One Nation Under God, or Under Something at Least

Last updated on: June 29, 2018 at 5:10 am by Jack Hartjes

One Nation Under God, or Under Something at Least 2018-06-29T05:10:19-06:00 Jack Hartjes

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

American flag with sun shining through The Fourth of July, the celebration of our nation’s independence, is near. I have been thinking about what makes America great – and what does not. I argue here that the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance are a much better clue to that greatness then the loud cries of “America first,” which one hears in the politics of today.

The phrase “under God” was added to the Pledge of Allegiance in 1954. With the rise of atheism and the “nones,” that phrase has become controversial. I hadn’t formed a definite opinion on the issue, but I couldn’t help sympathizing with the atheists. Why should they be required to show their patriotism by paying tribute to a deity that they don’t believe in? But now that “America first” has become a rallying cry for a divisive and even mean spirit in American politics, I’ve begun to like “under God” better. It says, as our fouding documents say, we believe in something other than ourselves. America needs to be under something.

I would like a little honesty here. Contrary to what one hears, there are no politicians or significant group of ordinary Americans who put any other country ahead of America. In American politics there has never been an America-second movement, and there isn’t one today. So what does “America first” really mean? If it’s saying anything at all, I’m afraid it’s something like this quote that I found:

To be nationalist is to be always ready to give up any doctrine, any theory, any ideology, feelings, passions, ideals, and values, as soon as they appear as incompatible with the supreme loyalty which is due to the Nation above everything else. … There is no place, nor should there be, nor could there be place for nationalism as a simple instrument to another purpose that transcends it.

That statement by a Brazilian general is quoted by Walter Wink (The Powers that Be: Theology for a New Millennium, p. 58.) Compared to rhetoric of the “America first” kind, it’s more explicit but otherwise not much different. What else can “America first” mean when it comes with policies that:

cut already slim foreign development assistance budgets,
reduce to a fraction an already meager quota of refugees fleeing from the results of our own misconceived policies in the Middle East,
separate children from their parents as a deterrent,
take the country with historically the heaviest carbon footprint out of an international agreement to limit global-warming gases,
excuse ourselves from multi-national economic agreements in favor of bilateral negotiations, where we are always the strongest,
in short, place the selfish and short-term interests of America (really only the richest part of America) above much of what the Bible teaches.

You know something is wrong when athletes are called a traitors for reminding us what is wrong in our country during the National Anthem. “They’re not putting America first.” Of course not! There is something higher and deserving of greater loyalty. What transcendent purpose is served by labeling and punishing these conscientious Americans? This is nationalism just like the Brazilian general’s. It knows no higher purpose.

I have sympathized with my friends, both atheist and Christian, who believe the words “under God” should be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance. Now I’m being pushed back to liking “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance. But there’s one caution: We have to be serious about “under.” There has to be something that we are under, or “God” is just Ourselves with a capital letter and we become gods in our own eyes.

Wouldn’t being under something or other, something real in its own way, be just about the right place for a person or a country even if there were no god such as religious people believe? If so, then we should give it a name. Perhaps the name “God,” which has always served a variety of meanings, might symbolize that something even for an atheist – at least until a better word can be found.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 27, 2018

Four Amazing Women in the Genealogy of Jesus

Next Post

July 2, 2018 The Problem of Biblical Violence, Part One

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Christmas Amazon Synod Angels Being Consumed Bible Catholic Modern Creed Ecology Economics Elizabeth Johnson Eucharist Fragments and Filaments Gender and Sex Gospel of Mark Herzog Historical Jesus Liturgy Luke Opening Scriptures on Way to Emmaus Ordinary radicals Parables Pro-Life Reincarnation Rosary Sacraments science Social Justice Souls Stories of Jesus The Creed Torture and Eucharist Tracy Uncategorized War and Peace

Select a Month October 2026 June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 November 2024 July 2024 March 2024 December 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz