Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Looking Closer

A Few Thoughts on the Loss of Jackson and Fawcett

Last updated on: April 3, 2013 at 1:10 pm   by Jeffrey Overstreet

A Few Thoughts on the Loss of Jackson and Fawcett 2013-04-03T13:10:20-06:00 Jeffrey Overstreet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday, I felt a strange urge to give calls of concern to the other giants of my childhood.

I don’t have anything profound to say about either of the superstars that we lost. Neither were particularly inspiring for me personally, even though they did loom large on the landscape of my childhood. I haven’t watched a flicker of television coverage, and I’m trying to avoid the hype. So I’ll just mark the day with a few words about what the news called to my mind.

It interesting: In the community where I grew up, both Farrah Fawcett and Michael Jackson were discussed as icons of Satan’s work in the secular world. When I was a kid, I responded with fear and suspicion to images of Jackson… because I was taught in Sunday school that rock music was of the devil. I responded with feelings of contempt when I saw images of Fawcett, because I’d been given the impression that anyone who put up posters of pretty girls was basically selling their soul to the red guy with the pitchfork.

By the time I was a teenager, Fawcett was already an icon of another era. But Jackson was huge. I became conflicted about what I had been “told” to think about Jackson’s music, and the fact that I found it irresistibly funky. Jackson was popular with the “rebellious” kids in my conservative Christian school, and “Beat It” and “Thriller” were huge. Me, I loved “Billy Jean” best; it was so irresistibly funky. But I didn’t dare admit it to anyone around me, especially myself. And when I thought about the lyrics, I felt guilty for even listening. So I made up alternate lyrics that I could sing, to drown out the actual lyrics.

In my late teens, I had begun to see through the fears of my community, and began to realize there was nothing wrong with loving exciting music. But by then, my interest in Jackson’s music had dwindled. That’s because there was an authenticity to his early recordings that was exciting, an authenticity that vanished after Thriller. The songs became Statements, Shows of Defensiveness, Rants, and Self-Important (But Shallow) Anthems about saving the world. His music became secondary to his persona. He moved into reactionary mode.

And who could blame him? He was suffering in the spotlight we forced on him at every turn. The conversation shifted to concerns and sensationalized gossip about his childhood, his interests, his habits. We were making it impossible for him to grow and develop with the freedom and the relationships that are essential. We sentenced him to something like solitary confinement in a crowd. And he responded by grasping – however inappropriately or perversely – for that time when he knew a more innocent existence, when he was surrounded by kindred spirits, young brothers and young sisters.

So he loved E.T. Not Elliott, mind you, but the alien. (The only Jackson album I owned as a teenager was an LP of Jackson narrating the story of Spielberg’s extra-terrestrial.)

Isn’t it interesting? Jackson was moved by the story of a gentle character

Meanwhile, Jackson’s recordings began to feel calculated and over-produced. They no longer sparked that (yes, here comes this week’s most overused word) electrifying feeling of seeing someone supremely talented caught up in the moment of inspiration. It seemed his wealth allowed him to insulate himself from the fans–which was probably a good thing. But the wealth also cut him off from sources that might have brought real help for his reported troubles.

I cannot imagine what that was like for him. But for me, he became a metaphor, and so did his worshipful fans – representing so many wrong turns and cultural diseases.

Somewhere, some of those dismissive people from the community where I grew up are probably saying “I told you so.”

But no, I don’t think what has happened fulfills any dark prophecies regarding Jackson’s music. It wasn’t rock and roll that did this to him. He was a supremely talented pop musician and performer and innovator. At his best, he reminded us of the power of the imagination. He revolutionized pop by combining influences and styles in a way that brought disparate audiences together in appreciation of a fuller vision. And for a while, his performances were a celebratory fusion of arts.

I confess, I know next-to-nothing about Fawcett’s life. She all but vanished from my pop-culture radar in the 80s and 90s, and I refuse to educate myself with the idol-worship tributes going on right now. Maybe I’ll learn her story later. But I am very grateful for her small, unglamorous, and affecting performance in a film about faith and human nature that moves me deeply every time I see it: Robert Duvall’s The Apostle.

May God have mercy on them both, and grant them peace.

I’m going to continue to ignore the onslaught of press on Jackson, but friends have recommended these four pages, and I have found them well worth reading, in part because they remind me of the human being concealed by so many layers and barriers… some he made himself, and some we constructed for him. These articles cultivate more compassion and understanding, rather than throwing fuel on the fires of hype, hero-worship, mockery, and condemnation:

Blog

Farrah Fawcett

Michael Jackson

Obituaries

Previous Post



June 26, 2009

What a Story.

Next Post



July 5, 2009 Browser: A 4th of July surprise. Wilco loves you, baby. Jarmusch. Bono & the Virgin. Salinger. And the scariest video ever posted online.


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog Bloggers on "Through a Screen Darkly" Browser Coming Soon Endorsements Fiction Books Film Forum Film Reviews Inspirations Interviews Journal Kindlings Muse Movie buzz Music Reviews Non-Fiction Books radio Reviewers on "Through a Screen Darkly" The Auralia Thread Through a Screen Darkly Through a Screen Darkly - Bonus Materials Top 10 (or 20 or 100) lists Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 July 2003 May 2003 March 2003 September 1999


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: David committed adultery with Bathsheba and arranged for her husband Uriah to be killed.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Related posts from Looking Closer

Entertainment

This Is Not Goodbye. But It is... See...

Looking Closer

Entertainment

Mourn With Those Who Mourn

Looking Closer

Entertainment

What Specialists Are Saying About Jurassic World

Looking Closer

Entertainment

Torres and the Influence of David Bazan and...

Looking Closer

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Religious Music & Entertainment

"Les Diabolique" and Transgression

  Alongside something like Arrival, Vertigo, or Charade, Les Diaboliques is a...

"The Plague Dogs" and Mortality

So, flashback to the late 70s, early 80s. Walt Disney Studios is...

Movies Are Our Modern Myths

With the recent and highly successful release of Christopher Nolan’s epic film,...

"L'avventura" and Human Weakness

Today's piece is going to be a little different for a few...

Writer's Block in Tough Times

I first want to apologize for not posting or writing anything.  I'm...

Jerome

I've engaged in the multi-year project of reading through the Church Fathers,...

view all Religious Music & Entertainment blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube