How about People Don’t Hit People?!

Last updated on: August 8, 2014 at 2:33 pm by Libby Anne

How about People Don’t Hit People?! 2014-08-08T14:33:00-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Let’s hear from Jason Edwards over at Grove City College’s Vision and Values:

The public outcry over Roger Goodell’s failure to adequately punish NFL running back Ray Rice for knocking out his girlfriend in an Atlantic City hotel elevator is an encouraging sign that some vestige of civilization remains. It has been heartening to hear from talking heads that even in 2014 some things are still not tolerable. And, that one of those intolerable things is a man hitting a woman.

. . .

Of course, some of the barbarians at the ticket booth give reason to be worried. And so, Baltimore Ravens fans shamefully welcomed Ray Rice back to practice with a standing ovation. Likewise, what must be the most tone-deaf (and morality deaf) public relations department in the country proudly pasted this fact on the Ravens’ website.

Still, civilizations are more likely to crumble from within. The reaction from those that know men must not hit women may bode worse than the reaction of the small group of yahoos that do not. For instance, in perusing just a few comments generated from an ESPN column condemning Rice’s action, one reader opined that this type of incident will continue to happen “until men see females as truly equals.” It is hard to imagine a worse reading of the situation. While equality is a precious political principle, culturally, equality is fraught with problems.

Men do not hit women because women are fundamentally different than men. If men are taught that women are not different but equal, or worse yet, the same, then the compunction not to hit them is removed.

Wait. What? If men believe that women are their equals, they can go around hitting them? Do men go around hitting other men? Wait. Don’t answer that. I don’t want to know.

The irony here is that Jason appears to be suggesting that feminism actually leads to an increase in domestic violence. This is both historically false (there was plenty of domestic violence hundreds of years ago when patriarchy reigned supreme and women were quite literally possessions, thank you very much) but also logically twisted. It rests on the premise that men treat other men terribly, and that therefore if they see women as their equals they will treat them the way they treat other men—terribly. Are men really such terrible creatures as all that?

I get tired of saying this, but if men were really as horrid as supporters of patriarchy make them out to be, I’d be all for getting the hell out of Dodge and investing in an all-female commune. Maybe we could take our sons with us too, those of us that have them, and make an experiment in instilling in them compassion and basic human decency. If men are really this broken, they need fixing. Fortunately, I think supporters of patriarchy are lying when they they talk about men. I think that because the men in my life are nothing like they describe. Sean does not hit me not because I am a woman but because he believes that hitting people—of whatever gender—is wrong.

Richard Weaver explained this over 60 years ago in his magisterial book “Ideas Have Consequences.” He wrote, “the refusal to see distinction between babe and adult, between the sexes, between combatant and noncombatant—distinctions which lay at the core of chivalry … this is the destruction of society through brutality.” Weaver further noted that if “we say that woman is identical with man … there is no reason why she should not be bombed along with him.”

Weaver’s comparison of babe and adult, man and woman, and combatant and noncombatant is a false one. Children are less able to care for themselves than adults. This is simple fact. Similarly, combatants (ideally) volunteer and train for war while noncombatants do not. This is a difference. There is not a similar difference between men and women in our modern era.

Personally, I tend to agree with Weaver’s conclusion—I dislike the “women and children first” adage because I do not believe women should have special privileges—privileges that traditionally have come with the price of limited autonomy. In a wartime situation—and I should clarify that I hate war with a vengeance—the distinction should be drawn not between men on the one hand and women and children on the other but between combatants on the one hand and noncombatants on the other. I don’t want to hear how many women and children were killed. I want to hear how many civilians are killed. We are all people.

But then, given Jason’s lack of understanding of why someone would say gender-based domestic violence will continue until men view women as people, I doubt my position on this is something he’s ever considered.

In fact, the comment section responding to the ESPN column relayed this point exactly, as some miscreant pugnaciously asked, “Why does a man have to tolerate a woman insulting or hitting him?” While perhaps coming from a knuckle-dragging brute, this statement actually captures perfectly the spirit of enlightened equality—among equals, some actions merit a punch in the nose.

Men should not have to tolerate women hitting them—or insulting them. Seriously, who exactly is saying men should let women hit them and insult them? I think the problem is that those positing this question see only one solution to being insulted or hit—hit back. But why? We don’t live in a Wild West where might makes right and violence reigns supreme. There are other ways to handle this kind of thing—including reporting domestic violence to the police, or walking away from insults. The choice is not between letting a woman insult or hit you on the one hand, and knocking them out on the other.

Yes, there is self defense. Absolutely. The problem is that it does not seem to apply in the situation being discussed. That a quarterback would need to knock out his much-smaller girlfriend to protect himself seems unlikely. And besides, I don’t believe in the concept behind stand-your-ground laws. I believe you should use the least amount of force sufficient to protect yourself, not any amount of force you want.

Boys need it instilled in them that real men never hit women. All agree on that, but frustratingly for many is the fact that this makes sense only because women are fundamentally different than men, not because they are the same.

And exactly why can’t we instill in boys that real men never hit people? Why should it be okay for men to hit other men? I am not okay with that being okay. And yet, Jason’s entire premise is based on it being okay. It’s okay to hit other men, Jason says. Just not women. Seriously, where is this coming from? I don’t want my son Bobby growing up in Jason’s world. Please no.

As a feminist, I don’t just want a world where men and women are treated equally. I also want a world where people are treated with compassion and kindness. I don’t just want an equal world. I want a good world.

Feminism

Previous Post

August 8, 2014

In Defense of Progressive Religion

Next Post

August 9, 2014 Guest Post: I Am Not Planning on Being a Stay-at-Home Mom (part II)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Pride deceived those who dwell in the clefts of the rocks and make their home on the heights. Which nation was being addressed?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ammon Philistia Edom Moab