Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Love, Joy, Feminism

Thank God I’m Not an Asshole

Last updated on: October 8, 2013 at 1:57 pm   by Libby Anne

Thank God I’m Not an Asshole 2013-10-08T13:57:35-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The title of this post—“thank God I’m not an asshole”—was the first thing that came to my mind upon seeing this image:

Ken Ham believes that atheists will face eternal torture after they die. When I read his words—“thank God you’re wrong”—what I hear is “thank God you’re destined for eternal torture! Haha, SUCKER!”

Here is how Ken Ham explained the new billboards:

We decided on this billboard campaign that will last a month, with a cordial and engaging message: “To All Our Atheist Friends: Thank God You’re Wrong.” We trust this billboard campaign will give many of you an opportunity to witness to people—to proclaim the truth of God’s Word and the gospel. Here is why we chose the wording we did for the billboards:

  1. First of all, we are not angry at the atheists at all—we are burdened for them as people who will be lost for eternity, unless they receive the free gift of salvation. We want them to know that Christians love them as humans made in the image of God—but sinners in need of salvation.
  2. These atheists should thank God that they can receive the free gift of salvation and be saved for eternity. Yes, they need to thank God they have been wrong and turn to the truth.
  3. Those of us who have received the free gift of salvation and are truly born again as the Bible teaches can thank God the atheists are wrong—we thank God for our salvation and look forward to an eternity with our Creator and Savior.

I think of the verse that says, “if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved” (Romans 10:9).

Here’s the thing: If atheists are right and there is no God, atheists are not destined for eternal torture at all, just natural death. But if atheists are wrong and Ken Ham’s God exists, atheists are destined for eternal torture after death. Ken Ham seems to be suggesting that atheists should be glad they’re wrong because even though they’re destined for eternal torture if they don’t change their views they have the chance to be saved through the gospel and avoid eternal torture. The thing is, if atheists are right there’s no eternal torture to be avoided in the first place.

Imagine that someone told you that the island you live on is alive and is going to sink into the sea at any moment, drowning everyone on it, but that if you decide to worship the island you will personally be spared from that destruction. Naturally, you don’t believe the person who tells you this, and you tell him it’s just regular island and reminding him that there have been no forewarnings or signs of any sort of structural unsoundness or impending collapse. Of course, you don’t mind him worshipping the island if that’s what he wants to do, but it would sure get annoying if he were to go around saying “I’m so glad you’re wrong. Aren’t you glad you’re wrong? Isn’t it great that you’re wrong!” Um, sorry, but no.

Finally, Ken Ham seems to think that these billboards are a way to open dialogue with atheists. They’re not. They’re the equivalent of slamming the door in our faces, and then laughing. You don’t start a dialogue by telling someone they’re wrong. You start a dialogue by being willing to listen! Also, “cordial and engaging”? Ha!

Personally, I prefer the “There’s a God out there who loves you, wouldn’t you like to get to know him?” approach. It may get annoying, but it’s not mean. This is mean.

Atheism

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

Ken Ham

Previous Post



October 8, 2013

Be Still My Heart: Crushes and Guy-Girl Friendships

Next Post



October 8, 2013 CTNAHM: How Michael Turns Debi On


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the correct chronological order of Paul's travels mentioned in his letters to the Corinthians?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Macedonia, Corinth, Jerusalem, Asia Jerusalem, Macedonia, Corinth, Asia Corinth, Jerusalem, Macedonia, Asia Asia, Jerusalem, Corinth, Macedonia

Related posts from Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Maybe Let's Not Read More Puritans

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Feminists, Repent!

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

"So Your Problem with Christianity is the Jesus...

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

No, the "Second Shift" Isn't Feminism's Fault

Love, Joy, Feminism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious

Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself

Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...

Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians

I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...

Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process

Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....

To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others

The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....

Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow

The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...

view all Nonreligious blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube