Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Leithart

Home
Evangelical
Proverbs 28:22-28

Proverbs 28:22-28

Last updated on: September 7, 2017 at 12:03 am by Peter Leithart

Proverbs 28:22-28 2017-09-07T00:03:39+06:00 Peter Leithart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

PROVERBS 28:22

Though this verse uses different terminology from Proverbs 28:20, it overlaps with that previous proverb. In both cases, there are observations about the relationship between wealth and hastiness. Verse 20 indicates that the one who makes haste to become rich, who chases dreams of quick prosperity, will end up guilty. Here, the one who rushes to riches is said to have an “evil eye.”

What is an evil eye? Eyes are organs of judgment and evaluation in Scripture, and the first time eyes are mentioned in connection with evil is in garden of Eden. As soon as Adam and Eve eat from the tree of knowledge, their eyes are open to know good and evil. One who has an evil eye is one who makes false judgments and evaluates things wrongly. Thus, Proverbs 23:6 warns that we should not eat the bread (literally, “bread the bread”) of a man with “an evil eye”; he may seem like a generous host, but “his heart is not with you” (v. 7). Jesus connects the “bad eye” with a wrong evaluation of wealth in the sermon on the mount (Matthew 6:23; see Luke 11:34). Hearts are fixed where our treasures are (Matthew 6:21), and our eyes follow our hearts, so that our eyes gaze toward and value what our heart treasures. When our heart is clear, directed by a heart set on heavenly treasures, the whole body is a body of light. Bad eyes blind and darken; the body cannot glow with the light of God if it is guided by a heart set on Mammon.

In Proverbs 28:22, hastiness is the evidence of an evil eye. The verb translated as “be hasty” sometimes means “to be in a hurry” but more commonly means “to be troubled” or even “tremble.” When Joseph reveals himself to his brothers, his brothers are “troubled” (Genesis 45:3), and when Edom and Moab hear of the exodus through the Red Sea, they will tremble with amazement (Exodus 15:15). The proverb envisions a man who expends his energies to gain wealth, a man who spends sleepless nights worrying over the collapse of the stock market or the insolvency of Greece, who is constantly trembling in anxiety over the possibility of losing wealth or losing the opportunity to make more. That kind of anxiety is evidence that our eyes are blinded, that our hearts are set on the wrong sorts of treasure, that we do not evaluate things rightly.

Adam and Eve ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, their eyes were open, and they “knew” good and evil. The man in the proverb, however, has an evil eye that is not open but closed and dark. Because he is anxious about wealth, and because he is rushing to protect what he has and gain more, he doesn’t see what’s ahead. He is ignorant of the poverty that will come upon him.

The word for poverty is the rare word cheser (used only here and in Job 30:3). The adjective form is used more frequently, and means “wanting, lacking, needing.” In a number of places in Proverbs, it describes the ‘want” of knowledge, wisdom, and understanding (Proverbs 6:32; 7:7; 9:4, 16; 10:13, 21; 11:12; 12:11; 17:18; 24:30; 28:16). The man who anxiously pursues wealth already lacks understanding and knowledge, and another form of poverty lies ahead. Cheser resembles the Hebrew word for “lovingkindness” ( chesed ), and that echo has ironic overtones in the verse. Instead of finding the faithful love and goodness of God, the man who makes an idol of Mammon, who trembles before it, will find poverty; instead of chesed , cheser .

PROVERBS 28:23

It is not easy to correct another person. Parents often avoid correcting their children because they fear their children will resent them for it. Pastors try to escape the difficult business of reproving members of their churches, and friends often overlook the follies and sins of their brothers to maintain a surface calm. Scripture rebukes this refusal to rebuke. Rebuke is a grace, an act of love (Proverbs 3:12) that produces love in the wise (Proverbs 9:8) and the understanding (Proverbs 19:25). Proverbs warns that rebuking a scorner is futile (9:8), but also says that the ones who courageously reprove the wicked will find favor (24:24-25). The law requires that we reprove our neighbors out of love (Leviticus 19:17).

In Proverbs 28:23, two uses of the tongue are contrasted. On the one hand there is reproof and correction; on the other hand there is flattery. The verb “flatter” ( chalab ) more typically means “to be smooth” or “to divide,” especially by lot. The noun form means “portion, share.” Perhaps it is used here with the connotation of smoothness; flatter is smooth speech, without edges, without any sharpness that might administer a healing wound. The word is used of Dame Folly, who speaks words that are as smooth as butter (Proverbs 7:5). On the other hand, the word could be used in contexts of speech as an extension of the connotation of “apportion.” The proverb warns about those who portion out words to their hearers, portion out words that their hearers want to hear.

In either case, the contrast of the two forms of speech is a contrast of ends. Rebuke and reproof are difficult, and look to be hard. Reproof seems to be the way to disfavor, and flattery the way to favor. But the proverb highlights the key word “after.” In the long run, those who honestly rebuke and correct will find more favor than those who smooth and soften their words. A soft answer turns away wrath, and Proverbs warns against unnecessary and unwise provocation. But Proverbs never endorses flattery, the little lies that we tell each other to avoid dealing with sin and evil that is right in front of us.

PROVERBS 28:24

This Proverb is an extension of the fifth commandment to honor father and mother. Instead of honoring, giving glory and respect and building up the “wealth” of one’s parents, the man in the proverb robs his father and mother and claims that he is innocent. The word for “transgression” in the second clause is pesha , which means “rebellion.” Someone who robs his father and mother is clearly a rebel against God and against his parents, and his denial is obviously false.

The main point of the proverb is to claim that the man who robs father and mother and then shrugs with a “what did I do?” attitude is a destroyer. Before the flood, men became destroyers (Genesis 6:11-12), so Yahweh determined to “destroy” them (Genesis 6:13, 17). Children who refuse to honor their parents might as well be tearing them limb from limb. It is not surprising that the verb translated as “rob” here is a violent term, sometimes meaning “flay” (Micah 3:2). The proverb is describing children who strip the flesh off their own flesh.

The oddity of the proverb is not in its basic thrust, which is fairly obvious. Rather, the puzzle is what kind of activity it could be warning about. Surely, children who actually rob their parents, who violently strip away their wealth, who flay them of their goods are comparatively rare. I suspect that the proverb envisions more subtle forms of violence. Jesus rebuked the Pharisees for their false piety when they gave the wealth that should be used for the upkeep of parents to God, claiming it was qorban , a sacred gift. Children who take advantage of aging parents are also destroyers.

PROVERBS 28:25

The contrasts of this proverb are worth noting. The one who is “large of soul” is contrast

ed to the one who “trusts Yahweh.” The results are contrasted as well: The large-souled man creates conflict around him, while the one who trusts Yahweh enjoys the fatness, the best and the abundance of God’s gifts.

Aristotle endorsed the “great-souled man” as a paragon of virtue. Not Scripture. In Scripture, souls are most often associated with desires, hungers, thirsts, lusts, longings. The Hebrew word nephesh , typically translated as “soul,” is etymologically “throat”; the soul is that dimension of man that longs to gulp things down. When a man has a large or wide soul, it means he is a man of great appetites, one who is never satisfied. No wonder he stirs up strife.

The word “strife” ( madon ) is rooted in a word for legal judgment or contention ( din ), which is the root of the tribal name “Dan” (cf. Genesis 30:6). The great-souled man is involved in strife generally, but the proverb is specifically pointing at his penchant for lawsuits. A litigious nation is one full of people with enlarged souls.

The great-souled have only themselves to rely on. If they are going to satisfy their desires, they are going to have to grab and grapple for what they want. They cannot simply wait for someone to give what they desire. But that’s precisely the attitude that the proverb enjoins: Those who trust in Yahweh to meet their needs, to provide food, clothing, shelter, and much else, will find satisfaction in them.

The two men contrasted in this proverb are ultimately Adam and the Last Adam. The first Adam was the great-souled man, the man whose appetites were too great to be controlled. The Last Adam trusts His Father, and His soul is made fat with all good things.

PROVERBS 28:26

On every side, children and young people in our culture are encouraged to trust their hearts. A girl feels a flutter of attraction to a boy, and they hop in bed. A young man is almost bursting with longing to escape his parents’ home, and so he follows his heart and moves out. Without consulting parents or anyone older than himself, a young man chooses a career path because he is following his dream. Nearly every liturgy of our culture – the liturgies of advertising and popular entertainment especially – hammers this one catechetical lesson: What is the chief end of man? To follow his heart.

According to the previous proverb, Yahweh is the one to be trusted. Obviously, that means we trust Yahweh rather than Baal or Chemosh or Allah or Krishna. But the juxtaposition of the two proverbs in verses 25-26 indicates that there is another potential idol lurking within our breast. Calvin said that the fallen human heart is an idol factory. That’s true, and that’s because the human heart is itself one of our main idols. Our God, Luther said, is the one we love, trust, and fear above all things. For many, that ultimate and final deity is functionally their own heart.

The contrast of this proverb is not exactly symmetrical. Trust-heart-fool is not self-evidently the opposite of walk-wise-delivered. But the proverb is constructed to invite us to contrast the two options. Trusting the heart is the opposite of walking in wisdom, apparently. And when we think about proverbs as a whole, we see why. Wisdom comes from teachers; in Proverbs, the teacher is mainly the father, the king training his son the prince. Wisdom comes from discerning the lessons of other people’s lives. Wisdom comes from receiving the correction and discipline of those who are our superiors.

None of this can happen if we are trusting our heart. If we trust our hearts, we will not listen to our parents unless our parents tell us what we already believe is correct. If we trust our hearts, we will not receive correction humbly but will resent it. If we are trusting our hearts, we are being trained in folly and not wisdom, because wisdom has to come from elsewhere.

The last word of the proverb is the verb “deliver,” which introduces a new dimension. Nothing is said explicitly about danger to the one who trusts his own heart. But throughout Proverbs we are warned that folly leads to destruction and misery. If the one who trusts his heart is a fool, then we should expect that such fools will end badly. This proverb never says that, but by mentioning deliverance at the end of the verse, it is implied.

The last word alerts us to a possible structural feature of this verse. Verses 25-26 seem to operate as a pair, chiastically arranged:

A. Great-souled stir strife

B. Those who trust Yahweh are fat

B’. Those who trust their hearts are fools

A’. Those who walk wisely will be delivered

Delivered from what? The structure suggests that those who walk wisely, and not with expanded and unsatisfiable appetites will be delivered from the strife and litigiousness that dominate the life of the great-souled.

PROVERBS 28:27

Verse 27 verbally echoes verse 22 in a couple of ways. In verse 22, we learn that anyone who is anxious or hasty to be rich has an evil eye; verse 27 also refers to the eyes, this time eyes that are covered over so that the needs of the poor never comes to his attention. Verse 22 tells us that the one who is anxious to be rich doesn’t know that lack ( cheser ) is coming, and verse 27 uses a form of this same word ( machsor ) to describe the lack of lack that the generous enjoy. In fact, the two verses are chiastically related to one another:

A. Evil eye

B. Want comes

B’. The generous do not want

A’. Hide eyes, curse.

Evil eyes are eyes that hide themselves from need. On the other hand, the two verses can be taken in parallel to one another:

A. Evil Eye

B’. Want comes

A’. Generosity, in contrast to evil eye

B’. Curses in abundance

Here, the evil eye is the eye that keeps close watch over its stuff, and doesn’t freely give.

We can note several things about the content of the verse. First, the counterintuitive paradox of the first line should not be missed. Naturally, it would seem that hoarding goods and wealth would be best way to ensure that we are lack. The Bible regularly says the opposite: Those who are generous are the ones who have plenty, while the stingy end up with abundance only of curses. This is nonsense, unless we realize that it is a theological point. “One who is gracious to a poor man lends to Yahweh, and He will repay him for his good deed” (Proverbs 19:17). Jesus says the same thing: Those who give without thinking of what they will receive in return receive rewards from the Father, particularly the reward of being regarded as “sons of the Most High” (Luke 6:35).

Second, that reference to the gospel of Luke highlights another point about this proverb. Contrary to popular mythology, generosity toward the poor and kindness toward the helpless is not a New Testament idea. It is woven into the law, and it is a regular theme of the prophets. And it is found even here in Proverbs, an Old Testament book often viewed as offering a “health and wealth” gospel. This proverb describes precisely the same dynamic that Jesus does.

Third, the image of “hiding the eyes” is worth noting. The phrase is sometimes used as a metaphor of ignorance (Leviticus 4:13; 5:2-4; Numbers 5:13), but it can also describe deliberate ignorance, the averting of the eyes from need (Leviticus 20:4; Deuteronomy 22:1-4; Isaiah 58:7). Yahweh threatens to hide His eyes
, the eyes of His favor, from those who have committed injustice by hiding their eyes from abuse and oppression (Isaiah 1:15). Eventually, the Lord brings all hidden things into the open (Ecclesiastes 12:14), lays them bare before His flaming eyes to evaluate, test, and judge.

We hide our eyes from needs in all kinds of ways. We might literally turn away our eyes from a beggar in the street, cross the street and change our course when we see a homeless man on a bench. Our very wealth and comfort screens us from the desperate needs of the poor in other parts of the world, whose poverty and want we cannot even begin to fathom. Sometimes, ideologies screen us from the poor and blunt generosity of spirit. We excuse our lack of generosity by convincing ourselves that the poor deserve to be poor because of some character flaw. Proverbs makes it clear that character flaws do lead to poverty. But this proverb shows that one of those character flaws that leads to poverty is stinginess.

PROVERBS 28:28

This proverb is integrated with several of the previous verses by several verbal echoes. The word for “wicked” here is rasha , which puns on the word “transgression” ( pesha ) in verse 24. The verb “hide” in verse 28 is not the same as that in verse 27, but there is clearly a conceptual connection. Finally, the word “increase” in the second line is a slightly different form of the word for “many” in verse 27. Verbally, verse 28 emerges from the last line of verse 27; the image of “hiding” in verse 28 provides the theme of the first line of verse 28, while the theme of “increase” is brought out in the second line of verse 28.

As often in this chapter of Proverbs, the word for “men” is adam . We cannot read this proverb about hiding Adam without thinking of the fall story of Genesis 3, but this proverb provides an interesting angle on that account. Adam is guilty and goes into hiding, but reading the fall from the viewpoint of this proverb Adam hides because the wicked are ascendant. By his sin, Sin and Death enter the world (Romans 5), and Satan takes a throne. It is possible to see the entire Old Testament era as a time of hiding, when everything was under the dominion of the “ruler of this age” and the “prince of the power of the air.”

Of course, the proverb applies more narrowly as well. At certain times in history, wicked men gain power and drive their subjects into hiding. Economic activity is driven into black markets, criticisms of the regime was spoken only in a hush and in secret. When the wicked are overthrown, though, the righteous flourish and increase. People who have been driven into hiding emerge into the light and life is renewed. This is also the story of the gospel: Through His death and resurrection, Jesus has triumphed over the ruler of this world, and He is busy increasing the righteous throughout the world.

Bible - OT - Proverbs

Previous Post

May 12, 2010

Eros, Agape, Marcion

Next Post

May 14, 2010 Development of Doctrine

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1-2 Samuel 1968 Abelard Abortion Abraham Acedia AD 70 Adam Smith Addiction Advent Advertising Aeneid Aesthetics Africa African Christianity African Church African religion Age Aging Agriculture Airline industry Alabama Alasdair MacIntyre Albania Alcohol Allegory Alms Alternative Medicine Ambrose America American Christianity American culture American economy American Evangelicals American Foreign Policy American history American Literature American Military American Politics American Religion American Revolution Anagogy Analytic Philosophy Anamnesis Ancient Egypt Ancient Greece Ancient history Ancient Near East Ancient Religion Angels Anglican Church Anglicanism Animism Anointing of the Sick Anselm Anthropology Anthropomorphism anti-Catholicism Antiquities Antonio Lopez apocalypse Apocalyptic Apocalyptic language Apostles Creed Aquinas Archeology Architecture Arianism Aristotle Ark of the Covenant Art Art History Ascension Aseity Assurance Athanasius Atheism Athens atonement Attention Attributes Augustine Austin Farrer Authority autonomy Avant-garde Awe Bach Ballooning Balzac Banking Bankruptcy Baptism Baptists Baseball Basketball Bavinck Beatitudes Beauty Behavioral Economics Being Benedict XVI Benjamin Benjamin Franklin Beowulf Berkeley Bernie Sanders Bertrand Russell Bestiary Bible Bible - criticism Bible - NT Bible - NT - 1 Corinthians Bible - NT - 1 John Bible - NT - 1 Peter Bible - NT - 2 Corinthians Bible - NT - 2 Peter Bible - NT - Acts Bible - NT - Colossians Bible - NT - Ephesians Bible - NT - Galatians Bible - NT - Gospels Bible - NT - Hebrews Bible - NT - James Bible - NT - John Bible - NT - Jude Bible - NT - Luke Bible - NT - Mark Bible - NT - Matthew Bible - NT - Paul Bible - NT - Philippians Bible - NT - Revelation Bible - NT - Romans Bible - NT - Thessalonians Bible - NT - Timothy Bible - OT Bible - OT - Amos Bible - OT - Chronicles Bible - OT - Daniel Bible - OT - Deuteronomy Bible - OT - Ecclesiastes Bible - OT - Esther Bible - OT - Exodus Bible - OT - Ezekiel Bible - OT - Ezra-Nehemiah Bible - OT - Genesis Bible - OT - Habakkuk Bible - OT - Hosea Bible - OT - Isaiah Bible - OT - Jeremiah Bible - OT - Job Bible - OT - Joel Bible - OT - Jonah Bible - OT - Joshua Bible - OT - Judges Bible - OT - Kings Bible - OT - Lamentations Bible - OT - Leviticus Bible - OT - Malachi BIble - OT - Micah Bible - OT - Nehemiah Bible - OT - Numbers Bible - OT - Pentateuch Bible - OT - Proverbs Bible - OT - Psalms Bible - OT - Ruth Bible - OT - Samuel Bible - OT - Song of Songs Bible - OT - Torah Bible - OT - Zechariah Bible - OT - Zephaniah Biblical Law Biblicism Billy Graham biography Biology Biololgy Biotechnology Blasphemy Blindness Blog news Blogging Blogroll Bloomsbury Group Bob Dylan Body Body symbolism Boethius Boko Haram Bonhoeffer Book of Common Prayer Books Botany Boundary Brexit Britain British History British Politics Bruce Springsteen Buddhism Bureaucracy Burial Business C. S. Lewis C. S. Peirce Calendars Caliphate Calvin calvinism Camille Paglia Canon Capitalism Cappadocians Carl Schmitt Catholic Social Teaching Catholicism Catholicity Causation cemeteries Cervantes Charism Charismata Charity Charles Dickens Charles Hodge Charles Simeon Charles Taylor Charles Williams Chaucer Chermistry Chess Chesterton Chiasm children China Chinese Exclusion Act Chivalry Chopin Chretien de Troyes Christendom Christian Democracy Christian reconstruction Christianity in Britain Christianization Christmas Christology Chronology Church church and state Church architecture Church Calendar Church history Church of England Church Year Cicero Circumcision Cities City of God Civil Religion Civil Society Civil War Civility Classical Theism Classics Climate Change Clothing Coleridge Colloquy of Marburg Colonialism Color Comedy Comenius Commodity Communio Communism Community Comparative religions Computer Science Confederacy Confessionalization Conflict Congregations consciousness Consecration Conservatism Constantine Constitution consumerism Contra Faustum Conversion Coriolanus Cormac McCarthy Cosmology Cosmopolitanism Council of Trent Counter-culture Counter-insurgency Courage Courtly love Covenants Crafts Craftsmanship Cranach Creation Creativity Creator-creature Credit Crime Crime and Punishment Crisis Critical scholarship Criticism Cross Cubism Cultural theory Culture Culture War Dance Daniel Dennett Dante Darwin Dave Eggers David David Foster Wallace David Hume David Jones Deadly sins Death Debt Dechristianization Decolonization Deconstruction Defoe Deja vu Democracy Denis de Rougemont Denominationalism Derrida Descartes Developmental psychology Devils Diocletian Discipleship Disenchantment Disgust Diversion Diversity Divine energies Divine Impassibility Divine Simplicity Divine Warrior Doctrine dogma Dominion Donald Trump Dostoevsky Douglas Campbell Douglas Farrow Dreams Dualism Durkheim Dystopia E.M. Forster Early Christianity Early Modern Europe Easter Eastern Europe Eastern Orthodoxy Ecclesiology Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Eden Edgar Allan Poe Edmund Spenser Education Egypt Election Elites Emergence Emma Emotion Empire England English History English Reformation Enlightenment Entertainment Entrepreneur environmentalism Envy Epic Epiphany Episcopals Epistemology Epistles Equality Erasmus Ernst Kantorowicz Eros Eschatology Eternity Ethics Eucharist Europe Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Catholics Together Events Evil Evolution Exile Face Fairie Queene Fairy Tales Faith family Family and Marriage Fantasy Farming Fashion Fasting Fatherhood Fear Femininity Feminism Fertility Fetishization Feud Feudalism Feuerbach Fiction Figs Film Finance Finland Fire Flag Flags Flannery O'Connor Flood myths Folly Food football Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy Foreknowledge Forgiveness Foucault Fracking France Francois Mauriac Franz Rosenzweig free will Freedom Freedom of God French Revolution Freud Funerals Future G. K. Chesterton Gambling Gaming Gay Marriage Gender gender identity Genealogy Geography George Berkeley George Eliot George Herbert; Poetry George Romanes Gerald Manley Hopkins Germany Gethsemane Gift Gifts Giorgio Agamben Global Christianity Global economics Globalism Globalization Glorious Revolution Gnosticism God's sovereignty Gods Goethe Golf Good Friday Gospel Gospels Gothic Gothic architecture Grace Grammar Gramsci Gratitude Greek Literature Greek Philosophy Greek Religion Greek Science Gregory of Nyssa Guillermo del Toro H. Richard Niebuhr Haiku hair Hamann Hamlet Handicap Handles Hands Hans Urs von Balthasar Happiness Harold Bloom Harper Lee Harvest healing Heaven Heavenly treasure Heavenly treasure Hebrew Bible Hebrew language Hegel Heidegger Hell Hellenism; Judaism; Revelation Henri de Lubac heresy Herman Dooyeweerd Hermeneutics Herod Heroic Heroism Hesiod Hidegard of Bingen Hierarchy Hieronymus Bosch Historicism Historiography History History - Early Modern History - Middle Ages Hoaxes Hobbes Holiness Holy Saturday Holy Spirit Home Homeless Homer Homosexuality Honor hope Horror Hospitality Housing Hugh of St. Victor Human Rights Humanism Humor hylomorphism Hymns Hypocrisy. Iago Iconoclasm Identity Ideology Idleness Idolatry Iliad Images Imagination Immigrant churches Immigrant Religion Immigration Imperialism Improvization Imputation Incarnation Incest India Individualism Indonesia Inequality Inerrancy Infant Baptism Infant mortality Infanticide Ingratitude Innovation Inspiration Institutions Insult Intellectual History Intellectuals Intelligent Design International Politics Internet Intimacy IQ Iran Iran-Iraq War Iraq Ireland Irony Islam Islamic State Islamism Ismail Kadare Israel Ivan Illich J. Gresham Machen J.N. Figgis Jacob Jacques Lacan James Bond James Jordan James Joyce James KA Smith James Wood Jane Austen Jane Jacobs Jealousy Jed Perl Jeff Koons Jeroboam Jesus Jewish War 66-70 AD Jihad Johann Georg Hamann Johannine Epistles John Ashbery John Behr John Bunyan John Calvin John Donne John Frame John Howard Yoder John Knox John Milbank John Milton John Owen John Rawls John Ruskin John Stuart Mill John the Baptist John Webster John Wesley John Williamson Nevin Jonathan Edwards Jorge Luis Borges Joseph Conrad Joseph Ratzinger Journalism Joy Judaism Judaize Judgment Judith Butler Jurgen Moltmann Justice Justification Kalevala Kant Karl Barth Karl Marx Karl Polanyi Karl Rahner Kazakhstan Kazuo Ishiguro Kenneth Lonergan Kierkegaard King Lear Kingdom of God Kitsch Knighthood Knowledge Korea Labor movement Lactantius Lamech Lament Landscape Language Latin America Laughter Law Law and Punishment Leftism Lent Les Murray Levi-Strauss Levites Leviticus Liber Mundi Liberal arts Liberal Theology Liberalism Light Lighthouse Linguistics LIstening Literacy Literary structure Literature Liturgics Liturgy Locke Logic Love Luther Lutheran Lutheranism Lying Lytton Strachey Macbeth Machiavelli Machines Madness Mainline Manhattan Manicheanism Manners Manufacturing Manuscripts Mao Zedong Maps Marcion Marilynne Robinson Marketing Marriage Martha Nussbaum Martin Bucer Martin Chemnitz Martyrdom Marx Marxism Mary Mary Douglas masculinity Mass Materialism Mathematics Maundy Thursday Max Weber Media Mediation Medication Medicine Medieval Church Medieval exegesis Medieval Literature Medieval theology Medieval Thought Medievalism Memory Merchant of Venice Mesopotamian Religion Messianic Metaphor Metaphysics Methodist Mexican-American War Michel de Montaigne Michel Faber Middle Ages Middle East Midwifery Mikhail Bulgakov Military Millennium Mind Miracles Miscellaneous Mission missionaries Mixed constitution Modern self modernism Modernity monasticism Monotheism Monroe Doctrine Monsters Montaigne's Essays Moral philosophy Mormonism Moses Mother Teresa Motherhood Motive Mount of Olives Movies Multiculturalism Murder Music Musicals Mutability Mutability Mystery Mysticism myth N. T. Wright Narrative Nation-State Nationalism Natural Law Natural-Supernatural Nature Nature and culture Nature and Grace Nazi Nazirite Necrophilia Nero Nestorianism Neuroscience Nevin Lectures New Atheism New Testament New York City Newbigin News NGOs Nibelungenlied Nicholas of Cusa Nicholas of Lyra Nietzsche Nigeria Nihilism Nobel Prize Nobility Nominalism Norbert Elias Norman MacCaig nostalgia Novels Numerology Obama Objectivity and subjectivity Occasionalism Odysseus Oil Old Testament Oliver O'Donovan Ontology Origen original sin Orthodoxy Othello Owen Barfield Pacifism Pactum salutis Paedocommunion Paganism Pain Painting Paleoconservatism Palm Sunday Pannenberg Parenting Pascal Passions Passivity Pastoral Care Pastoral theology Patrick Modiano Patristics Patronage Paul Peace of God Peace of Westphalia Penal substitution Pentecost Pentecostalism Perichoresis Pericles Persecution Person Peter Peter Enns Petrarch Philip K. Dick Philip Melanchthon Philosophy Philosophy of Action Philosophy of History Philosophy of language Philosophy of science Phone booth Photography Physics Pictures Pierre Bourdieu Place Planned Parenthood Plants plato Play Plot Plotinus Pluralism Pneumatology Poetics poetry Poetry & Stories Poland police Political Philosophy Political theology Political Theory Politics Pop Culture Pope Francis Popular Culture Populism Pornography Porphyry Post-Colonial Theory Post-Structuralism Postmodernism Postmodernity Potential Poverty Power Practice Pragmatism Prayer Preaching Predestination Prediction Prehistory Premillennialism Presbyterian Priesthood Prince Charles Prison Reform privacy Private Prodigal Son Progress Progressivism Property Prophecy Prophet Propitiation Prosperity gospel Prostitution Protectionism Protestantism Providence Prudentius psalms Pseudo-Dionysus Psychological Warfare Psychology Public intellectual Public Life Public Philosophy Public Theology Publishing Punk Rock Pure nature Puritanism Purity Pushkin Putin Pythagoreanism R.J. Rushdoony Race Racism Radical Orthodoxy Rape Rationality Reactionary reading Realism Reason Red State Blue State Reformation Reformational Catholicism Reformational Philosophy Reformed theology refugees reinhold niebuhr Relationality Relativism Relics Religion Religion and science Religions Religious Freedom Religious Liberty Religious Right Renaissance Rene Girard Republican Party Resurrection Resurrection. Revelation Revelations Revenge Revivalism Revolution rhetoric Richard Flannagan Richard II Richard III Richard Wagner Richard Wilbur Righteousness Ritual Robert Frost Robert Herrick Robert Jenson Robert Mugabe Robert Spaemann Robinson Crusoe Rock n' Roll Rod Dreher Rodin Roman Catholicism Roman Empire Roman Religion Romance Romanticism Rome Rootedness Rosenstock-Huessy Rousseau Rowan Williams Rural America Russia Russian literature Russian Orthodoxy Rusty Reno Rwanda S. Y. Agnon Sabbath Sacrament Sacramental theology Sacraments Sacred Sacred Space Sacrifice saints Salt Sam Harris Same-sex marriage Sanctuary Satan Satire Saudi Arabia Scapegoat Scarcity Schism Schleiermacher Scholarship Science Science and Theology Science Fiction Scopes trial Scotland Scott Adams Scott Cairns Scottish Reformation Scotus Scripture and tradition sculpture Sea Second temple Secularism Secularization Self-Help Self-trust Semiotics Semper reformanda separation of church and state Sermon on the Mount Sex Sex Trafficking Sexual abuse Sexual Politics Sexual Revolution Sexuality Shakespeare Shame Culture Shema Sherlock Shopping Silence Simone Weil Simplicity Simpsons Sin Sincerity Sixties Skepticism Slavery Slavoj Zizek Sleep Sloth Social capital Social change Social Imaginary Social Science Socialism Socialization Sociology Sociology of Knowledge Sociology of Religion Sola scriptura Sonnets Sophocles Soteriology Soviet Union Space Spain Speculation Spinoza Spirit Sport Sports Star Trek State State-formation Stephen Masty Steven Bannon Strangers Structuralism structure Subject-object Substitution Suburbs Suffering Suicide Super-Rich Superheroes Supersessionism Supplication Supreme Court Surveillance Symbol Synagogue Taberancle Tabernacle Tax Taxes Tears Technology Teens Teleology Television Temple Ten Commandments Terence Terrence Malick Terrorism Thanksgiving The South The West Theodore Roosevelt Theogony Theological Education Theological Language Theology Theology - Anthropology Theology - Christology Theology - Covenant Theology - Creation Theology - Ecclesiology Theology - Eschatology Theology - Liturgical Theology - Pneumatology Theology - Soteriology Theology - Trinity Theology proper Theopolis Theopolis Institute Theosis Theresa May Thomas A. Clark Thomas Aquinas Thomas Carlyle Thomas Mann Threshing Thucydides Time Tocqueville Tolerance Toleration Tolstoy Tom Wolfe Tools Torah Torture Toscanini Totalitarianism Trade Tradition Tragedy Transhumanism Translation Transubstantiation Travel Trees Trinitarianism Trinity Trinity House Tristan Troilus and Creysede Trump Trump Truth Turkey Twelfth Night Two Kingdoms Typology Ukraine Ulysses Uncanny Uncategorized Uniform Union with Christ United States Unity University Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Value Vatican II Vengeance Vico Victorian Age Victorian Literature Vienna Violence Virgil Virgin Birth Virginia Woolf Vladimir Nabokov Vladimir Solovyev Vladimir Solovyov W.H. Auden Walls Walt Disney Walt Whitman Walter Benjamin Walter Lippmann War Wars of Religion Washington DC Wealth Weddings Will William Carlos Williams William Gilpin William Golding Wine Wisdom wonder Word of God Wordsworth Work Works World Council of Churches World History World War I World War II Worldview Worship Wrath Writing Youth Youth Ministry Yuja Wang Yves Congar Zimbabwe Zwingli Zygmunt Bauman

Select a Month January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who led the Israelites into the Promised Land?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Moses Caleb Aaron Joshua