Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Leithart

Home
Evangelical
Proverbs 26:11-16

Proverbs 26:11-16

Last updated on: September 7, 2017 at 12:03 am by Peter Leithart

Proverbs 26:11-16 2017-09-07T00:03:40+06:00 Peter Leithart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

STRUCTURE

There is a fairly clear chiasm in verses 11-17:

A. Dog returning to vomit, v 11

B. Man wise in his own eyes, v 12

C. Sluggard, vv 13-15

B’. Sluggard wise in his own eyes, v 16

A’. Taking dog by the ears, v 17

Perhaps the chiasm extends further. Verses 10 and 18 share the theme of someone who endangers all around him with a weapon – arrows in the one instance and a firebrand in the second.

From this structure, it is possible to take verses 12-16 as a whole as a section about the sluggard. Though verse 12 is phrased more generally than verse 16, it uses the same “wise in his on eyes.” The comparison in verse 12 suggests that the man who is wise in his own eyes is even worse than a fool, and the following verses suggest that the sluggard is that worse-than-fool.

PROVERBS 26:11

Dogs were sometimes domesticated in biblical times, beings used as watchdogs (Isaiah 56:10) and to herd sheep (Job 30:1). The overwhelming impression of dogs in the Bible, however, is negative. As Waltke points out, they eat “carcasses, garbage and corpses and licked the blood of the dead, a sort of scavenger” (Exodus 22:31 ; 1 Kings 14:11 ; 16:4; 21:19 , 23-24). In Psalm 22, dogs are the “evildoers” who surround the king, pierce his hands and feet, and join with lions and wild oxen to attack David’s life (vv. 16-21). They play a similar symbolic role in Psalm 59.

Two recurring features emerge from this portrait. First, dogs are defined by what they eat. They eat flesh and blood; they are cannibals and scavengers, refuse. Psalm 59:14-15 depicts the dogs prowling around looking for something to eat. Given the emphasis that the Jews later put on conformity to dietary regulations, it is not surprising to find the word “dog” used to describe Gentiles, who will eat anything, and it was probably also used of Jews who were lax about purity (cf. Matthew 7:6; 15:26-27). Second, dogs are urban scavengers. They are paired with birds, which are rural scavengers. Those who die in the city, and have no one to bury them, are eaten by dogs, while those who die in the country are devoured by birds of prey.

The first of these is in the background of Paul’s use of the word “dogs” in Philippians 3:2. There is clearly refers not only to “evil workers” in general, but more specifically to the “castration,” that is, to Jews and Judaizers. Jews considered non-Jews to be dogs, feeding on the carrion of paganism; Paul, by contrast, considers his own Judaism to be “rubbish” for the sake of Christ (v. 8), and yet the “castration” clings to the old and dying corpse of Judaism. Psalm 22 may be in the background; those who attack Jesus are the “dogs,” the leaders of Judaism, scavengers feeding on Jesus’ flesh, in a macabre inversion of the sacrament.

Proverbs 26:11 also describes the dog in terms of what he eats. Fools are like dogs who return to the vomit. They eat what is repulsive. 2 Peter 2:20-22 quotes this passage to describe the folly of the apostate who is delivered from the defilements of the world by the knowledge of the Lord Jesus, but later returns to the miasma that he has only recently escaped. The fool is the same. You can take a fool out of his garbage heap, but he’ll still long for it, and will return to it at his first opportunity.

The noun “vomit” is used only a handful of times in the Old Testament, usually in connection with the image of the “cup of Yahweh,” the cup of wrath that the Lord pours out to make nations drunk, to cause them to stagger and fall (cf. Isaiah 19:14; 48:26). Isaiah 28 gives a specific spin to this image by applying it to priests and prophets who “reel while having visions” and “totter in judgment” because of the strong drink of God’s wrath. They become so unstable that “all the tables are full of filthy vomit” (vv. 7-8). The verb is used a few more times, often with reference to the land “vomiting” out the inhabitants who practice idolatry and sexual sin (Leviticus 18:25 , 28; 20:22 ; cf. Jonah 2:10 ). In Revelation, Jesus threatens to “spew” evildoers out of His mouth; they will be vomited from His body.

Though vomit is never described as “unclean” in the Bible, it has the same “structure” as uncleanness. Bodily impurity is always something that comes from within the body and flows out; it’s something that crosses the boundary of the skin, and particularly of the sexual organs. Vomit, though, is particularly something that has been consumed and then expelled, through the same opening that it entered. Israel is supposed to be incorporated into the land, but if they sin the land will become sick of them and vomit them out to the nations. Israel ’s sacrifices were Yahweh’s food, and He is supposed to be pleased by them; but if they offer sacrifice while practicing injustice and secret idolatry, the Lord will reject their offerings. Believers are supposed to be “eaten into” Jesus, but Jesus rejects those who make his stomach sour.

The fool is given something worth eating, the bread and wine, or the honey of wisdom. Yet, the fool is incapable of incorporating that food into himself, and expels it. Instead of receiving wisdom and becoming wise, he delights in sniffing around at his own vomit. There may also be a reference to what the fool “spews out” of his mouth. Vomit is a good image of disgusting words, and the fool delights in words that repel others.

PROVERBS 26:12

Proverbs includes many warnings not to be wise in our own eyes. Early on, Solomon warns his son “Do not be wise in your own eyes” (3:7), and several times this self-satisfied wisdom is characteristic of a fool ( 12:17 ; 26:5). Wealth has a blinding effect, so that the rich are often wise in their own eyes (28:11): “I’m worth a billion dollars; how could I possibly be stupid?” Isaiah includes those who are “wise in their own eyes” and “clever in their own sight” in a series of woes ( 5:21 ). The context suggests that Isaiah is particularly talking about leaders, the elites, the wealthy (vv. 8, 11, 18-19, 22-23). It is particularly dangerous when those who are wise in their own eyes rule; instead of having the “fear of Yahweh” before their eyes, they have an image of their own mind.

Eyes, as we have often said, are organs of judgment. A man who is wise in his own eyes is wise in his own judgment and estimation. He assesses his own wisdom, and his own wisdom passes the test. The ludicrous circularity is glaring: A man uses his own wisdom to judge whether his wisdom passes the test of wisdom. By contrast, Solomon says that the wise man humbles himself before Yahweh, fears Yahweh, and seeks the counsel of others (Proverbs 12:15 ).

Fools are often wise in their own estimation, but here Solomon distinguishes between fool and fool. Fools can be full of all sorts of folly – they might be babblers who can’t stop talking, angry people who flare up at the least provocation, sluggards. But as long as they don’t consider themselves wise, there is still some hope for them. But once a fool becomes a fool who thinks he’s wise, that hope fades.

PROVERBS 26:13-16

References to the sluggard are scattered about Proverbs (6:9; 13:4; 19:24 ; 20:4; 21:25 ; 22:13 ; 24:30), but this section is the most detailed portrait of this particular character. He is an important character in Proverbs. As Solomon tells us at the beginning of the book, getting wisdom requires exertion and perseverance, and the sluggard is incapable of both.

Solomon tells us that the sluggard is too lazy to eat (v. 15), and thus sloth leads to poverty. But Solomon also gives us a number of other insights into the slothful. Sluggards are full of ungrounded fear: “There is a lion in the street” (v. 13). This might be an excuse for inaction; it may be that the sluggard is not genuinely fearful at all, but simply wanting to find a reason to stay in bed. Perhaps, though, he has invented fears that keep him from acting. Sluggards manufacture threats; they are worse-case-scenario types, who think of all the ways something can go wrong rather than trying to figure out how things can be made to go right.

The sluggard makes no progress. He moves, but he moves only like a door turning on its hinges. Doors don’t get up and do creative things; they are locked to their frames, and the sluggard is locked to his bed. The image is complicated by the wording that Solomon uses. The word translated “hinge” is translated that way only here, and elsewhere refers to labor pains (1 Samuel 4:19 ; Isaiah 13:8; 18:2; 21:3; Daniel 10:16 ) or to messengers and ambassadors (Proverbs 13:17 ; 25:13; Isaiah 57:9; Jeremiah 49:14).

Perhaps we are to understand a door “groaning” on hinges; or perhaps the comparison of a door to a laboring woman is linked with the biblical picture of birth as an entry through a doorway (cf. Sarah at the doorway in Genesis 18). The reference to the sluggard may be to his writhing on his bed like a woman in labor. If so, the image is deeply ironic. A woman twists in labor on her bed in order to give birth to something, but the sluggard groans, tosses, and turns to give birth only to wind. He produces nothing.

Beds are obviously places for sleep, but beds are also places where people die. The same Hebrew word refers to beds and to biers (2 Samuel 3:31 ). The sluggard is as stuck to his bed as a corpse, and is as lively.

Finally, Solomon tells us that the sluggard, despite his fear, his excuse-making, his lack of life experience, still considers himself wise. It is easy to think you understand the world when you gaze at it from the distance and safety of a bed. The sluggard is a couch potato, and not just because he sits doing nothing; he is an armchair pundit who thinks he can solve the problems of the world without actually having to do anything.

As I’ve written previously on this site, sloth is not just laziness, but indifference, the attitude of “whatever,” the avoidance of seriousness, commitment, and the trouble that inevitably comes from involvement with others.

Bible - OT - Proverbs

Previous Post

April 16, 2009

Domestic sacrifice

Next Post

April 17, 2009 Pharisees and nations

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1-2 Samuel 1968 Abelard Abortion Abraham Acedia AD 70 Adam Smith Addiction Advent Advertising Aeneid Aesthetics Africa African Christianity African Church African religion Age Aging Agriculture Airline industry Alabama Alasdair MacIntyre Albania Alcohol Allegory Alms Alternative Medicine Ambrose America American Christianity American culture American economy American Evangelicals American Foreign Policy American history American Literature American Military American Politics American Religion American Revolution Anagogy Analytic Philosophy Anamnesis Ancient Egypt Ancient Greece Ancient history Ancient Near East Ancient Religion Angels Anglican Church Anglicanism Animism Anointing of the Sick Anselm Anthropology Anthropomorphism anti-Catholicism Antiquities Antonio Lopez apocalypse Apocalyptic Apocalyptic language Apostles Creed Aquinas Archeology Architecture Arianism Aristotle Ark of the Covenant Art Art History Ascension Aseity Assurance Athanasius Atheism Athens atonement Attention Attributes Augustine Austin Farrer Authority autonomy Avant-garde Awe Bach Ballooning Balzac Banking Bankruptcy Baptism Baptists Baseball Basketball Bavinck Beatitudes Beauty Behavioral Economics Being Benedict XVI Benjamin Benjamin Franklin Beowulf Berkeley Bernie Sanders Bertrand Russell Bestiary Bible Bible - criticism Bible - NT Bible - NT - 1 Corinthians Bible - NT - 1 John Bible - NT - 1 Peter Bible - NT - 2 Corinthians Bible - NT - 2 Peter Bible - NT - Acts Bible - NT - Colossians Bible - NT - Ephesians Bible - NT - Galatians Bible - NT - Gospels Bible - NT - Hebrews Bible - NT - James Bible - NT - John Bible - NT - Jude Bible - NT - Luke Bible - NT - Mark Bible - NT - Matthew Bible - NT - Paul Bible - NT - Philippians Bible - NT - Revelation Bible - NT - Romans Bible - NT - Thessalonians Bible - NT - Timothy Bible - OT Bible - OT - Amos Bible - OT - Chronicles Bible - OT - Daniel Bible - OT - Deuteronomy Bible - OT - Ecclesiastes Bible - OT - Esther Bible - OT - Exodus Bible - OT - Ezekiel Bible - OT - Ezra-Nehemiah Bible - OT - Genesis Bible - OT - Habakkuk Bible - OT - Hosea Bible - OT - Isaiah Bible - OT - Jeremiah Bible - OT - Job Bible - OT - Joel Bible - OT - Jonah Bible - OT - Joshua Bible - OT - Judges Bible - OT - Kings Bible - OT - Lamentations Bible - OT - Leviticus Bible - OT - Malachi BIble - OT - Micah Bible - OT - Nehemiah Bible - OT - Numbers Bible - OT - Pentateuch Bible - OT - Proverbs Bible - OT - Psalms Bible - OT - Ruth Bible - OT - Samuel Bible - OT - Song of Songs Bible - OT - Torah Bible - OT - Zechariah Bible - OT - Zephaniah Biblical Law Biblicism Billy Graham biography Biology Biololgy Biotechnology Blasphemy Blindness Blog news Blogging Blogroll Bloomsbury Group Bob Dylan Body Body symbolism Boethius Boko Haram Bonhoeffer Book of Common Prayer Books Botany Boundary Brexit Britain British History British Politics Bruce Springsteen Buddhism Bureaucracy Burial Business C. S. Lewis C. S. Peirce Calendars Caliphate Calvin calvinism Camille Paglia Canon Capitalism Cappadocians Carl Schmitt Catholic Social Teaching Catholicism Catholicity Causation cemeteries Cervantes Charism Charismata Charity Charles Dickens Charles Hodge Charles Simeon Charles Taylor Charles Williams Chaucer Chermistry Chess Chesterton Chiasm children China Chinese Exclusion Act Chivalry Chopin Chretien de Troyes Christendom Christian Democracy Christian reconstruction Christianity in Britain Christianization Christmas Christology Chronology Church church and state Church architecture Church Calendar Church history Church of England Church Year Cicero Circumcision Cities City of God Civil Religion Civil Society Civil War Civility Classical Theism Classics Climate Change Clothing Coleridge Colloquy of Marburg Colonialism Color Comedy Comenius Commodity Communio Communism Community Comparative religions Computer Science Confederacy Confessionalization Conflict Congregations consciousness Consecration Conservatism Constantine Constitution consumerism Contra Faustum Conversion Coriolanus Cormac McCarthy Cosmology Cosmopolitanism Council of Trent Counter-culture Counter-insurgency Courage Courtly love Covenants Crafts Craftsmanship Cranach Creation Creativity Creator-creature Credit Crime Crime and Punishment Crisis Critical scholarship Criticism Cross Cubism Cultural theory Culture Culture War Dance Daniel Dennett Dante Darwin Dave Eggers David David Foster Wallace David Hume David Jones Deadly sins Death Debt Dechristianization Decolonization Deconstruction Defoe Deja vu Democracy Denis de Rougemont Denominationalism Derrida Descartes Developmental psychology Devils Diocletian Discipleship Disenchantment Disgust Diversion Diversity Divine energies Divine Impassibility Divine Simplicity Divine Warrior Doctrine dogma Dominion Donald Trump Dostoevsky Douglas Campbell Douglas Farrow Dreams Dualism Durkheim Dystopia E.M. Forster Early Christianity Early Modern Europe Easter Eastern Europe Eastern Orthodoxy Ecclesiology Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Eden Edgar Allan Poe Edmund Spenser Education Egypt Election Elites Emergence Emma Emotion Empire England English History English Reformation Enlightenment Entertainment Entrepreneur environmentalism Envy Epic Epiphany Episcopals Epistemology Epistles Equality Erasmus Ernst Kantorowicz Eros Eschatology Eternity Ethics Eucharist Europe Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Catholics Together Events Evil Evolution Exile Face Fairie Queene Fairy Tales Faith family Family and Marriage Fantasy Farming Fashion Fasting Fatherhood Fear Femininity Feminism Fertility Fetishization Feud Feudalism Feuerbach Fiction Figs Film Finance Finland Fire Flag Flags Flannery O'Connor Flood myths Folly Food football Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy Foreknowledge Forgiveness Foucault Fracking France Francois Mauriac Franz Rosenzweig free will Freedom Freedom of God French Revolution Freud Funerals Future G. K. Chesterton Gambling Gaming Gay Marriage Gender gender identity Genealogy Geography George Berkeley George Eliot George Herbert; Poetry George Romanes Gerald Manley Hopkins Germany Gethsemane Gift Gifts Giorgio Agamben Global Christianity Global economics Globalism Globalization Glorious Revolution Gnosticism God's sovereignty Gods Goethe Golf Good Friday Gospel Gospels Gothic Gothic architecture Grace Grammar Gramsci Gratitude Greek Literature Greek Philosophy Greek Religion Greek Science Gregory of Nyssa Guillermo del Toro H. Richard Niebuhr Haiku hair Hamann Hamlet Handicap Handles Hands Hans Urs von Balthasar Happiness Harold Bloom Harper Lee Harvest healing Heaven Heavenly treasure Heavenly treasure Hebrew Bible Hebrew language Hegel Heidegger Hell Hellenism; Judaism; Revelation Henri de Lubac heresy Herman Dooyeweerd Hermeneutics Herod Heroic Heroism Hesiod Hidegard of Bingen Hierarchy Hieronymus Bosch Historicism Historiography History History - Early Modern History - Middle Ages Hoaxes Hobbes Holiness Holy Saturday Holy Spirit Home Homeless Homer Homosexuality Honor hope Horror Hospitality Housing Hugh of St. Victor Human Rights Humanism Humor hylomorphism Hymns Hypocrisy. Iago Iconoclasm Identity Ideology Idleness Idolatry Iliad Images Imagination Immigrant churches Immigrant Religion Immigration Imperialism Improvization Imputation Incarnation Incest India Individualism Indonesia Inequality Inerrancy Infant Baptism Infant mortality Infanticide Ingratitude Innovation Inspiration Institutions Insult Intellectual History Intellectuals Intelligent Design International Politics Internet Intimacy IQ Iran Iran-Iraq War Iraq Ireland Irony Islam Islamic State Islamism Ismail Kadare Israel Ivan Illich J. Gresham Machen J.N. Figgis Jacob Jacques Lacan James Bond James Jordan James Joyce James KA Smith James Wood Jane Austen Jane Jacobs Jealousy Jed Perl Jeff Koons Jeroboam Jesus Jewish War 66-70 AD Jihad Johann Georg Hamann Johannine Epistles John Ashbery John Behr John Bunyan John Calvin John Donne John Frame John Howard Yoder John Knox John Milbank John Milton John Owen John Rawls John Ruskin John Stuart Mill John the Baptist John Webster John Wesley John Williamson Nevin Jonathan Edwards Jorge Luis Borges Joseph Conrad Joseph Ratzinger Journalism Joy Judaism Judaize Judgment Judith Butler Jurgen Moltmann Justice Justification Kalevala Kant Karl Barth Karl Marx Karl Polanyi Karl Rahner Kazakhstan Kazuo Ishiguro Kenneth Lonergan Kierkegaard King Lear Kingdom of God Kitsch Knighthood Knowledge Korea Labor movement Lactantius Lamech Lament Landscape Language Latin America Laughter Law Law and Punishment Leftism Lent Les Murray Levi-Strauss Levites Leviticus Liber Mundi Liberal arts Liberal Theology Liberalism Light Lighthouse Linguistics LIstening Literacy Literary structure Literature Liturgics Liturgy Locke Logic Love Luther Lutheran Lutheranism Lying Lytton Strachey Macbeth Machiavelli Machines Madness Mainline Manhattan Manicheanism Manners Manufacturing Manuscripts Mao Zedong Maps Marcion Marilynne Robinson Marketing Marriage Martha Nussbaum Martin Bucer Martin Chemnitz Martyrdom Marx Marxism Mary Mary Douglas masculinity Mass Materialism Mathematics Maundy Thursday Max Weber Media Mediation Medication Medicine Medieval Church Medieval exegesis Medieval Literature Medieval theology Medieval Thought Medievalism Memory Merchant of Venice Mesopotamian Religion Messianic Metaphor Metaphysics Methodist Mexican-American War Michel de Montaigne Michel Faber Middle Ages Middle East Midwifery Mikhail Bulgakov Military Millennium Mind Miracles Miscellaneous Mission missionaries Mixed constitution Modern self modernism Modernity monasticism Monotheism Monroe Doctrine Monsters Montaigne's Essays Moral philosophy Mormonism Moses Mother Teresa Motherhood Motive Mount of Olives Movies Multiculturalism Murder Music Musicals Mutability Mutability Mystery Mysticism myth N. T. Wright Narrative Nation-State Nationalism Natural Law Natural-Supernatural Nature Nature and culture Nature and Grace Nazi Nazirite Necrophilia Nero Nestorianism Neuroscience Nevin Lectures New Atheism New Testament New York City Newbigin News NGOs Nibelungenlied Nicholas of Cusa Nicholas of Lyra Nietzsche Nigeria Nihilism Nobel Prize Nobility Nominalism Norbert Elias Norman MacCaig nostalgia Novels Numerology Obama Objectivity and subjectivity Occasionalism Odysseus Oil Old Testament Oliver O'Donovan Ontology Origen original sin Orthodoxy Othello Owen Barfield Pacifism Pactum salutis Paedocommunion Paganism Pain Painting Paleoconservatism Palm Sunday Pannenberg Parenting Pascal Passions Passivity Pastoral Care Pastoral theology Patrick Modiano Patristics Patronage Paul Peace of God Peace of Westphalia Penal substitution Pentecost Pentecostalism Perichoresis Pericles Persecution Person Peter Peter Enns Petrarch Philip K. Dick Philip Melanchthon Philosophy Philosophy of Action Philosophy of History Philosophy of language Philosophy of science Phone booth Photography Physics Pictures Pierre Bourdieu Place Planned Parenthood Plants plato Play Plot Plotinus Pluralism Pneumatology Poetics poetry Poetry & Stories Poland police Political Philosophy Political theology Political Theory Politics Pop Culture Pope Francis Popular Culture Populism Pornography Porphyry Post-Colonial Theory Post-Structuralism Postmodernism Postmodernity Potential Poverty Power Practice Pragmatism Prayer Preaching Predestination Prediction Prehistory Premillennialism Presbyterian Priesthood Prince Charles Prison Reform privacy Private Prodigal Son Progress Progressivism Property Prophecy Prophet Propitiation Prosperity gospel Prostitution Protectionism Protestantism Providence Prudentius psalms Pseudo-Dionysus Psychological Warfare Psychology Public intellectual Public Life Public Philosophy Public Theology Publishing Punk Rock Pure nature Puritanism Purity Pushkin Putin Pythagoreanism R.J. Rushdoony Race Racism Radical Orthodoxy Rape Rationality Reactionary reading Realism Reason Red State Blue State Reformation Reformational Catholicism Reformational Philosophy Reformed theology refugees reinhold niebuhr Relationality Relativism Relics Religion Religion and science Religions Religious Freedom Religious Liberty Religious Right Renaissance Rene Girard Republican Party Resurrection Resurrection. Revelation Revelations Revenge Revivalism Revolution rhetoric Richard Flannagan Richard II Richard III Richard Wagner Richard Wilbur Righteousness Ritual Robert Frost Robert Herrick Robert Jenson Robert Mugabe Robert Spaemann Robinson Crusoe Rock n' Roll Rod Dreher Rodin Roman Catholicism Roman Empire Roman Religion Romance Romanticism Rome Rootedness Rosenstock-Huessy Rousseau Rowan Williams Rural America Russia Russian literature Russian Orthodoxy Rusty Reno Rwanda S. Y. Agnon Sabbath Sacrament Sacramental theology Sacraments Sacred Sacred Space Sacrifice saints Salt Sam Harris Same-sex marriage Sanctuary Satan Satire Saudi Arabia Scapegoat Scarcity Schism Schleiermacher Scholarship Science Science and Theology Science Fiction Scopes trial Scotland Scott Adams Scott Cairns Scottish Reformation Scotus Scripture and tradition sculpture Sea Second temple Secularism Secularization Self-Help Self-trust Semiotics Semper reformanda separation of church and state Sermon on the Mount Sex Sex Trafficking Sexual abuse Sexual Politics Sexual Revolution Sexuality Shakespeare Shame Culture Shema Sherlock Shopping Silence Simone Weil Simplicity Simpsons Sin Sincerity Sixties Skepticism Slavery Slavoj Zizek Sleep Sloth Social capital Social change Social Imaginary Social Science Socialism Socialization Sociology Sociology of Knowledge Sociology of Religion Sola scriptura Sonnets Sophocles Soteriology Soviet Union Space Spain Speculation Spinoza Spirit Sport Sports Star Trek State State-formation Stephen Masty Steven Bannon Strangers Structuralism structure Subject-object Substitution Suburbs Suffering Suicide Super-Rich Superheroes Supersessionism Supplication Supreme Court Surveillance Symbol Synagogue Taberancle Tabernacle Tax Taxes Tears Technology Teens Teleology Television Temple Ten Commandments Terence Terrence Malick Terrorism Thanksgiving The South The West Theodore Roosevelt Theogony Theological Education Theological Language Theology Theology - Anthropology Theology - Christology Theology - Covenant Theology - Creation Theology - Ecclesiology Theology - Eschatology Theology - Liturgical Theology - Pneumatology Theology - Soteriology Theology - Trinity Theology proper Theopolis Theopolis Institute Theosis Theresa May Thomas A. Clark Thomas Aquinas Thomas Carlyle Thomas Mann Threshing Thucydides Time Tocqueville Tolerance Toleration Tolstoy Tom Wolfe Tools Torah Torture Toscanini Totalitarianism Trade Tradition Tragedy Transhumanism Translation Transubstantiation Travel Trees Trinitarianism Trinity Trinity House Tristan Troilus and Creysede Trump Trump Truth Turkey Twelfth Night Two Kingdoms Typology Ukraine Ulysses Uncanny Uncategorized Uniform Union with Christ United States Unity University Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Value Vatican II Vengeance Vico Victorian Age Victorian Literature Vienna Violence Virgil Virgin Birth Virginia Woolf Vladimir Nabokov Vladimir Solovyev Vladimir Solovyov W.H. Auden Walls Walt Disney Walt Whitman Walter Benjamin Walter Lippmann War Wars of Religion Washington DC Wealth Weddings Will William Carlos Williams William Gilpin William Golding Wine Wisdom wonder Word of God Wordsworth Work Works World Council of Churches World History World War I World War II Worldview Worship Wrath Writing Youth Youth Ministry Yuja Wang Yves Congar Zimbabwe Zwingli Zygmunt Bauman

Select a Month January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who received a coat of many colors?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Moses Joseph David Jacob