Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
In Which Christianity Today Goes Halfway (with gifs)

In Which Christianity Today Goes Halfway (with gifs)

Last updated on: April 29, 2014 at 2:23 pm by Libby Anne

In Which Christianity Today Goes Halfway (with gifs) 2014-04-29T14:23:47-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A post about female masturbation recently appeared on Christianity Today‘s women’s section. Christianity Today is generally more mainstream evangelical than my upbringing, so much so that I remember viewing it as somewhat liberal. This post, though, has had me questioning all of that.

The basic gist is this—the author accepts that women are sexual and may turn to masturbation as an outlet for their sexual desire—something that is foreign to many evangelicals—but follows that up by affirming that masturbation is not only sinful but actually idolatry. In other words, what we have is this:

Isn’t it nice that we’re finally admitting you women have sexual desires just like men do? Now have a large serving of shame with your potatoes.

With that introduction, let’s turn to the text of the article itself.

It’s refreshing to finally hear women talking about female masturbation. Given the social stigma around the topic, it can be difficult just to bring it up.

Unfortunately, too often the conversation doesn’t overcome the unhelpful stereotypes about the female sex drive…or lack thereof. Time and time again, Christian leaders explain that women masturbate because they want to “fill a void” or have “attachment issues.” These emotional generalizations fail to get at the real problem.

Yes! These are problems! Can I say how glad I am to have them recognized?

Evangelicalism in particular and American society in general have a big problem grasping the reality that women are just as sexual as men. Instead, men are expected to be sexually driven while women are expected to be demure and chaste. That people are challenging this narrative in forums like Christianity Today is an incredibly positive development. Or at least, it should be.

When men talk about masturbation (or at least what I have heard and read), everyone pretty much settles on the basics: It’s hard to practice self-control. It’s hard to resist indulging in lust. Really hard. Few men try to psychoanalyze the process, explaining masturbation away by realizing that they secretly have underlying issues relating to real women. (Though, it’s true that many men do struggle to relate to real women in the flesh, if the movie Her is any indication.) Men realize that even if they do resolve those relational issues with women or somehow meet their “unmet needs,” that won’t solve their real problem. Their real problem is lust.

The Bible does not actually say anything about masturbation. That’s right, not a word. Where, then, do evangelicals derive their teaching that masturbation is sin?

Popular evangelical author Josh Harris wrote a book on lust that I read as a teen. In it he described his adolescent struggle with masturbation and laid out a “biblical” case for why masturbation is always—always—wrong. He argued that it is impossible to masturbate without lusting, and that lusting after a woman you are not married to is just as sinful as actually having sex with her. Within marriage, he argued that sex should only and always be an act between two individuals, and not something done alone. I don’t remember his justification, but I found it convincing at the time.

This, then, is the evangelical argument against masturbation.

Many conversations about female masturbation—including some here on Her.meneutics—are missing that realization [that the “real problem” is lust]. Women are sometimes actually drawn to masturbation and pornography because they desire sexual pleasure. Rather than escaping emotional issues, they simply struggle with lust.

Women masturbate because they desire sexual pleasure. I know, right?!

Honestly, I had forgotten just how much of a revelation female sexual desire is to evangelicals. But then, I well remember being taught that women who are sexually active outside of marriage are simply trying to use sex to get love, or fill a void, or obtain financial stability. The idea that women might have sex outside of marriage because they, well, enjoy having sex was not a part of the narrative.

In sermons and blog posts, pastors give examples of men committing idolatry by looking at pornography, and women committing idolatry by desiring romance, flagrantly ignoring the number of women who suffer from porn addictions.

To evangelicals, there is no real difference between looking at porn and having a porn addiction. They’re one and the same.

Also, I well remember that whole lecture on how men are drawn to porn and women are drawn to romance novels, which are the female version of porn. It didn’t help that I really liked romance novels. Ah well, I assuaged my guilt by only reading Christian romance novels.

Christians remain uncomfortable with the idea of women possessing sexual desire. Even as they talk about the ideal Christian woman being a steamy hot wife willing to fulfill her husband’s every desire by not depriving him once married, we don’t want to imagine the wife’s own libido.

The doublespeak here—that women are supposed to be simultaneously sexually adventurous, available, and willing yet without possessing lust themselves—is an impossible contradiction to embody. It treats sex as a man’s playing field, reinforcing the notion that women should cater to men’s desires without possessing similar desires of their own.

What drives me nuts about this article is that in parts like these it makes absolutely crucial points. This double speak is indeed a serious problem, and the Christian steamy hot wife ideal is so full of problems I don’t even know where to start. But . . .

To fully address female masturbation, we don’t need more psychoanalysis about sex that implicitly negates female sexuality. We need a biblical approach that recognizes both the immense pleasure of the female orgasm and the inherent goodness of sexual desire while reserving its proper place for within marriage.

We need a strategy that recognizes the sin of lust and calls it by its name, rather than pretending that women have no agency beyond reacting to environmental stressors or psychological difficulties. We must treat lust like other sins—not a way we act out as a consequence of other problems in our lives—but as a sin requiring us to learn the discipline of self-control that we must master if we ever hope to be the women God made us to be.

And, well, that’s about that.

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

Purity

masturbation

sex

Previous Post

April 29, 2014

Awesome Comment Award: "I Am Angry"

Next Post

April 30, 2014 Crosspost: What "Christian Patriarchy" Is Not

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who became David's closest friend, even though he was Saul's son?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Shimei Abner Ish-bosheth Jonathan