David Barton’s The Jefferson Lies pulled by publisher

Last updated on: August 10, 2012 at 12:23 pm by Libby Anne

David Barton’s The Jefferson Lies pulled by publisher 2012-08-10T12:23:40-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I wasn’t going to write about this but I think I need to. I was raised on David Barton’s historical revisionism, studying from his books and reading his literature. Barton argues that mainstream historians have it wrong, and that the founders really were all devout evangelical Christians who intended to found a Christian nation. In a move reminiscent of creationism, Barton essentially argues that mainstream historians are engaged in a cover up, but that he can give you the real story.

Well, Christian publisher Thomas Nelson has just discontinued publishing Barton’s latest book, The Jefferson Lies, amidst concerns about accuracy raised by conservative evangelical World Magazine. Yes you read that right – Barton is finally being called out by his own side. He’s just that sloppy! Basically, it’s simply becoming increasingly obvious to all that he lies, twists the truth, and makes up quotes. Because, well, that’s what he does.

Here are some links:

David Barton’s Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Career

The Most Influential Evangelist You’ve Never Heard Of

Thomas Nelson Pulls David Barton’s The Jefferson Lies

I’ve written about Barton before, and the main point I made was this:

By now you may be wondering, why should I care? I mean, people are free to say and believe as they like! Well yes, but the problem is that Barton doesn’t just think these things, he’s spreading his propaganda with surprising alacrity. For one thing, many homeschooled students, like I myself, are today being raised on Barton’s twisted version of American history. But it’s not just homeschooled students.

…

Believe it or not, Barton was called up as a historical expert at the most recent Texas State Board of Education social studies standards revision. Texas is very important in the textbook market with its large number of children, and its standards therefore exert a lot of control over the textbooks of the nation. And Barton had a very real influence on those standards.

But it’s even more than that. All of the leading Republican contenders for presidential nominee have cited Barton as a historical expert, and as someone who has had a lot of influence on their thinking. When Barton talks, Republican presidential candidateslisten and believe. This would be less scary if Barton wasn’t calling the separation of church and state bullshit.

I want to leave you with these links and finish by making three points.

First, documents aren’t everything. Barton likes to go on and on about how he has all these original documents, and what they say isn’t what historians say, and on and on. Well, leaving aside the lying and making up quotes part, doing history is more than simply having a lockbox of original documents – or as we call them, primary sources. There’s a reason historians train for a decade in order to get their Ph.D.s – something Barton never did. Historians employ methods and use theoretical frameworks. You can’t simply read a document and think you suddenly understand it all. There are things like context, for instance! Put simply: Barton has no idea what a historian actually does.

Second, let me offer an example to illustrate my first point. Barton and others like him like to argue that the founding fathers were basically exactly what evangelicals are today when it comes to religion. This is simply not true. Even colonial and revolutionary evangelical Christians were not the same as evangelical Christians today. Religion changes as culture changes and people’s needs and daily lives change. Which beliefs are emphasized and which are not changes – and sometimes beliefs fall out of fashion altogether. For crying out loud, evangelicals in the colonial and revolutionary era didn’t believe in the rapture because, well, that belief hadn’t been invented yet! Their conception of the end times was nothing like evangelicals’ current conception. And the differences go on and on. Reading current evangelicals into the past is silly, and pretending religion has never changed is silly.

Third and finally, I think it’s important to remember that people like Barton will never fall completely out of fashion – because they have an audience. As long as there is a substantial population that wants to believe our country was founded with the intent of having a Christian government and political system, or that our founding fathers were all identical to modern evangelicals, there will be an audience for books like The Jefferson Lies – and, relatedly, for organizations like Vision Forum which advocate returning to an imaginary idyllic Christian past. On some level, facts can only do so much. People like my parents will go on buying books like The Jefferson Lies. They believe it all, facts be damned, because they want to believe. And we can’t change that.

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

Previous Post

August 10, 2012

Worthwhile Reads: Feminism, "Love," and Kidnapping

Next Post

August 11, 2012 Theology 101: Divine Revelation and Spiritual Headship

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the first king anointed by Samuel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Saul David Solomon Jonathan