Dolls, Yes; Ballerinas, No

Last updated on: January 15, 2015 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

Dolls, Yes; Ballerinas, No 2015-01-12T01:14:45-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It may surprise some readers to know that in spite of my parents’ patriarchal beliefs, they gave one of my brothers a doll for Christmas one year—because he had begged for a doll of his own. My parents believed that my brothers were preparing to be fathers, and that that meant boys playing with dolls was perfectly acceptable.

There’s lots more, too. There’s the brother who built his own dollhouse so that he could get in on dollhouse play with his sisters. He carefully fashioned the rooms, furnishings, and trappings, and was proud of his creation. There’s the brother who wanted to learn to sew, so my mother taught him, and he then went about sewing everyone lopsided but adorable blankets. There’s the brother who was into art, a passion and interest my parents supported with supplies and encouragement.

But there were limits, too. When he was little, one of my brothers had a fascination with a pink ballet leotard with puffy tutu that he found in our dress-up box. He used to wear it around the house, pretending he was a ballerina. There were no objections. Then October came, and he said he wanted to be a ballerina for the fall harvest fest at our church (we didn’t do trick-or-treating, because demons). If I remember correctly, my mother didn’t object. What I remember very clearly, though, is that when my father found out about my brother’s plans he stepped in and put an end to them. My brother was crushed.

I’m not sure why my mother was okay with my brother wearing the ballerina costume when, to this day, she shudders at any mention of LGBTQ individuals. Perhaps because this was over a decade ago, the issue seemed less pressing? Perhaps she never thought of any connection between such childish cross-dressing and being transgender? Mind you, I am not saying that wearing a costume created for the other gender makes one transgender. Kids often don’t notice gender in the same way we do, and this brother has shown no signs of being transgender that I have seen. I’m simply surprised that my mother didn’t object, given her revulsion of LGBTQ individuals.

I suspect I know why my father put the lid on my brother wearing the costume out, though. We were going to be at church, in a semi-public setting, around other people we knew or who knew of us. It’s very likely that heads would have turned at a little boy in a pink ballerina costume.

And so today, I’m curious. Why were certain transgressions of traditional gender norms tolerated while others weren’t? My parents were fine with my brothers, as future fathers, playing with dolls or dollhouses, but they weren’t okay with more direct assaults on these norms, such as my brother dressing as a ballerina for Halloween. And while my mother did teach one of my brothers to sew, it was only that one and only because he asked, and she made an effort to teach each of my sisters whether or not we were interested. Our chores, too, were gendered—we girls generally did the cooking and laundry while the boys generally did outdoor chores.

Musing about my own upbringing makes me wonder about society at large, too. I’ve seen parents wonder whether playing with dolls will make boys grow up to be “soft” (whatever that means) or even gay. I worry that we may be policing the gender lines more strictly today than in the past, especially with how severely gendered advertising to children has become. I’ve heard some argue that companies gender things to make more sales—so that you have to buy a pink one for your girl and a blue one for your boy, rather than just getting one and passing it down—but I wonder if part of the impetus behind gendering things so highly comes from the increasing success marriage equality and an internal concern over what gender means.

I’d like to think that things are getting better on the gender front, but finding an image of a little boy with a doll to use as the featured image for this post was more of a struggle than I’d expected. The first image I chose turned out to be the same one I used with a previous post, so I decided against that one. Ultimately, I found a second picture, but it is from an Italian catalogue of some sort rather than from the U.S. That it was that hard for me to find a picture of a boy holding a doll makes me wonder whether my openly patriarchal parents were more progressive on gendered play than most parents today.

As I’ve written before, my own son has dolls, including one in particular that he always cheers to see. He also has dinosaurs and matchbox cars, and a princess crown. I let my children follow their own interests, including my son. I would hate to think of trying to push his tender soul into some sort of hard exterior of “manly” or “strong” (what does that even mean, anyway?).

I’d rather let kids be kids, and encourage all kids—boys and girls alike—to be persistent, nurturing, and compassionate protectors of those who are smaller or less fortunate.

Previous Post

January 14, 2015

Things HSLDA Opposes: Required Medical Exams for Public School Students

Next Post

January 16, 2015 Anonymous Tip: Where Things Go Haywire

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In James, what is the correct sequence that leads from temptation to death?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Desire, sin conceived, sin full-grown, death Desire, temptation, sin, death Sin, desire, full-grown sin, death Temptation, desire, death, judgment