Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Anonymous Tip: Details, Details, Details

Anonymous Tip: Details, Details, Details

Last updated on: June 19, 2015 at 1:33 am by Libby Anne

Anonymous Tip: Details, Details, Details 2015-06-19T01:33:36-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A review series of Anonymous Tip, by Michael Farris

p. 84-87

Most of this section is rather boring and mundane. After having supper with Gwen at the hospital at 7:00, Peter returns to the Paulsen Building. He uses “his pass key” to get in and goes to the law library “located two floors below his office.” Notice all the details? We’re told that “lawyers aren’t expected to have the law completely memorized, but they are expected to know how to find it,” and we then follow Peter as he looks up various legal statutes and copies them.

Legal statutes in hand, Peter jogs up two the two flights of stairs to his office and flips on his computer—his 1996 computer must have still had a switch—to look at the list of must-do items compiled by Joe and Sally. Farris then tells us, with detail, each thing on Peter’s must-do list (remember that he had asked Joe and Sally to clear his schedule for the week as much as possible).

A mandatory settlement conference on Friday at two with Judge Goodlate—a real estate fraud trial that Peter and filed thirteen months earlier and was on the August trial ticket. That would take an hour to an hour-and-a-half—but the preparation was all complete. And there was a deposition Monday at three. His client was bien sued for breach of a covenant not to complete. It had been continued twice before and shouldn’t be continued again. Fortunately, he had his line of questions for his client’s former employer all prepared from the prior occasions on which it had been scheduled. An hour’s review would bring him fully up to speed and ready to do battle.

You see what I mean about all of the extraneous detail?

Anyway, Farris tells us that Peter was “proud of Joe and Sally” for the excellent work they did clearing his schedule, and that he knew that “most of the work had fallen on them” rather than just being put off.

Peter opens his word processor and begins to type the motion for an independent psychological evaluation, to be given to Gail the prosecutor by noon the next day.

“Two can play the psychological game,” Peter said aloud as he finished the third document—the proposed order for Judge Romer to sign. It had taken him less than fifteen minutes, but Sally would need another half-hour in the morning to put in the finishing touches and clean up his mistake.

With this finished, Peter takes the elevator down and heads outside to his car, which we learn “was parked right in front of the building.”

As he began the drive out to Liberty Lake in the far eastern edge of the valley to his home, he picked up his car phone and punched the number for his friend Aaron Roberts.

Aaron was forty and was an elder in Peter’s church. He had been discipling Peter for five years. As brothers in the Lord, they had developed a deep love and appreciation for each other. Aaron was one of the top computer programmers in the Northwest and was on demand as a consultant all over Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and western Montana, Occasionally, he would venture into norther California and British Columbia. Aaron’s wife, Lynn, was homeschooling their four children.

And there we have it, Farris found a place to insert homeschooling into his story!

And then we have yet another strange conversation.The award for the strangest conversation would go to the conversation in which Peter informed Gwen that he could not marry her because she was divorced, you know, right after he met her, but this one has its weird moments. It also introduces a new character.

“Aaron, I’m glad you’re home,” Peter said when he answered.

“Me too. Doesn’t happen often. What’s up?” Aaron asked.

“I got a new case today that I would like you to pray about. A mother lost custody of her four-year-old daughter this morning. Probably was mishandled by another lawyer. After the hearing he had the wild notion that this lady would be willing to trade sexual favors so that he could continue on the case for free.”

“Good grief! Who are they?”

“You know I can’t tell you the names of clients, but I’ll be happy to tell you the name of the lawyer as soon as I’m off this cellular phone,” Peter said. “This lady has been accused of bruising her child and I think it’s a phony deal.”

“What makes you think so?”

“Well, for one thing, she’s a nurse at Sacred Heart and obviously knows bruises. And something in my spirit just tells me she’s innocent.”

“You know better than to rely on hunches. Our intuition is not always the Holy Spirit. Have you prayed about all this?”

“Not really. I need to do that. But anyway, this lady is really upset and needs prayer. She’s probably not a believer either. And we can certainly pray along those lines too.”

“Sure Peter, I’ll pray,” Aaron said. “How’s everything else?”

“Well, this week everything else will probably be set aside so I can do her case. There’s a critical hearing on Tuesday.”

“Don’t forget our time Friday morning at seven. You aren’t planning on being to busy for that, are you?”

“No way,” said Peter. “See ya then.”

There are so many things to comment here!

First, Aaron is portrayed as being constantly away from his family, but also as godly mentor and church elder. You better believe that a mother who is constantly away from her young children would catch flack from Farris. Second, Peter says he’ll tell Aaron the lawyer’s name once he’s “off this cellular phone”—is he worried he’s being listened in on? And is handing the Bill Walinksi’s name off to yet another layperson when Peter still hasn’t contacted the ethics board really a good idea?

Actually, it seems like Peter is overly eager in general to tell people about Bill Walinski sexually harassing Gwen. Sure, he’s not giving Gwen’s name here, but given how long Peter is going to spend on this case the woman’s identity is going to become obvious. I mean he even tells Aaron that the woman is a nurse at Sacred Heart, and that she has been accused of bruising her child! I guess I feel like if I ever had need of a lawyer I’d want that lawyer to be a bit more judicious about who they tell what. Peter doesn’t appear to be very scrupulous on that front.

Now I will say that I am really impressed that Aaron pushes back against Peter’s insistence that Gwen is innocent. I wasn’t expecting that, especially given that Aaron is a homeschooling dad—i.e. I assumed he would presume a parent accused of abuse to be innocent, barring some sort of egregious evidence otherwise. Of course, Aaron’s solution to Peter’s relying on a hunch is for him to . . . rely on a hunch. After all, he tells him to pray about it rather than, say, to do some more investigation into the case to try to determine whether or not Gwen really is innocent of the charges.

By the way, I’m getting really annoyed by the insistence that Gwen’s employment as a nurse points to her innocence. Over the past year, I have heard stories of a school bus driver and a county social services supervisor who were discovered to be severely abusing their children. Being a nurse does not prevent someone from being an abuser. This really isn’t that complicated!

Finally, note the mention of a weekly meeting. While Farris has established Aaron as a mentor to Peter (who is eight years his junior), this sounds much like the common evangelical emphasis on having an accountability partner. My dad used to meet with another homeschooling dad each week in this fashion—they were accountability partners. The other father would come over early, and they’d sit outside as the sun rose talking about their lives, their joys, and their struggles.

I predict that Aaron’s role in this story is going to be to keep Peter on the straight and narrow. Joe has also been introduced as a good Christian man, but he is younger than Peter and is junior to him in his firm. When I was a kid, my dad used to say that everyone in an evangelical community should have people they mentor, and people who mentor them. I think that’s what we’re seeing here—Peter can mentor Joe, but he also needs someone to mentor him, and Aaron fills that slot. I also predict that at some point Gwen will be introduced to Aaron, his so-far unnamed wife, and his four homeschooled children.

I’ll conclude this section by stating that I’m no longer surprised the book is 470 pages long, given that Farris padded it with all of this extraneous detail. Next week we will return to Gwen to see how she is faring without Casey.

Uncategorized

Anonymous Tip

Previous Post

June 18, 2015

Are Evangelicals Rejecting Legal Marriage?

Next Post

June 21, 2015 The Lesbian Duplex 21: An Open Thread

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the last book of the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Exodus Matthew Revelation Genesis