Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Why the Pope’s Recent Comments on Limiting Family Size Were Not Actually “Compassionate”

Why the Pope’s Recent Comments on Limiting Family Size Were Not Actually “Compassionate”

Last updated on: January 20, 2015 at 11:18 pm by Libby Anne

Why the Pope’s Recent Comments on Limiting Family Size Were Not Actually “Compassionate” 2015-01-20T23:18:43-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

While in college, I converted to Catholicism. I went through the full process and was received into the Church. I still have the dress I wore that day. As a newly married Catholic, I relied on natural family planning (NFP) to plan and space out my children. Even after I found that I no longer believed in God, I continued using NFP, largely because I liked that it was natural and I was taught growing up that artificial birth control was little better than poison. While today I have an IUD, I used NFP (and did so successfully) until after my second child was born.

It was as a former Catholic and former user of NFP that I read this description of the pope’s recent remarks while visiting the Philippines:

The pope cited the case of a woman he met who was pregnant with her eighth child after seven Cesarean sections. “That is an irresponsibility!” he said. The woman might argue that she should trust in God. “But God gives you methods to be responsible,” he said.

He said there are many “licit” ways of regulating births that are approved by the church, an apparent reference to the family planning method of monitoring a woman’s cycle to avoid intercourse when she is ovulating.

“God gives you methods to be responsible,” he said, according to the National Catholic Reporter’s account. “Some think that — excuse the word — that in order to be good Catholics we have to be like rabbits. No.”

I’ve seen a lot of people point to this as evidence that the pope is being compassionate, and human. This leaves me a bit confused. So let’s talk about this.

There is no change in Catholic doctrine here. For over fifty years now, the Church has held that artificial birth control is not allowed but that natural family planning—choosing not to have sex during the days a woman is fertile—is. Specifically, using natural family planning when there is just reason for limiting or spacing births is permitted, but using NFP for selfish reasons is not.

The pope says that “God gives you methods to be responsible.” I have to wonder, why is NFP the only method God allows? I know the justification is that artificial birth control negates the procreative purpose of sex, but doesn’t using NFP to prevent pregnancy do that as well? You know what’s interesting? Of all methods of birth control, it is NFP that is most difficult to use. NFP also only works with complete cooperation of the male partner, which prevents a woman from making independent decisions about her own reproduction.

It’s often been said that this pope is a compassionate pope who is restoring the “human side” to Catholic teaching. But wouldn’t true compassion mean giving women the pope himself admits have good reason to limit the number of births effective means to do so?

Not only is NFP difficult to learn and use, it also doesn’t work for everyone. I have a friend who planned to use NFP to space out her second child from her first, but ended up giving birth to an oops baby only 16 months after her first. After her second birth she told me she would be more careful, but then she had a second oops baby 11 months later, three children in only two and a half years. And to top all of this off, she had a condition that made her morning sickness so severe she could barely care for the children she already had. After my friend’s third child was born, her husband had a vasectomy.

How can the Church be “compassionate” while condemning my friend’s decision—a decision that has given her freedom from her condition and allowed her to finally spend meaningful time with her children? Had my friend gone to a priest, she would have been told to give NFP another try. Perhaps she could have made NFP work if she’d given it a third try, but even then she’d likely live in fear of another “oops” baby—and based on my own experience with NFP, that fear would likely bleed over into her sex life.

And it’s not just my friend, either. Take a look at this post by a Catholic blogger and mother of four. In this it, the author writes about being failed by NFP multiple times despite her best efforts, and about trying to cling to the Church’s teaching even as her sanity slips and her family’s financial security is thrown into question.

Here is an excerpt:

[My husband] didn’t say much. We’re in the same boat, me and him. Me terrified of the physical, mental and emotional toll wrought by more children, and him terrified of the financial weight on our already sinking ship. To tell the truth, I think he’s equally terrified at the thought of losing me to a complete nervous breakdown, or a heart attack or stroke brought on by overwhelming stress. And neither of us have any answers. We know what the Church says. We know that we ought to have faith, and trust. Personally, I don’t think I have any faith or trust left in me. I think that well was depleted by the last two pregnancies, immediately following courses in new methods of NFP. Ones that, we were assured, would really work. Is it possible that we did it wrong, that I misread signs, that it’s all down to user error? Absolutely. I’d even say it’s probable. But there’s only so much perfection in reading signs and charting that can be expected from a sleep-deprived, over-stretched mother whose every bathroom break is accompanied by a toddler or two. And there’s only so much abstinence that can reasonably be expected of a couple not in a Josephine marriage. Seven, eight months last time? I lost count. How long this time? A year, two? And how do we deal with the incredible strain that so much abstinence places on our marriage? The frustrated desires, the feelings of rejection, the guilt, the anger, the loneliness?

Telling women that limiting their number of pregnancies is reasonable—even that it is their responsibility—but allowing them only NFP to do so is not compassion. I was able to make NFP work for me, but only by being very very careful, and I spent years being paranoid that it would fail (and for good reason!). Indeed, the years I spent using NFP wreaked havoc on my sex life. NFP defenders might say I should have worried less, but if I had I might well have ended up like my friend.

While I’m at it, I really have to address something else, too. In his recent remarks in the Philippines, the pope also said this:

“Every people deserves to conserve its identity without being ideologically colonized.”

I appreciate this remark, which is about five centuries too late. It’s also highly selective and more than a little disingenuous.

Use of contraception in the Philippines is a contentious issue, as the Philippine government only recently approved contraceptive access against forceful opposition from Catholic bishops, the National Catholic Reporter said.

In other words, the pope made his remark in support of bishops who sought to maintain a ban on artificial contraception. The 2012 Reproductive Health Law, which offered filipinos access to free contraceptives and survived legal challenge from the Catholic Church, was welcomed by 72% of filipinos, according to one survey. Another study found a similar level of support for contraceptives among husbands and wives as far back as 1993.

In other words, you could argue that the Catholic Church’s efforts to prevent filipinos from having access to birth control—access that is widely supported by the filipino people—is an act of ideological colonization. Yes, the Philippines is a very Catholic country, but the pope’s remarks nevertheless represent the efforts of the global Catholic Church hierarchy working to force its will on the filipino people.

The Philippines is in the middle of a severe crisis that has resulted in widespread poverty and even starvation. The Philippines is the size of Arizona, but has a population roughly one third that of the U.S. Most filipinos rely on a diet of rice and fish, but the surrounding fish populations are suffering from severe overfishing. If the country’s population continues growing at its current rate, it will double by 2080. It’s no wonder the filipino people view artificial contraception positively.

As one headline put it, Philippines birth control: Filipinos want it, priests don’t.

What I find most ironic in all of this is that the pope is seen by so many as being compassionate for calling a woman who had eight children irresponsible and at the same time barring her from using the most effective and user friendly methods of birth control. The pope’s teachings put the filipino women into a double bind where they are damned if they do and damned if they don’t. They are expected to reduce their birth rate . . . but are only allowed to use natural family planning to do so.

Natural Family Planning is incredibly difficult to do correctly. It involves monitoring body signs, including temperature and cervical mucous—a dangerous proposition in a country with hazardous sanitation, I might add. It requires complete cooperation from the male partner, who has to be willing to go for without sex during a woman’s fertile days. It involves keeping careful records of body signs, charting fertility, and determining when ovulation has occurred (based on sometimes conflicting signs). Think you that it is compassionate to expect this of women in poverty, struggling to put food on their children’s plates?

No, my friends. The pope’s remarks were not compassionate at all. Rather, the pope continues to put doctrine over people—and it is the people who suffer.

Previous Post

January 20, 2015

Grown Children and Estranged Parents

Next Post

January 21, 2015 Things HSLDA Opposes: Marriage Equality

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is the oldest man in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Enoch Methuselah Noah Jared