What If My Children Adopted My Parents’ Beliefs?

Last updated on: July 29, 2014 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

What If My Children Adopted My Parents’ Beliefs? 2014-07-27T23:58:19-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Every so often, I get a comment like this on my blog:

Dear Libby Anne,

You state that you are an atheist. What would you do if one of your children choose the lifestyle your parents have—if he/she states that you are totally wrong in not believing in god? Would you support or accept his/ her choices? Would you feel betrayed in everything you taught them (e.g. critical thinking) because they don’t think it to be the right way for them? What if he/she decides to leave the decision of family size to god, homeschool their 15 children and be a strong supporter of “How to train up a child” or the Pearls? Would you tell your children that there choices of life are wrong—are you tolerant enough for that?

Jesse

Holy assumptions Batman! But let’s untangle this, because I do get this question fairly frequently, and it’s worth addressing—if only so that I can have a link to share next time this question comes up, which it will.

The first thing I notice is the assumption that I think critical thinking is only compatible with atheism. I don’t. I think you can be both a critical thinker and religious. In other words, Jesse makes a lot of assumptions about me as an atheist that are quite simply not accurate. Atheists don’t have some sort of creed they all sign. I find that a lot of people see I’m an atheist and then assume that I’m some sort of anti-theist who views religion as the root of all evil. I’m not. Some atheists may hold those views, but I don’t.

The truth is that I would have no problem with one of my children becoming Christian, or joining another religious tradition. My children are their own people, and their beliefs and choices are theirs. I have not hung my happiness or my fulfillment as a person on them replicating my beliefs. I am not raising them as some sort of do-overs of myself. I am raising them to become independent people, leave home, and fly. Their journeys are their journeys.

Last year a close relative went through a faith crisis and I realized that I had literally no stake in her becoming an atheist. As she moved away from fundamentalist Christianity, I encouraged her to look into a variety of Christian traditions. When she ultimately left Christianity entirely, it wasn’t because I’d tried to push her in that direction, because I hadn’t. I was very happy for her, but not because she had left Christianity. Rather, I was happy that she had found somewhere she felt at peace.

But that’s not really what Jesse is asking, is it? He’s asking not how I’d handle my children becoming religious, but rather how I’d handle my children becoming my parents. The truth is, I’d have some problems with that—but not for the reasons Jesse suggests.

If my children became my parents they would treat me with judgement, seeing me as a lost sinner in need of converting. This would destroy our relationship, and that would sadden me deeply—and it would hurt, too. But it would be them damaging our relationship, not me—just as it is my parents, not me, who damage our relationship. I am content to disagree with my parents, and to leave aside subjects like politics and religion. They are the ones who cannot do that, because their religious beliefs won’t let them. If my children adopted those same beliefs, they, too, would not be able to agree to disagree or accept each other’s differences.

While it would be painful to watch my children destroy their relationships with me, for my part I would do what I could to be accepting and gracious. Their lives are their own, and their journeys are their own. While I might set boundaries with them (for instance, putting certain topics off limits between us), I would not push them away or treat them unkindly.

I should pause to clarify that there are plenty of Christians whose beliefs allow them to get along just fine with those who are different from them. I have numerous close friends who are Christians, but who do not judge me or view me as broken or in need of saving. If my children were to become this sort of Christian, our relationships need not be damaged one whit.

But there’s another point to be made, and that has to do with one of my children becoming “a strong supporter of “How to train up a child” or the Pearls.” If one of my children became followers of the Pearls’ childrearing teachings, they would be abusing my grandchildren. There is a big difference between being tolerant of differences in belief and being tolerant of abuse. While I don’t have a problem with the former, I have a big problem with the latter. (If you don’t believe that the Pearls teach abuse, please read my page-by-page review of their book, To Train Up A Child.)

If one of my children became a follower of the Pearls, I would be concerned for my grandchildren. I would voice my concerns to my child, I would keep an eye out for my grandchildren’s wellbeing, and, if I felt it necessary, I would place a call to social services. My (hypothetical) grandchildren’s wellbeing is important to me, and I would in no way tolerate my children abusing them. That’s not what “tolerance” means.

At this point Jesse may be wondering how I define “abuse.” Yes, there are some atheists who argue that raising children in a faith tradition is abuse. I am not one of them. I also don’t view homeschooling as abuse, and I don’t see growing up in a large family as abuse. I’m not playing fast and loose with definitions here. But if anyone doesn’t believe that what the Pearls teach is abuse, they need to take a look at my page-by-page review of their book, To Train Up A Child. The Pearls teach that parents should beat their children into submission. That is abuse.

But let’s take another piece. What if one of my children left family planning to God and ended up with 15 children? I personally think having more children than you can properly care for—and 15 children is more children than anyone can properly care for—is unwise. But then, Jesse’s question seems to rest on the assumption that accepting differences means agreeing with the person you disagree with—which obviously makes no sense. I can disagree with my children’s choices or beliefs while still accepting that they are independent people who have every right to make their own choices and form their own beliefs.

Should one of my children have 15 children, I would voice my concerns, but I would do my best to not let this difference damage our relationship. It is in fact possible to disagree with someone without pushing them away or constantly judging them. I would try to be there for my grandchildren as needed, but I wouldn’t alienate my children.

One more point—how would I react of Sally grew up to believe that wives’ role is to submit and husbands’ role is to lead? I would of course be saddened, because Sally deserves better than that. I would also likely be a bit concerned for Sally’s wellbeing. I’m her mother. I want her to be happy and healthy. But even with my concerns, I wouldn’t push her away or judge her—and I wouldn’t alienate her. Instead I would love her, accept her, and be there for her.

I suppose that for me, when I talk about tolerance or acceptance, what I’m really talking about the ability to maintain a healthy relationship with someone in spite of differences in belief or life choices. Having a healthy relationship doesn’t mean never disagreeing with someone, or never telling someone when you are concerned for them, but it does mean not treating someone badly or resorting to guilt trips or manipulation when there are disagreements.

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

Family

Previous Post

July 27, 2014

"And How Many Daddies?"

Next Post

July 30, 2014 Both Children and Parents Are Demanding

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which is the only book that does not mention "God"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lamentations Esther Ezra Song of Solomon