Does God Choose the President of the United States?

Last updated on: July 25, 2019 at 5:40 pm by Bruce Epperly

Does God Choose the President of the United States? 2019-07-25T17:40:28-04:00 Bruce Epperly

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Several times this week, I’ve seen Facebook posts or shared articles asserting that God chose Donald Trump as our president and implying that challenging Trump either on policy or character goes against God’s plan for the USA. In 2000 and 2004, I saw similar articles describing the divine anointing of George W. Bush as the USA president and asserting that opposition to “W” would be opposition to God. I’ve seen this mantra recited from conservative Christian leaders as well. Ironically, these messages were absent when Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton were running for president or during Barack Obama’s presidency. Whenever I see such post, I often respond, if I have a relationship to the person who’s responsible for the post, “does this mean that God chose Barack Obama to be president as well?” That seems to stop the conversation.

I believe identifying any president, including the presidency of Donald Trump, with God’s ordination is theologically as well as constitutionally problematic in a democratic nation.

Let me start with theology. Historically, Christian theologians have held one of two contrasting positions, albeit with various nuances. On the one hand, many theologians in the Augustinian-Calvinist tradition assert that divine providence is directly or indirectly responsible for everything that occurs from the fall of a leaf to an airplane crash. Our salvation is fully in the hands of God, who determines, at least in the Calvinist tradition, both the saved and damned. In relationship the Sovereign God, we have absolutely no role in our salvation. This view is problematic theologically, ethically, and politically. God appears to have no preferences ethically speaking and stands for what is, the current status quo, rather than what could be. God ordained, from this perspective, Hitler, Stalin, Assad, Kim, and Mao as well as Donald Trump and George W. Bush. God pushes the levers in the voting booth, we are mere instruments in God’s inscrutable plan. Yet, ironically, those who deny human agency in choosing a president, use a great deal of human agency to vilify those who oppose Trump and spent a lot of energy denigrating the presidency of Barack Obama, who according to their perspective must have been duly ordained by God. Yes, Trump is president, but what if God’s plan is Biden, Sanders, Warren, or Harris? Could we be going against God’s plan in supporting Trump for a second term?

On the other hand, the Pelagian-Arminian-Wesleyan-Process tradition – and I view Pelagius in a positive light – sees the world in terms of call and response. God calls to everyone, but the response – positive or negative – is in our hands. Grace is prior and embraces all, but grace awakens and purifies rather than denies human freedom. We live in a multi-factorial universe in which God’s will is one of many factors determining each event. Accordingly, the election of a president may involve divine action, but it also involves chance events, political opponents, the involvement of foreign powers, the quality of candidate’s campaign, financial resources, the political environment, the gullibility as well as wisdom of the populace, the actions of other public servants such as Jim Comey, as well as the weather on election day. From this perspective, God is no more responsible for the election of Trump or any other presidents than God is responsible for the occurrence of cancer, school shootings, or natural disasters. Every event, including the election of a president, is the result of many factors rather than just one, whether divine or human. This theology leads to a more democratic
and constitutional approach to government and challenges us to be actors and also to critique our leaders and their policies when they go against our understanding of God’s vision for humankind and the world.

Theologically, the divine ordination of rulers is often identified in practice with the status quo, authoritarianism, persecution of opponents, and absolution of any evil committed by political leaders. It places the present and future in God’s hands entirely, discouraging prophetic critique, political challenge, and higher aspirations toward a “more perfect” union.

The multi-factorial approach to divine-human relationships encourages, in contrast, acceptance of diverse positions, political challenge, and give and take between differing parties, based on the realities of human limitation and the diversity in how persons respond to God’s call. A multi-factorial approach to divine-human relationships and causation is more conducive to tolerance and
democracy that the coercive, deterministic, authoritarian vision of God.

Finally, to assume the divine election of presidents encourages passivity and obedience and suggests that God has already decided the outcome so why bother to get involved, except ironically to increase our power or wealth! Like the literal doctrine of the second coming, the divine ordination of rulers robs us of agency, when we need it most. God doesn’t need puppets, and our planetary survival and the survival of millions depends on our actions as well as God’s.

To leave the presidency in human as well as divine hands challenges us to be responsible agents, to question all authority, to discontentment with the status quo and injustice, and to aspire for a better world regardless of who is elected or serves as the USA president.

I am content knowing that God has not chosen the next president or her predecessor. This means that I can work with God to seek a more perfect union, advocate for public policies that reflect my understanding of God’s vision in a pluralistic society, and recognize even as advocate for particular candidates and policies that I “see in mirror dimly” and, accordingly, must not conflate my vision with God’s but always aspire for more wisdom, compassion, and insight.

(FN: Often cited, Romans 13:1 does not refer to a specific leader, but to government in general. Political leaders are part of the ordering of the community, but are, by definition, ambiguous, creating positive order but also imperfect in goal and execution. “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities; for there is no authority except from God, and those authorities that exist have been instituted by God.” This has to be seen in light of the whole library of scripture, including the critiques of governments by the prophets and the critique of Roman rulers found throughout Revelation. Scripture notes that God anoints certain rulers, David and Cyrus, but remains silent on the majority of rulers.)
+++
Bruce Epperly is a Cape Cod pastor, professor, and author of over 50 books, including “One World: The Lord’s Prayer from a Process Perspective,” “Ruth and Esther: Women of Agency and Adventure,” and “Become Fire: Guideposts for Interspiritual Pilgrims.”

Uncategorized

divine sovereignty

divine-human relationship

faith and politics

God and the presidential election

presidential election

Previous Post

July 23, 2019

“Challenge and Stay: A Prophetic Response to Xenophobia”

Next Post

July 24, 2019 The Adventurous Lectionary – The Eighth Sunday after Pentecost – August 4, 2019

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews The Adventurous Lectionary Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 December 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz