Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Leithart

Home
Evangelical
Proverbs 24:21-34

Proverbs 24:21-34

Last updated on: September 7, 2017 at 12:03 am by Peter Leithart

Proverbs 24:21-34 2017-09-07T00:03:40+06:00 Peter Leithart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

PROVERBS 24:21-22

Verse 21 begins with an exhortation to “fear” Yahweh and the king. Fear involves respect and honor, but also includes an element of what we call fear. To fear Yahweh is to recognize that He is the one who has power to send both soul and body to hell, to recognize that He is the judge. In associating Yahweh and the king, Solomon is expressing a common biblical link. At various places in the Bible, rulers are called “gods” (Exodus 22:8-9; Psalm 82), using a word (elohim) that is also used of God Himself. Further, the law prohibits, in the same breath, cursing Yahweh and cursing the king (Exodus 22:28). The logic behind this link is twofold: First, that Yahweh is king, and human kings and rulers are images of Yahweh; second, that Yahweh is the one who establishes the powers that be, and therefore dishonoring rulers is tantamount to dishonoring God (Romans 13:1-7).

Two points can be drawn from this.

First, the Bible suggests that our attitude toward human rulers and authorities is a good gauge of our attitude toward God Himself. If we ignore and resist human rulers, we are likely rebels against God as well. To paraphrase John, how can we submit to the God whom we cannot see unless we submit to the “gods” that we can see? Second, and more specifically, this applies with particular forces in the political situation we find ourselves in since the 2008 election. Christians opposed to the Clinton administration did not show the honor due to rulers, and the religious right made itself odious as a result. If we oppose the policies of the Obama administration, we have to make sure that we do it with the proper respect for his office.

Verses 21b-22 are a connected exhortation to avoid association with people who are given to change. The verb “associate” is the same verb translated elsewhere as “pledge” or “be surety for,” so the association in view is specifically a financial and business arrangement. Solomon warns us not to act as guarantors of loans for certain kinds of people. The people are those who are “given to change,” and the reason is in one sense obvious: If you enter a business arrangement with someone who is unstable in his commitments, you’re not going to succeed. He’ll commit himself to something for a time, but then drift off to something else, and you’ll be left holding the bag. The reason given in verse 22 is that changeable, unstable people are heading toward ruin, and if we are wise we’ll avoid an association that will lead us into ruin as well.

Though the specific association in view is a business partnership, the principle applies more broadly. Paul warns us not to be blown about by every wind of doctrine, every new fad in religion (Ephesians 4:14), and says that instability in faith is a mark of immaturity. Adults don’t dart here and there in their commitments and beliefs, but settle and move in a particular pathway. Change is inevitable for creatures. We are changing constantly in all sorts of ways – physically, spiritually, intellectually, socially. The issue is not whether we are changing, but whether there is a direction and a trajectory to our change. Do we dabble in orthodox Christianity for awhile, and then get attracted to Eastern spirituality, and then lurch toward Mormonism? Do we slip from one church to another without settling? Or, do we settle in, and seek to mature in a particular direction?

The trick of verses 21-22 is to understand how the exhortation to fear Yahweh and the king is related to the warning against being surety for unstable people. The link seems to be that avoiding association with unstable people is one expression of fear of Yahweh and of the king. And that perhaps gives a more political tone to the exhortation against association with unstable people. That is, the “pledge” is not first of all a business pledge but a political one. Solomon is warning his son not to enter into seditious political alliances, to enter into alliance with people who are given to change (even if it is change we can believe in!). The calamity then may come from the king himself. Solomon is saying, If you join yourself with a revolutionary group that wants to dismantle everything and start over, you’re going to find yourself at the pointy end of a smart bomb.

PROVERBS 24:23-26

This section is a connected series of exhortations concerning judgment and rebuke, introduced by the comment that there are “things of the wise” (v. 23; the Hebrew is literally “these [are] to the wise”). The wisdom of Solomon is a wisdom in judgment (1 Kings 3:9), and so the things that belong to the wise in this section are things that have to do with passing judgment.

The first statement is a truism of biblical justice. Literally, the Hebrew says “to be acquainted with faces in judgment is not good.” The “face” is a key biblical image of political life. When a king shows favor to one of his courtiers, he shines his “face” upon him. When he gives a courtier a higher position, he “lifts his face.” A face of wrath is an expression of displeasure; Yahweh threatens to set His face against Israel if they sin. Knowing faces in judgment means taking note of favorites and allies; being acquainted with faces in judgment means judging not on the basis of the right but on the basis of one’s personal preferences and connections. The Torah gives a specific thrust to this, warning judges not to favor the rich (the great) or the poor (the small) in deciding cases (Deuteronomy 1:17). Justice should be faceless.

The standard for judgment is given in verse 24. Judges should ignore faces – social standing, wealth, personal connections – and pass judgment on the basis of righteousness and wickedness. Judges ought not to justify the wicked by pronouncing them righteous (cf. Deuteronomy 25:1; 1 Kings 8:32-33). Judges should condemn the wicked and exonerate the righteous. Solomon’s temple dedication prayer shows what this means: Condemning the wicked means not only making a pronouncement but causing the wicked to suffer the consequences of their wickedness; justifying the righteous means not only pronouncing them righteous but giving him the reward of his righteousness. A king who fails to do this will be universally cursed, abhorred by the nations.

Does God violate His own instructions? Doesn’t He “justify the ungodly” (Romans 4:5)? One response would be to say that Yahweh isn’t bound by these standards, so He can do what He forbids human rulers to do. That is a bad answer, both because of what it says about God and because it breaks any connection between human and divine justice. Another answer is that “ungodly” in Romans 4 ref
ers not to sinfulness but to Abram’s status as a non-Jew. He was “ungodly” by Pharisaical standards. But that doesn’t seem to fit with the following verses in Romans that speak of the forgiveness of sins. Paul says that God treats sinners as if they had not sinned, and that’s the “justification of the ungodly.” Paul’s overall point in Romans is that through the cross God shows Himself to be both just and the justifier of those who have faith in Jesus. God the Judge doesn’t simply cancel sin; He deals with guilt and sin by taking it upon Himself. He pronounces us righteous because, in Christ, we are righteous; the declaration of justification is rooted in the fact that Christ’s righteousness belongs to us by faith.

On the other hand, verse 24 might be more directly applicable to the gospel than that. Solomon doesn’t say “don’t justify the wicked,” but rather “anyone who justifies the wicked will be abhorred.” That is precisely what happens in the gospel story: Jesus welcomes the “wicked” and “sinners” to His table, heals them, cares for them. And He is indeed despised. God’s mercy to the unrighteous is always an offense to the self-righteous.

Verse 25 contrasts to verse 24. Verse 24 warns that a king who clears the wicked will be abhorred, while verse 25 says that someone who rebukes the wicked will be a delight. When we rebuke the wicked, we expose their sin to public notice and make it clear that their wickedness is not tolerable. We might also arrest the wicked in his wickedness, turning him to the way of righteousness.

Verse 25 doesn’t seem to hold in reality, however. Today, there are many who rebuke wickedness and are met with public scorn and jeering. Think of how Jerry Falwell was portrayed for his opposition to abortion, homosexual rights, and other forms of institutionalized wickedness. Think of how the Jews treated Jesus when He rebuked the Pharisees and other leaders of Israel. We can see the truth of verse 25 only if we take a longer term view. For a time, those who rebuke the wicked may be despised; but ultimately, in the longest of the long run, they will receive blessing, a crown of righteousness. According to verse 26, a straight or right answer or response is like a kiss on the lips. That straight answer may be a rebuke, rather than an encouragement, but it still brings pleasure like a kiss.

PROVERBS 24:27, 30-34

These two sections work together, both of them having to do with the nature of diligence. Verse 27 says that our work should have priorities. It is reminiscent of a historical pattern that recurs throughout the Old Testament. Kings first wage war and conquer, and then build their houses. That is what David does. And kings do this in imitation of Yahweh, who first wages war on Egypt, plunders the Egyptians, and then gives Israel instructions about building His house. Houses are places of rest after labor, and according to Solomon the labor must come first. Sabbath comes at the end of six days of labor.

The more general point is about timing and priorities in work. We can’t do everything at once, and there are some things that have to be done before others. The sluggard doesn’t really have priorities, and what priorities he has are backwards. Instead of working his fields first and then taking his ease, he lets his fields become overgrown while he sleeps away the day. Solomon is saying that a sluggard’s sluggardliness is visible, evident in the nettles and thistles that cover his fields. The sluggard lacks “heart” (v. 30). He doesn’t have the drive or the commitment to get done what he should be getting done.

There is an allusion here to the “thorns and thistles” that grow up after Adam’s sin; Adam was the first “sluggard.” The context also suggests that Solomon is making a political point. As in Richard II, gardening is an image of rule. One of the first priorities of a king (or a father) is to weed out the thorns and thistles.

PROVERBS 24:28-29

Verse 28 reiterates the demands of the ninth commandment: We are not to become false witnesses. Solomon goes further, however. He not only warns against false witness, but warns against becoming a witness at all. We should not be quick to condemn our neighbor, and to testify to his wrongs and sins. If we bear witness against a neighbor, it has to be for cause.

It is common for people to witness against a neighbor out of vengeance. We charge a neighbor with wrong because of some wrong he has done to us. Like Paul (Romans 12), Solomon warns against testifying against our neighbor out of vengeance. This is equivalent to becoming judge. Interestingly, Solomon’s phrasing echoes other parts of Scripture that talk about God’s judgment of everyone “according to his work” (Romans 12:17). God is the judge, and He does render what everyone deserves; God is Judge, and Avenger. When we take vengeance, we are pretending to take the place of God. As Barth emphasizes, one of the fundamental manifestations of original sin is our refusal to accept God’s judgment and our desire to take His place and become Judge of all the earth.

Bible - OT - Proverbs

Previous Post

December 3, 2008

Cosmic harmony

Next Post

December 6, 2008 Unto death

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1-2 Samuel 1968 Abelard Abortion Abraham Acedia AD 70 Adam Smith Addiction Advent Advertising Aeneid Aesthetics Africa African Christianity African Church African religion Age Aging Agriculture Airline industry Alabama Alasdair MacIntyre Albania Alcohol Allegory Alms Alternative Medicine Ambrose America American Christianity American culture American economy American Evangelicals American Foreign Policy American history American Literature American Military American Politics American Religion American Revolution Anagogy Analytic Philosophy Anamnesis Ancient Egypt Ancient Greece Ancient history Ancient Near East Ancient Religion Angels Anglican Church Anglicanism Animism Anointing of the Sick Anselm Anthropology Anthropomorphism anti-Catholicism Antiquities Antonio Lopez apocalypse Apocalyptic Apocalyptic language Apostles Creed Aquinas Archeology Architecture Arianism Aristotle Ark of the Covenant Art Art History Ascension Aseity Assurance Athanasius Atheism Athens atonement Attention Attributes Augustine Austin Farrer Authority autonomy Avant-garde Awe Bach Ballooning Balzac Banking Bankruptcy Baptism Baptists Baseball Basketball Bavinck Beatitudes Beauty Behavioral Economics Being Benedict XVI Benjamin Benjamin Franklin Beowulf Berkeley Bernie Sanders Bertrand Russell Bestiary Bible Bible - criticism Bible - NT Bible - NT - 1 Corinthians Bible - NT - 1 John Bible - NT - 1 Peter Bible - NT - 2 Corinthians Bible - NT - 2 Peter Bible - NT - Acts Bible - NT - Colossians Bible - NT - Ephesians Bible - NT - Galatians Bible - NT - Gospels Bible - NT - Hebrews Bible - NT - James Bible - NT - John Bible - NT - Jude Bible - NT - Luke Bible - NT - Mark Bible - NT - Matthew Bible - NT - Paul Bible - NT - Philippians Bible - NT - Revelation Bible - NT - Romans Bible - NT - Thessalonians Bible - NT - Timothy Bible - OT Bible - OT - Amos Bible - OT - Chronicles Bible - OT - Daniel Bible - OT - Deuteronomy Bible - OT - Ecclesiastes Bible - OT - Esther Bible - OT - Exodus Bible - OT - Ezekiel Bible - OT - Ezra-Nehemiah Bible - OT - Genesis Bible - OT - Habakkuk Bible - OT - Hosea Bible - OT - Isaiah Bible - OT - Jeremiah Bible - OT - Job Bible - OT - Joel Bible - OT - Jonah Bible - OT - Joshua Bible - OT - Judges Bible - OT - Kings Bible - OT - Lamentations Bible - OT - Leviticus Bible - OT - Malachi BIble - OT - Micah Bible - OT - Nehemiah Bible - OT - Numbers Bible - OT - Pentateuch Bible - OT - Proverbs Bible - OT - Psalms Bible - OT - Ruth Bible - OT - Samuel Bible - OT - Song of Songs Bible - OT - Torah Bible - OT - Zechariah Bible - OT - Zephaniah Biblical Law Biblicism Billy Graham biography Biology Biololgy Biotechnology Blasphemy Blindness Blog news Blogging Blogroll Bloomsbury Group Bob Dylan Body Body symbolism Boethius Boko Haram Bonhoeffer Book of Common Prayer Books Botany Boundary Brexit Britain British History British Politics Bruce Springsteen Buddhism Bureaucracy Burial Business C. S. Lewis C. S. Peirce Calendars Caliphate Calvin calvinism Camille Paglia Canon Capitalism Cappadocians Carl Schmitt Catholic Social Teaching Catholicism Catholicity Causation cemeteries Cervantes Charism Charismata Charity Charles Dickens Charles Hodge Charles Simeon Charles Taylor Charles Williams Chaucer Chermistry Chess Chesterton Chiasm children China Chinese Exclusion Act Chivalry Chopin Chretien de Troyes Christendom Christian Democracy Christian reconstruction Christianity in Britain Christianization Christmas Christology Chronology Church church and state Church architecture Church Calendar Church history Church of England Church Year Cicero Circumcision Cities City of God Civil Religion Civil Society Civil War Civility Classical Theism Classics Climate Change Clothing Coleridge Colloquy of Marburg Colonialism Color Comedy Comenius Commodity Communio Communism Community Comparative religions Computer Science Confederacy Confessionalization Conflict Congregations consciousness Consecration Conservatism Constantine Constitution consumerism Contra Faustum Conversion Coriolanus Cormac McCarthy Cosmology Cosmopolitanism Council of Trent Counter-culture Counter-insurgency Courage Courtly love Covenants Crafts Craftsmanship Cranach Creation Creativity Creator-creature Credit Crime Crime and Punishment Crisis Critical scholarship Criticism Cross Cubism Cultural theory Culture Culture War Dance Daniel Dennett Dante Darwin Dave Eggers David David Foster Wallace David Hume David Jones Deadly sins Death Debt Dechristianization Decolonization Deconstruction Defoe Deja vu Democracy Denis de Rougemont Denominationalism Derrida Descartes Developmental psychology Devils Diocletian Discipleship Disenchantment Disgust Diversion Diversity Divine energies Divine Impassibility Divine Simplicity Divine Warrior Doctrine dogma Dominion Donald Trump Dostoevsky Douglas Campbell Douglas Farrow Dreams Dualism Durkheim Dystopia E.M. Forster Early Christianity Early Modern Europe Easter Eastern Europe Eastern Orthodoxy Ecclesiology Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Eden Edgar Allan Poe Edmund Spenser Education Egypt Election Elites Emergence Emma Emotion Empire England English History English Reformation Enlightenment Entertainment Entrepreneur environmentalism Envy Epic Epiphany Episcopals Epistemology Epistles Equality Erasmus Ernst Kantorowicz Eros Eschatology Eternity Ethics Eucharist Europe Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Catholics Together Events Evil Evolution Exile Face Fairie Queene Fairy Tales Faith family Family and Marriage Fantasy Farming Fashion Fasting Fatherhood Fear Femininity Feminism Fertility Fetishization Feud Feudalism Feuerbach Fiction Figs Film Finance Finland Fire Flag Flags Flannery O'Connor Flood myths Folly Food football Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy Foreknowledge Forgiveness Foucault Fracking France Francois Mauriac Franz Rosenzweig free will Freedom Freedom of God French Revolution Freud Funerals Future G. K. Chesterton Gambling Gaming Gay Marriage Gender gender identity Genealogy Geography George Berkeley George Eliot George Herbert; Poetry George Romanes Gerald Manley Hopkins Germany Gethsemane Gift Gifts Giorgio Agamben Global Christianity Global economics Globalism Globalization Glorious Revolution Gnosticism God's sovereignty Gods Goethe Golf Good Friday Gospel Gospels Gothic Gothic architecture Grace Grammar Gramsci Gratitude Greek Literature Greek Philosophy Greek Religion Greek Science Gregory of Nyssa Guillermo del Toro H. Richard Niebuhr Haiku hair Hamann Hamlet Handicap Handles Hands Hans Urs von Balthasar Happiness Harold Bloom Harper Lee Harvest healing Heaven Heavenly treasure Heavenly treasure Hebrew Bible Hebrew language Hegel Heidegger Hell Hellenism; Judaism; Revelation Henri de Lubac heresy Herman Dooyeweerd Hermeneutics Herod Heroic Heroism Hesiod Hidegard of Bingen Hierarchy Hieronymus Bosch Historicism Historiography History History - Early Modern History - Middle Ages Hoaxes Hobbes Holiness Holy Saturday Holy Spirit Home Homeless Homer Homosexuality Honor hope Horror Hospitality Housing Hugh of St. Victor Human Rights Humanism Humor hylomorphism Hymns Hypocrisy. Iago Iconoclasm Identity Ideology Idleness Idolatry Iliad Images Imagination Immigrant churches Immigrant Religion Immigration Imperialism Improvization Imputation Incarnation Incest India Individualism Indonesia Inequality Inerrancy Infant Baptism Infant mortality Infanticide Ingratitude Innovation Inspiration Institutions Insult Intellectual History Intellectuals Intelligent Design International Politics Internet Intimacy IQ Iran Iran-Iraq War Iraq Ireland Irony Islam Islamic State Islamism Ismail Kadare Israel Ivan Illich J. Gresham Machen J.N. Figgis Jacob Jacques Lacan James Bond James Jordan James Joyce James KA Smith James Wood Jane Austen Jane Jacobs Jealousy Jed Perl Jeff Koons Jeroboam Jesus Jewish War 66-70 AD Jihad Johann Georg Hamann Johannine Epistles John Ashbery John Behr John Bunyan John Calvin John Donne John Frame John Howard Yoder John Knox John Milbank John Milton John Owen John Rawls John Ruskin John Stuart Mill John the Baptist John Webster John Wesley John Williamson Nevin Jonathan Edwards Jorge Luis Borges Joseph Conrad Joseph Ratzinger Journalism Joy Judaism Judaize Judgment Judith Butler Jurgen Moltmann Justice Justification Kalevala Kant Karl Barth Karl Marx Karl Polanyi Karl Rahner Kazakhstan Kazuo Ishiguro Kenneth Lonergan Kierkegaard King Lear Kingdom of God Kitsch Knighthood Knowledge Korea Labor movement Lactantius Lamech Lament Landscape Language Latin America Laughter Law Law and Punishment Leftism Lent Les Murray Levi-Strauss Levites Leviticus Liber Mundi Liberal arts Liberal Theology Liberalism Light Lighthouse Linguistics LIstening Literacy Literary structure Literature Liturgics Liturgy Locke Logic Love Luther Lutheran Lutheranism Lying Lytton Strachey Macbeth Machiavelli Machines Madness Mainline Manhattan Manicheanism Manners Manufacturing Manuscripts Mao Zedong Maps Marcion Marilynne Robinson Marketing Marriage Martha Nussbaum Martin Bucer Martin Chemnitz Martyrdom Marx Marxism Mary Mary Douglas masculinity Mass Materialism Mathematics Maundy Thursday Max Weber Media Mediation Medication Medicine Medieval Church Medieval exegesis Medieval Literature Medieval theology Medieval Thought Medievalism Memory Merchant of Venice Mesopotamian Religion Messianic Metaphor Metaphysics Methodist Mexican-American War Michel de Montaigne Michel Faber Middle Ages Middle East Midwifery Mikhail Bulgakov Military Millennium Mind Miracles Miscellaneous Mission missionaries Mixed constitution Modern self modernism Modernity monasticism Monotheism Monroe Doctrine Monsters Montaigne's Essays Moral philosophy Mormonism Moses Mother Teresa Motherhood Motive Mount of Olives Movies Multiculturalism Murder Music Musicals Mutability Mutability Mystery Mysticism myth N. T. Wright Narrative Nation-State Nationalism Natural Law Natural-Supernatural Nature Nature and culture Nature and Grace Nazi Nazirite Necrophilia Nero Nestorianism Neuroscience Nevin Lectures New Atheism New Testament New York City Newbigin News NGOs Nibelungenlied Nicholas of Cusa Nicholas of Lyra Nietzsche Nigeria Nihilism Nobel Prize Nobility Nominalism Norbert Elias Norman MacCaig nostalgia Novels Numerology Obama Objectivity and subjectivity Occasionalism Odysseus Oil Old Testament Oliver O'Donovan Ontology Origen original sin Orthodoxy Othello Owen Barfield Pacifism Pactum salutis Paedocommunion Paganism Pain Painting Paleoconservatism Palm Sunday Pannenberg Parenting Pascal Passions Passivity Pastoral Care Pastoral theology Patrick Modiano Patristics Patronage Paul Peace of God Peace of Westphalia Penal substitution Pentecost Pentecostalism Perichoresis Pericles Persecution Person Peter Peter Enns Petrarch Philip K. Dick Philip Melanchthon Philosophy Philosophy of Action Philosophy of History Philosophy of language Philosophy of science Phone booth Photography Physics Pictures Pierre Bourdieu Place Planned Parenthood Plants plato Play Plot Plotinus Pluralism Pneumatology Poetics poetry Poetry & Stories Poland police Political Philosophy Political theology Political Theory Politics Pop Culture Pope Francis Popular Culture Populism Pornography Porphyry Post-Colonial Theory Post-Structuralism Postmodernism Postmodernity Potential Poverty Power Practice Pragmatism Prayer Preaching Predestination Prediction Prehistory Premillennialism Presbyterian Priesthood Prince Charles Prison Reform privacy Private Prodigal Son Progress Progressivism Property Prophecy Prophet Propitiation Prosperity gospel Prostitution Protectionism Protestantism Providence Prudentius psalms Pseudo-Dionysus Psychological Warfare Psychology Public intellectual Public Life Public Philosophy Public Theology Publishing Punk Rock Pure nature Puritanism Purity Pushkin Putin Pythagoreanism R.J. Rushdoony Race Racism Radical Orthodoxy Rape Rationality Reactionary reading Realism Reason Red State Blue State Reformation Reformational Catholicism Reformational Philosophy Reformed theology refugees reinhold niebuhr Relationality Relativism Relics Religion Religion and science Religions Religious Freedom Religious Liberty Religious Right Renaissance Rene Girard Republican Party Resurrection Resurrection. Revelation Revelations Revenge Revivalism Revolution rhetoric Richard Flannagan Richard II Richard III Richard Wagner Richard Wilbur Righteousness Ritual Robert Frost Robert Herrick Robert Jenson Robert Mugabe Robert Spaemann Robinson Crusoe Rock n' Roll Rod Dreher Rodin Roman Catholicism Roman Empire Roman Religion Romance Romanticism Rome Rootedness Rosenstock-Huessy Rousseau Rowan Williams Rural America Russia Russian literature Russian Orthodoxy Rusty Reno Rwanda S. Y. Agnon Sabbath Sacrament Sacramental theology Sacraments Sacred Sacred Space Sacrifice saints Salt Sam Harris Same-sex marriage Sanctuary Satan Satire Saudi Arabia Scapegoat Scarcity Schism Schleiermacher Scholarship Science Science and Theology Science Fiction Scopes trial Scotland Scott Adams Scott Cairns Scottish Reformation Scotus Scripture and tradition sculpture Sea Second temple Secularism Secularization Self-Help Self-trust Semiotics Semper reformanda separation of church and state Sermon on the Mount Sex Sex Trafficking Sexual abuse Sexual Politics Sexual Revolution Sexuality Shakespeare Shame Culture Shema Sherlock Shopping Silence Simone Weil Simplicity Simpsons Sin Sincerity Sixties Skepticism Slavery Slavoj Zizek Sleep Sloth Social capital Social change Social Imaginary Social Science Socialism Socialization Sociology Sociology of Knowledge Sociology of Religion Sola scriptura Sonnets Sophocles Soteriology Soviet Union Space Spain Speculation Spinoza Spirit Sport Sports Star Trek State State-formation Stephen Masty Steven Bannon Strangers Structuralism structure Subject-object Substitution Suburbs Suffering Suicide Super-Rich Superheroes Supersessionism Supplication Supreme Court Surveillance Symbol Synagogue Taberancle Tabernacle Tax Taxes Tears Technology Teens Teleology Television Temple Ten Commandments Terence Terrence Malick Terrorism Thanksgiving The South The West Theodore Roosevelt Theogony Theological Education Theological Language Theology Theology - Anthropology Theology - Christology Theology - Covenant Theology - Creation Theology - Ecclesiology Theology - Eschatology Theology - Liturgical Theology - Pneumatology Theology - Soteriology Theology - Trinity Theology proper Theopolis Theopolis Institute Theosis Theresa May Thomas A. Clark Thomas Aquinas Thomas Carlyle Thomas Mann Threshing Thucydides Time Tocqueville Tolerance Toleration Tolstoy Tom Wolfe Tools Torah Torture Toscanini Totalitarianism Trade Tradition Tragedy Transhumanism Translation Transubstantiation Travel Trees Trinitarianism Trinity Trinity House Tristan Troilus and Creysede Trump Trump Truth Turkey Twelfth Night Two Kingdoms Typology Ukraine Ulysses Uncanny Uncategorized Uniform Union with Christ United States Unity University Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Value Vatican II Vengeance Vico Victorian Age Victorian Literature Vienna Violence Virgil Virgin Birth Virginia Woolf Vladimir Nabokov Vladimir Solovyev Vladimir Solovyov W.H. Auden Walls Walt Disney Walt Whitman Walter Benjamin Walter Lippmann War Wars of Religion Washington DC Wealth Weddings Will William Carlos Williams William Gilpin William Golding Wine Wisdom wonder Word of God Wordsworth Work Works World Council of Churches World History World War I World War II Worldview Worship Wrath Writing Youth Youth Ministry Yuja Wang Yves Congar Zimbabwe Zwingli Zygmunt Bauman

Select a Month January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is a fruit of the Spirit listed in Galatians 5?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Envy Kindness Pride Greed