Biblical Terms for “Ritual”

Last updated on: April 27, 2016 at 12:00 am by Peter Leithart

Biblical Terms for “Ritual” 2016-04-27T00:00:00+06:00 Peter Leithart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

English Bibles rarely employ the words “ceremony,” “rite,” or “ritual” to translate biblical terms. The NASB, for example, uses the words “ritual” and “rite” in only three instances, all having to do with the Passover (Exodus 12:25-26; 13:5). The Authorized Version uses the word “ritual” only at Number 9:3. The NIV uses these terms in six passages (Genesis 50:11; Exodus 12:25-26; 13:5; Acts 21:24; Hebrews 9:21), and the Revised Standard Version five times (Exodus 12:24; Number 3:38; John 2:6; Hebrews 9:6, 23), as well as several times in the Apocrypha (Wisdom 12:4; 14:15; 3 Maccabees 6:36). In the New King James, these words appear with somewhat greater frequency, some 15 times in 12 verses (Numbers 9:3, 14; Deuteronomy 23:17; 2 Kings 17:26-40; 23:7; Jeremiah 34:5; Ezekiel 20:26; Hosea 4:14). Among English translations, they are used most frequently in the New Revised Standard Version: 22 uses, plus six in the Apocrypha. Surprisingly, none of the other translations uses these English words in Leviticus, but the NRSV does so thirteen times (Leviticus 6:9, 14, 25; 7:1, 7, 11, 37; 13:59; 14:2, 32, 54, 57; 15:32). Most of these translate torah, which the NASB gives the more usual rendering of “law.” It should be said that not all of these uses of “ritual” are felicitous. Leviticus 6-7 does not provide a full description of the sequences of actions for the various sacrifices, concentrating instead on proper disposal of the “leftovers.” The NASB’s broader and more literal translation of torah in these chapters is well-warranted.

Initially, the relative paucity of uses of “ritual” and “ceremony” in the English Bible seems odd. A great deal of the Pentateuch, after all, is concerned with what theologians call “ceremonial law,” what we would instinctively identify as “ritual” matters. It is possible that certain translations have been influenced by the anti-ritualist bias that characterizes much of modern Christianity, to the extent that even the term “ritual” is avoided. On the other hand, this peculiarity of English Bibles may accurately reflect the reality of the biblical picture of things. None of the Hebrew words translated with “ritual” or “ceremony” have the same range of meaning as our terms. To take the example cited in the previous paragraph, the Hebrew word torah is sometimes used in contexts where English speakers would tend to use the word “ritual.” But torah, of course, has a much broader connotation and usage. The same is true, as we shall see, of other biblical terms whose semantic fields overlap with that of our word “ritual.” While it is risky to infer too much out of lexical data, the lack of a specific biblical vocabulary of “ritual” raises the suspicion that the Bible does not isolate ritual as a distinct sort of activity in the way that we do. In anthropological theories of ritual, it is often assumed that ritual activities are symbolic and expressive forms of action, distinct from the functional and pragmatic activities of daily life. Almost by definition, “ritual” has come to mean “merely symbolic” or “non-functional.” The fact that the Bible does not employ a distinct vocabulary of ritual suggests that it assumes continuities between ritual and other types of activity that moderns find hard to grasp. The biblical evidence thus lends support to “deconstructive” or “genealogical” approaches to modern concepts of ritual.[1]

Recognition of the historically relative character of our notions of “ritual” does not mean, however, that we need to abandon use of the term altogether. “Ritual” names a set of practices that exists in the real world. The meal that the Church shares as eucharist is different from the common meals of the weak, and since we need some term to highlight this difference, there can hardly be objection to calling it a “ritual” meal. Indeed, rituals generally mark themselves off from other activities through appointment of times, and often through the use of special clothing or music.[2] To use the term is not necessarily to accept the biases that have constituted its current usage. Diligence must be exercised lest the terminology exert a kind of gravitational pull on theological formulation, lest the terminology function like railroad tracks that force theology to travel in prearranged directions — directions that, while familiar, often lead to dead ends. Indeed, one of the values of examining the biblical terminology of ritual is that its vocabulary, precisely because it is different, can free us from our own prejudices.[3]

Though the Bible has no distinct language of ritual, it does, especially in the Old Testament, have a rich variety of terms concerned with worship and ceremonies at the house of God. In addition to terms that name specific rites and actions (olah, mincha, terumah, tenupah, etc.), there are several that are used more generally, and thus approach the semantic field of the English word “ritual.” A study of these terms will suggest the contours of a biblical account of “ritual” activity. As noted above, none of these terms is confined to ceremonial contexts, and this study proceeds on the assumption that the meaning of these terms in ritual contexts can be illumined by an examination of their use in other contexts. As the few “secular” uses of cohen (“priest”) help us understand the nature of the Aaronic priesthood, so the non-liturgical uses of liturgical terms will help us understand the liturgical uses and the meaning of the actions that these terms describe.

Ordinance (choq; chuqqah).

These nouns are related to several other words. chaqah is used in the pual only three times in the Old Testament: in Ezekiel 8:10, the prophet “digs” or “scratches” through the wall of the temple in order to see its abominations; in 1 Kings 6:35, we are told that gold was overlaid on the cherubim, palm trees, and open flowers that were “engraved” on the temple walls; Ezekiel 23:14 uses the word to refer to the relief carvings of Chaldeans that incite Israel to lust. The verb is used only once in the hitpael, in Job 13:27, again with the connotation of “carve” or “scratch.”

A number of the uses of chaqaq have a similar meaning. It is used to describe hewing of a tomb (Isaiah 22:16) and inscribing words on a scroll (Isaiah 30:8), a book (Job 19:23), or the palms of God (Isaiah 49:16). Ezekiel scratched an image of Jerusalem on a brick (Ezekiel 4:1). The verb is used twice in Proverbs 8 to describe God’s activity in creation (vv. 27, 29). From these senses arises the meaning, “to decree” (Proverbs 8:15; 31:5; Isaiah 10:1). A “decree” is what has been “scratched” or “inscribed” as a permanent law. As as substantive, the word sometimes takes on the meaning of “leader” (Judges 5:9, 14; Isaiah 33:22), “sceptre” (Genesis 49:10; Numbers 21:18; Psalm 60:9), or “lawgiver” (Isaiah 33:22).

The noun choq is used in a few instances in the sense of “boundary,” perhaps in relation to the idea of lines or boundaries “scratched” or “carved.” Because of Israel’s lack of knowledge, Sheol opens his mouth without “limit” (Isaiah 5:14). The Lord’s promise through Micah is that Jerusalem’s boundaries will be extended (Micah 7:11). Job 38:10 describes the creation as a house-building project, in which the Lord bounded the sea with doors and bolts (cf. Proverbs 8:29). According to Jeremiah 5:22, the Lord established the sand as a boundary for the sea, keeping the sea within bounds. In context, Jeremiah is comparing Israel unfavorably with the sea: unlike the sea, Israel bursts all bounds in her rebellion (vv. 23-24). In this comparison, the boundary established by the sea evidently corresponds to the “boundaries” established by the laws and statutes of God. Thus, from the sense of “boundary,” choq sometimes has the connotation of “custom,” which guides behavior by placing limits on it. It became a choq for the daughters of Israel annually to commemorate the story of Jephthah’s daughter (Judges 11:39), David’s decision that those who kept the baggage should share the plunder with those who fought became a choq and a mishpat in Israel (1 Samuel 30:25).

The word can also take the somewhat stronger sense of “statute” or “decree.” Psalm 94:10 condemns kings who enact trouble by choq. We shall see below that in ceremonial contexts choq sometimes has the meaning of “assigned portion,” and even when the word means “statute” in a secular sense, it can refer specifically to a statute having to do with the apportionment of land (Genesis 47:26) or to a “production quota” (Exodus 5:13-14). God’s determinations are sometimes denoted by choq: In Psalm 2:7, the Lord grants the whole earth to His royal Son by decree (choq), the heavenly bodies have been established by God’s creative decree (Psalm 148:1-6), and the Lord’s decision to bring judgment on His unfaithful people is described as the birth of the choq (Zephaniah 2:2). Job acknowledges that God does all He pleases, and that He brings His decree to completion (Job 23:14). God’s revealed law is also characterized as choq, frequently in combination with mishpat (“judgment” or “statute”) or with mishpat and torah as a summary of the whole law (cf. Leviticus 26:46; Ezra 7:10; Psalm 79:7). This combination is especially prominent in Deuteronomy, where choq and mishpat are used, sometimes with other terms, to describe the teachings of Moses, which are contrasted with the “ten words” that were directly spoken and written by the Lord (Deueronomy 4:14; cf. Leviticus 10:11; Nehemiah 9:13-14).[4] The choqim revealed through Moses have no lesser authority than the words spoken directly by God to the people; Israel’s life depends on her adherence to the choqim and mishpatim (Deuteronomy 4:1), and even the choqim, though mediated through Moses, are “commanded” (tzwah, Numbers 30:17; 1 Chronicles 22:13; Nehemiah 1:7) and “written” by the Lord (2 Kings 17:37)

In Jeremiah 32:11, choq and mitzwah refer to the terms and conditions of Jeremiah’s deed of purchase. This secular usage is very illuminating, since the Lord’s commandments, statutes, and ordinances are “conditions” of Israel’s retention of the land of promise (cf. 2 Chronicles 33:7-8). The choqim are the terms of God’s land-lease contract with Israel, and if they fail to keep the terms they will be evicted. Similarly, for Solomon, walking in the Lord’s paths and guarding His statutes and commandments were the conditions for long life and the continuance of his dynasty (1 Kings 3:14; 9:4-6; 2 Chronicles 7:17). Zechariah reminded the restoration community that the words and choq “overtook” their fathers (1:6). This seems to involve a personification of the choqim of the Lord: Israel failed to guard the statutes and words of the Lord, and the word turned from being a protector to being an adversary, pursuing Israel and driving her from the land. The promise of the New Covenant is that the Spirit will enable Israel to walk in the Lord’s statutes and thereby remain in the land (Ezekiel 36:26-28).

Used of God’s revealed commandments, choq at times continues to imply the idea of “boundary.” Because God’s law places boundaries on human behavior, it forms a pathway in which His people are called to walk (Ezekiel 11:12; 20:18-26). The choq and torah revealed through the hand of Moses teach Israel how to “walk” and “work” (Exodus 18:20). In some passages, choq covers the entire law (Deuteronomy 16:12), and is used in parallel with berith, “covenant” (Psalm 105:8-10). Telling of God’s choqim is the same as taking the berith into one’s mouth (Psalm 50:16). Isaiah 24:5 states that the earth has become polluted because the people have transgressed laws, violated statutes, and broken the covenant (‘bru torah, chalfu choq, and hafru berith). To walk in the pathway established by the Lord’s decrees is to keep the covenant.

Israel may draw near to the Lord’s presence only by walking in the pathway He has delimited by His decrees. In this way, the sense of “boundary” extends to the sense of “ritual ordinance.” The use of choq in several passages thus emphasizes that there are not many ways to approach God in worship, but that He is to be worshipped as He has decreed. Jacob Milgrom has argued that “P scrupulously distinguishes between hoq (masc.) ‘due’ and huqqa (fem.) ‘statute.’” He concedes that in Leviticus 7:36 the word choq might be translated in the latter sense “because the Lord’s command to assign these prebends to the priests automatically becomes an everlasting statute,” but, comparing this verse with 7:34, concludes that both should be understood as granting “a due for all time.”[5] The soundness of this point depends on one’s acceptance that the existence of a “P document” is a meaningful concept, since it is clear that, outside of “P,” the Old Testament does use choq in the sense of ritual ordinance or statute. Israel was instructed to “observe this thing” (shamar dabar) as a choq for all generations (Exodus 12:24); here choq can hardly be translated as “due.” Likewise, it was a perpetual choq that Aaronic priests wash their hands and feet before ministering in the Lord’s tent or at the altar (Exodus 30:17-21). Twice this passage warns that failure to observe this ordinance will be punished with death (vv. 20, 21). Approaching God’s house of altar with hands or feet defiled by the cursed earth results in death. Again, it makes no sense to translate choq as “due” here. The tithe is a choq (Malachi 3:7). It is a statute for Israel that they should worship on the new moon with singing and music (Psalm 81:4), and Jeremiah’s lamentation for Josiah became a choq for Israel (2 Chronicles 35:25). It is not clear in the latter case whether the chanting of this lament involved a regular commemoration of Josiah’s death, or simply implies that Jeremiah’s lamentation was added to the stock of Israelite hymnody. On either interpretation, choq in 2 Chronicles 35:25 may be translated “liturgical ordinance.”

In a number of cases, choq, when used in ceremonial contexts, has the meaning of “portion” or “due.” These uses can denote either the grant or apportionment itself or the portion granted, and there is often little reason to choose between the two meanings. Perhaps these uses are still related to the notion of “boundary.” A “portion” is what lies within certain boundaries: When the priests are ordained, they are given rights to certain portions (choq) of the peace offering: the breast of the tenupah and the thigh of the terumah (Exodus 29:28; Leviticus 7:34), but they were not permitted to take portions beyond those assigned. It is clear, moreover, that these uses of choq emphasize that the portion is “authorized.” After the rebellion of Korah, the Lord gave new instructions and privileges to the priests and Levites, and in enumerating the particular portions assigned to them the Lord calls them “choq” (Numbers 18:8, 11, 19). Speaking of the tribute (grain) offering for the priestly ordination, the Lord said, “by a permanent choq it shall be entirely offered up in smoke to the Lord” and none was to be eaten (Leviticus 6:22 [Hebrew, 6:15]). Leviticus 6:14-18 (Hebrew 6:7-11) states that only a handful of the tribute (grain) offering is to be burned on the bronze altar, the remainder being reserved for Aaron and his sons to eat in a holy place. Verse 18 summarizes: “Every male among the sons of Aaron may eat it; it is a permanent choq throughout your generations, from the food offerings of the Lord. Whoever touches them shall become consecrated.” On the one hand, choq here may refer to the portion of the tribute offering reserved for the priests; but it is possible also to translate choq, as the NASB does, as “ordinance.” In the latter case, the sense would be, “it is a perpetual ritual ordinance that the priests should eat the tribute offering in a holy place.” Perhaps both nuances are meant to be implied. The same is true of the instructions concerning the exchange of the bread of the presence in Leviticus 24:5-9. The passage details the arrangement of the twelve loaves on the golden table, the addition of frankincense to each row of bread as a “memorial,” and the exchange for new bread each sabbath day. Aaron and his sons are given the old bread, which must be eaten in a hold place; it is considered as most holy food because it has been reserved from the Lord’s food offerings. The passage closes with, “it is most holy to him from the Lord’s offerings by fire, choq forever” (24:9). Again, choq may refer to the portion given to the priests, or to the ceremonial rules governing the arrangement and disposal of the bread of the face, or both.

The usage of chuqqah overlaps considerably with that of choq. chuqqah can refer to the statutes or customs of a ruler or a nation (1 Kings 3:3; 2 Kings 17:8). And it is used to describe the fixed time of harvest (Jeremiah 5:24); here the use of chuqqah seems to place emphasis on the fixity of the time of harvest. The word is also used in the sense of “allotment” or “due”; Leviticus 7:36 summarizes the preceding chapters as a designation of the priests’ “due” from the offerings of the sons of Israel. In several passages, the word comes close to meaning something like “ceremonial ordinance”: the Passover is to be celebrated “as a permanent chuqqah” (Exodus 12:14).

From these uses, we can infer the following dimensions of the word group: 1) in its original sense, the verbs refer to the physical action of writing, inscribing, carving, which gives a permanent form to words and images; 2) the words are used in secular contexts in the sense of “boundary”; 3) by extension of the first meaning, the words take on the sense of “authoritative” or “fixed” decree; 4) by extension of the second meaning, the words can be used to way laws place limits on human behavior, and thus form a pathway in which a people is to walk; 5) in liturgical contexts, the words thus can refer to the rules that govern a worshipper’s approach to God; 6) the words can also refer to assigned portions of sacrificial food. It is noteworthy, however, that choq does not cover any particular area of life; though it can mean “ritual ordinance,” it does not have an exclusively cultic connotation, a fact that suggests that in biblical thought there is an unbroken continuum between life and liturgy, and between God’s commandments for daily living and His commandments concerning special worship.

[1]See Talal Asad, Genealogies of Religion (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1993), chapter 2: “Toward a Genealogy of the Concept of Ritual.”

[2]Stephen Buckland, “Ritual, Bodies and ‘Cultural Memory,’” Concilium (1995/3) 49.

[3]A great deal of effort has been expended in attempting to formulate a general definition of ritual. See Caroline Humphrey and James Laidlaw, The Archetypal Actions of Ritual, for a recent attempt. I suspect that these efforts are doomed: Since they inevitably proceed by abstracting from the particular cultural contexts that give meaning to rites in the first place, it is no wonder if they conclude that the rites in fact have no meaning. Definition is a perennial theoretical problem, and it is hopeless to suspend analysis until it is solved. I operate here on a vague and common definition of ritual.

[4]Choq and mispat may be used together in other senses as well. In Exodus 15:25, the content of the “statute and regulation” is a promise that faithfulness will be blessed with deliverance from the diseases of Egypt (v. 26). After the covenant renewal at Shechem, we are told that “Joshua made a covenant (berith) with the people that day, and made for them a statute and an ordinance (choq umishpat) in Shechem” (Joshua 24:25).

[5]Milgrom, Leviticus 1-16: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (Anthor Bible #3; New York: Doubleday, 1991), p. 435.

Ritual

Previous Post

April 26, 2016

Protestant Individualism?

Next Post

April 28, 2016 Preaching to Spirits

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1-2 Samuel 1968 Abelard Abortion Abraham Acedia AD 70 Adam Smith Addiction Advent Advertising Aeneid Aesthetics Africa African Christianity African Church African religion Age Aging Agriculture Airline industry Alabama Alasdair MacIntyre Albania Alcohol Allegory Alms Alternative Medicine Ambrose America American Christianity American culture American economy American Evangelicals American Foreign Policy American history American Literature American Military American Politics American Religion American Revolution Anagogy Analytic Philosophy Anamnesis Ancient Egypt Ancient Greece Ancient history Ancient Near East Ancient Religion Angels Anglican Church Anglicanism Animism Anointing of the Sick Anselm Anthropology Anthropomorphism anti-Catholicism Antiquities Antonio Lopez apocalypse Apocalyptic Apocalyptic language Apostles Creed Aquinas Archeology Architecture Arianism Aristotle Ark of the Covenant Art Art History Ascension Aseity Assurance Athanasius Atheism Athens atonement Attention Attributes Augustine Austin Farrer Authority autonomy Avant-garde Awe Bach Ballooning Balzac Banking Bankruptcy Baptism Baptists Baseball Basketball Bavinck Beatitudes Beauty Behavioral Economics Being Benedict XVI Benjamin Benjamin Franklin Beowulf Berkeley Bernie Sanders Bertrand Russell Bestiary Bible Bible - criticism Bible - NT Bible - NT - 1 Corinthians Bible - NT - 1 John Bible - NT - 1 Peter Bible - NT - 2 Corinthians Bible - NT - 2 Peter Bible - NT - Acts Bible - NT - Colossians Bible - NT - Ephesians Bible - NT - Galatians Bible - NT - Gospels Bible - NT - Hebrews Bible - NT - James Bible - NT - John Bible - NT - Jude Bible - NT - Luke Bible - NT - Mark Bible - NT - Matthew Bible - NT - Paul Bible - NT - Philippians Bible - NT - Revelation Bible - NT - Romans Bible - NT - Thessalonians Bible - NT - Timothy Bible - OT Bible - OT - Amos Bible - OT - Chronicles Bible - OT - Daniel Bible - OT - Deuteronomy Bible - OT - Ecclesiastes Bible - OT - Esther Bible - OT - Exodus Bible - OT - Ezekiel Bible - OT - Ezra-Nehemiah Bible - OT - Genesis Bible - OT - Habakkuk Bible - OT - Hosea Bible - OT - Isaiah Bible - OT - Jeremiah Bible - OT - Job Bible - OT - Joel Bible - OT - Jonah Bible - OT - Joshua Bible - OT - Judges Bible - OT - Kings Bible - OT - Lamentations Bible - OT - Leviticus Bible - OT - Malachi BIble - OT - Micah Bible - OT - Nehemiah Bible - OT - Numbers Bible - OT - Pentateuch Bible - OT - Proverbs Bible - OT - Psalms Bible - OT - Ruth Bible - OT - Samuel Bible - OT - Song of Songs Bible - OT - Torah Bible - OT - Zechariah Bible - OT - Zephaniah Biblical Law Biblicism Billy Graham biography Biology Biololgy Biotechnology Blasphemy Blindness Blog news Blogging Blogroll Bloomsbury Group Bob Dylan Body Body symbolism Boethius Boko Haram Bonhoeffer Book of Common Prayer Books Botany Boundary Brexit Britain British History British Politics Bruce Springsteen Buddhism Bureaucracy Burial Business C. S. Lewis C. S. Peirce Calendars Caliphate Calvin calvinism Camille Paglia Canon Capitalism Cappadocians Carl Schmitt Catholic Social Teaching Catholicism Catholicity Causation cemeteries Cervantes Charism Charismata Charity Charles Dickens Charles Hodge Charles Simeon Charles Taylor Charles Williams Chaucer Chermistry Chess Chesterton Chiasm children China Chinese Exclusion Act Chivalry Chopin Chretien de Troyes Christendom Christian Democracy Christian reconstruction Christianity in Britain Christianization Christmas Christology Chronology Church church and state Church architecture Church Calendar Church history Church of England Church Year Cicero Circumcision Cities City of God Civil Religion Civil Society Civil War Civility Classical Theism Classics Climate Change Clothing Coleridge Colloquy of Marburg Colonialism Color Comedy Comenius Commodity Communio Communism Community Comparative religions Computer Science Confederacy Confessionalization Conflict Congregations consciousness Consecration Conservatism Constantine Constitution consumerism Contra Faustum Conversion Coriolanus Cormac McCarthy Cosmology Cosmopolitanism Council of Trent Counter-culture Counter-insurgency Courage Courtly love Covenants Crafts Craftsmanship Cranach Creation Creativity Creator-creature Credit Crime Crime and Punishment Crisis Critical scholarship Criticism Cross Cubism Cultural theory Culture Culture War Dance Daniel Dennett Dante Darwin Dave Eggers David David Foster Wallace David Hume David Jones Deadly sins Death Debt Dechristianization Decolonization Deconstruction Defoe Deja vu Democracy Denis de Rougemont Denominationalism Derrida Descartes Developmental psychology Devils Diocletian Discipleship Disenchantment Disgust Diversion Diversity Divine energies Divine Impassibility Divine Simplicity Divine Warrior Doctrine dogma Dominion Donald Trump Dostoevsky Douglas Campbell Douglas Farrow Dreams Dualism Durkheim Dystopia E.M. Forster Early Christianity Early Modern Europe Easter Eastern Europe Eastern Orthodoxy Ecclesiology Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Eden Edgar Allan Poe Edmund Spenser Education Egypt Election Elites Emergence Emma Emotion Empire England English History English Reformation Enlightenment Entertainment Entrepreneur environmentalism Envy Epic Epiphany Episcopals Epistemology Epistles Equality Erasmus Ernst Kantorowicz Eros Eschatology Eternity Ethics Eucharist Europe Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Catholics Together Events Evil Evolution Exile Face Fairie Queene Fairy Tales Faith family Family and Marriage Fantasy Farming Fashion Fasting Fatherhood Fear Femininity Feminism Fertility Fetishization Feud Feudalism Feuerbach Fiction Figs Film Finance Finland Fire Flag Flags Flannery O'Connor Flood myths Folly Food football Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy Foreknowledge Forgiveness Foucault Fracking France Francois Mauriac Franz Rosenzweig free will Freedom Freedom of God French Revolution Freud Funerals Future G. K. Chesterton Gambling Gaming Gay Marriage Gender gender identity Genealogy Geography George Berkeley George Eliot George Herbert; Poetry George Romanes Gerald Manley Hopkins Germany Gethsemane Gift Gifts Giorgio Agamben Global Christianity Global economics Globalism Globalization Glorious Revolution Gnosticism God's sovereignty Gods Goethe Golf Good Friday Gospel Gospels Gothic Gothic architecture Grace Grammar Gramsci Gratitude Greek Literature Greek Philosophy Greek Religion Greek Science Gregory of Nyssa Guillermo del Toro H. Richard Niebuhr Haiku hair Hamann Hamlet Handicap Handles Hands Hans Urs von Balthasar Happiness Harold Bloom Harper Lee Harvest healing Heaven Heavenly treasure Heavenly treasure Hebrew Bible Hebrew language Hegel Heidegger Hell Hellenism; Judaism; Revelation Henri de Lubac heresy Herman Dooyeweerd Hermeneutics Herod Heroic Heroism Hesiod Hidegard of Bingen Hierarchy Hieronymus Bosch Historicism Historiography History History - Early Modern History - Middle Ages Hoaxes Hobbes Holiness Holy Saturday Holy Spirit Home Homeless Homer Homosexuality Honor hope Horror Hospitality Housing Hugh of St. Victor Human Rights Humanism Humor hylomorphism Hymns Hypocrisy. Iago Iconoclasm Identity Ideology Idleness Idolatry Iliad Images Imagination Immigrant churches Immigrant Religion Immigration Imperialism Improvization Imputation Incarnation Incest India Individualism Indonesia Inequality Inerrancy Infant Baptism Infant mortality Infanticide Ingratitude Innovation Inspiration Institutions Insult Intellectual History Intellectuals Intelligent Design International Politics Internet Intimacy IQ Iran Iran-Iraq War Iraq Ireland Irony Islam Islamic State Islamism Ismail Kadare Israel Ivan Illich J. Gresham Machen J.N. Figgis Jacob Jacques Lacan James Bond James Jordan James Joyce James KA Smith James Wood Jane Austen Jane Jacobs Jealousy Jed Perl Jeff Koons Jeroboam Jesus Jewish War 66-70 AD Jihad Johann Georg Hamann Johannine Epistles John Ashbery John Behr John Bunyan John Calvin John Donne John Frame John Howard Yoder John Knox John Milbank John Milton John Owen John Rawls John Ruskin John Stuart Mill John the Baptist John Webster John Wesley John Williamson Nevin Jonathan Edwards Jorge Luis Borges Joseph Conrad Joseph Ratzinger Journalism Joy Judaism Judaize Judgment Judith Butler Jurgen Moltmann Justice Justification Kalevala Kant Karl Barth Karl Marx Karl Polanyi Karl Rahner Kazakhstan Kazuo Ishiguro Kenneth Lonergan Kierkegaard King Lear Kingdom of God Kitsch Knighthood Knowledge Korea Labor movement Lactantius Lamech Lament Landscape Language Latin America Laughter Law Law and Punishment Leftism Lent Les Murray Levi-Strauss Levites Leviticus Liber Mundi Liberal arts Liberal Theology Liberalism Light Lighthouse Linguistics LIstening Literacy Literary structure Literature Liturgics Liturgy Locke Logic Love Luther Lutheran Lutheranism Lying Lytton Strachey Macbeth Machiavelli Machines Madness Mainline Manhattan Manicheanism Manners Manufacturing Manuscripts Mao Zedong Maps Marcion Marilynne Robinson Marketing Marriage Martha Nussbaum Martin Bucer Martin Chemnitz Martyrdom Marx Marxism Mary Mary Douglas masculinity Mass Materialism Mathematics Maundy Thursday Max Weber Media Mediation Medication Medicine Medieval Church Medieval exegesis Medieval Literature Medieval theology Medieval Thought Medievalism Memory Merchant of Venice Mesopotamian Religion Messianic Metaphor Metaphysics Methodist Mexican-American War Michel de Montaigne Michel Faber Middle Ages Middle East Midwifery Mikhail Bulgakov Military Millennium Mind Miracles Miscellaneous Mission missionaries Mixed constitution Modern self modernism Modernity monasticism Monotheism Monroe Doctrine Monsters Montaigne's Essays Moral philosophy Mormonism Moses Mother Teresa Motherhood Motive Mount of Olives Movies Multiculturalism Murder Music Musicals Mutability Mutability Mystery Mysticism myth N. T. Wright Narrative Nation-State Nationalism Natural Law Natural-Supernatural Nature Nature and culture Nature and Grace Nazi Nazirite Necrophilia Nero Nestorianism Neuroscience Nevin Lectures New Atheism New Testament New York City Newbigin News NGOs Nibelungenlied Nicholas of Cusa Nicholas of Lyra Nietzsche Nigeria Nihilism Nobel Prize Nobility Nominalism Norbert Elias Norman MacCaig nostalgia Novels Numerology Obama Objectivity and subjectivity Occasionalism Odysseus Oil Old Testament Oliver O'Donovan Ontology Origen original sin Orthodoxy Othello Owen Barfield Pacifism Pactum salutis Paedocommunion Paganism Pain Painting Paleoconservatism Palm Sunday Pannenberg Parenting Pascal Passions Passivity Pastoral Care Pastoral theology Patrick Modiano Patristics Patronage Paul Peace of God Peace of Westphalia Penal substitution Pentecost Pentecostalism Perichoresis Pericles Persecution Person Peter Peter Enns Petrarch Philip K. Dick Philip Melanchthon Philosophy Philosophy of Action Philosophy of History Philosophy of language Philosophy of science Phone booth Photography Physics Pictures Pierre Bourdieu Place Planned Parenthood Plants plato Play Plot Plotinus Pluralism Pneumatology Poetics poetry Poetry & Stories Poland police Political Philosophy Political theology Political Theory Politics Pop Culture Pope Francis Popular Culture Populism Pornography Porphyry Post-Colonial Theory Post-Structuralism Postmodernism Postmodernity Potential Poverty Power Practice Pragmatism Prayer Preaching Predestination Prediction Prehistory Premillennialism Presbyterian Priesthood Prince Charles Prison Reform privacy Private Prodigal Son Progress Progressivism Property Prophecy Prophet Propitiation Prosperity gospel Prostitution Protectionism Protestantism Providence Prudentius psalms Pseudo-Dionysus Psychological Warfare Psychology Public intellectual Public Life Public Philosophy Public Theology Publishing Punk Rock Pure nature Puritanism Purity Pushkin Putin Pythagoreanism R.J. Rushdoony Race Racism Radical Orthodoxy Rape Rationality Reactionary reading Realism Reason Red State Blue State Reformation Reformational Catholicism Reformational Philosophy Reformed theology refugees reinhold niebuhr Relationality Relativism Relics Religion Religion and science Religions Religious Freedom Religious Liberty Religious Right Renaissance Rene Girard Republican Party Resurrection Resurrection. Revelation Revelations Revenge Revivalism Revolution rhetoric Richard Flannagan Richard II Richard III Richard Wagner Richard Wilbur Righteousness Ritual Robert Frost Robert Herrick Robert Jenson Robert Mugabe Robert Spaemann Robinson Crusoe Rock n' Roll Rod Dreher Rodin Roman Catholicism Roman Empire Roman Religion Romance Romanticism Rome Rootedness Rosenstock-Huessy Rousseau Rowan Williams Rural America Russia Russian literature Russian Orthodoxy Rusty Reno Rwanda S. Y. Agnon Sabbath Sacrament Sacramental theology Sacraments Sacred Sacred Space Sacrifice saints Salt Sam Harris Same-sex marriage Sanctuary Satan Satire Saudi Arabia Scapegoat Scarcity Schism Schleiermacher Scholarship Science Science and Theology Science Fiction Scopes trial Scotland Scott Adams Scott Cairns Scottish Reformation Scotus Scripture and tradition sculpture Sea Second temple Secularism Secularization Self-Help Self-trust Semiotics Semper reformanda separation of church and state Sermon on the Mount Sex Sex Trafficking Sexual abuse Sexual Politics Sexual Revolution Sexuality Shakespeare Shame Culture Shema Sherlock Shopping Silence Simone Weil Simplicity Simpsons Sin Sincerity Sixties Skepticism Slavery Slavoj Zizek Sleep Sloth Social capital Social change Social Imaginary Social Science Socialism Socialization Sociology Sociology of Knowledge Sociology of Religion Sola scriptura Sonnets Sophocles Soteriology Soviet Union Space Spain Speculation Spinoza Spirit Sport Sports Star Trek State State-formation Stephen Masty Steven Bannon Strangers Structuralism structure Subject-object Substitution Suburbs Suffering Suicide Super-Rich Superheroes Supersessionism Supplication Supreme Court Surveillance Symbol Synagogue Taberancle Tabernacle Tax Taxes Tears Technology Teens Teleology Television Temple Ten Commandments Terence Terrence Malick Terrorism Thanksgiving The South The West Theodore Roosevelt Theogony Theological Education Theological Language Theology Theology - Anthropology Theology - Christology Theology - Covenant Theology - Creation Theology - Ecclesiology Theology - Eschatology Theology - Liturgical Theology - Pneumatology Theology - Soteriology Theology - Trinity Theology proper Theopolis Theopolis Institute Theosis Theresa May Thomas A. Clark Thomas Aquinas Thomas Carlyle Thomas Mann Threshing Thucydides Time Tocqueville Tolerance Toleration Tolstoy Tom Wolfe Tools Torah Torture Toscanini Totalitarianism Trade Tradition Tragedy Transhumanism Translation Transubstantiation Travel Trees Trinitarianism Trinity Trinity House Tristan Troilus and Creysede Trump Trump Truth Turkey Twelfth Night Two Kingdoms Typology Ukraine Ulysses Uncanny Uncategorized Uniform Union with Christ United States Unity University Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Value Vatican II Vengeance Vico Victorian Age Victorian Literature Vienna Violence Virgil Virgin Birth Virginia Woolf Vladimir Nabokov Vladimir Solovyev Vladimir Solovyov W.H. Auden Walls Walt Disney Walt Whitman Walter Benjamin Walter Lippmann War Wars of Religion Washington DC Wealth Weddings Will William Carlos Williams William Gilpin William Golding Wine Wisdom wonder Word of God Wordsworth Work Works World Council of Churches World History World War I World War II Worldview Worship Wrath Writing Youth Youth Ministry Yuja Wang Yves Congar Zimbabwe Zwingli Zygmunt Bauman

Select a Month January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What language was most of the Old Testament written in?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Hebrew Greek Latin Aramaic