Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Leithart

Home
Evangelical
Cusa and Renaissance

Cusa and Renaissance

Last updated on: September 6, 2017 at 10:51 pm by Peter Leithart

Cusa and Renaissance 2017-09-06T22:51:57+06:00 Peter Leithart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve posted a number of times on Cusa in the past, and the following builds on notes and outline that I posted in Febrary 2004.

NICHOLAS OF CUSA
This is a continuation of the earlier essay on Renaissance and modernity. To keep my assessment of the Renaissance under control, and to have something other than glittering generalities to offer, I have restricted myself to the examination of one Renaissance thinker, one whose influence on the Renaissance as such is very difficult to assess or know, but one who exemplifies some of the key themes of the Renaissance. And this writer sets out these themes in an explicitly Christian context. I speak of Nicholas of Cusa. To justify concentrating on Cusa, let me cite Heinz Heimsoeth, who claims that Giordano Bruno was the greatest of the Renaissance philosophers. He goes on to say that Bruno?s philosophy is thoroughly indebted to themes he borrowed from Cusa: ?all other decisive themes of his speculation derive from Nicholas of Cusa and were virtually taken over from him in their profoundest formulations.?E

In some ways, Cusa was more medieval than Renaissance. He was a cardinal and served in the Archdiocese of Trier. Yet, his life (c 1400-1464) was in the heart of the Renaissance. Petrarch was crowned as poet in the Capitol of Rome in 1340, sixty years before Cusa was born. Dante died in 1321, Boccaccio wrote the Decameron in 1348. Donatello was flourishing during Cusa?s lifetime, the Cathedral of Florence was completed when he was a young man, Boticelli was born in 1444, da Vinci in 1452, and Michaelangelo a decade after Cusa died.

Cusa?s work also shows his wide interests. He wrote in mathematics as well as philosophy and theology, and displayed the interests associated with being a ?Renaissance?Eman. One of the most striking things about his philosophy and theology is that it completely lacks the precision and exacting argumentation of scholasticism. In de docta ignorantia, 1.4, he writes: ?Since the absolute Maximum is all that which can be, it is altogether actual. And just as there cannot be anything greater, so for the same reason there cannot be anything lesser, since it is all that which can be. But the Minimum is that than which there cannot be a lesser. And since the Maximum is of this kind, it is evident that the Minimum coincides with the Maximum.?E

What to make of this. As an argument, it doesn?t work. If the absolute Maximum exists and is everything that can possibly be, we might infer that the Minimum is not among things that can be. Or, if the Min is among the things that can be, then it would imply that the Max is not everything whatsoever. But exposing the logical problems with this passage misses Cusa?s intention. He is not trying to establish that the max and min are identical. Rather, as Karl Jasper says, ?he is endeavouring to render plausible his notion that the absolutely Maximum is beyond all opposition and otherness. That is, he does not use the preceding passage to PROVE that God is beyond all opposition; rather, he sues it as a step toward CLAIMING that God is beyond all opposition. For he knows that the ?argument?Ecan be ?controverted?Eby anyone who insists upon an unrelenting application of the principle of noncontradiction.?E
Another indication is his use of terminology that is not clearly defined and his tendency to say things that lend themselves to misunderstanding. For instance, ?Homo enim deus est, sed non absolute, quoniam homo; humanus est igitur deus?E(man is God, but not absolutely; for he is man: he is therefore a human God). Or in de visione dei 12, when he claims that God is ?created?Eas well as creator. Sometimes speaks of God as the one in whom all contradictories coincide, and we immediately think, ?Including the contrary of good and evil???E

Another intriguing thing about his theology is his use of Scripture, which he often interprets with philosophical ideas in mind. His doctrine of acquired or learned ignorance comes from 1 Cor 3:19, and his doctrine that God is all things comes out of 1 Cor 15:28. He finds a basis for the via negativa in Eph 1:21, the claim that God is above all principality and power and virtue and dominion.

POSSEST
This can seem like mere confusion, and to some philosophers, especially in the analytic tradition, this is just what it is. But I think in fact it?s an example of Cusa?s amazing transcendance of Greek philosophy in a Christian direction. His achievement is not perfect, by any means, but it is quite remarkable. An extended example will be useful to treat. This comes from his treatise on ?de Possest,?Ea neologism that he invented to express his fundamental doctrine of God.

Cusa begins from the assumption that the sensible world is finite, and therefore must exist from another (ab alio). Because the world cannot fix its own limits, it must have something fixing its limits. Think of it this way: a finite being cannot step outside of finite being and set boundaries around finite being, otherwise he would not be finite. But finite being necessarily has a limit. So, there must be something OTHER than finite being for the finite being to have limits, a being outside the limits who can set the limits.

This ?other-from-which-the-world-exists?Eis a se , that is, exists from itself. It is the boundary-maker for finite being, and creator. Since created things only exist from another, this creator does not exist from another, but from himself. Existing from itself, it is necessarily eternal, and because it is eternal, it is necessarily invisible. Visible things are necessarily temporal, Cusa argues. As one commentator points out, this is not apologetic. We can think of possibilities that Cusa doesn?t try to refute. He is assuming the Creator-creature distinction, and then trying to fill out the features of a metaphysics based on creation.

One of the things that he discovers here is a doctrine of possibilities and actuality, the notion o ?actualized possibility?Eor what he called ?possest,?Ea combination of Latin ?posse?E(able, possibility) and ?esse?E(being, actualization). What does he mean?

First, everything that exists necessarily is able to be what it is. This leads to a consideration of actuality itself. Actuality must itself exist, since it is presupposed by anything that actually exists. If actuality did not exist, then nothing could actually be. Things are; therefore, actuality exists. Just as nothing could be white without the existence of whiteness, no things could be without the actuality of actuality. (The Platonic tenor of the whole argument is obvious. Patience. It gets better.)

Yet, if actuality exists, it is able to exist, because nothing can exist unless it is capable of existing. But it would not have the possibility for existing unless something else existed, and that something else is possibility itself: ?without possibility nothing is possible.?E If actuality is able/possible to exist, then possibility must also actually exist. Neither possibility and actuality cannot be prior to the other. If possibility were prior to actuality, then possibility would not ACTUALLY exist; but if actually were prior to possibility, then it would not be able/possible to exist. Therefore, the two are co-dependent, and must be equally ultimate, equally originary. In fact, possibility exists eternally, and since it cannot be prior to actuality, actuality also exists eternally. This possible-actuality or actualize possibility is God. God is different from all other beings in being that being that is the actuality of all possibility: ?He alone is, actually, everything of which ?is able to be?Ecan be predicated truly.?E In contrast to Aquinas, Cusa does not describe God in terms of essence and existence, but in terms of possibility and actuality.

Some corollaries follow for Cusa form this conclusion. First, God is all that is possible to be. He cannot be other than He is: ?
He is also actually all that He can be, whereas no other existing thing is ever all that IT can be?E(Hopkins). The sun is capable of being brighter or larger than it is, and therefore the sun is NOT all that it could be. There are possibilities for the sun that the sun does not actually exhibit. But God is all that He can possibly be. He is the only one who has made it through boot camp, and has become ?all that He can be?E
One response to this line of argument would be to draw a distinction between potentiality and possibility. Potentiality is based on the properties of a thing, possibility is a bare abstract able-to-be. In this sense, the sun is all that it has the potency of being. Given its essence as sun, it cannot be brighter, hotter, larger. In a purely abstract sense of logical possibility, it could be greater, hotter, brighter than it is. But the sun doesn?t exist as an abstraction, but as a particular thing with a particular character. This would be an Aristotelian response, based on an Aristotelian conception of potentiality that is tied to nature. For the Aristotelian, there is some inherent property that enables the thing to change and become something else.

Nicholas does not recognize this distinction. Instead, he uses potentia, posse, and possibilitas interchangeably. In his view, ?anything (other than God) can become something else (other than God), since God Himself has the power ?to turn any created thing into any other created thing.?? Things have no ?potential?Ein themselves, other than what God makes of them. And since He is creator, He can make anything of anything.

From this angle, it becomes clear that the Aristotelian doctrine of potentiality actually conflicts with the creation ex nihilo. It suggests that there is something in the thing itself that RESISTS God?s making of it what He will. There is some potentiality that is DIFFERENT FROM what God is able to do with it. In a metaphysics based on creation, we have to say that there is NO inherent potentiality in the creation, but only God?s word with what He has made. This same point can be brought against the doctrine of forms: forms are pre-arranged models to which substance conform or not. The substance cannot transcend the form, and there is no progress past a certain point. Once tragedy reaches its zenith, it cannot develop but just continue in infinite identical repetition. Once man has reached the form, he cannot advance in humanity. But again this posits some control or limit in the creation that stands over against God?s Word and Will. Though Cusa begins with a Platonic style argument ?Eassuming the actual existence of abstractions like ?actuality?Eand ?possibility?E?Ethat argument is ultimately in the interests of a radically un-Hellenistic metaphysics.

The Trinity is the background to Cusa?s doctrine of possest, possibility and being. ?Without possibility and actuality and the union of the two there is not, and cannot be anything. For if something lacked these, it could not exist. For how would it exist if it did not actually exist (since existence is actuality)? And if it were possible to exist but it did not exist, in what sense would it exist? (Therefore, it is necessary that there be the union of possibility and actuality.) The possibility-to-exist, acutally existing, and the union of the two are not other than one another.?E He uses the example of a rose. There is a possible rose, the actual rose, and the possible that is actual are one and the same rose. If the rose were not possible, I could not see it; it if were not actual, I could not see it; if there were not some combination of possibility and actuality, I could not see it. The rose is triune: ?I see a triune rose from a triune Beginning.?E This Triune origin is thus manifest in all things: ?nothing which is originated fails to be triune.?E God is not Triune in the sense that he combines various principles. He is the absolute Trinity, from which all other trinities are derived.

These three match the three persons: Father is ?Absolute Possibility,?Eomnipotent; the Son is ?existence itself?Eand therefore the actuality of the Father?s possibility; and the Spirit is the union of the two, ?since natural love is the spiritual union of the Father and the Son.?E The Father is not defined in otherness from the Son since for Cusa God trasncends all otherness; ?That the Father is not the Son is not on account of not-being; for God is triune prior to all not-being.?E Rather, the Father and Son and Spirit are distinguished by the dynamics of actuality and possibility. The Father is ?God who does not presuppose a beginning for Himself?E Son is ?God who does presuppose a beginning for Himself?E and the Spirit ?God who proceeds from both of these.?E Another way to say this is that the Son ?IS that which the Father can.?E The Father is possibility, the Son is the actuality of all possibilities, which is to say that all possibilities are actualized first of all in the Son.

The trinity is not mathematically three, but ?a trinity of vitally reciprocal relations.?E Creation is triune, and thus perfect life is perfectly triune: ?it is of the essence of the most perfect Life that it must be more perfectly triune, so that the Possibility-to-love is so omnipotent that from itself it begets a life of its own. From these two proceeds eternal Joy and the Spirit of love.?E

Another related concern in Cusa?s philosophy and theology was the question of the relation between infinite and finite, and here again we see Cusa?s transcendence of Hellenistic categories. Contrary to what we might think, the ancient philosophers all thought of the infinite as something threatening, bad, inferior to the finite. The infinite was unbounded, outside control, and associated with chaos and with change and becoming. For the Greeks that was a bad thing. The better thing was ?being,?Ewhich was a static, bounded, finite reality. To ?be?Emeant staying within one?s bounds and not spilling over, it meant unchangingness. Later in antiquity, Plotinus came up with a more positive understanding of infinity, in that for him infinity was a plenitude, not a chaos. Plotinus thus comes closer to Christian conceptions.

The idea of a personal, infinite God was brought by Christianity. Christianity reversed the ancient duality of infinite/finite. For the Greeks, the material world was infinite and therefore imperfect; for the Christian world, the material world was finite and therefore imperfect. But this reversal was not really breaking out of the paradigm of the contrast of infinite and finite. Certainly, many did not see the possibility of infinity within the created world. Throughout the Middle Ages, thinkers maintained the contrast of infinite God v finite world, and struggled to make sense of it.

Only with the Renaissance do we arrive at the notion of an infinite created thing: ?Everywhere the Renaissance (e.g., Ficino) emphasizes the soul?s infinite longing and the infinite power to know and to will.?E As Heimsoeth says, Cusa made the decisive step: ?every creature is a finite infinite, as it were.?E Thus, ?Whereas Aristotle always regarded the infinite as the merely potential and all actuality as finite, Nicholas now said that a never-ending line is actually everything that a finite line describes in potency. Although the ancients always viewed measure and anything it measured as the limited, pure and simple, not the infinite stood for the proper, ?most adequate measure?Eand RATIO [proportion] of the finite line! And so, in general terms: Absolute infinite is the ground and therefore the most adequate measure of all that exists. We always know the finite only through contact with, in and through, the infinite.?E Since God holds in compact form all that the world is, the world itself must be infinite. Because the world is the unfolding of what preexists in God, ?the universe in space and time must be infinite too, because it expresses and unfolds infinity.?E

To return to the Renaissance: Cusa provided a philoso
phical grounding for the Renaissance emphasis on self-presentation, self-fashioning. In the light of his speculations about God as Possest, Cusa had speculated about the Second Person of the Trinity as the ?Art?Eof God, so that, without denying the Nicene formula, he could speak of a kind of eternal ?making?Eor artistry in the Father?s begetting of the Son, which rendered ?God?s inner creativity definatory of the divine essence.?E Since all truth and wisdom is contained in the Word of the Father, who is generated by the Father, verum and factum are convertible even in the Godhead. In this way, ?factum?Ebecame one of the transcendentals. ?Making?Eor creativity is among the leading attributes of the Trinity; a ?creation?Ead intra grounds the ab extra. On Milbank?s reading, Cusa makes creation rather than esse the principal philosophical concept. Made in God?s image, man is homo creator and, just as the Father is never without His eternal ?Art,?Eso human artifacts are not a secondary reality grafted onto a more basic ?natural?Eexistence but ?fully equiprimordial?Ewith humanity itself. Since human making reflects the eternal trinitarian nature and the continually creative work of God, however, it is not ?secular?Eor ?neutral?Ebut a reaching for transcendence, and an imitation of and participation in the ongoing creative action of God. Reflecting the divine making, human art even partakes of the ex nihilo of the original divine creation. Though the original creation is unique, it implies that the essence of created existence is ongoing origination, a continual bringing-into-existence of new things and new states of affairs.

What Stephen Greenblatt has called ?Renaissance self-fashioning?Egives more popular expression to this theme. It was also central to the Renaissance conception of human life that living a human life was a matter of creative self-fashioning, creative construction, and NOT a matter of conformity to preconceived molds. Yet, this was not seen, at least initially, as a departure from a Christian vision of reality. And again Toulmin’s theory fits here: After the burst of creativity in the Renaissance, there was a counter-Renaissance effort to limit the range of self-fashioning, forcing people through various mechanisms to conform to a limited series of cultural models. And Foucault can take it from here . . . .

Theology

Previous Post

May 20, 2005

Renaissance and Modernity

Next Post

May 21, 2005 Ups and Downs

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1-2 Samuel 1968 Abelard Abortion Abraham Acedia AD 70 Adam Smith Addiction Advent Advertising Aeneid Aesthetics Africa African Christianity African Church African religion Age Aging Agriculture Airline industry Alabama Alasdair MacIntyre Albania Alcohol Allegory Alms Alternative Medicine Ambrose America American Christianity American culture American economy American Evangelicals American Foreign Policy American history American Literature American Military American Politics American Religion American Revolution Anagogy Analytic Philosophy Anamnesis Ancient Egypt Ancient Greece Ancient history Ancient Near East Ancient Religion Angels Anglican Church Anglicanism Animism Anointing of the Sick Anselm Anthropology Anthropomorphism anti-Catholicism Antiquities Antonio Lopez apocalypse Apocalyptic Apocalyptic language Apostles Creed Aquinas Archeology Architecture Arianism Aristotle Ark of the Covenant Art Art History Ascension Aseity Assurance Athanasius Atheism Athens atonement Attention Attributes Augustine Austin Farrer Authority autonomy Avant-garde Awe Bach Ballooning Balzac Banking Bankruptcy Baptism Baptists Baseball Basketball Bavinck Beatitudes Beauty Behavioral Economics Being Benedict XVI Benjamin Benjamin Franklin Beowulf Berkeley Bernie Sanders Bertrand Russell Bestiary Bible Bible - criticism Bible - NT Bible - NT - 1 Corinthians Bible - NT - 1 John Bible - NT - 1 Peter Bible - NT - 2 Corinthians Bible - NT - 2 Peter Bible - NT - Acts Bible - NT - Colossians Bible - NT - Ephesians Bible - NT - Galatians Bible - NT - Gospels Bible - NT - Hebrews Bible - NT - James Bible - NT - John Bible - NT - Jude Bible - NT - Luke Bible - NT - Mark Bible - NT - Matthew Bible - NT - Paul Bible - NT - Philippians Bible - NT - Revelation Bible - NT - Romans Bible - NT - Thessalonians Bible - NT - Timothy Bible - OT Bible - OT - Amos Bible - OT - Chronicles Bible - OT - Daniel Bible - OT - Deuteronomy Bible - OT - Ecclesiastes Bible - OT - Esther Bible - OT - Exodus Bible - OT - Ezekiel Bible - OT - Ezra-Nehemiah Bible - OT - Genesis Bible - OT - Habakkuk Bible - OT - Hosea Bible - OT - Isaiah Bible - OT - Jeremiah Bible - OT - Job Bible - OT - Joel Bible - OT - Jonah Bible - OT - Joshua Bible - OT - Judges Bible - OT - Kings Bible - OT - Lamentations Bible - OT - Leviticus Bible - OT - Malachi BIble - OT - Micah Bible - OT - Nehemiah Bible - OT - Numbers Bible - OT - Pentateuch Bible - OT - Proverbs Bible - OT - Psalms Bible - OT - Ruth Bible - OT - Samuel Bible - OT - Song of Songs Bible - OT - Torah Bible - OT - Zechariah Bible - OT - Zephaniah Biblical Law Biblicism Billy Graham biography Biology Biololgy Biotechnology Blasphemy Blindness Blog news Blogging Blogroll Bloomsbury Group Bob Dylan Body Body symbolism Boethius Boko Haram Bonhoeffer Book of Common Prayer Books Botany Boundary Brexit Britain British History British Politics Bruce Springsteen Buddhism Bureaucracy Burial Business C. S. Lewis C. S. Peirce Calendars Caliphate Calvin calvinism Camille Paglia Canon Capitalism Cappadocians Carl Schmitt Catholic Social Teaching Catholicism Catholicity Causation cemeteries Cervantes Charism Charismata Charity Charles Dickens Charles Hodge Charles Simeon Charles Taylor Charles Williams Chaucer Chermistry Chess Chesterton Chiasm children China Chinese Exclusion Act Chivalry Chopin Chretien de Troyes Christendom Christian Democracy Christian reconstruction Christianity in Britain Christianization Christmas Christology Chronology Church church and state Church architecture Church Calendar Church history Church of England Church Year Cicero Circumcision Cities City of God Civil Religion Civil Society Civil War Civility Classical Theism Classics Climate Change Clothing Coleridge Colloquy of Marburg Colonialism Color Comedy Comenius Commodity Communio Communism Community Comparative religions Computer Science Confederacy Confessionalization Conflict Congregations consciousness Consecration Conservatism Constantine Constitution consumerism Contra Faustum Conversion Coriolanus Cormac McCarthy Cosmology Cosmopolitanism Council of Trent Counter-culture Counter-insurgency Courage Courtly love Covenants Crafts Craftsmanship Cranach Creation Creativity Creator-creature Credit Crime Crime and Punishment Crisis Critical scholarship Criticism Cross Cubism Cultural theory Culture Culture War Dance Daniel Dennett Dante Darwin Dave Eggers David David Foster Wallace David Hume David Jones Deadly sins Death Debt Dechristianization Decolonization Deconstruction Defoe Deja vu Democracy Denis de Rougemont Denominationalism Derrida Descartes Developmental psychology Devils Diocletian Discipleship Disenchantment Disgust Diversion Diversity Divine energies Divine Impassibility Divine Simplicity Divine Warrior Doctrine dogma Dominion Donald Trump Dostoevsky Douglas Campbell Douglas Farrow Dreams Dualism Durkheim Dystopia E.M. Forster Early Christianity Early Modern Europe Easter Eastern Europe Eastern Orthodoxy Ecclesiology Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Eden Edgar Allan Poe Edmund Spenser Education Egypt Election Elites Emergence Emma Emotion Empire England English History English Reformation Enlightenment Entertainment Entrepreneur environmentalism Envy Epic Epiphany Episcopals Epistemology Epistles Equality Erasmus Ernst Kantorowicz Eros Eschatology Eternity Ethics Eucharist Europe Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Catholics Together Events Evil Evolution Exile Face Fairie Queene Fairy Tales Faith family Family and Marriage Fantasy Farming Fashion Fasting Fatherhood Fear Femininity Feminism Fertility Fetishization Feud Feudalism Feuerbach Fiction Figs Film Finance Finland Fire Flag Flags Flannery O'Connor Flood myths Folly Food football Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy Foreknowledge Forgiveness Foucault Fracking France Francois Mauriac Franz Rosenzweig free will Freedom Freedom of God French Revolution Freud Funerals Future G. K. Chesterton Gambling Gaming Gay Marriage Gender gender identity Genealogy Geography George Berkeley George Eliot George Herbert; Poetry George Romanes Gerald Manley Hopkins Germany Gethsemane Gift Gifts Giorgio Agamben Global Christianity Global economics Globalism Globalization Glorious Revolution Gnosticism God's sovereignty Gods Goethe Golf Good Friday Gospel Gospels Gothic Gothic architecture Grace Grammar Gramsci Gratitude Greek Literature Greek Philosophy Greek Religion Greek Science Gregory of Nyssa Guillermo del Toro H. Richard Niebuhr Haiku hair Hamann Hamlet Handicap Handles Hands Hans Urs von Balthasar Happiness Harold Bloom Harper Lee Harvest healing Heaven Heavenly treasure Heavenly treasure Hebrew Bible Hebrew language Hegel Heidegger Hell Hellenism; Judaism; Revelation Henri de Lubac heresy Herman Dooyeweerd Hermeneutics Herod Heroic Heroism Hesiod Hidegard of Bingen Hierarchy Hieronymus Bosch Historicism Historiography History History - Early Modern History - Middle Ages Hoaxes Hobbes Holiness Holy Saturday Holy Spirit Home Homeless Homer Homosexuality Honor hope Horror Hospitality Housing Hugh of St. Victor Human Rights Humanism Humor hylomorphism Hymns Hypocrisy. Iago Iconoclasm Identity Ideology Idleness Idolatry Iliad Images Imagination Immigrant churches Immigrant Religion Immigration Imperialism Improvization Imputation Incarnation Incest India Individualism Indonesia Inequality Inerrancy Infant Baptism Infant mortality Infanticide Ingratitude Innovation Inspiration Institutions Insult Intellectual History Intellectuals Intelligent Design International Politics Internet Intimacy IQ Iran Iran-Iraq War Iraq Ireland Irony Islam Islamic State Islamism Ismail Kadare Israel Ivan Illich J. Gresham Machen J.N. Figgis Jacob Jacques Lacan James Bond James Jordan James Joyce James KA Smith James Wood Jane Austen Jane Jacobs Jealousy Jed Perl Jeff Koons Jeroboam Jesus Jewish War 66-70 AD Jihad Johann Georg Hamann Johannine Epistles John Ashbery John Behr John Bunyan John Calvin John Donne John Frame John Howard Yoder John Knox John Milbank John Milton John Owen John Rawls John Ruskin John Stuart Mill John the Baptist John Webster John Wesley John Williamson Nevin Jonathan Edwards Jorge Luis Borges Joseph Conrad Joseph Ratzinger Journalism Joy Judaism Judaize Judgment Judith Butler Jurgen Moltmann Justice Justification Kalevala Kant Karl Barth Karl Marx Karl Polanyi Karl Rahner Kazakhstan Kazuo Ishiguro Kenneth Lonergan Kierkegaard King Lear Kingdom of God Kitsch Knighthood Knowledge Korea Labor movement Lactantius Lamech Lament Landscape Language Latin America Laughter Law Law and Punishment Leftism Lent Les Murray Levi-Strauss Levites Leviticus Liber Mundi Liberal arts Liberal Theology Liberalism Light Lighthouse Linguistics LIstening Literacy Literary structure Literature Liturgics Liturgy Locke Logic Love Luther Lutheran Lutheranism Lying Lytton Strachey Macbeth Machiavelli Machines Madness Mainline Manhattan Manicheanism Manners Manufacturing Manuscripts Mao Zedong Maps Marcion Marilynne Robinson Marketing Marriage Martha Nussbaum Martin Bucer Martin Chemnitz Martyrdom Marx Marxism Mary Mary Douglas masculinity Mass Materialism Mathematics Maundy Thursday Max Weber Media Mediation Medication Medicine Medieval Church Medieval exegesis Medieval Literature Medieval theology Medieval Thought Medievalism Memory Merchant of Venice Mesopotamian Religion Messianic Metaphor Metaphysics Methodist Mexican-American War Michel de Montaigne Michel Faber Middle Ages Middle East Midwifery Mikhail Bulgakov Military Millennium Mind Miracles Miscellaneous Mission missionaries Mixed constitution Modern self modernism Modernity monasticism Monotheism Monroe Doctrine Monsters Montaigne's Essays Moral philosophy Mormonism Moses Mother Teresa Motherhood Motive Mount of Olives Movies Multiculturalism Murder Music Musicals Mutability Mutability Mystery Mysticism myth N. T. Wright Narrative Nation-State Nationalism Natural Law Natural-Supernatural Nature Nature and culture Nature and Grace Nazi Nazirite Necrophilia Nero Nestorianism Neuroscience Nevin Lectures New Atheism New Testament New York City Newbigin News NGOs Nibelungenlied Nicholas of Cusa Nicholas of Lyra Nietzsche Nigeria Nihilism Nobel Prize Nobility Nominalism Norbert Elias Norman MacCaig nostalgia Novels Numerology Obama Objectivity and subjectivity Occasionalism Odysseus Oil Old Testament Oliver O'Donovan Ontology Origen original sin Orthodoxy Othello Owen Barfield Pacifism Pactum salutis Paedocommunion Paganism Pain Painting Paleoconservatism Palm Sunday Pannenberg Parenting Pascal Passions Passivity Pastoral Care Pastoral theology Patrick Modiano Patristics Patronage Paul Peace of God Peace of Westphalia Penal substitution Pentecost Pentecostalism Perichoresis Pericles Persecution Person Peter Peter Enns Petrarch Philip K. Dick Philip Melanchthon Philosophy Philosophy of Action Philosophy of History Philosophy of language Philosophy of science Phone booth Photography Physics Pictures Pierre Bourdieu Place Planned Parenthood Plants plato Play Plot Plotinus Pluralism Pneumatology Poetics poetry Poetry & Stories Poland police Political Philosophy Political theology Political Theory Politics Pop Culture Pope Francis Popular Culture Populism Pornography Porphyry Post-Colonial Theory Post-Structuralism Postmodernism Postmodernity Potential Poverty Power Practice Pragmatism Prayer Preaching Predestination Prediction Prehistory Premillennialism Presbyterian Priesthood Prince Charles Prison Reform privacy Private Prodigal Son Progress Progressivism Property Prophecy Prophet Propitiation Prosperity gospel Prostitution Protectionism Protestantism Providence Prudentius psalms Pseudo-Dionysus Psychological Warfare Psychology Public intellectual Public Life Public Philosophy Public Theology Publishing Punk Rock Pure nature Puritanism Purity Pushkin Putin Pythagoreanism R.J. Rushdoony Race Racism Radical Orthodoxy Rape Rationality Reactionary reading Realism Reason Red State Blue State Reformation Reformational Catholicism Reformational Philosophy Reformed theology refugees reinhold niebuhr Relationality Relativism Relics Religion Religion and science Religions Religious Freedom Religious Liberty Religious Right Renaissance Rene Girard Republican Party Resurrection Resurrection. Revelation Revelations Revenge Revivalism Revolution rhetoric Richard Flannagan Richard II Richard III Richard Wagner Richard Wilbur Righteousness Ritual Robert Frost Robert Herrick Robert Jenson Robert Mugabe Robert Spaemann Robinson Crusoe Rock n' Roll Rod Dreher Rodin Roman Catholicism Roman Empire Roman Religion Romance Romanticism Rome Rootedness Rosenstock-Huessy Rousseau Rowan Williams Rural America Russia Russian literature Russian Orthodoxy Rusty Reno Rwanda S. Y. Agnon Sabbath Sacrament Sacramental theology Sacraments Sacred Sacred Space Sacrifice saints Salt Sam Harris Same-sex marriage Sanctuary Satan Satire Saudi Arabia Scapegoat Scarcity Schism Schleiermacher Scholarship Science Science and Theology Science Fiction Scopes trial Scotland Scott Adams Scott Cairns Scottish Reformation Scotus Scripture and tradition sculpture Sea Second temple Secularism Secularization Self-Help Self-trust Semiotics Semper reformanda separation of church and state Sermon on the Mount Sex Sex Trafficking Sexual abuse Sexual Politics Sexual Revolution Sexuality Shakespeare Shame Culture Shema Sherlock Shopping Silence Simone Weil Simplicity Simpsons Sin Sincerity Sixties Skepticism Slavery Slavoj Zizek Sleep Sloth Social capital Social change Social Imaginary Social Science Socialism Socialization Sociology Sociology of Knowledge Sociology of Religion Sola scriptura Sonnets Sophocles Soteriology Soviet Union Space Spain Speculation Spinoza Spirit Sport Sports Star Trek State State-formation Stephen Masty Steven Bannon Strangers Structuralism structure Subject-object Substitution Suburbs Suffering Suicide Super-Rich Superheroes Supersessionism Supplication Supreme Court Surveillance Symbol Synagogue Taberancle Tabernacle Tax Taxes Tears Technology Teens Teleology Television Temple Ten Commandments Terence Terrence Malick Terrorism Thanksgiving The South The West Theodore Roosevelt Theogony Theological Education Theological Language Theology Theology - Anthropology Theology - Christology Theology - Covenant Theology - Creation Theology - Ecclesiology Theology - Eschatology Theology - Liturgical Theology - Pneumatology Theology - Soteriology Theology - Trinity Theology proper Theopolis Theopolis Institute Theosis Theresa May Thomas A. Clark Thomas Aquinas Thomas Carlyle Thomas Mann Threshing Thucydides Time Tocqueville Tolerance Toleration Tolstoy Tom Wolfe Tools Torah Torture Toscanini Totalitarianism Trade Tradition Tragedy Transhumanism Translation Transubstantiation Travel Trees Trinitarianism Trinity Trinity House Tristan Troilus and Creysede Trump Trump Truth Turkey Twelfth Night Two Kingdoms Typology Ukraine Ulysses Uncanny Uncategorized Uniform Union with Christ United States Unity University Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Value Vatican II Vengeance Vico Victorian Age Victorian Literature Vienna Violence Virgil Virgin Birth Virginia Woolf Vladimir Nabokov Vladimir Solovyev Vladimir Solovyov W.H. Auden Walls Walt Disney Walt Whitman Walter Benjamin Walter Lippmann War Wars of Religion Washington DC Wealth Weddings Will William Carlos Williams William Gilpin William Golding Wine Wisdom wonder Word of God Wordsworth Work Works World Council of Churches World History World War I World War II Worldview Worship Wrath Writing Youth Youth Ministry Yuja Wang Yves Congar Zimbabwe Zwingli Zygmunt Bauman

Select a Month January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was known for interpreting dreams in Babylon?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Daniel Moses Joseph