Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Love is an Orientation

Mind Your Words — They Have Meaning

Last updated on: September 23, 2013 at 8:51 am   by Andrew Marin

Mind Your Words — They Have Meaning 2013-09-23T08:51:23-05:00 Andrew Marin

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The following post is by Trista L. Carr, Psy.D., is a Clinical Psychologist for a State Prison in the Central Valley of CA, a consultant for individuals and organizations, and a conference speaker. She completed her doctorate in clinical psychology at Regent University in Virginia Beach, VA, where she was a research assistant for the Institute for the Study of Sexual Identity. She obtained an M.A. degree in Community Counseling from The University of Akron in Ohio. Her research and clinical interests are in the integration of Christian faith, psychology, and sexual identity concerns. She can be found at http://www.tristacarr.com.

Recently, the wonderfully thoughtful Brent Bailey wrote a great piece for The Marin Foundation about the differences between transparency and vulnerability; two words with subtle yet meaningful differences. He is not alone in using these words synonymously. I, like Brent, conflate these and many other important and extremely similar words. This is a challenge for me, and others who are trying to bridge cultures and paradigms.

As individuals trying to be peacemakers or bridge builders, we need to be mindful of our words and their impact. We need to be aware of the weight of our words and the unintended meaning some words carry. It is not uncommon for people in positions of authority to make well-intentioned speeches only to find their hearers completely offended, or worse harmed, by the choice of words used to communicate the message.

For instance, I was recently turned off to a journal article in a scholarly publication in which the authors spoke of “homosexuals.” It made it difficult for me to hear the research findings without judgment because the authors utilized a term that has so much negative baggage when used as a noun instead of an adjective (which, by the way, is why scholars are advised in the APA Style Manual against using the word homosexual as a noun when writing psychology literature).

Yes, I’ll admit this particular incident reveals a pet peeve of mine, but I hope it also illustrates my point:

Words carry baggage and various meanings given their usage.

It is because of that baggage and meaning that words can harm people far more than sticks and stones ever can.

Two words, in addition to transparency and vulnerability, that get thrown around a lot in difficult dialogues are acceptance and tolerance. Acceptance and tolerance are very similar to transparency and vulnerability in that they too are often used synonymously. However, these two words are also very different from the other two in that acceptance and tolerance are often touted as having extremely different meanings.

To put it more simply, some people use acceptance and tolerance interchangeably whereas other people are quick to explain to you the vast differences between them.

I am someone who likes to not only know how words are used in everyday language and scholarly writing, but also how they have been used in Scripture. So please bear with me for a second while I do a quick Biblical word study:

The word accept is used in the Bible (NIV) 77 times. Of those, only three times is its intent anything other than to receive something. The one instance in the Old Testament where accept is used in conjunction with a person, its meaning is to take delight in, to be favored or esteemed. The other two occurrences—in Romans—refer to welcoming a person into your fellowship. Otherwise, to accept simply means to receive a thing.  Acceptance is found twice, meaning approval of trustworthy sayings; it never once refers to a person.

The word “tolerate” is used very rarely in the NIV Bible—only 6 times. Some of its meanings are to allow or keep, to look at, to carry or bear up, and to permit. Half of those instances refer to different or wicked people; the other three times tolerate is used, it is in reference to allowing or putting up with wrongdoing. Tolerance is only found once in all the Scriptures, and it means forbearance; it’s used as a character quality like patience.

You might see here some vast differences between these two words as used in Scripture. At the same time, there are some similarities. For one, neither word is used all that frequently. Additionally, more often than not, neither word is necessarily used in the same context in Scripture as we tend to use them in the gay-Christian debate. We are typically using these two words strictly in relation to accepting or tolerating people who are different from us but not necessarily evil people.

Let’s look now to typical dictionary definitions. To accept means to consent to receiving something or come to recognize an opinion or explanation as valid. Tolerate means to allow the existence or practice of something that one does not necessarily like or agree with, without interference. Interestingly, within the clarifications of the main definitions for each of the words, the other is used as a synonym.

I think these two words and their uses make it challenging for people to hear each other at times. Because there is this dialectic between the words—sometimes we use them synonymously and other times feel they are diametrically opposed to one another—we often run into problems when we use them in bridge building.

In my work within the gay community and Christian circles I find two common phenomena:

1. Some conservatively religious individuals will say things like, “I accept you as you are.” What they typically mean is: “I will tolerate you as long as you act and believe the way I want you to act and believe.”

2. Some sexual minorities will say things like, “I want you to accept me for who I am.” They really mean: “I want you to love me without conditions or restrictions. I want you to validate my experience. I am not something evil to be tolerated.”

Keep in mind these are common themes; as always, there are exceptions to the rule. But I think you can see how people in both camps can use the same word and mean something very different.

This desire for “acceptance” that we have as humans is much deeper and grander than mere tolerance. It is a deep desire to be fully known and fully loved…

What if we committed to being more descriptive in our speech? What would happen if we become more specific in what we say?

For instance, what if we move away from saying, “I accept you for who you are”?
And, we replace it with things like: “I love you unconditionally,” or “I want you to know the unwavering love of God deep in your heart,” or “You don’t have to do anything to earn God’s love, or my love for that matter,” or even “Your experience is valid.”

We can also move away from, “I want you to just accept me for who I am.”
Instead, we can be more specific and say: “I want you to take the time to get to know me without judgment,” or “I want you love me without exceptions,” or “I would like for you to fight against the things that hurt me and celebrate the things that bring me great joy,” or even “I want to be validated.”

When these types of descriptive statements and requests are made, the conversation is no longer about acceptance or tolerance, but becomes instead about being fully known, loved, respected, honored, and valued regardless of belief systems. If all sides of the gay-Christian debate would be descriptive and use less value-laden or judgment-prone vocabulary, we might find ourselves being able to speak the same language.

And, when we speak the same language we are in a much better place to hear the hearts of those with whom we are trying to relate. And isn’t that what we all want…for our hearts to be heard and not judged?

It is amazing what the right words—most effective, nonjudgmental, descriptive, life-giving words—can mean to another’s heart.

We all need to do a better job of minding our words. Words have meaning and they create the basis for relationship. What kind of relationships do you want to create with your words? Healthy, productive, life-giving relationships? Then, please, let us all mind our words.

Guest Posts

Language

Previous Post



September 20, 2013

God Loves Uganda -- and you're invited (to our private screening)

Next Post



September 25, 2013 How Are Churches Walking With Those Pursuing Celibacy?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Bridging Opposing Worldviews Culture Don't Drink and Drive Faith Guest Posts I'm Sorry Campaign Interviews Language Laura Statesir LGBT Living in the Tension Living in the Tension Gatherings Love Is an Orientation Love Is an Orientation Blog Love Is an Orientation Book Love Is an Orientation DVD Melinda Guerra Memory My One Sentence Bible Newsletter Our Last Option Parents & Families Politics Quick Quotes Quotes ReEngaging Civility Sexuality Speaking The Marin Foundation Theology Uncategorized Us Versus Us Videos Warren Perry Youth and Campus Ministry

Select a Month June 2016 May 2016 December 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Commanded to go to Nineveh, I fled in the opposite direction on a ship to Tarshish. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Hosea Elijah Jonah Jeremiah

Related posts from Love is an Orientation

Evangelical

Don't Let Your Anger Turn Into Their Hate

Love is an Orientation

Evangelical

He Knows Their Name: The Mom of a...

Love is an Orientation

Evangelical

On Body Image

Love is an Orientation

Evangelical

Bi the Way :: Some Helpful Tips for...

Love is an Orientation

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube