Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Love, Joy, Feminism

A Clarification Part 2: Things I Do Have A Problem With

Last updated on: March 20, 2012 at 10:04 pm   by Libby Anne

A Clarification Part 2: Things I Do Have A Problem With 2012-03-20T22:04:43-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Last week, the article I wrote for Butterflies and Wheels (My Life as a Daughter of Christian Patriarchy) was posted on the news site Alternet. I received a lot of comments from horrified individuals who had never heard of Christian Patriarchy, but I also received a number of comments like the one below:

I was very disheartened as I read this post. In some ways, my family would fit under her headings of Patriarchy and Quiverfull. We are followers of Jesus, my wife has chosen to work at home, we homeschool our 5 kids, and would love to have more. It was ironic listening to the author’s disapproval over the way she feels people in this movement demonize secularists, environmentalists, humanists, etc – because I feel the same disapproval at being painted with the same broad brush. I would argue that narrow-mindedness, domineering husbands, and oppressed wives are no more common within families of faith than without.

I also think that it’s important to note that the degree to which my family qualifies as Patriarchal or Quiverfull is the result of careful consideration, not lifelong brainwashing. My wife and I are first generation followers of Jesus, both college educated, from an arts background, considered the liberal tree-buggers of our church. We don’t fit any of the rather bleak characterizations the author lays out. While I certainly wouldn’t argue the painful reality of the author’s personal journey, I must strongly contest her broad indictment. Shouldn’t it be recognized that some parents genuinely delight in many children, that some mothers freely choose to invest their lives in their families, that the overwhelming majority of homeschooling families aren’t remotely cult-like?

I actually find it kind of strange when people read what I have to say and then respond by saying that they have a large family and stay at home mom, they homeschool and they’re Christians, and they’re not anything like what I’m saying, so I’m somehow wrong. Look, if you don’t follow the teachings of Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull, then I didn’t write it about you! Sometimes I wonder if what I’ve said hits too close to the mark, but I don’t want to assume that because I know that there really are families with all of these characterizations that do just fine. These sorts of comments were actually what prompted me to write my Things I Don’t Have a Problem With post, but I thought I’d respond to this issue again here, since it keeps coming up.

The author is right that there are plenty of couples who choose to have a large number of kids (which in this context usually means five or so), mutually decide for the wife to stay at home, and homeschool and thrive in it. Their kids are happy and well adjusted, with lots of friends and activities. The parents are energetic and fun loving and the kids love having numerous siblings. The parents work hard to have individual time with each child and seek each kid as an individual. I also don’t have a problem with “families of faith,” as the author seems to assert. I understand the appeal of religion, and church can serve as a family style community center complete with youth group and mothers’ day out programs. I get that.

In fact, in many ways, this all describes my family. My childhood was really fairly carefree and happy. My mother was college educated and chose to stay at home, and they originally choose homeschooling for practical, not religious, reasons. I really enjoyed the evangelical church we attended when I was a child, and all the programs it offered. Furthermore, my parents had a large family because they wanted a large family. They loved having lots of kids, and they always seemed to have energy for a game or a new adventure. If this had been the extent of it, I wouldn’t have any critiques to offer, because this part was truly wonderful.

The problem wasn’t my mom being a homemaker, the large family, the homeschooling, or the fact that my parents were Christians. It was when the other beliefs crept in – the Christian Patriarchy/Quiverfull beliefs – that the problems took root. And that – THAT – is why I speak out. Without the beliefs of Christian Patriarchy/Quiverfull, there really would have been no problem at all with my childhood and coming of age. In fact, a large part of why I write is to warn parents like this commenter of pitfalls to avoid, of things not to do.  

So to state it again: I don’t have a problem with women who choose to stay at home, couples that have five or more children in order to shower them with love and make life a daily adventure, those who choose to homeschool, and those who raise their children in the Christian tradition. I really don’t.  I have to wonder if I really wrote that article so poorly that this is what comes across. I know I’d write it slightly differently if I had it to do over again, including a clarification simply to avoid this misunderstanding.

Let me clarify the problems I was actually trying to point to in my article. These are all problems that are introduced directly by the various teachings of Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull, NOT by choosing homemaking, having a large family, homeschooling, or raising children in the faith.

 

The problem is with the beliefs of Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull – that women are always to be under male authority (which includes obedience), that women’s place is in the home and not outside of it, and that parents must raise of armies of soldiers for Christ – not with homemaking, large families, homeschooling, or Christianity in general. And I guess I should have made that more clear in my article.

Also, in case anyone missed it, I did write an article breaking down the relationship between Christian Patriarchy/Quiverfull and the homeschool movement. I am more than aware that they are not identical, and that there are plenty of homeschoolers who have nothing to do with the Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull movements.

Patriarchy

Quiverfull

Previous Post



September 18, 2011

The Stay At Home Daughters: A Dream Greater Than Stardom?

Next Post



September 19, 2011 Vision Forum Quick Takes


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was a "phylactery," criticized by Jesus in Matthew 23?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A small box with Scripture A robe A lamp A fishing net

Related posts from Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

"So Your Problem with Christianity is the Jesus...

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

The "Man Code"

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Lindsey Graham: There Is Only a Place for...

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

The Federalist Uses Amy Coney Barrett's Nomination to...

Love, Joy, Feminism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious

Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself

Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...

Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians

I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...

Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process

Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....

To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others

The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....

Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow

The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...

view all Nonreligious blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube