Atanarjuat – The Fast Runner (2001)

Last updated on: December 11, 2008 at 9:23 pm by Jeffrey Overstreet

Atanarjuat – The Fast Runner (2001) 2008-12-11T21:23:19-07:00 Jeffrey Overstreet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A review by Jeffrey Overstreet.

●

Director – Zacharias Kunuk; writer – by Paul Apak Angilirq; in Inuktitut, with English subtitles; director of photography – Norman Cohn; editors – Zacharias Kunuk, Norman Cohn and Marie-Christine Sarda; music – Chris Crilly; art director – James Ungalaaq; producers – Paul Apak Angilirq, Norman Cohn and Zacharias Kunuk. Starring – Natar Ungalaaq (Atanarjuat), Sylvia Ivalu (Atuat), Peter-Henry Arnatsiaq (Oki) Lucy Tulugarjuk (Puja), Madeline Ivalu (Panikpak), Pauloosie Qulitalik (Qulitalik), Eugene Ipkarnak (Sauri) and Pakkak Innukshuk (Amaqjuaq). Lot 47 Films. 172 minutes.

●

Atanarjuat takes you to a place you’ve never been, but its dramatic story has the timelessness of an Old Testament tale. The cast will convince you that they are genuine Inuit natives that have spent their lives in igloos north of the Arctic Circle. The primitive sets, the landscapes, and the portrayal of a culture without electricity or contact with the rest of the world… these things will almost convince you that the crew traveled back in time to film this epic before the arrival of Europeans in the frozen north.

It’s a story full of life-and-death struggles, tragedy, and triumph. But perhaps the most affecting detail about the film is this: The screenwriter and co-producer of the film, Paul Apal Angilirq, never saw his movie finished. He died of cancer in 1999. He would become a Genie Award-winner (that’s a Canadian Oscar, basically).

Here’s the story:

A long time ago, in the Arctic territory far far away, a great adventure took place. An evil spirit goes to work, creating dissension and jealousy for power within a small clan of the Inuit people. This leads to the death of the local chief, Kumaglak. His killer, Sauri, overcomes his only challenger, Tulimaq, for control of the tribe. Many years later, Tulimaq’s sons are the tribe’s best hunters. Amaqjuaq is famous for his strength. Atanarjuat is famous for his speed on the ice. Sauri’s son, Oki, is jealous of the brothers’ talents. And when Atanarjuat falls in love with the woman Oki wants to marry, violence ensues.

Soon, Atanarjuat is running for his life, without a dog sled, without weapons, and yes, without any clothes. You’re not likely to see anything more memorable this year than Atanarjuat running naked across the snow, ice, and through freezing shallows, while those who seek to kill him pursue dressed in seal-skins and wielding spears.

As I said, it is rather like a Bible story. Like David running from his enemies, Atanarjuat must go into hiding and wait for the powers he believes in to tell him when it is time to return. Meanwhile, back home, Oki’s evil continues, wreaking havoc on the lives of the beautiful Atuat, Atanarjuat’s wife, and then even his own family. As happens so often in the Bible, the villain does not need a hero to rise and overthrow him. He is done in by his own evil. It is clear as Oki commits one crime after another, he is walking towards his own doom.

Without giving away too much, I must say this: Atanarjuat‘s storyteller is braver than most American cinematic storytellers. Why? Most Americans would have the events lead to the crowd-pleasing act of revenge, and that would be the end. This movie leads us to the inevitable confrontation, the final showdown between Atanarjuat and Oki. But what transpires is at once more surprising and at the same time more profound and inspiring.

I cannot offer high enough praise to the cast, who are completely convincing as ancient Inuit people suriving in the wind-blown snow. The crew traveled to Nunavut, and the whole story is told in the Inuktitut language. And while I was reminded me of the Eskimo cultures glimpsed in Map of the Human Heart, no film I can remember has so thoroughly immersed us in such an ancient culture. In doing so, director Zacharias Kunuk gives us a broader understanding of the rich diversity of cultures that have lived on the North American Continent.

He also shows us that no matter how people live, no matter where, they demonstrate the same inclination towards belief in God, the same apprehension of evil spirits at work, and the same intuition that the power of love and forgiveness are humankind’s highest calling.

I am of two minds about the film’s only off-putting quality… it’s 172-minute running time. The patience with which the filmmakers tell their story, and the attention paid to every small detail of the Unuit life, gives us an experience that is an education as well as entertainment. But at the same time, the length of the film, the drawn out exchanges between characters, and the insistence on documentary-style footage even in filming the story’s heights of tension… these things made me feel more like an interested spectator more than a breathless listener in the presence of a master storyteller. A bolder editor might have drawn our emotions more into play.

But that is a small wrinkle in an otherwise phenomenal experience. It’s no surprise that Kunuk won the Camera d’Or award (best first-time filmmaker) at the 2001 Cannes Film Festival.

There are so many scenes that I will never forget. There is a ritual fight scene in which two opponents take turns striking each other each other’s temples. This long, slow exchange was more painfully effective than most boxing scenes I’ve seen on the big screen.

There are also many questions that will lead to rewarding discussions after viewing. Can we, after seeing this, understand better why in some cultures polygamy was accepted? Surely in a place where many children were needed in order to get the work done for the survival of the tribe, it makes sense why a man might take two wives. At the same time, surely we can see the essentiality of forgiveness, when a duel to the death might endanger a tribe by robbing it of a valuable worker. We can also consider the wastefulness of our own culture, and just how much we take for granted, when we see the Inuit using every piece of the animals they hunt down.

You may find Atanarjuat to be an overlong movie. You may have trouble keeping the characters straight in your head, because so many of them look alike. But I guarantee you that in six months, you will remember vividly some of this film’s marvelous scenes.

And please see this movie in a theatre. It is so bright with sunlight and snow, many small and important details will be invisible on a television screen. These landscapes, faces, and displays of light are awe-inspiring and intricately detailed. Would you want to skip a visit to see the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel just because later you could look at it in a textbook?

Film Reviews

Previous Post

December 11, 2008

Army of Shadows (1969)

Next Post

December 11, 2008 Atlantis: The Lost Empire (2001)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog Bloggers on "Through a Screen Darkly" Browser Coming Soon Endorsements Fiction Books Film Forum Film Reviews Inspirations Interviews Journal Kindlings Muse Movie buzz Music Reviews Non-Fiction Books radio Reviewers on "Through a Screen Darkly" The Auralia Thread Through a Screen Darkly Through a Screen Darkly - Bonus Materials Top 10 (or 20 or 100) lists Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 July 2003 May 2003 March 2003 September 1999

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "We do not know what to do, but our eyes are on you"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Joshua Hezekiah Jehoshaphat