Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Leithart

Home
Evangelical
Proverbs 26:1-9

Proverbs 26:1-9

Last updated on: September 7, 2017 at 12:03 am by Peter Leithart

Proverbs 26:1-9 2017-09-07T00:03:40+06:00 Peter Leithart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

INTRODUCTION

Many of the proverbs in chapter 26 share the basic form of a simile. Sometimes, as in verse 1, the simile is explicit in the Hebrew text (“like snow in summer” is a literal translation); at other times, the simile is not explicit in Hebrew but is implied in the structure of the verse (v. 7). The specific verses we are examining are framed by references to things that are “unfitting.” Honor is explicitly inappropriate to the fool (v. 1), and though the word “fitting” is not used in verse 9, the implication that a proverb or parable in the mouth of a fool is badly placed. “Fittingness” is an aesthetic criterion, and these verses indicate Solomon’s pervasive assumption that the life of wisdom is a life lived skillfully and artfully. Folly is not only wrong and immoral, but it lacks craftsmanship; it is like dissonant music, like a disproportionate painting or a badly designed building. Folly is an eyesore.

PROVERBS 26:1

Snow is not mentioned a lot in the Bible, and when it is, the color is often emphasized. Lepers are “snow white” (Exodus 4:6; Numbers 12:10) and David wants his sins to be washed away so that he becomes whiter than snow – cleansed like the leper whose leprosy covers his whole body (Psalm 51:1; cf. Isaiah 1:18). Here, the emphasis is not on color but on the timing of snowfall. Snow during harvest is appropriate and refreshing (25:13) but snow during summer doesn’t fit. Neither does rain in harvest. Both are annoyances; neither is where it should be.

Solomon’s word “fitting” is an important theme in the wisdom literature. It never appears in the Torah, but becomes a description of the saints and of the bride in the period of the monarchy. Praise is “fitting” or “beautiful” (Psalm 33:1; 147:1), and the bride celebrated in Solomon’s song is also described as comely (Song 1:5; 2:14; 4:3; 6:4). In Proverbs the word is always used negatively to describe the things that are not fitting for a fool (cf. 17:7; 19:10). While the word means “beauty,” the constructions in Proverbs indicate that beauty is not a quality so much of individual things or persons, but a quality of things in relation to one another. Something is beautiful, fitting, lovely “to” or “for” something else.

This is especially clear in 26:1. Honor or glory ( kabod ) is beautiful in itself. Glory is associated with beauty in the Hebrew Bible. Glory can mean wealth (Genesis 31:1) or describe the high regard and respect that comes from others (Genesis 45:13). Applied to Yahweh, it means both the visible radiance of His appearance, and the reputation that He gains by acting on behalf of Israel (cf. Exodus 16:7, 10; 24:16-17; Psalm 66:2). The basic meaning is “heavy,” and the heaviness can come from the appearance of something or from the weight of its reputation. The Lord’s glorious appearance is beautiful, enthralling, awesome; He is beautiful in His glory.

Yet, Solomon says, even honor, glory, beauty that is inappropriately bestowed is displeasing. The honor in view in 26:1 seems to be the honor of reputation, the honor of high position, or the honor of respect. Fools don’t deserve to be honored, and when they are, the effect is repugnant rather than attractive. As throughout Proverbs, wisdom means not only doing the right thing, but doing it at the right time to the right people in the right way.

PROVERBS 26:2

Verse 2 also describes something that is “unfitting.” It is another explicit simile, comparing a bird that doesn’t find a place to land to curses that don’t have cause. Solomon is not saying curses are in themselves evil or wrong. Yahweh threatens to curse Israel for her unfaithfulness, and does curse them with defeat and exile. Jesus utters curses to His enemies (Luke 6), and Paul pronounces the curse of anathema on the teachers who are seducing the Galatians away from the gospel.

The problem with the curses that Solomon mentions here is that they are “causeless.” Elsewhere in the Old Testament, the word is used in economic contexts to mean “for nothing”; a slave who has served for six years goes free in the seventh “for nothing” (Proverbs 21:2). Other times, it describes actions that are done without sufficient motivation; Abigail warns David that he would shed blood without cause if he carries out his plan to destroy Nabal (1 Samuel 25:31). In Proverbs 26:1, the curse is uttered, but the person who is cursed has done nothing to deserve it. Maybe he’s cut in front of you on the highway, or made a sales call during dinner, or insulted you at a dinner party. You’re tempted to raise your finger and pronounce a curse. That is a causeless curse. Curses can be real and powerful; they are not simply prayers and wishes but performative actions, like Jesus’ cursing of the fig tree. Because they are powerful, they should be pronounced only for great cause.

What happens to the unfitting curse? They are like wandering birds and flitting swallows. (The NASB translation makes the first word more specific than it is; the first noun is a general word for “birds” or “small bird,” and the second is, according to tradition Jewish commentators, specifically the swallow. The first noun is tzippor , the root for the name of Moses’ wife.) A bird who wanders and flies around without finding rest will eventually return to the place he started, like the wandering dove sent out from the ark. So a curse without cause will come back on the speaker’s head. Don’t speak hastily; your words may go flying only to boomerang back to you.

PROVERBS 26:3

Verse 3 describes something that is fitting. The Hebrew is verse terse: “Whip for the horse, bridle for the ass, rod for the back of fools.” It’s as if these tools were made specifically for these creatures. If you happen along a whip, you should go looking for a horse; if you’ve got a rod, it’s in your hand to beat a fool.

Curiously, though “bridles” are used to direct animals, the Old Testament never uses the word literally. It always uses it to describe the direction and control of human beings who act like asses. When Sennacherib’s officials insult Israel and Yahweh, Yahweh says that He will hook the Assyrians’ nose and put a bridle in their mouth and force them back home (1 Kings 19:28; Isaiah 37:29). It is an ironic threat, because these are precisely the kinds of things Assyrians would do to their captives. The only other place the word “bridle” appears is Psalm 32:9, which warns us not to be like horse or donkeys that have to be controlled by bridles and whips. Some people are like beasts, and they need to be taken in hand and treated firmly, lest they do damage to themselves and others.

The word “rod” is used first to describe the sceptre of the tribe of Judah (Genesis 49:10), and when it is used to describe a rod used for discipline it still carries this royal connotation. Parents rule their childr
en by deploying the “sceptre” of the rod, masters rule slaves in the same way, and Solomon tells us that fools need to be controlled in the same manner. Moses effectly rules Egypt with his rod, taking over the scepter from the putative ruler, Pharaoh, and Aaron’s budding rod is a sign of his priestly authority in Israel. The same word is the main word for “tribe” in the Old Testament (Genesis 49:16, 28), but even when used in this sense, the other meaning of the word is hovering in the background. Dan is a “tribe” of Israel because he is one of Israel’s “scepters.” The twelve tribes are twelve kings, twelve rods in the hand of Yahweh.

We sometimes think that external discipline with the rod doesn’t really help. What’s needed is a change of heart that starts from the inside. It’s true that fools need a change of heart, but Solomon tells us that the rod is an effective means for making that change (cf. 22:15). We really can make a horse go where we want with a whip, and a donkey turns when we pull on the reins. We can direct a fool by the rod/scepter we take to his back, and through the rod on his back we might actually reach the heart.

PROVERBS 26:4-5

These verses famously contradict one another. Of course, they don’t really. Even if we didn’t believe the Bible was inspired, we’d still want to give Solomon a bit of credit. If he places two proverbs next to one another that appear to say exactly the opposite, we should assume he noticed that and expected us to notice too. Proverbs is full of riddles, knots that need to be untied. This is one of them.

Verse 4 warns against responding to a fool in kind. By answering the fool according to his folly, we become equivalent to the fool. “Answer” here includes verbal answers, but is broader. It refers to any kind of response, whether on word or action. A fool insults us, and we insult him back; he mocks us, we mock him; he threatens us, we threaten him. that is “answering the fool according to his folly.” That example makes it clear how we become like the fool. Importantly, this refusal to respond eye-for-eye to the folly of the fool gives us precisely the kind of ethical stance that the New Testament gives us. The New Testament roots its exhortations in the specific example of Jesus, but Jesus is the wisdom of God who follows the wisdom of Proverbs: When insulted, he does not respond; when abused, he does not rail (cf. Romans 12; 1 Peter 2).

Verse 5, though, undermines this exhortation. The NASB softens the contrast by adding some explanatory words: “Answer a fool as his folly deserves.” The Hebrew is more sharply contradictory; it uses precisely the same phrase as verse 4, the sole difference being the deletion of “not”: “Answer the fool according to his folly.” This doesn’t mean that we act foolishly toward the fool, tit for tat. It might mean, in an apologetic situation, that we show the fool just how foolish he is. But the context for the Proverb is action and life rather than apologetic debate. One way to answer a fool according to his folly is by following the exhortation of verse 3 – by putting a rod/scepter to his back.

The goal of addressing the fool according to his folly is to rebuke his own estimation of himself. Fools have a high opinion of themselves; they judge themselves wise. They need to be shown that their behavior is not wise, and one of the ways to do that is to ensure that their folly gets the response it deserves – rebuke and discipline. Yahweh does this constantly to Israel, giving Israel to her folly as a way to liberate her from folly.

PROVERBS 26:6

The translation of this verse is difficult. The NASB translates the first line as if there were two different comparisons being made: One who sends words by a fool is like one who “cuts off his feet” and and one who “drinks violence.” It is cleaner to translate the first line as a single phrase: “One who cuts off his own feet drinks violence/damage, so the one who sends words by the hand of a fool.” Cutting off your feet has obvious effects on your mobility and agility, and is damaging to life. If you have no feet you can’t move, can’t get things done. So the one who sends a message by a fool might as well hamstring himself.

“Feet” is often a euphemism for sexual organs, and it’s possible that this is the meaning in this verse. The image is not of a man who removes his feet, but a man who castrates himself.

“Drinking violence” is a striking image, used also in Proverbs 4:17, where wickedness and violence are like an infernal sacrament for evil men. They get pleasure out of violence, and find that violence gets them charged up, in the same way that wine is pleasant to a normal person. Drinking the wine of violence may also suggest that they will drink down the wrath of Yahweh. There is an eye-for-eye discipline here. Those who drink violence every Saturday night for kicks will be forced to drain the dregs of Yahweh’s cup of wrath.

26:6, though, seems extreme. How is sending words through a fool similar to drinking violence? It may be that the sender will have to suffer violence because of his messenger, but the first line of the proverb suggests that the damage is self-inflicted. If I send a message and the messenger is an idiot, how does that make me evil? The answer seems to be that the sender is responsible for the character of his messenger, his representative. Remember that Proverbs is largely addressed to a prince who will grow up to be king. The messenger in view is a royal messenger; if he is a fool, who speaks too much or returns harsh answers or insults or rages, he is going to cause the king harm. And the king should know better. He needs to know what kind of person represents him. If he doesn’t, and if he sends out someone who does more harm than good, he might as well cut off his “feet.”

PROVERBS 26:7-9

These proverbs all share a similar structure and theme. In the NASB, they are all constructed as similes. Only verse 8 is an explicit simile in the Hebrew. But they all depend on comparisons. The common theme, which we met at the beginning of the chapter, is unfittingness.

Proverbs in the mouths of fools are inappropriate; they “fail” like the legs of a lame man. The proverb may be perfectly sound in itself, but it loses its soundness by coming out of the mouth of a fool. It can’t get up and walk; it can’t do what proverbs are designed to do, which is to give wisdom, any more than a lame man’s legs can help him walk. Wisdom depends not only on the abstracted content of what’s said and taught; we have seen that it also depends on timing. But here we see that it also depends on the source. Wisdom will have its effect only if it is spoken by the right person at the right time in the right manner.

Verse 8 returns to the point of verse 1, about the inappropriateness of honor to a fool. Verse 1 says only that it is unfitting. Verse 8 says that it is dangerous. Put a fool in a high position, give him honor and reputat
ion, make him a mouthpiece, and you’ll be ducking slingstones before long. We don’t have to look far to see this proverb in action. Just watch the Oscars, a show that majors in giving a platform of honor to fools.

Thorns are the result of the curse (Genesis 3), and throughout the Bible thorns represent evil men, men who do damage just by being. A fool who utters a proverb is taking a thorn in hand; he is hurting himself. He speaks about wisdom and condemns folly, but in condemning folly he is condemning himself. But he doesn’t even notice that it’s happening. A drunkard will get into a bar fight, and then wonder the next morning why there’s a gash in his head; a fool will take up a proverb, and then wonder why his hand is bleeding.

Bible - OT - Proverbs

Previous Post

February 19, 2009

Anti-anti-Constantinianism

Next Post

February 20, 2009 Rapacious hands

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1-2 Samuel 1968 Abelard Abortion Abraham Acedia AD 70 Adam Smith Addiction Advent Advertising Aeneid Aesthetics Africa African Christianity African Church African religion Age Aging Agriculture Airline industry Alabama Alasdair MacIntyre Albania Alcohol Allegory Alms Alternative Medicine Ambrose America American Christianity American culture American economy American Evangelicals American Foreign Policy American history American Literature American Military American Politics American Religion American Revolution Anagogy Analytic Philosophy Anamnesis Ancient Egypt Ancient Greece Ancient history Ancient Near East Ancient Religion Angels Anglican Church Anglicanism Animism Anointing of the Sick Anselm Anthropology Anthropomorphism anti-Catholicism Antiquities Antonio Lopez apocalypse Apocalyptic Apocalyptic language Apostles Creed Aquinas Archeology Architecture Arianism Aristotle Ark of the Covenant Art Art History Ascension Aseity Assurance Athanasius Atheism Athens atonement Attention Attributes Augustine Austin Farrer Authority autonomy Avant-garde Awe Bach Ballooning Balzac Banking Bankruptcy Baptism Baptists Baseball Basketball Bavinck Beatitudes Beauty Behavioral Economics Being Benedict XVI Benjamin Benjamin Franklin Beowulf Berkeley Bernie Sanders Bertrand Russell Bestiary Bible Bible - criticism Bible - NT Bible - NT - 1 Corinthians Bible - NT - 1 John Bible - NT - 1 Peter Bible - NT - 2 Corinthians Bible - NT - 2 Peter Bible - NT - Acts Bible - NT - Colossians Bible - NT - Ephesians Bible - NT - Galatians Bible - NT - Gospels Bible - NT - Hebrews Bible - NT - James Bible - NT - John Bible - NT - Jude Bible - NT - Luke Bible - NT - Mark Bible - NT - Matthew Bible - NT - Paul Bible - NT - Philippians Bible - NT - Revelation Bible - NT - Romans Bible - NT - Thessalonians Bible - NT - Timothy Bible - OT Bible - OT - Amos Bible - OT - Chronicles Bible - OT - Daniel Bible - OT - Deuteronomy Bible - OT - Ecclesiastes Bible - OT - Esther Bible - OT - Exodus Bible - OT - Ezekiel Bible - OT - Ezra-Nehemiah Bible - OT - Genesis Bible - OT - Habakkuk Bible - OT - Hosea Bible - OT - Isaiah Bible - OT - Jeremiah Bible - OT - Job Bible - OT - Joel Bible - OT - Jonah Bible - OT - Joshua Bible - OT - Judges Bible - OT - Kings Bible - OT - Lamentations Bible - OT - Leviticus Bible - OT - Malachi BIble - OT - Micah Bible - OT - Nehemiah Bible - OT - Numbers Bible - OT - Pentateuch Bible - OT - Proverbs Bible - OT - Psalms Bible - OT - Ruth Bible - OT - Samuel Bible - OT - Song of Songs Bible - OT - Torah Bible - OT - Zechariah Bible - OT - Zephaniah Biblical Law Biblicism Billy Graham biography Biology Biololgy Biotechnology Blasphemy Blindness Blog news Blogging Blogroll Bloomsbury Group Bob Dylan Body Body symbolism Boethius Boko Haram Bonhoeffer Book of Common Prayer Books Botany Boundary Brexit Britain British History British Politics Bruce Springsteen Buddhism Bureaucracy Burial Business C. S. Lewis C. S. Peirce Calendars Caliphate Calvin calvinism Camille Paglia Canon Capitalism Cappadocians Carl Schmitt Catholic Social Teaching Catholicism Catholicity Causation cemeteries Cervantes Charism Charismata Charity Charles Dickens Charles Hodge Charles Simeon Charles Taylor Charles Williams Chaucer Chermistry Chess Chesterton Chiasm children China Chinese Exclusion Act Chivalry Chopin Chretien de Troyes Christendom Christian Democracy Christian reconstruction Christianity in Britain Christianization Christmas Christology Chronology Church church and state Church architecture Church Calendar Church history Church of England Church Year Cicero Circumcision Cities City of God Civil Religion Civil Society Civil War Civility Classical Theism Classics Climate Change Clothing Coleridge Colloquy of Marburg Colonialism Color Comedy Comenius Commodity Communio Communism Community Comparative religions Computer Science Confederacy Confessionalization Conflict Congregations consciousness Consecration Conservatism Constantine Constitution consumerism Contra Faustum Conversion Coriolanus Cormac McCarthy Cosmology Cosmopolitanism Council of Trent Counter-culture Counter-insurgency Courage Courtly love Covenants Crafts Craftsmanship Cranach Creation Creativity Creator-creature Credit Crime Crime and Punishment Crisis Critical scholarship Criticism Cross Cubism Cultural theory Culture Culture War Dance Daniel Dennett Dante Darwin Dave Eggers David David Foster Wallace David Hume David Jones Deadly sins Death Debt Dechristianization Decolonization Deconstruction Defoe Deja vu Democracy Denis de Rougemont Denominationalism Derrida Descartes Developmental psychology Devils Diocletian Discipleship Disenchantment Disgust Diversion Diversity Divine energies Divine Impassibility Divine Simplicity Divine Warrior Doctrine dogma Dominion Donald Trump Dostoevsky Douglas Campbell Douglas Farrow Dreams Dualism Durkheim Dystopia E.M. Forster Early Christianity Early Modern Europe Easter Eastern Europe Eastern Orthodoxy Ecclesiology Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Eden Edgar Allan Poe Edmund Spenser Education Egypt Election Elites Emergence Emma Emotion Empire England English History English Reformation Enlightenment Entertainment Entrepreneur environmentalism Envy Epic Epiphany Episcopals Epistemology Epistles Equality Erasmus Ernst Kantorowicz Eros Eschatology Eternity Ethics Eucharist Europe Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Catholics Together Events Evil Evolution Exile Face Fairie Queene Fairy Tales Faith family Family and Marriage Fantasy Farming Fashion Fasting Fatherhood Fear Femininity Feminism Fertility Fetishization Feud Feudalism Feuerbach Fiction Figs Film Finance Finland Fire Flag Flags Flannery O'Connor Flood myths Folly Food football Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy Foreknowledge Forgiveness Foucault Fracking France Francois Mauriac Franz Rosenzweig free will Freedom Freedom of God French Revolution Freud Funerals Future G. K. Chesterton Gambling Gaming Gay Marriage Gender gender identity Genealogy Geography George Berkeley George Eliot George Herbert; Poetry George Romanes Gerald Manley Hopkins Germany Gethsemane Gift Gifts Giorgio Agamben Global Christianity Global economics Globalism Globalization Glorious Revolution Gnosticism God's sovereignty Gods Goethe Golf Good Friday Gospel Gospels Gothic Gothic architecture Grace Grammar Gramsci Gratitude Greek Literature Greek Philosophy Greek Religion Greek Science Gregory of Nyssa Guillermo del Toro H. Richard Niebuhr Haiku hair Hamann Hamlet Handicap Handles Hands Hans Urs von Balthasar Happiness Harold Bloom Harper Lee Harvest healing Heaven Heavenly treasure Heavenly treasure Hebrew Bible Hebrew language Hegel Heidegger Hell Hellenism; Judaism; Revelation Henri de Lubac heresy Herman Dooyeweerd Hermeneutics Herod Heroic Heroism Hesiod Hidegard of Bingen Hierarchy Hieronymus Bosch Historicism Historiography History History - Early Modern History - Middle Ages Hoaxes Hobbes Holiness Holy Saturday Holy Spirit Home Homeless Homer Homosexuality Honor hope Horror Hospitality Housing Hugh of St. Victor Human Rights Humanism Humor hylomorphism Hymns Hypocrisy. Iago Iconoclasm Identity Ideology Idleness Idolatry Iliad Images Imagination Immigrant churches Immigrant Religion Immigration Imperialism Improvization Imputation Incarnation Incest India Individualism Indonesia Inequality Inerrancy Infant Baptism Infant mortality Infanticide Ingratitude Innovation Inspiration Institutions Insult Intellectual History Intellectuals Intelligent Design International Politics Internet Intimacy IQ Iran Iran-Iraq War Iraq Ireland Irony Islam Islamic State Islamism Ismail Kadare Israel Ivan Illich J. Gresham Machen J.N. Figgis Jacob Jacques Lacan James Bond James Jordan James Joyce James KA Smith James Wood Jane Austen Jane Jacobs Jealousy Jed Perl Jeff Koons Jeroboam Jesus Jewish War 66-70 AD Jihad Johann Georg Hamann Johannine Epistles John Ashbery John Behr John Bunyan John Calvin John Donne John Frame John Howard Yoder John Knox John Milbank John Milton John Owen John Rawls John Ruskin John Stuart Mill John the Baptist John Webster John Wesley John Williamson Nevin Jonathan Edwards Jorge Luis Borges Joseph Conrad Joseph Ratzinger Journalism Joy Judaism Judaize Judgment Judith Butler Jurgen Moltmann Justice Justification Kalevala Kant Karl Barth Karl Marx Karl Polanyi Karl Rahner Kazakhstan Kazuo Ishiguro Kenneth Lonergan Kierkegaard King Lear Kingdom of God Kitsch Knighthood Knowledge Korea Labor movement Lactantius Lamech Lament Landscape Language Latin America Laughter Law Law and Punishment Leftism Lent Les Murray Levi-Strauss Levites Leviticus Liber Mundi Liberal arts Liberal Theology Liberalism Light Lighthouse Linguistics LIstening Literacy Literary structure Literature Liturgics Liturgy Locke Logic Love Luther Lutheran Lutheranism Lying Lytton Strachey Macbeth Machiavelli Machines Madness Mainline Manhattan Manicheanism Manners Manufacturing Manuscripts Mao Zedong Maps Marcion Marilynne Robinson Marketing Marriage Martha Nussbaum Martin Bucer Martin Chemnitz Martyrdom Marx Marxism Mary Mary Douglas masculinity Mass Materialism Mathematics Maundy Thursday Max Weber Media Mediation Medication Medicine Medieval Church Medieval exegesis Medieval Literature Medieval theology Medieval Thought Medievalism Memory Merchant of Venice Mesopotamian Religion Messianic Metaphor Metaphysics Methodist Mexican-American War Michel de Montaigne Michel Faber Middle Ages Middle East Midwifery Mikhail Bulgakov Military Millennium Mind Miracles Miscellaneous Mission missionaries Mixed constitution Modern self modernism Modernity monasticism Monotheism Monroe Doctrine Monsters Montaigne's Essays Moral philosophy Mormonism Moses Mother Teresa Motherhood Motive Mount of Olives Movies Multiculturalism Murder Music Musicals Mutability Mutability Mystery Mysticism myth N. T. Wright Narrative Nation-State Nationalism Natural Law Natural-Supernatural Nature Nature and culture Nature and Grace Nazi Nazirite Necrophilia Nero Nestorianism Neuroscience Nevin Lectures New Atheism New Testament New York City Newbigin News NGOs Nibelungenlied Nicholas of Cusa Nicholas of Lyra Nietzsche Nigeria Nihilism Nobel Prize Nobility Nominalism Norbert Elias Norman MacCaig nostalgia Novels Numerology Obama Objectivity and subjectivity Occasionalism Odysseus Oil Old Testament Oliver O'Donovan Ontology Origen original sin Orthodoxy Othello Owen Barfield Pacifism Pactum salutis Paedocommunion Paganism Pain Painting Paleoconservatism Palm Sunday Pannenberg Parenting Pascal Passions Passivity Pastoral Care Pastoral theology Patrick Modiano Patristics Patronage Paul Peace of God Peace of Westphalia Penal substitution Pentecost Pentecostalism Perichoresis Pericles Persecution Person Peter Peter Enns Petrarch Philip K. Dick Philip Melanchthon Philosophy Philosophy of Action Philosophy of History Philosophy of language Philosophy of science Phone booth Photography Physics Pictures Pierre Bourdieu Place Planned Parenthood Plants plato Play Plot Plotinus Pluralism Pneumatology Poetics poetry Poetry & Stories Poland police Political Philosophy Political theology Political Theory Politics Pop Culture Pope Francis Popular Culture Populism Pornography Porphyry Post-Colonial Theory Post-Structuralism Postmodernism Postmodernity Potential Poverty Power Practice Pragmatism Prayer Preaching Predestination Prediction Prehistory Premillennialism Presbyterian Priesthood Prince Charles Prison Reform privacy Private Prodigal Son Progress Progressivism Property Prophecy Prophet Propitiation Prosperity gospel Prostitution Protectionism Protestantism Providence Prudentius psalms Pseudo-Dionysus Psychological Warfare Psychology Public intellectual Public Life Public Philosophy Public Theology Publishing Punk Rock Pure nature Puritanism Purity Pushkin Putin Pythagoreanism R.J. Rushdoony Race Racism Radical Orthodoxy Rape Rationality Reactionary reading Realism Reason Red State Blue State Reformation Reformational Catholicism Reformational Philosophy Reformed theology refugees reinhold niebuhr Relationality Relativism Relics Religion Religion and science Religions Religious Freedom Religious Liberty Religious Right Renaissance Rene Girard Republican Party Resurrection Resurrection. Revelation Revelations Revenge Revivalism Revolution rhetoric Richard Flannagan Richard II Richard III Richard Wagner Richard Wilbur Righteousness Ritual Robert Frost Robert Herrick Robert Jenson Robert Mugabe Robert Spaemann Robinson Crusoe Rock n' Roll Rod Dreher Rodin Roman Catholicism Roman Empire Roman Religion Romance Romanticism Rome Rootedness Rosenstock-Huessy Rousseau Rowan Williams Rural America Russia Russian literature Russian Orthodoxy Rusty Reno Rwanda S. Y. Agnon Sabbath Sacrament Sacramental theology Sacraments Sacred Sacred Space Sacrifice saints Salt Sam Harris Same-sex marriage Sanctuary Satan Satire Saudi Arabia Scapegoat Scarcity Schism Schleiermacher Scholarship Science Science and Theology Science Fiction Scopes trial Scotland Scott Adams Scott Cairns Scottish Reformation Scotus Scripture and tradition sculpture Sea Second temple Secularism Secularization Self-Help Self-trust Semiotics Semper reformanda separation of church and state Sermon on the Mount Sex Sex Trafficking Sexual abuse Sexual Politics Sexual Revolution Sexuality Shakespeare Shame Culture Shema Sherlock Shopping Silence Simone Weil Simplicity Simpsons Sin Sincerity Sixties Skepticism Slavery Slavoj Zizek Sleep Sloth Social capital Social change Social Imaginary Social Science Socialism Socialization Sociology Sociology of Knowledge Sociology of Religion Sola scriptura Sonnets Sophocles Soteriology Soviet Union Space Spain Speculation Spinoza Spirit Sport Sports Star Trek State State-formation Stephen Masty Steven Bannon Strangers Structuralism structure Subject-object Substitution Suburbs Suffering Suicide Super-Rich Superheroes Supersessionism Supplication Supreme Court Surveillance Symbol Synagogue Taberancle Tabernacle Tax Taxes Tears Technology Teens Teleology Television Temple Ten Commandments Terence Terrence Malick Terrorism Thanksgiving The South The West Theodore Roosevelt Theogony Theological Education Theological Language Theology Theology - Anthropology Theology - Christology Theology - Covenant Theology - Creation Theology - Ecclesiology Theology - Eschatology Theology - Liturgical Theology - Pneumatology Theology - Soteriology Theology - Trinity Theology proper Theopolis Theopolis Institute Theosis Theresa May Thomas A. Clark Thomas Aquinas Thomas Carlyle Thomas Mann Threshing Thucydides Time Tocqueville Tolerance Toleration Tolstoy Tom Wolfe Tools Torah Torture Toscanini Totalitarianism Trade Tradition Tragedy Transhumanism Translation Transubstantiation Travel Trees Trinitarianism Trinity Trinity House Tristan Troilus and Creysede Trump Trump Truth Turkey Twelfth Night Two Kingdoms Typology Ukraine Ulysses Uncanny Uncategorized Uniform Union with Christ United States Unity University Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Value Vatican II Vengeance Vico Victorian Age Victorian Literature Vienna Violence Virgil Virgin Birth Virginia Woolf Vladimir Nabokov Vladimir Solovyev Vladimir Solovyov W.H. Auden Walls Walt Disney Walt Whitman Walter Benjamin Walter Lippmann War Wars of Religion Washington DC Wealth Weddings Will William Carlos Williams William Gilpin William Golding Wine Wisdom wonder Word of God Wordsworth Work Works World Council of Churches World History World War I World War II Worldview Worship Wrath Writing Youth Youth Ministry Yuja Wang Yves Congar Zimbabwe Zwingli Zygmunt Bauman

Select a Month January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Solomon Job David Joseph