HSLDA on those “Radically Atheistic” Public Schools

Last updated on: February 26, 2015 at 8:30 am by Libby Anne

HSLDA on those “Radically Atheistic” Public Schools 2015-02-26T08:30:53-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As my regular readers will know, I am in favor of allowing homeschooled students to play sports in their local public schools. Perhaps surprisingly, the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) has long remained neutral on sports access bills, declining to directly oppose them but refusing to support them. I’ve heard concern that allowing homeschooled children to participate in sports would require some form of academic oversight, but then that oversight would only apply to those who voluntarily chose to participate in public school athletics so that clearly isn’t the main issue here. What is?

In a 2013 article, Scott Woodruff of HSLDA explained their concern as follows:

The Cons: Arguments against Access to Sports

Possible Con 1: If a homeschool student develops many friends on a public school team, he might pressure his parents to go all the way and just enroll him in the public school. Putting a child in the radically atheistic public school system for sports could send the child a message that public schools are OK despite their hostility toward faith.

First of all, we see how Woodruff—and by extension HSLDA—views public schools, and not just some public schools, but all public schools. Woodruff describes the public school system (again, he’s generalizing across the entire nation here) as “radically atheistic” and says that public schools express “hostility toward faith.” This would have made sense to me as a child and adolescent, as I was homeschooled myself and this is what I was taught about public schools. And yet, today I simply shake my head in confusion. I have a daughter in public school now, after all, and her public school bears no resemblance to the public schools described here by Woodruff.

I do have to wonder—perhaps Woodruff is worried that if a homeschooled students participates in public school athletics the student, and perhaps the parents too, will see that public schools aren’t the anti-Christian hedonistic quagmire HSLDA makes them out to be?

Possible Con 2: The team and coach will influence the faith, morality, habits, and attitudes of the homeschool student. This influence will probably be in a direction different from the way his parents have been rearing him.

Woodruff is here endorsing homeschooling as a way shelter children and protect them from outside influences. I am not surprised to see it come up here, but you know what I’ve realized? I would rather my children have contact with other influences while they’re still in the home, so that we can talk through things with them as needed, than have them have no contact with other influences until they leave home. I realize that I don’t see outside influences as dangerous in the way that HSLDA’s followers likely do, but I don’t think their logic necessarily holds up even if you accept its premises.

Besides, if your teaching falls apart so easily if a child is exposed to other viewpoints, how strong is what you’re teaching?

Possible Con 3: Some sports programs designed just for homeschoolers in Wisconsin might collapse if students can opt for public school sports.

This concern may be the one I understand best. (Wisconsin is mentioned because Woodruff was addressing a bill in that state.) However, I would note that most states do not have an effective homeschool athletic system.

Possible Con 4: The simple happiness of enjoying meals and fellowship together as a family can be destroyed by the heavy time demands for practices, meetings, games, and tournaments. At least one parent will spend a lot of time on the road and away from their family hauling the student to all those mandatory events.

Wait wait wait. I thought HSLDA was all about parents’ right to make their own decisions for their children? Isn’t this HSLDA telling these parents how to raise their children? What if a family is willing to put in the time for the practice schedule and feels the necessary road trips are good family bonding? I thought homeschooling was supposed to allow for individuality—what is this one size fits all approach?

Of course, Woodruff does admit that there may be some pros to sports access:

The Pros: Arguments for Access to Sports

Possible Pro 1: For a few homeschool students, like Tim Tebow from Florida, being able to play on a public school sports team creates an open door to college and professional sports while being able to keep the benefits of homeschooling.

Possible Pro 2: Some families quit homeschooling every year because their kids want to play public school sports. Some of those families might continue homeschooling if they could have both. And some families might switch from public to homeschool if they knew their kids could still play sports.

Possible Pro 3: For some homeschool students, the reward of being able to play sports might motivate them to treat their homeschool studies very seriously.

Possible Pro 4: It gives public school coaches and students a chance to rub shoulders with awesome homeshooled kids. It spreads the message that homeschooling is a great option.

The benefits, in other words, are (1) college scholarships; (2) ensuring that parents don’t quit homeschooling over sports; (3) giving a student more motivation in their studies; and (4) exposing more public school students to homeschoolers.

Note that Woodruff lists exposing public school students to homeschoolers as a pro, but lists exposing homeschoolers to public school students as a con. I’m not entirely sure what this means. If you put a homeschooler and a public school student together in a room, what does Woodruff think would happen? If he thinks the homeschooler would influence the public schooler, why is he worried about homeschoolers being exposed to public school student? And if he thinks the public schooler would corrupt the homeschooler, why does he suggest that more exposure to homeschoolers would be a good thing for public school students?

I’m not sure Woodruff’s points are completely consistent. Of course, it’s also worth noting that Woodruff completely erases both secular homeschoolers and others homeschooling for nonreligious reasons, seeming to assume that all homeschoolers are concerned about their children’s Christian faith being eroded through involvement in the public schools.

If nothing else this article makes HSLDA’s view of the public schools fairly clear: They believe that public schools are “radically atheistic” and that they show “hostility toward faith.” As a public school parent myself, I have to wonder. The attorneys at HSLDA all appear to be homeschooling parents. Is it possible that they are so out of touch with what twenty-first century public schools actually look like that they actually believe their rhetoric?

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

Homeschool

HSLDA

public school

Previous Post

February 25, 2015

What the Ruff, the Spotted Hyena, and the Cuttlefish Taught Me about Gender and Sexuality

Next Post

February 27, 2015 Anonymous Tip: Meet the Lawyer

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What happened to Jesus 40 days after His resurrection?

Select your answer to see how you score.

He visited the temple He ascended into heaven He performed one last miracle He went back into hiding