Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Love, Joy, Feminism

CTBHHM: Wives, Cover for Your Husbands

Last updated on: March 13, 2014 at 11:07 pm   by Libby Anne

CTBHHM: Wives, Cover for Your Husbands 2014-03-13T23:07:27-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Created To Be His Help Meet, pp. 214—215

This week we begin Debi’s chapter on being “Good,” which is the next character trait listed in Titus :4-5.

The Crown

“A virtuous woman is a crown to her husband: but she that maketh ashamed is as rottenness in his bones” (Proverbs 12:4).

A good woman is a crown to her husband. She can make a mediocre man be as honored as one wearing a crown.

This is a really good summary of this passage. The entire point is that by being “good” the woman can bring her husband honor—she can be a “crown” to her husband. How? By enabling him and covering for him. Debi offers three examples.

A good woman might be married to a man who is lazy or just does not make much money. Yet because she is a wise shopper and does not waste her time or their money foolishly by eating out or indulging in expensive entertainment, and because she is a keeper at home, she makes his “little money” go a long way. As a result, he appears wiser and wealthier than he really is and is looked upon with honor because of it.

Note that Debi doesn’t suggest that a woman whose husband is lazy or has a poorly paying job should get a job of her own. Debi has previously made it clear that she is against women, or at least mothers, working outside of the home. But note, too, the reason Debi says a woman should so carefully stretch her husband’s money—so that he appears wiser and wealthier than he really is. He. Basically, Debi is saying that a woman with a layabout husband or a husband who doesn’t make much money should cover for her husband, so that nobody knows.

A good woman may be married to a man who is not an attentive father or a patient child trainer. Yet a good wife never shows dishonor to him, and she trains the children to be obedient and resourceful. When people see their children, they assume that the father must be a good man to have such fine children.

And again, a woman is to cover for her husband—not to ensure that the children grow up well but rather to ensure that everyone will assume her husband is a good father when he isn’t.

A good woman could be married to a man who is a poor example of a father and husband. He may be selfish and self-centered, possibly not even honest, yet because she is submissive and honoring toward him, he treats her with kindness. People look at their relationship and think he must be a good man since he has a good woman and because they seem to be happy together.

I’m thinking that a selfish and self-centered husband and a submissive and honoring wife is a bad combination. The wife is set up to let the husband walk all over her. Her quiet submission is enabling him. What a selfish and self-centered husband needs is for his wife to stand up to him and not buckle under. Either he will correct his patterns, or they will split up.

And here, once again, Debi is asking for the wife to cover for her husband, so that people think he’s something he’s not. Is a bad man being seen as a good man a good idea? Bill Gothard was seen as a good man for decades, and that put him in the position to molest countless girls and young women. Sure, there’s quite the step from “selfish and self-centered” to pedophile, but seeing someone as good when they’re not is definitely a commonality there.

By now you are likely saying, “Why should she carry the load and make a lazy, impatient, selfish man look good?”

Why yes, yes I am wondering that!

Why should she not?

Hmm, let’s see. There’s the fact that that’s not fair. There’s also the fact that making a lazy, impatient, selfish man look good is a deception, and is dangerous, because then people may come to trust or rely on that man in a way they would not if they knew who he was. There’s also the fact that this is enabling, and ensuring that they do not have any reason to change. What lazy, impatient, selfish men generally need is for someone to stand up to them and say that that is not okay. So actually, covering for them and making them look good when they’re not is worse not only for those around them but also for lazy, impatient, selfish men themselves.

But somehow I don’t think Debi was expecting an actual answer.

By being a crown to her husband, she is raising children who will rise up and call her blessed. By the time they are teens, they will know their dad is something much less than he should be, but they will honor him because of the example of their mother.

I have spoken with enough individuals with submissive mothers and selfish, manipulative, abusive fathers to know that this is completely false. Generally, children with such parents are grateful when the mother finally says *enough—*and those whose mothers never say this are often resentful, or else end up viewing their mother with pity.

And what about the risk that a child with such parents will grow up to repeat such patterns? What about the chance that a son will see his father’s selfishness as normal, and repeat that pattern? What about the chance that he will walk in his father’s footsteps and be a bad husband and a bad father? What about the chance that a daughter will learn from her mother’s example and simply roll over if she finds herself in an abusive or unhealthy relationship?

Also, is it a really good idea to give honor when there is nothing to merit giving honor?

By being a crown to her husband, she is winning his love and appreciation, thus she gets treated much better than if she stood against him.

Woah, woah, woah. Back right up there. Just what kind of worse treatment are we talking about here? Because when it comes to men who are abusive or manipulative, “she was asking for it” is a very common defense, even for physical abuse. If she just hadn’t been so XYZ, I never would have hit her! This idea that a man will treat a woman badly if she stands up to him, but will treat her with love and appreciation if she is submissive and covers for his faults . . . this is not healthy. This is also not true for men who have healthy relationship skills.

And, by being a prudent woman in how she uses the meager funds given to her, she is gaining a comfortable place to raise her family.

Exactly what does Debi mean by “comfortable”? If a man is unemployed and refuses to get work, even pinching pennies isn’t going to result in “comfortable.”

In the final analysis, she is doing exactly what God says will cause her husband to come to God.

This is a constant theme for Debi, this idea that if a woman is perfectly submissive that will cause her husband to wonder what she has that he doesn’t and through her example find God. In a few chapters, Debi will tell a story of a woman who submitted to her husband in all things even when she did not want to and was so kind and sweet that he was eventually saved. That story stands out to me because the thing that is hard for that woman about submitting is that her husband requires her to perform oral sex on him even though doing so is repulsive to her because he was extremely unclean and never bathed. And yet, she submits, and as a result of years of sacrifice, her husband comes to Jesus. It’s hard to describe how horrific I find this.

And most of all, she is bringing honor to God by fulfilling her calling as a help meet.

Well of course—women’s role is as appendages to men.

In the end, people who know her will know the truth.

If that’s so then what’s the point of covering for your husband in the first place?

I am really disturbed by this passage. I’m trying to figure out precisely why it is so disturbing to me. I think a lot of it has to do with this expectation that women should cover for their husbands’ shortcomings while their husbands take all of the credit. That isn’t just not fair, it’s downright deceptive, bad for everyone involved, and even dangerous.

Uncategorized

Created to Be His Help Meet

Previous Post



March 13, 2014

CTNAHM: Understanding Your Woman's Motivation

Next Post



March 15, 2014 CTNAHM: What Saith the Scriptures? (Yes, it's THOSE Scriptures)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian group practices foot washing as an ordinance?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Methodists Catholics Baptists Anabaptists

Related posts from Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

CTBHHM: Blessings and Vessels

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

CTBHHM: "I Am His Water"

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

CTBHHM: Why Was Marian's Husband So Loving?

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

CTBHHM: A Young Wife Should Be "Bored and...

Love, Joy, Feminism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious

Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself

Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...

Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians

I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...

Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process

Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....

To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others

The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....

Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow

The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...

view all Nonreligious blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube