Should Christian Critics Be Applauding Certain Oscar Contenders?

Last updated on: August 25, 2012 at 12:02 pm by Jeffrey Overstreet

Should Christian Critics Be Applauding Certain Oscar Contenders? 2012-08-25T12:02:47-06:00 Jeffrey Overstreet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

UPDATE: Okay, I admit, I posted a somewhat reactionary entry earlier after reading Barbara Nicolosi’s post about the Oscars today at Church of the Masses. I’m a big Barbara Nicolosi fan, even though I don’t always agree with her, and today’s post just rubbed me the wrong way. So, to make up for my disrespect to Barbara, I’m going to re-word this post, since Barbara’s been gracious enough to clarify…

–

Act One screenwriting guru and blogger Barbara Nicolosi is on the attack today, criticized some of the Christian film reviewers who are to be found guilty of applauding certain Oscar contenders this year. The headline of her post was– “Sinning Against the Holy Spirit,” a reaction to the almost-total Oscar-snub of The Passion of the Christ.

I think the Gospel is the Greatest Story Ever Told. Yes, I do. I swear. But I’ve gotta be honest: I found some truly worthwhile things in those films.

I found value, real value, in The Aviator. I thought the film was guilty of celebrating Howard Hughes’ vanity, yes. But it was also a troubling portrait of a man with out-of-control compulsions, who ran roughshod over those around him. It was hard not to wonder if some of his ailments came from his own reckless lifestyle. “Dreaming the impossible dream” may be the way many pursue happiness, but clearly, it does not always lead to happiness.

I’m not recommending Closer, but as a story written by someone clearly familiar with extreme wickedness in the politics of relationships, it felt to me like an effort to face reality, to show the crap for what it was, to call liars “liars,” and to expose the disease in the hearts of the people involved. It didn’t find many answers, but as an ugly expose on the *problem,* it had some merit.

Vera Drake? I didn’t think it was advocating abortion so much as portraying the conflicted life of an abortionist… What is more, the abortionist was portrayed as a woman of misguided compassion, whose oversimplification of the issues led her to the disgrace of her family. The woman seemed incapable of having a coherent thought. She was all emotion, and that led to rash action.

The movie also had an absolutely charming, unlikely romance in one of its subplot that had little or nothing to do with the abortion-oriented plot. That subplot suggests that it’s not abortion that Leigh’s really concerned with here… it’s the way we can connect with one another through our mutual wounds and sufferings.

Million Dollar Baby: I also am in the minorty on this one, thinking it’s not advocating criminal behavior or sinful behavior, but rather showing us the life of a man who loses faith in God, and who makes a decision that–while celebrated by the narrator–clearly leads to the devastation of his conscience and the loss of all his hopes. I have a hard time understanding how someone could see that film and come away wanting to do what Eastwood’s character did. This film gives us a *wonderful* opportunity to share an experience with other moviegoers and then discuss it with them afterward. It gives us a provocation to a conversation in which we stand up for life and defend it.

Sideways: A movie about fools that knows it’s about fools. And while those fools engage in some spectacularly misguided affairs and exploits, I appreciated the film’s gentle exploration of wine as a metaphor for life. Sure, Thomas Hayden Church’s character was reprehensible, but I thought the movie was pretty clear about that. There are a lot of lost, confused, self-absorbed people out their fumbling their way toward the truth, sometimes because they’ve made outrageous mistakes. I detected that subtle shift in this one. I’m still “ho-hum” on this film, and it’s not even in my Top Twenty. But I don’t think it’s an abomination.

I can’t LIE and say that I thought Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ was a spectacular work of art. It was a powerful film… yes… but rather simplistic and heavy-handed in its imagery. I don’t need a long, lingering shot of maggots on a donkey corpse to make me feel creeped out by Judas’s betrayal … for example. I did, however, love Maia Morgenstern’s performance, and wish she had been nominated. I just don’t feel it’s any grievous blow to Oscar’s credibility that they didn’t nominate Gibson’s film with more acknowledgments. In each particular category, I think there were films that fulfilled the category better. Just because a poem is about Jesus doesn’t make it a GREAT poem.

Oscar rarely has much of a clue anyway. This year, they showed far more discernment than usual. Four nominations for The Incredibles? Much love for Eternal Sunshine and Finding Neverland? Fantastic cinematography choices, including THREE foreign films?! They’re learning a few lessons, slowly… but they’re learning them.

The Passion of the Christ

Previous Post

January 25, 2005

Rolling Stone rolls over -- takes Bible ad.

Next Post

January 27, 2005 Over the Rhine - Drunkard's Prayer - March 29 - Tour!!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog Bloggers on "Through a Screen Darkly" Browser Coming Soon Endorsements Fiction Books Film Forum Film Reviews Inspirations Interviews Journal Kindlings Muse Movie buzz Music Reviews Non-Fiction Books radio Reviewers on "Through a Screen Darkly" The Auralia Thread Through a Screen Darkly Through a Screen Darkly - Bonus Materials Top 10 (or 20 or 100) lists Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 July 2003 May 2003 March 2003 September 1999

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I am the power of God that brings salvation to everyone who believes. Paul was not ashamed of me. What am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The cross God's word The gospel Faith