Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Looking Closer

Home
Religious Music & Entertainment
C.S. Lewis explains.

C.S. Lewis explains.

Last updated on: October 7, 2012 at 4:14 pm by Jeffrey Overstreet

C.S. Lewis explains. 2012-10-07T16:14:15-06:00 Jeffrey Overstreet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

C.S. LEWIS:

What we want is not more little books about Christianity, but more little books by Christians on other subjects — with their Christianity latent.

And that’s why so many of the most important, insightful, imaginative Christians who write will never be published so long as they look to Christian publishing houses.

I’ve talked to plenty of writers who have submitted their best work to Christian publishers only to have it sent back, not because it wasn’t good enough, but because they thought it should be “more Christian.”

Many Christian publishing houses want a big fat stamp on the book cover that says “CHRISTIAN.” Doing this may give them some kind of sales advantage, but it’s guaranteed to scare away many of the readers who need those writers most. Further, they will discourage writers from writing about many of the most important matters, because the best writers won’t be interested in giving their work a makeover to appear more “religious.”

And, to make matters worse, a lot of Christian readers refuse to show interest in books that don’t bear that big fat “Christian” stamp… and so they miss out on much of the wisdom that would help them grow in Christ.

Take this quote from Oscar Wilde… and tweak it slightly. Let’s replace “The public” with “Christians”:

[Christians] have always, and in every age, been badly brought up. They are continually asking Art to be [“Christian”], to please their want of taste, to flatter their absurd vanity, to tell them what they have been told before, to show them what they ought to be tired of seeing, to amuse them when they feel heavy after eating too much, and to distract their thoughts when they are wearied of their own stupidity.

Think about it: Most Christian publishers would never have published Jesus’ parables, because those stories don’t come with an obvious Christian message in them. They weren’t religious stories. They weren’t terribly entertaining. They didn’t simplify the world into “Us vs. Them.” They didn’t puff up the egos of the listeners, and point to another group of people as The Problem. They didn’t promise that life would be full of happiness if you believed the right things. Jesus’ stories confused his listeners and drove them into conversation and interpretation. They were mysterious. They broke down barriers between people, instead of strengthening them. They made people insecure.

I am so grateful for WaterBrook Press. I write the stories I feel inspired to write, and I don’t feel any pressure to compromise them with any obvious “Christian message.” I can let the story become what it wants to become, and I can enjoy the surprise. But I don’t take this for granted. And I have no assurances that what I write tomorrow won’t be sent back to me with this request: “We need you to make it more Christian.”

So my adventures in publishing may be short-lived indeed. But better that than pumping out more of what those readers want to hear.

I’m not claiming to have any great insights, but I know what I don’t want to do: Write “Christian fiction” with “Christian messages” that are safe and comfortable for “Christian readers.” Every time a blogger describes my stories as “Christian fiction,” I know that I’ve just lost more readers, and the stories have less chance to make a difference. All I want to do is tell a good story that will cause readers to wrestle with questions that matter.

Let’s ask T.S. Eliot:

[T]he last thing I would wish for would be the existence of two literatures, one for Christian consumption and the other for the pagan world. What I believe to be incumbent upon all Christians is the duty of maintaining consciously certain standards and criteria of criticism over and above those applied by the rest of the world; and that by these criteria and standards everything that we read must be tested.

And finally: If we define “Christian books” as books that reflect the Truth with beauty and excellence, than it follows many “Christian books” are written all the time by writers who are not Christians and who would be offended at the implication. It also follows that many books written by Christians fall short of the qualifier “Christian books.” But, if we define “Christian books” as “books written by Christians”, then many Christian books are horribly misleading, ugly, and a royal waste of time.

I’m grateful that I’ve been given a chance to write a story that rings true to me, and that I haven’t been asked to simplify it or distort it for the sake of making Christians, or any other audience, happy. I wish that kind of experience for other imaginative writers.

Journal

"Christian" is a Bad Adjective

WaterBrook Multnomah Press

Previous Post

April 5, 2010

An Artist in Crisis

Next Post

April 8, 2010 It was twenty years ago today...

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog Bloggers on "Through a Screen Darkly" Browser Coming Soon Endorsements Fiction Books Film Forum Film Reviews Inspirations Interviews Journal Kindlings Muse Movie buzz Music Reviews Non-Fiction Books radio Reviewers on "Through a Screen Darkly" The Auralia Thread Through a Screen Darkly Through a Screen Darkly - Bonus Materials Top 10 (or 20 or 100) lists Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 July 2003 May 2003 March 2003 September 1999

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Jeremiah was known as the weeping prophet.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE