Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Leithart

Home
Evangelical
Guy on Me

Guy on Me

Last updated on: September 6, 2017 at 11:43 pm by Peter Leithart

Guy on Me 2017-09-06T23:43:24+06:00 Peter Leithart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Guy Waters devotes a chapter to my views on sacramental theology in his recent book. While much of it is a reasonably accurate summary of my various writings on this subject, he devotes a few pages to critique. Here are a few responses to that critique.

1) Waters rightly notes that my sacramental theology involves a conscious effort to think through sacramental theology in terms of a “Trinitarian personalism.” In his discussion of this background, he claims that Ralph Smith and I share an “ontological skepticism” that leaves us with little to say about the essence of God “except that it exists.” He is also concerned that Smith and I do not do justice to the unity of God, since Smith’s “perferred means of giving expression to the divine unity is relational but not ontological.”

But this criticism assumes an opposition of relational and ontological that both Smith (OK, let me call him Ralph) and I are challenging. We are not saying that we should conceive the Trinity or human nature as relational rather than ontological; we are suggesting that relationship is ontological, pursuing a relational ontology, or at least insisting that relationship is not epiphenomenal to being. This seems to me a perfectly obvious implication of the doctrine of the Trinity.

The same point serves as a response to the charge of “ontological skepticism.” I’m not an ontological skeptic. I can kick the rock with Dr Johnson. But I am suspicious about an ontology whose founding concept is “substance,” especially if we are trying to think about ontology in a Trinitarian framework.

I have difficulty seeing how Waters arrived at the conclusion that we are incapable of saying anything about the essence of God. Perhaps His point is that we don’t want to talk about the “essence of God” but about “God.” If that’s what he means, he’s correct; I don’t like the “distancing” involved in talk of God’s essence as if it were something distinct from God the Trinity. But that doesn’t leave me with a skeptical apophaticism. On the contrary: I affirm everything Scripture affirms about God, and I have argued (in lecture if not in print) that only a Trinitarian theology can really have a doctrine of God’s attributes (if we can, as I think we ought, understand “essence” as interchangeable with “attributes”). This in fact is the whole point of Ralph’s quite brilliant discussion of “righteousness.”

Waters has some minor criticisms of my Trinitarian work: I may have dismissed Aristotle too readily, and I haven’t given a detailed justification for using contemporary philosophical categories. It’s all true, and my only plea is finitude.

One additional point needs clarification, though: at one point, Waters claims that my philosophical tail is wagging my theological dog (p. 182) but later suggests that one of my articles “shows how Leithart attempts to pursue sacramental theology without reference to ontological philosophical categories and discussions” (p. 370). He’s not being inconsistent, since the emphasis in the latter comment is on an absence of “ontological” categories. I’m guilty of letting a non-ontological philosophy control my theology. Perhaps I am. But what I’m trying to do is let Scripture control my theology, and employing whatever philosophical categories and concepts might come to hand. And it seems to me that Scripture is perfectly capable of talking about sacramental theology without appeal to what Waters would recognize as “ontological categories.”

2) He asks if the grace of regeneration is an “infusion of a habitus, as Reformed theology has often argued.” He believes that this concept protects against the notion that regeneration is a physical change and the notion that it is a kind of “divine possession.” He also asks whether, on my view, we can still say that the works of a believer are properly his own; I am in danger of killing the “biblical synergism of sanctification.”

This is an intriguing criticism, since the Federal Vision is usually condemned as a legalistic not an antinomian move. I think Waters is right to be more concerned about me (and my friends) verging in the latter than the former direction – he’s more on target here than Cal Beisner is in his introduction to the book.

But to respond: Waters is here operating on a nature/supernature scheme that has been the principal object of my polemics lo these many years. All my actions, not merely the good works that come under the heading of sanctification, are both caused by God and by me. They are His and my own. Waters seems to think that we need to protect the “properly his own” of the works of sanctification; but in a decretal, Calvinistic, creationist perspective, where everything is literally settled ahead of time and where God is dynamically concurrently active in every action of every creation, the problem of “properly his own” arises EVERYWHERE. The only way of keeping it from being a problem is to assume (usually without admitting it) that there are creaturely actions that are EXCLUSIVELY the creature’s own. But there aren’t: All of us, regenerated or not, live and move and have our being in Him.

I don’t think we need the device of habitus to formulate the doctrine of regeneration (to turn one of Waters’s criticism of me back on him – is it plausible that Paul was operating with an idea of habitus?). I don’t believe Scripture teaches anything is infused into us in regeneration and sanctification other than the Holy Spirit Himself. I’m a Trinitarian Personalist, after all.

As for divine possession, that’s how the gift of the Spirit looks in the Bible – Samson in battle-frenzy, Jesus suspected of insanity, the apostles drunk with new wine. What’s the problem?

3) Waters criticizes my discussions of sacramental efficacy because it is normally used to refer to the question of the “communication of grace to the recipient,” while I use it in a sociological sense. He cites WLC 161’s language about sacraments being efficacious to salvation to illustrate. My formulations tempt people to think of “redemption in sacerdotal terms.” Elsewhere, he claims that I speak of efficacy “in sociological terms” and leave open the question of “whether this sociological change is the only change of which we may speak.”

But I don’t leave that question open, not even a crack. My discussions of sacramental efficacy start from the point that, when we’re talking church and sacraments, there is nothing “social” to talk about that is not always infinitely more than “social.” (I agree with Milbank that there is no isolatable “social” anywhere, but that’s a slightly different point.) And, I refuse to talk about “grace” except as a personal gift, which includes a self-gift, from the Triune God. The criticism, in other words, again simply assumes what I’m challenging. I’m not saying “social as opposed to soteriological”; I’m saying that when we’re talking church and sacraments the social is soteriological, and vice versa.

I don’t agree that this leads to “sacerdotal” views of sacraments. I instead think that the polarization of the social and soteriological (which is, after all, only one manifestation of a polarization of nature and supernature) is the source of “sacerdotal” views. And I would argue that Waters, by maintaining the polarization, is giving more aid and comfort to sacerdotalists than I am.

4) Waters concludes that my views o

n sacramental theology do not “leave Westminster’s doctrine of the sacraments untouched,” and says that since I define my terms differently I am suggesting that “the classical sacramental distinctions but also the sacramental doctrines themselves, as traditionally formulated, are illegitimate.”

I’ll leave to my Presbytery the question of whether my views are out of accord with the Confession. I do think that certain traditional distinctions and terms have done more harm than good.

5) He says I am “most comfortable” when speaking of sin and redemption in corporate rather than “moral” terms, but, since I won’t give up the moral, he suggests, quoting Warfield on Chafer, that this leaves my mind divided between two systems of religion, and thinks I should “choose one and set the other free.”

I simply do not understand this criticism. I have written a good deal about the communal aspects of sin, but I don’t see how this in any way comes at the expense of the moral or theological. Unless one assumes that “moral” means “individual morality,” talking about the communal dimensions of sin is also talk about moral issues. Righteousness is, inevitably, theological and moral and social all at once – and so is sin; sin is always offense against God, an individual moral fault, and damaging to community.

6) Waters thinks he spots a contradiction between my “ontological” talk about grace in one place and my insistence elsewhere on a “relational” conception of grace. I’m sure I’ve not been perfectly consistent in my use of language, and I definitely have changed my mind on a host of things over the years. But that’s only a contradiction if one assumes that “ontological” and “relational” are separate concerns, which is of course precisely what I, as a Trinitarian personalist, deny.

7) Waters claims that my affirmation that “Baptism is baptism” has disastrous hermeneutical implications. By the same hermeneutic, we have no way to discern between literal and figurative speech, we might as well affirm transubstantiation, and we’ll be left with problems of harmonization in the gospels.

I think that Waters is confusing issues here, though I may be misreading what he’s about. I’m concerned with a question of referent: When the NT uses “baptism,” I believe they’re referring to the rite of water baptism (not invariably – Jesus is “baptized” on the cross). That’s a question of what the writers are referring to. I think that Waters changes the subject when he begins talking about anthropomorphisms and transubstantiation. We can talk about the same referent in literal and in figurative ways – we can speak, say, of God’s arm or His power. But those two ways of speaking have the same object in view. I’m not sure that this is an adequate response, however.

8) Waters claims that I commit “us” to a “mechanistic doctrine of sacramental efficacy.” No, I’m committed to personalism through and through. God is always free and sovereign, an infinite Person, a Trinity of Persons. But He’s a God who does what He says, who meets us where He promised to meet us.

9) He claims that I haven’t proven that the Spirit came on Saul “only officially and externally.” Well, the text says that Saul became a new man, which seems pretty strong to me. And, again to turn Waters’s criticisms back on him, isn’t the use of “official and external” categories an anachronism? What evidence does Waters have that the OT writers thought in these terms? More generally, I have argued in various places that sealing off internal and external in self-contained sections of experience is contrary to Scripture and the product of modern, or late medieval, notions – specifically, the nature/supernature polarity, once again.

10) Regarding his exegetical responses to my articles on baptism, I can only say that I don’t find his exegesis persuasive. Perhaps I’ll have time to deal with his objections in detail at a later point. I need particularly to ponder his argument that the experience of Simon Magus conflicts with my claim that the Spirit works in baptism.

11) Distinguishing the Spirit’s work from water baptism, he argues, helps preserve the distinction of visible and invisible church. He claims that I share a view of “undifferentiated covenant membership.” That’s not accurate, since I do believe that covenant members who are on the way to apostasy are in a different sort of relationship with God than covenant members who are on their way to glory. The analogy of marriage is useful: A couple whose marriage will end in divorce have a different quality of marriage than a couple who will celebrate their golden anniversary happily. But both couples are equally married. This analogy highlights once again my emphasis on personalism, which, far from giving us an “undifferentiated covenant membership,” gives us a richly varied and nuanced view of covenant membership. In the course of history, people in covenant are related to the Triune God in all sorts of complicated ways; there are all shades and variants of covenant membership, from Moses-like faithfulness, to Aaron-like vacillation, to David-like faithfulness with great sin, to Solomonic apostasy after a time of faithfulness, and so on.

Theology - Liturgical

Previous Post

July 10, 2006

Dual creation

Next Post

July 12, 2006 Suffer Little Children

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1-2 Samuel 1968 Abelard Abortion Abraham Acedia AD 70 Adam Smith Addiction Advent Advertising Aeneid Aesthetics Africa African Christianity African Church African religion Age Aging Agriculture Airline industry Alabama Alasdair MacIntyre Albania Alcohol Allegory Alms Alternative Medicine Ambrose America American Christianity American culture American economy American Evangelicals American Foreign Policy American history American Literature American Military American Politics American Religion American Revolution Anagogy Analytic Philosophy Anamnesis Ancient Egypt Ancient Greece Ancient history Ancient Near East Ancient Religion Angels Anglican Church Anglicanism Animism Anointing of the Sick Anselm Anthropology Anthropomorphism anti-Catholicism Antiquities Antonio Lopez apocalypse Apocalyptic Apocalyptic language Apostles Creed Aquinas Archeology Architecture Arianism Aristotle Ark of the Covenant Art Art History Ascension Aseity Assurance Athanasius Atheism Athens atonement Attention Attributes Augustine Austin Farrer Authority autonomy Avant-garde Awe Bach Ballooning Balzac Banking Bankruptcy Baptism Baptists Baseball Basketball Bavinck Beatitudes Beauty Behavioral Economics Being Benedict XVI Benjamin Benjamin Franklin Beowulf Berkeley Bernie Sanders Bertrand Russell Bestiary Bible Bible - criticism Bible - NT Bible - NT - 1 Corinthians Bible - NT - 1 John Bible - NT - 1 Peter Bible - NT - 2 Corinthians Bible - NT - 2 Peter Bible - NT - Acts Bible - NT - Colossians Bible - NT - Ephesians Bible - NT - Galatians Bible - NT - Gospels Bible - NT - Hebrews Bible - NT - James Bible - NT - John Bible - NT - Jude Bible - NT - Luke Bible - NT - Mark Bible - NT - Matthew Bible - NT - Paul Bible - NT - Philippians Bible - NT - Revelation Bible - NT - Romans Bible - NT - Thessalonians Bible - NT - Timothy Bible - OT Bible - OT - Amos Bible - OT - Chronicles Bible - OT - Daniel Bible - OT - Deuteronomy Bible - OT - Ecclesiastes Bible - OT - Esther Bible - OT - Exodus Bible - OT - Ezekiel Bible - OT - Ezra-Nehemiah Bible - OT - Genesis Bible - OT - Habakkuk Bible - OT - Hosea Bible - OT - Isaiah Bible - OT - Jeremiah Bible - OT - Job Bible - OT - Joel Bible - OT - Jonah Bible - OT - Joshua Bible - OT - Judges Bible - OT - Kings Bible - OT - Lamentations Bible - OT - Leviticus Bible - OT - Malachi BIble - OT - Micah Bible - OT - Nehemiah Bible - OT - Numbers Bible - OT - Pentateuch Bible - OT - Proverbs Bible - OT - Psalms Bible - OT - Ruth Bible - OT - Samuel Bible - OT - Song of Songs Bible - OT - Torah Bible - OT - Zechariah Bible - OT - Zephaniah Biblical Law Biblicism Billy Graham biography Biology Biololgy Biotechnology Blasphemy Blindness Blog news Blogging Blogroll Bloomsbury Group Bob Dylan Body Body symbolism Boethius Boko Haram Bonhoeffer Book of Common Prayer Books Botany Boundary Brexit Britain British History British Politics Bruce Springsteen Buddhism Bureaucracy Burial Business C. S. Lewis C. S. Peirce Calendars Caliphate Calvin calvinism Camille Paglia Canon Capitalism Cappadocians Carl Schmitt Catholic Social Teaching Catholicism Catholicity Causation cemeteries Cervantes Charism Charismata Charity Charles Dickens Charles Hodge Charles Simeon Charles Taylor Charles Williams Chaucer Chermistry Chess Chesterton Chiasm children China Chinese Exclusion Act Chivalry Chopin Chretien de Troyes Christendom Christian Democracy Christian reconstruction Christianity in Britain Christianization Christmas Christology Chronology Church church and state Church architecture Church Calendar Church history Church of England Church Year Cicero Circumcision Cities City of God Civil Religion Civil Society Civil War Civility Classical Theism Classics Climate Change Clothing Coleridge Colloquy of Marburg Colonialism Color Comedy Comenius Commodity Communio Communism Community Comparative religions Computer Science Confederacy Confessionalization Conflict Congregations consciousness Consecration Conservatism Constantine Constitution consumerism Contra Faustum Conversion Coriolanus Cormac McCarthy Cosmology Cosmopolitanism Council of Trent Counter-culture Counter-insurgency Courage Courtly love Covenants Crafts Craftsmanship Cranach Creation Creativity Creator-creature Credit Crime Crime and Punishment Crisis Critical scholarship Criticism Cross Cubism Cultural theory Culture Culture War Dance Daniel Dennett Dante Darwin Dave Eggers David David Foster Wallace David Hume David Jones Deadly sins Death Debt Dechristianization Decolonization Deconstruction Defoe Deja vu Democracy Denis de Rougemont Denominationalism Derrida Descartes Developmental psychology Devils Diocletian Discipleship Disenchantment Disgust Diversion Diversity Divine energies Divine Impassibility Divine Simplicity Divine Warrior Doctrine dogma Dominion Donald Trump Dostoevsky Douglas Campbell Douglas Farrow Dreams Dualism Durkheim Dystopia E.M. Forster Early Christianity Early Modern Europe Easter Eastern Europe Eastern Orthodoxy Ecclesiology Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Eden Edgar Allan Poe Edmund Spenser Education Egypt Election Elites Emergence Emma Emotion Empire England English History English Reformation Enlightenment Entertainment Entrepreneur environmentalism Envy Epic Epiphany Episcopals Epistemology Epistles Equality Erasmus Ernst Kantorowicz Eros Eschatology Eternity Ethics Eucharist Europe Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Catholics Together Events Evil Evolution Exile Face Fairie Queene Fairy Tales Faith family Family and Marriage Fantasy Farming Fashion Fasting Fatherhood Fear Femininity Feminism Fertility Fetishization Feud Feudalism Feuerbach Fiction Figs Film Finance Finland Fire Flag Flags Flannery O'Connor Flood myths Folly Food football Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy Foreknowledge Forgiveness Foucault Fracking France Francois Mauriac Franz Rosenzweig free will Freedom Freedom of God French Revolution Freud Funerals Future G. K. Chesterton Gambling Gaming Gay Marriage Gender gender identity Genealogy Geography George Berkeley George Eliot George Herbert; Poetry George Romanes Gerald Manley Hopkins Germany Gethsemane Gift Gifts Giorgio Agamben Global Christianity Global economics Globalism Globalization Glorious Revolution Gnosticism God's sovereignty Gods Goethe Golf Good Friday Gospel Gospels Gothic Gothic architecture Grace Grammar Gramsci Gratitude Greek Literature Greek Philosophy Greek Religion Greek Science Gregory of Nyssa Guillermo del Toro H. Richard Niebuhr Haiku hair Hamann Hamlet Handicap Handles Hands Hans Urs von Balthasar Happiness Harold Bloom Harper Lee Harvest healing Heaven Heavenly treasure Heavenly treasure Hebrew Bible Hebrew language Hegel Heidegger Hell Hellenism; Judaism; Revelation Henri de Lubac heresy Herman Dooyeweerd Hermeneutics Herod Heroic Heroism Hesiod Hidegard of Bingen Hierarchy Hieronymus Bosch Historicism Historiography History History - Early Modern History - Middle Ages Hoaxes Hobbes Holiness Holy Saturday Holy Spirit Home Homeless Homer Homosexuality Honor hope Horror Hospitality Housing Hugh of St. Victor Human Rights Humanism Humor hylomorphism Hymns Hypocrisy. Iago Iconoclasm Identity Ideology Idleness Idolatry Iliad Images Imagination Immigrant churches Immigrant Religion Immigration Imperialism Improvization Imputation Incarnation Incest India Individualism Indonesia Inequality Inerrancy Infant Baptism Infant mortality Infanticide Ingratitude Innovation Inspiration Institutions Insult Intellectual History Intellectuals Intelligent Design International Politics Internet Intimacy IQ Iran Iran-Iraq War Iraq Ireland Irony Islam Islamic State Islamism Ismail Kadare Israel Ivan Illich J. Gresham Machen J.N. Figgis Jacob Jacques Lacan James Bond James Jordan James Joyce James KA Smith James Wood Jane Austen Jane Jacobs Jealousy Jed Perl Jeff Koons Jeroboam Jesus Jewish War 66-70 AD Jihad Johann Georg Hamann Johannine Epistles John Ashbery John Behr John Bunyan John Calvin John Donne John Frame John Howard Yoder John Knox John Milbank John Milton John Owen John Rawls John Ruskin John Stuart Mill John the Baptist John Webster John Wesley John Williamson Nevin Jonathan Edwards Jorge Luis Borges Joseph Conrad Joseph Ratzinger Journalism Joy Judaism Judaize Judgment Judith Butler Jurgen Moltmann Justice Justification Kalevala Kant Karl Barth Karl Marx Karl Polanyi Karl Rahner Kazakhstan Kazuo Ishiguro Kenneth Lonergan Kierkegaard King Lear Kingdom of God Kitsch Knighthood Knowledge Korea Labor movement Lactantius Lamech Lament Landscape Language Latin America Laughter Law Law and Punishment Leftism Lent Les Murray Levi-Strauss Levites Leviticus Liber Mundi Liberal arts Liberal Theology Liberalism Light Lighthouse Linguistics LIstening Literacy Literary structure Literature Liturgics Liturgy Locke Logic Love Luther Lutheran Lutheranism Lying Lytton Strachey Macbeth Machiavelli Machines Madness Mainline Manhattan Manicheanism Manners Manufacturing Manuscripts Mao Zedong Maps Marcion Marilynne Robinson Marketing Marriage Martha Nussbaum Martin Bucer Martin Chemnitz Martyrdom Marx Marxism Mary Mary Douglas masculinity Mass Materialism Mathematics Maundy Thursday Max Weber Media Mediation Medication Medicine Medieval Church Medieval exegesis Medieval Literature Medieval theology Medieval Thought Medievalism Memory Merchant of Venice Mesopotamian Religion Messianic Metaphor Metaphysics Methodist Mexican-American War Michel de Montaigne Michel Faber Middle Ages Middle East Midwifery Mikhail Bulgakov Military Millennium Mind Miracles Miscellaneous Mission missionaries Mixed constitution Modern self modernism Modernity monasticism Monotheism Monroe Doctrine Monsters Montaigne's Essays Moral philosophy Mormonism Moses Mother Teresa Motherhood Motive Mount of Olives Movies Multiculturalism Murder Music Musicals Mutability Mutability Mystery Mysticism myth N. T. Wright Narrative Nation-State Nationalism Natural Law Natural-Supernatural Nature Nature and culture Nature and Grace Nazi Nazirite Necrophilia Nero Nestorianism Neuroscience Nevin Lectures New Atheism New Testament New York City Newbigin News NGOs Nibelungenlied Nicholas of Cusa Nicholas of Lyra Nietzsche Nigeria Nihilism Nobel Prize Nobility Nominalism Norbert Elias Norman MacCaig nostalgia Novels Numerology Obama Objectivity and subjectivity Occasionalism Odysseus Oil Old Testament Oliver O'Donovan Ontology Origen original sin Orthodoxy Othello Owen Barfield Pacifism Pactum salutis Paedocommunion Paganism Pain Painting Paleoconservatism Palm Sunday Pannenberg Parenting Pascal Passions Passivity Pastoral Care Pastoral theology Patrick Modiano Patristics Patronage Paul Peace of God Peace of Westphalia Penal substitution Pentecost Pentecostalism Perichoresis Pericles Persecution Person Peter Peter Enns Petrarch Philip K. Dick Philip Melanchthon Philosophy Philosophy of Action Philosophy of History Philosophy of language Philosophy of science Phone booth Photography Physics Pictures Pierre Bourdieu Place Planned Parenthood Plants plato Play Plot Plotinus Pluralism Pneumatology Poetics poetry Poetry & Stories Poland police Political Philosophy Political theology Political Theory Politics Pop Culture Pope Francis Popular Culture Populism Pornography Porphyry Post-Colonial Theory Post-Structuralism Postmodernism Postmodernity Potential Poverty Power Practice Pragmatism Prayer Preaching Predestination Prediction Prehistory Premillennialism Presbyterian Priesthood Prince Charles Prison Reform privacy Private Prodigal Son Progress Progressivism Property Prophecy Prophet Propitiation Prosperity gospel Prostitution Protectionism Protestantism Providence Prudentius psalms Pseudo-Dionysus Psychological Warfare Psychology Public intellectual Public Life Public Philosophy Public Theology Publishing Punk Rock Pure nature Puritanism Purity Pushkin Putin Pythagoreanism R.J. Rushdoony Race Racism Radical Orthodoxy Rape Rationality Reactionary reading Realism Reason Red State Blue State Reformation Reformational Catholicism Reformational Philosophy Reformed theology refugees reinhold niebuhr Relationality Relativism Relics Religion Religion and science Religions Religious Freedom Religious Liberty Religious Right Renaissance Rene Girard Republican Party Resurrection Resurrection. Revelation Revelations Revenge Revivalism Revolution rhetoric Richard Flannagan Richard II Richard III Richard Wagner Richard Wilbur Righteousness Ritual Robert Frost Robert Herrick Robert Jenson Robert Mugabe Robert Spaemann Robinson Crusoe Rock n' Roll Rod Dreher Rodin Roman Catholicism Roman Empire Roman Religion Romance Romanticism Rome Rootedness Rosenstock-Huessy Rousseau Rowan Williams Rural America Russia Russian literature Russian Orthodoxy Rusty Reno Rwanda S. Y. Agnon Sabbath Sacrament Sacramental theology Sacraments Sacred Sacred Space Sacrifice saints Salt Sam Harris Same-sex marriage Sanctuary Satan Satire Saudi Arabia Scapegoat Scarcity Schism Schleiermacher Scholarship Science Science and Theology Science Fiction Scopes trial Scotland Scott Adams Scott Cairns Scottish Reformation Scotus Scripture and tradition sculpture Sea Second temple Secularism Secularization Self-Help Self-trust Semiotics Semper reformanda separation of church and state Sermon on the Mount Sex Sex Trafficking Sexual abuse Sexual Politics Sexual Revolution Sexuality Shakespeare Shame Culture Shema Sherlock Shopping Silence Simone Weil Simplicity Simpsons Sin Sincerity Sixties Skepticism Slavery Slavoj Zizek Sleep Sloth Social capital Social change Social Imaginary Social Science Socialism Socialization Sociology Sociology of Knowledge Sociology of Religion Sola scriptura Sonnets Sophocles Soteriology Soviet Union Space Spain Speculation Spinoza Spirit Sport Sports Star Trek State State-formation Stephen Masty Steven Bannon Strangers Structuralism structure Subject-object Substitution Suburbs Suffering Suicide Super-Rich Superheroes Supersessionism Supplication Supreme Court Surveillance Symbol Synagogue Taberancle Tabernacle Tax Taxes Tears Technology Teens Teleology Television Temple Ten Commandments Terence Terrence Malick Terrorism Thanksgiving The South The West Theodore Roosevelt Theogony Theological Education Theological Language Theology Theology - Anthropology Theology - Christology Theology - Covenant Theology - Creation Theology - Ecclesiology Theology - Eschatology Theology - Liturgical Theology - Pneumatology Theology - Soteriology Theology - Trinity Theology proper Theopolis Theopolis Institute Theosis Theresa May Thomas A. Clark Thomas Aquinas Thomas Carlyle Thomas Mann Threshing Thucydides Time Tocqueville Tolerance Toleration Tolstoy Tom Wolfe Tools Torah Torture Toscanini Totalitarianism Trade Tradition Tragedy Transhumanism Translation Transubstantiation Travel Trees Trinitarianism Trinity Trinity House Tristan Troilus and Creysede Trump Trump Truth Turkey Twelfth Night Two Kingdoms Typology Ukraine Ulysses Uncanny Uncategorized Uniform Union with Christ United States Unity University Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Value Vatican II Vengeance Vico Victorian Age Victorian Literature Vienna Violence Virgil Virgin Birth Virginia Woolf Vladimir Nabokov Vladimir Solovyev Vladimir Solovyov W.H. Auden Walls Walt Disney Walt Whitman Walter Benjamin Walter Lippmann War Wars of Religion Washington DC Wealth Weddings Will William Carlos Williams William Gilpin William Golding Wine Wisdom wonder Word of God Wordsworth Work Works World Council of Churches World History World War I World War II Worldview Worship Wrath Writing Youth Youth Ministry Yuja Wang Yves Congar Zimbabwe Zwingli Zygmunt Bauman

Select a Month January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: James teaches that pure religion before God is to visit orphans and widows in their trouble.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE