gwen have around who are going to randomly pop in over the course of this book?

But anyway, there you have it—Gwen, our heroine, takes time to consider kidnapping her child and running. I suppose on some level this might be natural, but Farris doesn’t present it as a bad option except to state that it is not tenable—that she’d be caught. The idea that kidnapping itself might be bad is absent, as is any consideration that child protective services might have a role to play (albeit in this case, of course, their entire case is built on fraud). In other words, kidnapping is treated as wrong only because Gwen would get caught.

Note that we haven’t been told that Casey is being mistreated in foster care. The only issue here is that Gwen can’t stand to be parted from Casey. And you know what? I’m a mom, I get that. But if I were parted from my children I would worry about them primarily because I would be worried about whether they were okay. And we haven’t seen that!

Gwen hasn’t worried about how Casey is doing, or about whether Casey is upset, or whether Casey is being taken care of. Nope. Nada. Instead, as she looks at the swing set before contemplating running, we’re told only that “Casey’s face and giggle were all too real—memories from the morning when Donna Corliss first invaded her life.” It’s not about Gwen worrying whether Casey’s okay, it’s about Gwen feeling sorry for herself that Casey’s not there. And this is Farris’s heroine and model mother.

 

Uncategorized

Anonymous Tip

Previous Post



June 25, 2015

Guest Post: You Can Call Me Rita: Coming Out Lesbian to My Evangelical Parents

Next Post



June 26, 2015 Marriage Equality: An Open Thread


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who played the harp for King Saul?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Asaph Samuel David Solomon

Related posts from Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Anonymous Tip: The (Actual) End

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Anonymous Tip: The (Almost) End

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Anonymous Tip: Some Accountability You Got There

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Anonymous Tip: Instant Distrust

Love, Joy, Feminism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious

Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself

Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...

Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians

I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...

Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process

Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....

To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others

The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....

Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow

The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...

view all Nonreligious blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube