Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Looking Closer

Home
Religious Music & Entertainment
Film Critic Pet Peeves: “Stranger Than Fiction” Edition

Film Critic Pet Peeves: “Stranger Than Fiction” Edition

Last updated on: January 26, 2013 at 3:45 pm by Jeffrey Overstreet

Film Critic Pet Peeves: “Stranger Than Fiction” Edition 2013-01-26T15:45:11-07:00 Jeffrey Overstreet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

From a Christian film review of Stranger Than Fiction:

It is a shame that a film based around such a clever idea couldn’t have been slightly altered to make an otherwise interesting story more palatable for families. Hollywood continues to add in offensive elements that serve no real purpose to the plot in spite of proof that films that are family friendly will appeal to wider audiences. And that is truly stranger than fiction.

Three thoughts in response to this conclusion:

1.
“It is a shame that a film based around such a clever idea couldn’t have been slightly altered to make an otherwise interesting story more palatable for families.”

Why?

Why is it a shame that a film about grownups behaving the way grownups do couldn’t be altered to make it more palatable for families?

The filmmakers could have told a story for children, but no, they were telling a story that they hoped would appeal to grownups. They wanted to move and inspire adults who might have lost touch with what is important in their lives. So, they let their adult characters behave like many adults do. I consider it a strength of the film that it told a whimsical story to grownups, who should be able to deal with the way the film portrays some adult misbehavior.

Is it a shame that Shakespeare didn’t dumb down Hamlet or King Lear so second-graders could enjoy it? Stranger than Fiction isn’t Shakespeare, but it is a comedy for discerning adults. And that’s not a bad thing.

There is an attitude amongst many Christians that good movies are all family-friendly. Would they prefer bookstores and libraries that contain only children’s books?

Is it a shame that The Bible wasn’t revised to be more palatable for families? Should we shake our heads in disappointment that they decided to leave Ezekiel’s 23rd chapter in there, or Song of Solomon, or the rather graphic descriptions of Ehud’s endeavors with a knife?

“Hollywood continues to add in offensive elements that serve no real purpose to the plot…”

On what does this critic base her claim that someone “added in” some “offensive elements”?

What I saw in the film was a bunch of grownups with some of the rough edges that grownups often demonstrate. They cuss occasionally. They make some rash decisions. A guy sleeps with his girlfriend. People do this all the time. And the autenticity of the adults’ behavior only added to the film’s sense of relevance for grownup viewers. It looked like a story that relates to the messed up world grownups live in.

(It turns out the critic was offended by glimpses of a few male backsides in a scene that “included” them because, well, it was pretty funny.)

Movies are stories told by people who live in this messed-up world. They reflect some messed-up ideas and messed-up behavior. “The world speaks of the holy in the only language it knows, and that is a worldly language,” says Frederick Buechner.

These “elements” are parts of life that people see when they look around them. They may or may not agree with Christians as to whether or not these things are grave errors or sinful. But who are we to require that storytellers cut out anything that might offend us? The Bible itself reflects all kinds of misbehavior, even in its God-fearing heroes.

Should we wish that The Bible’s storytellers hadn’t “added in” all of that talke about murder, foul talk, sexual misbehavior, thievery, blasphemy, etc. etc. etc.?

Why did the writer of Ezekiel 23 have to “add in” all of that talk about whores, testicles, and semen?

“Hollywood continues to add in offensive elements … in spite of proof that films that are family friendly will appeal to wider audiences.”

Should all filmmakers strive to make family-friendly films just because family-friendly films will appeal to wider audiences? Should an artist’s chief goal be to reach the largest audience that he can? Should box office success be the primary aim of anybody?

Since when do Christians preach that entertainers should make choices based on what will earn the most money?

There’s proof that pornography is a lucrative business as well. Should entertainers let that influence their decisions?

Blog

Family movies

Stranger Than Fiction

Previous Post

November 26, 2006

Film Critic Pet Peeves: "The Fountain" Edition

Next Post

November 26, 2006 Quick Looks: "Casino Royale," "The Double Life of Veronique," "Catch a Fire"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog Bloggers on "Through a Screen Darkly" Browser Coming Soon Endorsements Fiction Books Film Forum Film Reviews Inspirations Interviews Journal Kindlings Muse Movie buzz Music Reviews Non-Fiction Books radio Reviewers on "Through a Screen Darkly" The Auralia Thread Through a Screen Darkly Through a Screen Darkly - Bonus Materials Top 10 (or 20 or 100) lists Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 July 2003 May 2003 March 2003 September 1999

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which giant Philistine did David defeat with a sling and a stone?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ishbi-Benob Og Agag Goliath