Catherine Hardwicke Won’t Direct the “Twilight” Sequel. Thank Goodness.

Last updated on: March 19, 2013 at 11:51 am by Jeffrey Overstreet

Catherine Hardwicke Won’t Direct the “Twilight” Sequel. Thank Goodness. 2013-03-19T11:51:41-06:00 Jeffrey Overstreet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I can’t help but feel sad at the news that Catherine Hardwicke’s been fired from directing the next installment of the Twilight franchise.

I disliked Twilight for a long, long list of reasons, and I’ll have to be paid well to bother seeing the sequel. But it’s not often that a female director scores a box office hit like this, and shouldn’t the studio show her some respect for giving them this year’s surprise blockbuster?

Having said that, while I feel bad for Hardwicke, I also think it’s probably for the best. Hardwicke proved herself a talented director with her debut film–Thirteen. Since then, she’s been attached to projects that did not suit the strengths she demonstrated in her first outing.

She clearly sought to bring some realism to The Nativity Story, and that was the best thing about the film. But the story of the Virgin’s pregnancy, the heavenly host, the star in the east, and the Christ Child in the manger should be a pageant that inspires awe, wonder, and hope… and that movie did not. It felt trapped between “gritty” authenticity and Hallmark-card imagery.

Twilight was a silly, forgettable project to begin with. Sure, Stephenie Myer’s story appeals to almost everybody one level: It appeals to our desire to be told that we’re special. Who doesn’t want to discover that, for their flaws, they might still be loved and cherished by someone extraordinary?

But Myer’s particular version of that fundamental fairy tale is grossly distorted. It gave Hardwicke very little chance of turning those two hours into anything more than adolescent wish-fulfillment, reinforcing the insecurities of awkward adolescents. (I’m grateful for Laura Miller’s article at Salon for shedding so much light on the Myer phenomenon. I’m also grateful for Steven D. Greydanus’s insightful examination, and Gina R. Dalfonzo’s piece in The National Review. And check out “How Twilight is Destroying America and Harming Our Nation’s Youth“, over at /FILM.)

It gave her an unremarkable paranormal romance with a maddening “heroine.” But wait… is Bella really a heroine? What does Bella ever do?

Imagine a revised Pride and Prejudice: This time Mr. Darcy chooses to pursue a girl who’s both sensationally glamorous and completely incapable of taking care of herself. He decides that she’s better than them all, but we see absolutely no evidence of why… unless we’re to assume that being hot has everything to do with being special. (Let’s face it: Bella is clearly the hottest girl in the school, but she’s just going to feel mopey and awkward and sorry for herself unless the school’s hottest boy validates her existence by desiring her above all else in the world.)

And this Mr. Darcy… he’s a Prince Charming who sucks blood from rodents and slaughters deer for nourishment. (Thank goodness, we never have to face that reality onscreen.) Moreover, in spite of living for hundreds of years, Edward’s stuck in a case of arrested development, adolescent emotionalism, and bad boy antics.

Just imagine if Mr. Darcy had decided to enable the heroine’s weaknesses by making all her decisions for her, taking her away from her family, and plunging her into moral danger. Imagine if he remained unconcerned about her obsession with him. Edward doesn’t do anything to help Bella grow and gain confidence. He just delivers her from one peril after another… perils that she never worried about before selling her soul to his reckless, self-absorbed pretty boy.

Meanwhile, all of those much more interesting characters in the background… characters who learn to cope, who take risks, who reach out to each other… they’re nowhere near as sexy, and ultimately they’re just not as special either. In this movie’s aesthetic, the couple that looks most like a Gap commercial are the pair who most deserve our sympathy and support — and Gap Boy saves Gap Girl by declaring her the hottest of them all. This film actually affirms that it’s not half-bad to yearn for the company of the coolest clique in school, and that if they accept you, life will be so much more exciting than it is for all of those boring, unfashionable classmates.

Now, if Edward and Bella became the villains in the sequel, I’d suddenly be a big fan.

But I’ve strayed from the point… which was this: Why waste Catherine Hardwicke’s talents on this?

The realism of Thirteen seemed like a perfect fit for Hardwicke. I completely believed in the relationship between Holly Hunter and Evan Rachel Wood in that film. That was a movie that blazed with emotion and authenticity. And it might have even served as a meaningful challenge to mothers and daughters, encouraging them make better choices and forge stronger relationships.

Previous Post

December 5, 2008

Roger Ebert's favorite films of 2008.

Next Post

December 9, 2008 Browser: Gerard Manley Hopkins & Paul Mariani; A moratoriaum on Holocaust films?; Plus, U2, Katherine Heigl, Keanu and more 2008 Film Awards

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog Bloggers on "Through a Screen Darkly" Browser Coming Soon Endorsements Fiction Books Film Forum Film Reviews Inspirations Interviews Journal Kindlings Muse Movie buzz Music Reviews Non-Fiction Books radio Reviewers on "Through a Screen Darkly" The Auralia Thread Through a Screen Darkly Through a Screen Darkly - Bonus Materials Top 10 (or 20 or 100) lists Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 July 2003 May 2003 March 2003 September 1999

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book of the Bible has a talking tree?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Genesis Proverbs Judges Ezekiel