There Are No Good People, Only Good Actions

Last updated on: February 3, 2015 at 10:18 pm by Libby Anne

There Are No Good People, Only Good Actions 2015-02-03T22:18:25-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Several weeks ago I called Rachel Held Evans out for the way she responded to Julie McMahon’s allegations of abuse by her ex-husband Tony Jones. Rachel and Tony were co-sponsoring a convention, and one of Rachel’s followers posted a comment asking her about the abuse allegations against Tony. Rachel responded by saying that there was no truth to the allegations, that this was not the right place to air abuse allegations, and that time spent on the allegations detracted from the church and from her and Tony’s efforts to uplift women’s voices in the upcoming conference.

As I stated in my post, if we are going to take abuse allegations seriously, we must take all abuse allegations seriously, including those against our own associates. I explained my concerns with her response and expressed hope that she would listen to the criticism she was getting and understand why people were troubled by her response.

Yesterday, Rachel posted another comment on her blog:

Here’s an update on production of the “Why Christian?” event, which is no longer being produced by JoPa:

http://www.whychristian.net/tr…

On a personal note, I want to apologize for expressing my opinion regarding the veracity of the disclosures Danica published to my blog comment section. It was not my place to do so. I especially grieve that my initial response may have triggered memories of not being believed in the lives of abuse survivors and regret that I said anything that took the focus off of where it should be, which is on whatever healing is possible for all of those personally involved in this difficult situation.

As you know, I greatly value the contribution of your life experiences in the comment section of my blog, Facebook page, and Twitter. However, the public forums I’m responsible for cannot become platforms for reporting abuse or publishing private information. Local authorities, qualified counselors, and victim support groups are created for these purposes and respecting their findings and direction are of paramount importance. I continue to support utilization of those channels and oppose efforts to circumvent them.

Thanks for your feedback, even when it is critical. I am grateful for the ways in which you challenge me to be a better advocate, a better storyteller, and a better person.

I for one am glad that Rachel was able to see that her first response was problematic, and that she was willing to take a step back and apologize for it.

I want to use this post to discuss a bigger issue, of which this is but one example. We as humans like to consign people to groups. And so we create categories where there are “good” people and there are “bad” people, and when someone in the “good” group messes up, we can be quick to consign them to the “bad” group. I worry that this approach misses a lot of nuance. As a friend of mine once told me, there are no good or bad people, only good or bad actions.

If we expect people to be prefect, we are bound to be disappointed. This goes for leaders, too. Everyone needs a little bit of space to mess up now and then. Of course, just as we would like to be called out when we misstep, even so we should call out others when they misstep. After all, if no one calls it to our attention when we make mistakes, how will we learn from them and grow? Mistakes are okay, but they should be accompanied by a willingness to listen to criticism and to rethink our own positions, ideas, or actions as needed.

I hear concerns, sometimes, about “call out” culture. I understand the concerns, and I do sympathize with them. But if we never call someone out when they make a mistake, how are they to learn and grow? I think the issue boils down to two things. First, what do we mean by a “call out”? What does it look like, and feel like? And second, what happens when calling someone out doesn’t lead them to change their mind? What do we do when there is actual disagreement?

Now first of all, I strive to call attention to a person’s missteps in a way that gives that person room to listen and rethink. I have found that this approach works best for me, so it is what I use with others. But I do recognize that what a call out may look like can be situation and person dependent, and that how we call people out may also depend on how likely we think they are to actually listen. I would respond differently to a misstep by Rachel Held Evans, for example, than I would to a misstep by Debi Pearl, and I would expect a cis ally to respond differently to transphobia than a trans person who has to deal with it every second of their lives.

But second, what happens when we call someone out on a point, but even after they listen to what we have to say there is still disagreement? I for one am very much against trying to force someone else to share my beliefs, and while I find it frustrating when someone still disagrees with me on something I feel passionate about even after they listen to me explain it, I do respect people’s right to disagree. Of course, that does not mean I see all beliefs as equally correct or equally good. I don’t. We must each make our own determination about who we are or are not willing to work with, or to see as an ally, and how much disagreement we are okay with.

I find that for me, it helps to remember that categorizing people as either “good” or “bad” is both without nuance and often unhelpful. Even people we consider “good” can make mistakes and, yes, sometimes people we consider “bad” do good things too. As Lana reminds us, it’s not helpful to characterize Duggar-type homeschooling as all bad when that’s not generally how children experience it, and an all-bad categorization can make them question the veracity of the critic.

What you do with Rachel Held Evans’ apology is up to you. But for me, if nothing else, I am appreciating the reminder that even people I have a lot of respect for can—and do—make mistakes. And sometimes they end up apologizing for them.

Addendum: Some readers have pointed out in the comments that in her latest comment Rachel urges victims to keep discussion of their abuse in “proper channels.” I understand this concern, and I suppose I may be interpreting her statement in the best possible light—i.e. I see many blogs as part of informal “victim support groups.” I also respect her desire for her forums—her facebook and her blog—to not be places for reporting abuse. I have a comment policy too, and she can have hers. I did not read her comment as an attempt to dictate other people’s policies for the forums they control, but if it is, I do have a problem with this. I have further elucidated my thoughts on this here.

What with Tony’s confirmation that he was diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder, and statements by those who have read private documents that Tony includes falsehoods and glaring omissions in his official statement, I’m increasingly uncomfortable with the willingness of so many to trust Tony’s word on this issue. However, my original post called out Rachel not for her failure to condemn Tony but simply for the way she responded, regardless of the truth or falsehood of the allegations. In her comment, she acknowledges that she responded badly, and I do appreciate that. It is now my hope that Rachel and others will do some research on NPD and take Tony’s condition seriously.

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

abuse

Rachel Held Evans

Tony Jones

Previous Post

February 3, 2015

Why We Need to Talk about Narcissism: Tony Jones Edition

Next Post

February 3, 2015 Bill Gothard Was Brought Down by a Blog: Thoughts on the "Proper" Channels for Making Abuse Allegations

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book of the Bible contains the Ten Plagues of Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Deuteronomy Exodus Leviticus Genesis