Patrick Henry College: Claims to be Anti-Quiverfull, Invites Quiverfull Speaker

Last updated on: February 25, 2014 at 11:17 pm by Libby Anne

Patrick Henry College: Claims to be Anti-Quiverfull, Invites Quiverfull Speaker 2014-02-25T23:17:00-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Patrick Henry College released a statement after the New Republic article on its mishandling of sexual assault cases (which I wrote about here). To my knowledge, this statement was released only to alumni and students, though it may have also been released more generally. You can read it here. The statement was read aloud during morning chapel, and was met with applause. What I found most interesting about this response, in line with what I discussed last week, was this bit:

Some readers have wondered if the overall aim of the article is to associate PHC with a set of anti-women attitudes that we do not hold, and to insinuate that we are connected with outside movements that we positively reject (like the “Quiverfull/Christian Patriarchy Movement”). This philosophy, incorrectly attributed in the article to Dr. Michael Farris, Chancellor, espouses that college is inappropriate for Christians in general, and especially women. As his own life at PHC and with his own children reflect, Chancellor Farris has never agreed with such an offensive philosophy.

As I have noted, this is a really strange definition of quiverfull (you can read how I have defined quiverfull in this blog post from several years ago). Quiverfull only means being convicted by God to give up birth control and and let God control your fertility. It is generally accompanied by the belief that children are always a blessing from God and a conviction of the importance of raising up a new generation dedicated to God. Whether they use the term or not, Farris and his wife Vickie are in fact quiverfull. They have never been shy about their conviction to reject birth control, their belief that children are always a blessing from God, or their conviction of the importance of raising up a new generation dedicated to God.

This idea that if you believe women should attend college you’re not quiverfull or patriarchal is simply bizarre. I know plenty of quiverfull families who also sent their daughters to college. Also, sending your daughter to college doesn’t mean you’re not patriarchal. I know this one from first hand experience here! And as for Farris, he believes wives should obey their husbands absolutely, and that daughters should be raised with the understanding that they should be full time mothers when they grow up. This idea that if you believe women should attend college you’re not quiverfull or patriarchal strikes me as Farris’s blatant attempt to define himself out of a term that has fallen into disrepute.

But I don’t really want to rehash that. What I want to focus on is Patrick Henry College’s open rejection of quiverfull and patriarchy ideology (or at least, open to alumni and current students). The reason I want to focus on it is that it rings more than a little bit hollow in the light of this semester’s Faith & Reason lecture. The semiannual Faith & Reason lectures are designed to showcase quality Christian thought and stimulate students’ intellectual thought. Last semester Stephen Baskerville spoke. This semester’s lecture, which occurred four days after the New Republic lecture and three days after the college’s response, was given by Allan Carlson.

Carlson’s lecture was titled the The Marriage Crisis in America: Historical Roots. Just what did Carlson say were the roots of the marriage crisis? The legalization and cultural acceptance of birth control. Yes, that’s right.

This is the Allan Carlson who makes his living preaching the evils of birth control and openly praising and endorsing quiverfull by name. Carlson was featured as an expert on the subject in The Birth Control Movie, a two-part virulent anti—birth control documentary promoted by the now defunct Vision Forum.

In The Birth Control Movie, Carlson appeared alongside Kevin Swanson, Geoffrey Botkin, Doug Wilson, and R. C. Sproul Jr. In other words, Carlson is deep into the most extreme wings of the quiverfull movement and has close ties and a warm relationship with individuals who would self identify as part of the “Quiverfull/Christian Patriarchy Movement,” men like Kevin Swanson and Doug Phillips. The Allan Carlson who rejects the notion of marital rape, and wants to see that part of the law scrubbed. Yes, that Allan Carlson.

I have heard that there was quite the row during the Q&A section of Carlson’s Faith & Reason lecture. It seems that Carlson’s statements were so extreme that some of the students and even a few of the faculty openly called him out. What I want to know is why a university that supposedly so categorically rejects the quiverfull ideology would invite Carlson to speak, as a representative of sound Christian thought, in the first place. The Faith & Reason lecture is not designed to bring in diverse viewpoints so that students can hear divergent or contrary perspectives but rather to showcase the best in Christian thought.

If Michael Farris and the administration of Patrick Henry College have decided to reject the ideology of quiverfull and patriarchy, I applaud them. But—and this is a big but—actions speak louder than words.

Patriarchy

Quiverfull

Michael Farris

Patrick Henry College

Previous Post

February 24, 2014

Bobby's Trains and Confirmation Bias

Next Post

February 26, 2014 CTNAHM: Psychic Michael Knows All

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How long were the Jews in Babylonian captivity?

Select your answer to see how you score.

50 years 70 years 60 years 80 years