Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Leithart

Insight of Unbelievers

Last updated on: August 7, 2012 at 8:00 am   by Peter Leithart

Insight of Unbelievers 2012-08-07T08:00:40+06:00 Peter Leithart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Deeana Copeland Klepper, The Insight of Unbelievers: Nicholas of Lyra and Christian Reading of Jewish Text in the Later Middle Ages (Jewish Culture and Contexts) . Philadelphia:University ofPennsylvania Press, 2007.

 

Modern biblical criticism is the product of Jewish-Christian cooperation. On the one hand, it is a creation of Anti-Calvinist Pietists in theNetherlands. Against the Protestant Orthodox insistence that even the vowel points of the Hebrew text were divinely inspired, pietist Arminians known as Collegiants exalted the spirit over the letter, and their emphasis on the “inner light” of the guiding spirit morphed, as Andrew Fix has shown, into the “inner light” of natural reason. Whether understood as “spirit” or “reason,” the inner light provided a standard by which the letter could be weighed in the balances, and found wanting.

Though Christian in origin, critical reading of Scripture was injected into the bloodstream of European thought through the ministrations of a Jew, Baruch (Benedict) Spinoza. Spinoza himself had close ties with the Dutch Collegiants, and his seminal Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (1670) echoed pietist rhetoric. He complained that for the Calvinist Orthodox, the “impious are not those who point out the contradictions in the Biblical text but those who bludgeon others with their Bibles,” and insisted that the keynote of true religion is not orthodox adherence to dogma or Scripture’s propositions but obedience to the Divine Law of justice and love. While Spinoza advocated a form of the Protestant principle of Scripture interpreting Scripture, ultimately he measured Scripture by ethical and rational standards from elsewhere. Philosophy, not theology should guide ethics, and he found much of the Bible historically absurd, philosophically untenable, and theologically impious.

Given this pedigree, historical critical scholarship could plausibly seize the high ground of ecumenicity: In contrast to the sectarian readings offered by the different sects of Christianity, or by Christians opposed to Jews and Jews opposed to Christians, critical methods promised a truly universal biblical scholarship. Biblical scholars no longer need to be Christians, nor Jews, nor believers of any kind. Historical criticism unites people of all faiths, and none, in the common enterprise accessing the meaning of an influential ancient text, using methods freed from sectarian bias. As many have argued in the last half century, the neutrality of historical criticism is an illusion, as are all claims to neutrality. Spinoza’s methods had an overt religious and political aim, and in adopting the methods of historical criticism, Christian interpreters have (sometimes unwittingly) accepted assumptions about language and textuality, epistemology and politics that run against the grain of Christian tradition.

Nothing marks the difference between critical and premodern interpretation as dramatically as the difference in approach to Jewish interpretation of the Old Testament. That Christian interpreters follow Spinoza – not only Jewish but a highly unorthodox Jew – would have astonished the fathers and medieval interpreters.

Jews, after all, occupy a large and largely negative place in the premodern Christian imagination. Long after the church had stretched out far beyond the boundaries of her Palestinian birthplace, Jews remained the prototypical enemies of the faith. Eusebius was not alone in tracing all early heresies to Simon Magus. As late as the fourth century, Athanasius could level the charge of “Judaizing” at Arius. And he wasn’t the last. Andrew of the famedschoolofSt. Victorcharged his colleague Richard with “Judaizing” because Richard was too uncritical in his use of Jewish sources.

The connections that early theologians draw between Judaism and Christian heresy are often interesting and sometimes plausible, but in the process Christians forged an anti-Jewish rhetoric that ranged from petty to vicious. In a letter sent to bishops after the Council of Nicea, Constantine does not mention Arius, Christ, or homoousios , but takes a good deal of space to celebrate the conciliar consensus on the date of Easter, a consensus whose primary virtue was that it was independent on Jewish time-keeping. It was “unworthy,” the emperor argued, that in the “celebration of this most holy feast we should follow the practice of the Jews” since they “impiously defiled their hands with enormous sin, and are, therefore, deservedly afflicted with blindness of soul.” In general, Christians should avoid “all participation in the perjured conduct of the Jews.”

Particularly when it came to biblical interpretation, the Jews were unreliable. Even Christians who did not accuse Jews of roasting and eating small children denied that Jewish scholars could provide insight into Scripture. After the Talmud was put on trial inParisin 1240, and condemned as heretical, heaps of Jewish books were burned. Pope Innocent IV followed with an exhortation to the French king to find and destroy any that remained. No other European country tried and burned the Talmud, but Dominicans devoted their impressive energies and subtle minds to pile up a large stack of anti-Talmudic tracts.

Vivid stories like the trial of the Talmud make for good copy, but Deeana Klepper’s well researched book demonstrates that some Christian responses were more nuanced than a bonfire. At the very time that the church’s antiJudaism was reaching a peak, the Franciscan Nicholas of Lyra (c. 1270-1349) was developing a carefully nuanced treatment of Jewish interpretation that influenced Christian readers into the early modern period.

One of Lyra’s most important contributions was the Postilla litteralis super Bibliam (1322), a literal commentary on the entire Bible, and he also published a single volume abridgement examining passages where the Vulgate differed from the Hebrew Scriptures. The Postilla was the second most popular commentary on the Bible in the late medieval period, surpassed only by the Glossa ordinaria , with which it often circulated. As late as the seventeenth century, both Protestants and Catholics were still using Nicholas’s commentary, Luther defending his ad fontes translations by appeal to Nicholas’s example. One illuminated manuscript of the Postilla shows Nicholas, smallish and cramped at his desk in the lower right corner, taking notes from a resplendent Jerome who teaches from a podium. Despite subordinating Lyra to Jerome, the illustration is a compliment that visually expresses the common description of Nicholas as a “second Jerome.”

What is most striking about Nicholas’s Postilla is his wide and varied use of Jewish sources. He appealed to the Hebrew Bible directly to challenge Vulgate translations, arguing, for example, that Rahab was not a harlot but an “innkeeper.” At times, he built Christological interpretations of the Old Testament on Jewish sources other than the Hebrew Bible to correct what he claimed were deliberate Jewish alterations of the text. More importantly for Klepper’s book, he drew on the work of Jewish exegetes, especially the eleventh century rabbi Solomon ben Isaac known as Rashi, to clarify literal meaning and sometimes to fill out a Christological allegory. As a re

sult, Lyra’s Postilla became the major Christian conduit for transmitting Jewish exegetical traditions to Christians through the late Middle Ages.

As he was well aware, Nicholas’s use of Jewish tradition raises the complex epistemological question of Jewish unbelief. How can Jews who reject the Messiah who is the res of Scripture have exegetical insight of any kind? The question had been raised in various forms by scholastics for at least two centuries, and one of the most intriguing sections of Klepper’s book reviews some of the work of Nicholas’s predecessors – Roger Bacon, Roger Marston, Peter Olivi. Nicholas himself addresses this issue in his quodlibetal treatise answering the questions “whether the Jews knew Jesus of Nazareth to be the messiah promised to them” and “whether from Scriptures received by the Jews it is possible to prove effectively that our savior was both God and man.”

In answer to the first question, Nicholas surveys the New Testament and concludes that the Jews both knew and did not know Jesus was Messiah. On element of his solution to this apparent contradiction was sociological: The elites ofIsraelrecognized Jesus, but the common people did not. Philosophically, he appealed to the Aristotelian distinction between general and particular knowledge. An intemperate man has a false moral code, but an incontinent man does not practice temperance even though he knows he should. The latter has the right code but fails to act on it. Aristotle identified passion as one of the main obstacles to knowledge, and Nicholas argued that passions so corrupted the knowledge of the Jews that “a temporary ignorance deprived from moral weakness that was distinct from their customary perceptiveness.” It was a neat solution: It allowed Nicholas to stand with the church in condemning Jewish ignorance while leaving him space to employ Jewish interpretive traditions freely.

Besides addressing this epistemological issue, Nicholas wanted to defend the Christian use of Hebrew prophecy, and this was the thrust of his second quodlibetal question. His premise was that a literal interpretation of the Hebrew Bible would yield a Christian interpretation. As Klepper points out, this argument assumes a more flexible notion of “literal” than had existed in the patristic and early medieval period. Instead of arguing for a twofold meaning, literal and spiritual, Nicholas, like some of his contemporaries, argued that a “parabolic” sense is embedded within the literal. When Yahweh identifies Solomon as his son, he is not only literally describing Solomon’s adopted sonship but also, in a parabolic/literal fashion, describing the natural sonship of the Second Person of the Trinity.

On the basis of this hermeneutical theory, Nicholas argues for Christian interpretations of prophecy by attending to the details of the letter. Jeremiah 23:5 on the strictest interpretation promises that the Messiah will himself be divine, and Isaiah 9:6 says quite literally that Yahweh is a child. He concludes that the Jews could have derived the Christian belief in a God-man from their own Scriptures, were they not blinded by passion and envy. Nicholas’s approach has apologetic value. An argument from the letter is likely to be persuasive to Jewish readers than an apparently arbitrary move to a “spiritual” meaning.

No one today longs to return to the days of book-burning and Jew-baiting. Everyone is happy to see as many yarmulkas as clerical collars at meetings of the Society of Biblical Literature. Yet, I am unconvinced that critical scholarship can make the lions lie with the lambs. The usual solutions are far too easy, including the easy brush-away charge of supercessionism. With a wave of the hand, anti-supercesssionism removes the problem of Jewish incredulity about Jesus, and replaces the problem with the happy news that Jews have always been in covenant with God after all.

Surely it matters to our reading of the tabernacle texts whether we believe that the veil is destined to be torn by the final sacrifice of Jesus, or whether we believe that a permanent veil is the genius of biblical religion. Surely we cannot read the beginning and middle in the same manner unless we agree on where the story ends. Nicholas of Lyra’s approach was more honest and more comprehensive: He took seriously both Jewish insight and Jewish unbelief. He has much to teach us, and Klepper’s book shows us once again that we have a long way to go to catch up with the medievals.

Bible

History

Previous Post



August 7, 2012

Myth of Religious Violence

Next Post



August 7, 2012 Bultmann and Moltmann


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1-2 Samuel 1968 Abelard Abortion Abraham Acedia AD 70 Adam Smith Addiction Advent Advertising Aeneid Aesthetics Africa African Christianity African Church African religion Age Aging Agriculture Airline industry Alabama Alasdair MacIntyre Albania Alcohol Allegory Alms Alternative Medicine Ambrose America American Christianity American culture American economy American Evangelicals American Foreign Policy American history American Literature American Military American Politics American Religion American Revolution Anagogy Analytic Philosophy Anamnesis Ancient Egypt Ancient Greece Ancient history Ancient Near East Ancient Religion Angels Anglican Church Anglicanism Animism Anointing of the Sick Anselm Anthropology Anthropomorphism anti-Catholicism Antiquities Antonio Lopez apocalypse Apocalyptic Apocalyptic language Apostles Creed Aquinas Archeology Architecture Arianism Aristotle Ark of the Covenant Art Art History Ascension Aseity Assurance Athanasius Atheism Athens atonement Attention Attributes Augustine Austin Farrer Authority autonomy Avant-garde Awe Bach Ballooning Balzac Banking Bankruptcy Baptism Baptists Baseball Basketball Bavinck Beatitudes Beauty Behavioral Economics Being Benedict XVI Benjamin Benjamin Franklin Beowulf Berkeley Bernie Sanders Bertrand Russell Bestiary Bible Bible - criticism Bible - NT Bible - NT - 1 Corinthians Bible - NT - 1 John Bible - NT - 1 Peter Bible - NT - 2 Corinthians Bible - NT - 2 Peter Bible - NT - Acts Bible - NT - Colossians Bible - NT - Ephesians Bible - NT - Galatians Bible - NT - Gospels Bible - NT - Hebrews Bible - NT - James Bible - NT - John Bible - NT - Jude Bible - NT - Luke Bible - NT - Mark Bible - NT - Matthew Bible - NT - Paul Bible - NT - Philippians Bible - NT - Revelation Bible - NT - Romans Bible - NT - Thessalonians Bible - NT - Timothy Bible - OT Bible - OT - Amos Bible - OT - Chronicles Bible - OT - Daniel Bible - OT - Deuteronomy Bible - OT - Ecclesiastes Bible - OT - Esther Bible - OT - Exodus Bible - OT - Ezekiel Bible - OT - Ezra-Nehemiah Bible - OT - Genesis Bible - OT - Habakkuk Bible - OT - Hosea Bible - OT - Isaiah Bible - OT - Jeremiah Bible - OT - Job Bible - OT - Joel Bible - OT - Jonah Bible - OT - Joshua Bible - OT - Judges Bible - OT - Kings Bible - OT - Lamentations Bible - OT - Leviticus Bible - OT - Malachi BIble - OT - Micah Bible - OT - Nehemiah Bible - OT - Numbers Bible - OT - Pentateuch Bible - OT - Proverbs Bible - OT - Psalms Bible - OT - Ruth Bible - OT - Samuel Bible - OT - Song of Songs Bible - OT - Torah Bible - OT - Zechariah Bible - OT - Zephaniah Biblical Law Biblicism Billy Graham biography Biology Biololgy Biotechnology Blasphemy Blindness Blog news Blogging Blogroll Bloomsbury Group Bob Dylan Body Body symbolism Boethius Boko Haram Bonhoeffer Book of Common Prayer Books Botany Boundary Brexit Britain British History British Politics Bruce Springsteen Buddhism Bureaucracy Burial Business C. S. Lewis C. S. Peirce Calendars Caliphate Calvin calvinism Camille Paglia Canon Capitalism Cappadocians Carl Schmitt Catholic Social Teaching Catholicism Catholicity Causation cemeteries Cervantes Charism Charismata Charity Charles Dickens Charles Hodge Charles Simeon Charles Taylor Charles Williams Chaucer Chermistry Chess Chesterton Chiasm children China Chinese Exclusion Act Chivalry Chopin Chretien de Troyes Christendom Christian Democracy Christian reconstruction Christianity in Britain Christianization Christmas Christology Chronology Church church and state Church architecture Church Calendar Church history Church of England Church Year Cicero Circumcision Cities City of God Civil Religion Civil Society Civil War Civility Classical Theism Classics Climate Change Clothing Coleridge Colloquy of Marburg Colonialism Color Comedy Comenius Commodity Communio Communism Community Comparative religions Computer Science Confederacy Confessionalization Conflict Congregations consciousness Consecration Conservatism Constantine Constitution consumerism Contra Faustum Conversion Coriolanus Cormac McCarthy Cosmology Cosmopolitanism Council of Trent Counter-culture Counter-insurgency Courage Courtly love Covenants Crafts Craftsmanship Cranach Creation Creativity Creator-creature Credit Crime Crime and Punishment Crisis Critical scholarship Criticism Cross Cubism Cultural theory Culture Culture War Dance Daniel Dennett Dante Darwin Dave Eggers David David Foster Wallace David Hume David Jones Deadly sins Death Debt Dechristianization Decolonization Deconstruction Defoe Deja vu Democracy Denis de Rougemont Denominationalism Derrida Descartes Developmental psychology Devils Diocletian Discipleship Disenchantment Disgust Diversion Diversity Divine energies Divine Impassibility Divine Simplicity Divine Warrior Doctrine dogma Dominion Donald Trump Dostoevsky Douglas Campbell Douglas Farrow Dreams Dualism Durkheim Dystopia E.M. Forster Early Christianity Early Modern Europe Easter Eastern Europe Eastern Orthodoxy Ecclesiology Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Eden Edgar Allan Poe Edmund Spenser Education Egypt Election Elites Emergence Emma Emotion Empire England English History English Reformation Enlightenment Entertainment Entrepreneur environmentalism Envy Epic Epiphany Episcopals Epistemology Epistles Equality Erasmus Ernst Kantorowicz Eros Eschatology Eternity Ethics Eucharist Europe Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Catholics Together Events Evil Evolution Exile Face Fairie Queene Fairy Tales Faith family Family and Marriage Fantasy Farming Fashion Fasting Fatherhood Fear Femininity Feminism Fertility Fetishization Feud Feudalism Feuerbach Fiction Figs Film Finance Finland Fire Flag Flags Flannery O'Connor Flood myths Folly Food football Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy Foreknowledge Forgiveness Foucault Fracking France Francois Mauriac Franz Rosenzweig free will Freedom Freedom of God French Revolution Freud Funerals Future G. K. Chesterton Gambling Gaming Gay Marriage Gender gender identity Genealogy Geography George Berkeley George Eliot George Herbert; Poetry George Romanes Gerald Manley Hopkins Germany Gethsemane Gift Gifts Giorgio Agamben Global Christianity Global economics Globalism Globalization Glorious Revolution Gnosticism God's sovereignty Gods Goethe Golf Good Friday Gospel Gospels Gothic Gothic architecture Grace Grammar Gramsci Gratitude Greek Literature Greek Philosophy Greek Religion Greek Science Gregory of Nyssa Guillermo del Toro H. Richard Niebuhr Haiku hair Hamann Hamlet Handicap Handles Hands Hans Urs von Balthasar Happiness Harold Bloom Harper Lee Harvest healing Heaven Heavenly treasure Heavenly treasure Hebrew Bible Hebrew language Hegel Heidegger Hell Hellenism; Judaism; Revelation Henri de Lubac heresy Herman Dooyeweerd Hermeneutics Herod Heroic Heroism Hesiod Hidegard of Bingen Hierarchy Hieronymus Bosch Historicism Historiography History History - Early Modern History - Middle Ages Hoaxes Hobbes Holiness Holy Saturday Holy Spirit Home Homeless Homer Homosexuality Honor hope Horror Hospitality Housing Hugh of St. Victor Human Rights Humanism Humor hylomorphism Hymns Hypocrisy. Iago Iconoclasm Identity Ideology Idleness Idolatry Iliad Images Imagination Immigrant churches Immigrant Religion Immigration Imperialism Improvization Imputation Incarnation Incest India Individualism Indonesia Inequality Inerrancy Infant Baptism Infant mortality Infanticide Ingratitude Innovation Inspiration Institutions Insult Intellectual History Intellectuals Intelligent Design International Politics Internet Intimacy IQ Iran Iran-Iraq War Iraq Ireland Irony Islam Islamic State Islamism Ismail Kadare Israel Ivan Illich J. Gresham Machen J.N. Figgis Jacob Jacques Lacan James Bond James Jordan James Joyce James KA Smith James Wood Jane Austen Jane Jacobs Jealousy Jed Perl Jeff Koons Jeroboam Jesus Jewish War 66-70 AD Jihad Johann Georg Hamann Johannine Epistles John Ashbery John Behr John Bunyan John Calvin John Donne John Frame John Howard Yoder John Knox John Milbank John Milton John Owen John Rawls John Ruskin John Stuart Mill John the Baptist John Webster John Wesley John Williamson Nevin Jonathan Edwards Jorge Luis Borges Joseph Conrad Joseph Ratzinger Journalism Joy Judaism Judaize Judgment Judith Butler Jurgen Moltmann Justice Justification Kalevala Kant Karl Barth Karl Marx Karl Polanyi Karl Rahner Kazakhstan Kazuo Ishiguro Kenneth Lonergan Kierkegaard King Lear Kingdom of God Kitsch Knighthood Knowledge Korea Labor movement Lactantius Lamech Lament Landscape Language Latin America Laughter Law Law and Punishment Leftism Lent Les Murray Levi-Strauss Levites Leviticus Liber Mundi Liberal arts Liberal Theology Liberalism Light Lighthouse Linguistics LIstening Literacy Literary structure Literature Liturgics Liturgy Locke Logic Love Luther Lutheran Lutheranism Lying Lytton Strachey Macbeth Machiavelli Machines Madness Mainline Manhattan Manicheanism Manners Manufacturing Manuscripts Mao Zedong Maps Marcion Marilynne Robinson Marketing Marriage Martha Nussbaum Martin Bucer Martin Chemnitz Martyrdom Marx Marxism Mary Mary Douglas masculinity Mass Materialism Mathematics Maundy Thursday Max Weber Media Mediation Medication Medicine Medieval Church Medieval exegesis Medieval Literature Medieval theology Medieval Thought Medievalism Memory Merchant of Venice Mesopotamian Religion Messianic Metaphor Metaphysics Methodist Mexican-American War Michel de Montaigne Michel Faber Middle Ages Middle East Midwifery Mikhail Bulgakov Military Millennium Mind Miracles Miscellaneous Mission missionaries Mixed constitution Modern self modernism Modernity monasticism Monotheism Monroe Doctrine Monsters Montaigne's Essays Moral philosophy Mormonism Moses Mother Teresa Motherhood Motive Mount of Olives Movies Multiculturalism Murder Music Musicals Mutability Mutability Mystery Mysticism myth N. T. Wright Narrative Nation-State Nationalism Natural Law Natural-Supernatural Nature Nature and culture Nature and Grace Nazi Nazirite Necrophilia Nero Nestorianism Neuroscience Nevin Lectures New Atheism New Testament New York City Newbigin News NGOs Nibelungenlied Nicholas of Cusa Nicholas of Lyra Nietzsche Nigeria Nihilism Nobel Prize Nobility Nominalism Norbert Elias Norman MacCaig nostalgia Novels Numerology Obama Objectivity and subjectivity Occasionalism Odysseus Oil Old Testament Oliver O'Donovan Ontology Origen original sin Orthodoxy Othello Owen Barfield Pacifism Pactum salutis Paedocommunion Paganism Pain Painting Paleoconservatism Palm Sunday Pannenberg Parenting Pascal Passions Passivity Pastoral Care Pastoral theology Patrick Modiano Patristics Patronage Paul Peace of God Peace of Westphalia Penal substitution Pentecost Pentecostalism Perichoresis Pericles Persecution Person Peter Peter Enns Petrarch Philip K. Dick Philip Melanchthon Philosophy Philosophy of Action Philosophy of History Philosophy of language Philosophy of science Phone booth Photography Physics Pictures Pierre Bourdieu Place Planned Parenthood Plants plato Play Plot Plotinus Pluralism Pneumatology Poetics poetry Poetry & Stories Poland police Political Philosophy Political theology Political Theory Politics Pop Culture Pope Francis Popular Culture Populism Pornography Porphyry Post-Colonial Theory Post-Structuralism Postmodernism Postmodernity Potential Poverty Power Practice Pragmatism Prayer Preaching Predestination Prediction Prehistory Premillennialism Presbyterian Priesthood Prince Charles Prison Reform privacy Private Prodigal Son Progress Progressivism Property Prophecy Prophet Propitiation Prosperity gospel Prostitution Protectionism Protestantism Providence Prudentius psalms Pseudo-Dionysus Psychological Warfare Psychology Public intellectual Public Life Public Philosophy Public Theology Publishing Punk Rock Pure nature Puritanism Purity Pushkin Putin Pythagoreanism R.J. Rushdoony Race Racism Radical Orthodoxy Rape Rationality Reactionary reading Realism Reason Red State Blue State Reformation Reformational Catholicism Reformational Philosophy Reformed theology refugees reinhold niebuhr Relationality Relativism Relics Religion Religion and science Religions Religious Freedom Religious Liberty Religious Right Renaissance Rene Girard Republican Party Resurrection Resurrection. Revelation Revelations Revenge Revivalism Revolution rhetoric Richard Flannagan Richard II Richard III Richard Wagner Richard Wilbur Righteousness Ritual Robert Frost Robert Herrick Robert Jenson Robert Mugabe Robert Spaemann Robinson Crusoe Rock n' Roll Rod Dreher Rodin Roman Catholicism Roman Empire Roman Religion Romance Romanticism Rome Rootedness Rosenstock-Huessy Rousseau Rowan Williams Rural America Russia Russian literature Russian Orthodoxy Rusty Reno Rwanda S. Y. Agnon Sabbath Sacrament Sacramental theology Sacraments Sacred Sacred Space Sacrifice saints Salt Sam Harris Same-sex marriage Sanctuary Satan Satire Saudi Arabia Scapegoat Scarcity Schism Schleiermacher Scholarship Science Science and Theology Science Fiction Scopes trial Scotland Scott Adams Scott Cairns Scottish Reformation Scotus Scripture and tradition sculpture Sea Second temple Secularism Secularization Self-Help Self-trust Semiotics Semper reformanda separation of church and state Sermon on the Mount Sex Sex Trafficking Sexual abuse Sexual Politics Sexual Revolution Sexuality Shakespeare Shame Culture Shema Sherlock Shopping Silence Simone Weil Simplicity Simpsons Sin Sincerity Sixties Skepticism Slavery Slavoj Zizek Sleep Sloth Social capital Social change Social Imaginary Social Science Socialism Socialization Sociology Sociology of Knowledge Sociology of Religion Sola scriptura Sonnets Sophocles Soteriology Soviet Union Space Spain Speculation Spinoza Spirit Sport Sports Star Trek State State-formation Stephen Masty Steven Bannon Strangers Structuralism structure Subject-object Substitution Suburbs Suffering Suicide Super-Rich Superheroes Supersessionism Supplication Supreme Court Surveillance Symbol Synagogue Taberancle Tabernacle Tax Taxes Tears Technology Teens Teleology Television Temple Ten Commandments Terence Terrence Malick Terrorism Thanksgiving The South The West Theodore Roosevelt Theogony Theological Education Theological Language Theology Theology - Anthropology Theology - Christology Theology - Covenant Theology - Creation Theology - Ecclesiology Theology - Eschatology Theology - Liturgical Theology - Pneumatology Theology - Soteriology Theology - Trinity Theology proper Theopolis Theopolis Institute Theosis Theresa May Thomas A. Clark Thomas Aquinas Thomas Carlyle Thomas Mann Threshing Thucydides Time Tocqueville Tolerance Toleration Tolstoy Tom Wolfe Tools Torah Torture Toscanini Totalitarianism Trade Tradition Tragedy Transhumanism Translation Transubstantiation Travel Trees Trinitarianism Trinity Trinity House Tristan Troilus and Creysede Trump Trump Truth Turkey Twelfth Night Two Kingdoms Typology Ukraine Ulysses Uncanny Uncategorized Uniform Union with Christ United States Unity University Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Value Vatican II Vengeance Vico Victorian Age Victorian Literature Vienna Violence Virgil Virgin Birth Virginia Woolf Vladimir Nabokov Vladimir Solovyev Vladimir Solovyov W.H. Auden Walls Walt Disney Walt Whitman Walter Benjamin Walter Lippmann War Wars of Religion Washington DC Wealth Weddings Will William Carlos Williams William Gilpin William Golding Wine Wisdom wonder Word of God Wordsworth Work Works World Council of Churches World History World War I World War II Worldview Worship Wrath Writing Youth Youth Ministry Yuja Wang Yves Congar Zimbabwe Zwingli Zygmunt Bauman

Select a Month January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does 1 Peter say wives can do to win over their unbelieving husbands?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Win them without words by their behavior Pray for them constantly Show them love Share the gospel

Related posts from Leithart

Evangelical

Century of the Bible

Leithart

Evangelical

Triune Creation, Triune History

Leithart

Evangelical

Altar on the East

Leithart

Evangelical

Death and the Community

Leithart

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube