As always, a wide range of responses…

Last updated on: September 14, 2012 at 11:27 am by Jeffrey Overstreet

As always, a wide range of responses… 2012-09-14T11:27:13-06:00 Jeffrey Overstreet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

CT Movies has updated its feedback page, and there are some interesting responses to the Kingdom of Heaven coverage.

There are also the typically varied displays of enthusiasm and protest over reviews of Kicking and Screaming, Monster-in-Law, and Crash...

posted 05/23/05
Regarding Kicking and Screaming, I must object to one aspect of your review that, at some level, shows a lack of respect for male sexuality. Your review mentions (with great tolerance) the crude jokes concerning male genitalia. Would you have been equally tolerant if the movie had been infused with crude jokes about female genitalia? Moreover, there are several scenes where boys are hit hard in the groin with soccer balls for the sake of “humor.” Similarly, a man is hit hard several times with a tetherball in the groin for the sake of “humor.” Are these kinds of “jokes” consistent with Christian values? Would you have similar tolerance for “comic” scenes where women/girls are sexually injured? I think not.
Doug Wells

posted 05/23/05
In your review of Monster-in-Law, your Family Corner section mentions premarital sex, gay relationships, multiple marriages, etc., as things “for parents to consider.” But shouldn’t this section be a warning to Christians of all ages and not just children? Shouldn’t we guard ourselves against these things and not just guard our children? I would prefer that the “For Parents to Consider” section be called “For Christians to Consider, “because what we consider unsuitable for our children is also what God considers unsuitable for his children.
Karen Workman

posted 05/23/05
I’m very impressed with your reviews; they’re insightful, informed and well-written. As a Christian college student who enjoys seeing and analyzing films for their artistic and cultural merit, I really appreciate your even-handed treatment, particularly of Crash. So many Christian reviews come from an overly moralistic perspective that often completely misunderstands the film they are addressing. I was struck by your awareness that while some films should be only seen by adults, their use of explicit content is at times appropriate. That is something that is missing from the Christian understanding of art and culture, and many kudos to you guys for breaking the mold.
David Sessions

Of course, Workman’s letter begs the question–God communicates that it’s unsuitable for Christians to behave in these ways, but does that mean it’s unsuitable for Christians to pay attention to stories in which these behaviors take place? If so, we’d better throw out the Bible, which is full of unsuitable behavior.

I doubt we’ll ever eradicate from Christian circles the narrow-minded idea that art should reflect only the world they want to see, rather than the world they live in. But at least things have changed, and now Christian film criticism is moving deeper into art interpretation and farther from reactionary alarm-sounding.

Having said that, I’m not sure I’m comfortable saying “Monster-in-Law” and “art” in the same blog post.

Journal

CT Movies

Reader Mail

Previous Post

May 23, 2005

PG, PG-13, or R?

Next Post

May 23, 2005 Today's specials: Bono corrects Chicago reporter. Summertime fiction. And the man playing Orbison.

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog Bloggers on "Through a Screen Darkly" Browser Coming Soon Endorsements Fiction Books Film Forum Film Reviews Inspirations Interviews Journal Kindlings Muse Movie buzz Music Reviews Non-Fiction Books radio Reviewers on "Through a Screen Darkly" The Auralia Thread Through a Screen Darkly Through a Screen Darkly - Bonus Materials Top 10 (or 20 or 100) lists Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 July 2003 May 2003 March 2003 September 1999

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the wife of Isaac?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Rachel Sarah Leah Rebekah