Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Anonymous Tip: Meet the Foster Family

Anonymous Tip: Meet the Foster Family

Last updated on: May 8, 2015 at 1:43 pm by Libby Anne

Anonymous Tip: Meet the Foster Family 2015-05-08T13:43:21-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Review Series of Anonymous Tip, by Michael Farris

pp. 66-68

Okay, so you know what’s interesting here? Farris portrays the foster family very positively. He says that “the transfer of Casey was tearful, but without hysterics,” and explains that “the foster parents, Tom and Brenda MacArthur, were kind people who seemed to understand the trauma of all concerned.” This seems to run a bit against the whole “foster care is horrific and scars children” narrative so common in anti-CPS circles. In fact, Farris tells us that:

They also arranged a time for Gwen to call each day to talk with Casey. CPS hadn’t told them to do that; the MacArthurs simply took the initiative out of compassion for both Casey and her mom.

Wait a minute. Is that actually allowed? Foster parents arranging for contact between a foster child and her biological parent without CPS permission seems kind of iffy to me. Actually, more than “kind of.” I mean, what is going on here? Are the MacArthurs so taken in by sweet mom Gwen that they’ve decided to assume she’s innocent and throw the rules? Are they unaware that courts only order a child into foster care when they think something is wrong? This is just confusing.

Farris tells us that after the MacArthurs leave with Casey, Gwen has a cry in Stan’s arms.

When she had calmed down a good deal, Stan said, “Gwen, she’ll be alright.”

“That’s right, honey,” June added. “They seem like real nice people.

She speaks! June Mansfield speaks! It simply took her until *checks page number* page 66 to do so! (For anyone confused at this point, June has played so little role in this book that I operated under the assumption that Gwen’s mother was out of the picture until page 25. Since then, June has done a lot of silently existing in the room as things transpire and dialogue takes place.)

“Gwen, I’m dying to know what happened with Walinski and all about this new guy. What in the world has been going on for the last couple of hours?” her dad asked.

Because right after Gwen has lost her daughter and immediately following “her most violent cry of the day” is a great time to ask her about something you know is sensitive.

And so, once again, Gwen rehashes “Walinski’s indecent proposal,” as Farris terms it. Stan gets angry—really angry. So angry he’s glad Bill is not present in the courthouse, in fact, because if he was he might just go kill him and then end up being “the next one in trouble—for murder.” This whole protective dad thing is a well worn trope, but okay. I feel fiercely protect of my children as well.

It’s perhaps because of that that what happens next feels slightly odd.

Gwen explains how she ran into Peter, and all about Peter’s plans to “blow the case wide open.” Stan is impressed, but June is concerned.

Her mother spoke. “Well, he seems like a wonderful young man and a very competent lawyer. But who can tell these days? Are you sure that he is on the level? He’s very handsome. Maybe he’s on the make as well, but just more subtle.”

Yes! June weighs in with an opinion! Go June!

“I said something to him that brought up the same issue you’re asking about. He went into this long explanation that he’s a born-again Christian and an’t marry divorced women—or something like that. But he said he was only telling me all this so that I would know he is safe after the incident with Walinski. I didn’t understand all his Bible talk, but he seems totally sincere, very aggressive as a lawyer, and just very, very nice. And what other choice do I have?”

This is where Stan ought to burst in with something like “What? He said he’s too good for you? How dare he say that! As though you’re damaged goods! No one says that about my daughter!” Or, maybe, something like “Who said anything about marriage?! What, did he think you were proposing to him? The cad!” Or even, “Does he take you for a fool? It doesn’t take intentions of marriage to prey on a vulnerable young woman who feels she has no other choice!”

But no, protective-father Stan says none of this. Instead he asks how she’s going to pay him, and Gwen explains about Peter’s payment plan, and then we get this:

“Well, that’s pretty generous really,” Stan said, seeming convinced.

Stan’s protectiveness seems to be highly selective.

And then June, determined not to be outdone, speaks for a third time:

“What are we supposed to do next?” her mom asked.

Gwen says she’s to write down every detail of what happened each time “those CPS witches” visited her and Casey, and that Peter is going to start gathering reports and issuing subpoenas.

Oh wait! June speaks again! Gwen explains that in one meeting Peter has more plans than Walisnki had the whole time, and then this exchange takes place:

“I think he spent his time plotting something else,” Stan said with jaws clenched. “That bird is going to pay for that.”

“Now, Stan,” his wife said, “let’s not do anything in anger that will only cause us all more trouble with Casey.”

“Humph,” Stan replied. It was the standard answer he had developed in over forty years of marriage when he was giving in to his wife’s position in an argument, but still wanted to cling to another minute to his own view.

Healthy, that.

Still, Gwen brings up “Peter’s idea of pursuing a complaint with the bar association,” so I think that’s actually going to happen.

I know I promised this section would be about meeting the foster family and I’ve made it mostly about Gwen’s conversation with Stan and June afterward, but honestly, that’s because so very little is said about the foster family, except that they are a good, loving, well-meaning couple sympathetic to Gwen’s plight. Perhaps the import is similar to that with the Judge, who is also portrayed as kind—perhaps, like him, they are meant to be good people stuck in a bad system that unbeknownst to them corrupts their desires to help people.

Uncategorized

Anonymous Tip

Previous Post

May 6, 2015

Christian Reconstructionist Gary DeMar Compares the Gay Rights Movement to ISIS

Next Post

May 9, 2015 The Lesbian Duplex 16: An Open Thread

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Emmanuel" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God with Us God is Righteous God is Judge God is Peace