Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Leithart

Home
Evangelical
Cross and Culture: Sacrifice and the Redemption of Society

Cross and Culture: Sacrifice and the Redemption of Society

Last updated on: September 6, 2017 at 10:51 pm by Peter Leithart

Cross and Culture: Sacrifice and the Redemption of Society 2017-09-06T22:51:53+06:00 Peter Leithart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is based on a lecture delivered at NSA several years ago. I have not been able to prepare this for publication, though I hope to do so someday.

My title is ?Cross and Culture,?Ebut that needs to be made more specific. The cross is described in the New Testament in a variety of ways: It is a military operation, the Divine Warrior?s victory over Satan, sin, and death; it is an act of diplomacy, reconciling the world to God; it is a legal act, the execution of a sentence of death; it is a cultic act, the sacrifice that ends all sacrifice. This last will occupy me, and my theme can be stated more precisely as ?sacrifice and the redemption of society.?E

It is clear from the New Testament that the cross has both theological and sociological dimensions. That is, the cross reconciles God with man and also reconciles man and man, redeeming human society. My goal is to outline some of the resources that could be used in developing a biblical account of the cross that integrates these two dimensions, an account that shows both that the theological dimension is indispensable to the redemption of society, and that the redemption of society is directly implicated in our reconciliation to God. My ultimate aim is to answer Anselm?s question, Cur Deus Homo ? in a way that demonstrates not only the theological but the ?sociological?Enecessity of the cross.

I.
Raising the question this way immediately raises a conflict with secular thought. To be sure, Christians and secularists agree that society needs to be redeemed. Though secularists may object to the use of a religiously loaded word like ?redemption,?Eone of the driving forces of post-Enlightenment modernity has been the passion to liberate human society from its pathologies so that it may flourish in freedom and peace. A central question that divides Christians and moderns has to do with the means for achieving that condition. For Christianity, society is redeemed by the Incarnate Son, who entered a disordered and perverted world reeling under the curse and wrath of God (Rom. 1:18-32) to redeem ?us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us?Eon the cross (Gal. 3:13). Through the blood of Christ and through His cross, Jew and Gentile have been made ?one new man?Eand are ?reconciled in one body?E(Eph 2:11-16). Through Jesus, societies torn by violence, hatred, and envy, societies inflated with pride, societies distracted and obsessed by sensuality are renewed in joy, peace, patience, love, goodness, faithfulness, and self-control.

For moderns, on the other hand, Christianity is one of the pathologies from which society must be delivered. Moderns are repulsed at the idea of substitutionary atonement and by sacrifice. For Jesus to take our place is unjust and unbecoming of God. According to Nietzsche, the ?god on the cross?Ecannot be the redeemer of society and human life; rather, the cross was the negation of life. For others, claiming that a violent death lies at the heart of history legitimizes violence, and to suggest that human society and culture can be redeemed only by an event during the first century, an event that took place in the Eastern backwaters of the Roman Empire, is patently absurd. Who needs that? If we liberalize political systems, adjust the incentive structure of the economy, break down invidious class barriers ?Eif all this can be done, then soon the lion will lie with the lamb and the cow and the bear will graze together. This confidence that society can be redeemed by human effort cuts across the political spectrum; it can take a conservative law-and-order regime or a liberal agenda of removing-discrimination-and-inequalities. The differences between conservative and liberal are less important than their essential agreement that society can be redeemed by law. Both agree that a ?new order of the ages?Ecan be established by Constitutional Convention, without the gore of crucifixion or the miracle of resurrection.

Theologians in the modern world have felt the pressure of these objections to traditional theories of the atonement. Beginning with the Socinians of the sixteenth century, and increasingly in the subsequent two centuries, sociological (and psychological) theories of the atonement supplanted earlier theological theories. For modern theologians the cross did not effect a transformation of human life, but instead set an example of the kind of life that would regenerate man. If only we all lived like Jesus, pouring ourselves out for others, sympathizing with the miserable, identifying ourselves with outcasts, we could usher in the millennium.

Intellectual history is full of paradoxes, and several are involved in modern theology?s abandonment of satisfaction theories of the atonement. For one, many modern thinkers, eager to escape the long shadow of Anselm, found that some idea of atonement and substitution was essential to any coherent moral philosophy. Kant serves to illustrate this point. According to the analysis offered by R. R. Reno, Kant, like other thinkers of the Enlightenment and post-Enlightenment, attempted to hold together three premises concerning the possibility of redemptive change for man or for society. First, according to the ?personal continuity?Ecriterion, a man or society who changes from evil to good must be somehow the same throughout the process of change. Otherwise, obviously, no change has taken place, but only replacement. Second, according to the principle of ?moral determination,?Ewhat we are morally is who we are. Our moral condition is the key to our identity. Finally, according to the (Pelagian) criterion of ?personal potency,?Ethe power to change from evil to good must lie in human beings themselves.

But Kant ultimately could not avoid some kind of atonement, even substitutionary atonement. There is evidently a conflict between the ?personal continuity?Ecriterion and the ?moral determination?Ecriterion. If our moral condition determines our identity, then the ?new man?Eis not the same person as the old man and if this is true, it does not seem that moral change is possible. The problem becomes acute in Kant?s analysis of punishment. Those who sin must be punished, but the new man is not the same as the old man, and therefore it is unjust for him to suffer the consequences of his former self?s actions. But if the new man does not suffer any consequences of his former self?s sins then there does not appear to be any meaningful moral continuity between the old man and the new.

Kant?s solution to this dilemma is to introduce a concept of vicarious suffering. Though the new man is not strictly liable for the sins of his former self, yet he suffers the consequences of the old man?s sins. As Reno puts it, ?The righteous person I seek to become pays the debt of the sinful person I presently am.?EKant has not dispensed with the need for substitutionary atonement and vicarious suffering but merely relocated it. In place of an external atonement through Jesus?Esufferings and death, Kant offers a self-atonement. Here it becomes clear that Kant?s ?personal potency?Ecriterion is supreme above all: What Kant and the Enlightenment reject is not atonement per se, but the idea that we need someone else to atone for us. Fundamentally, the Enlightenment rejected the Christian doctrine of atonement because it conflicted with the basic assumption that man is autonomous, capable of making his own way.

I wish to focus, however, on a second paradox, which is this: At the same time that theologians were busy seeking alternatives to sacrificial accounts of Christ?s death, anthropologists and psychologists were discovering that sacrifice was at the heart of ancient and primitive society, and had left a permanent imprint on human psychology and culture. Freud believed that society grew out of a primal murder, and James Frazer?s monumental Golden Bough traced the myth of the dying and rising god through Greek and other mythologies, showing how this provided the background for rituals of death and resur

rection that were believed to renew nature and society. Early in the twentieth century, Marcel Mauss uncovered links between religious transactions and human social transactions by focusing on the phenomenon of gift-exchange. Relations with the gods were constituted by sacrificial offerings, in much the same way that relations among men were nourished by mutual giving and receiving. By the middle of the last century, Mary Douglas was defending the logic of supposedly primitive notions of pollution, purity, and sacrifice, and claiming that these were still at work in our own sanitized culture.

Over the past thirty years, the most thorough account of sacrifice and its role in social regeneration has been offered by the French-American literary critic and philosopher, Rene Girard. Girard has developed a theory of religion and culture that highlights the formative role of sacrifice and scapegoating, and this theory has led him to convert to Christianity. Girard?s theory is worth lingering over for a few moments.

Central to Girard?s work are his notions of ?mimetic desire?Eand ?mimetic rivalry.?EContrary to the Enlightenment assumption that men are autonomous, Girard asserts that we are radically social, so much so that even our desires ?Ewhich we often think of as uniquely our own ?Eare socially formed. We desire ?mimetically,?Ethat is, because we imitate the desires of others. When we see another person, especially someone we admire, desiring something or someone, we begin to desire it as well. This is simply a fact of human life, according to Girard, but it has a built-in bias toward rivalry. If I see my friend?s desire for a woman, and begin to imitate that desire, we are shortly drawn into rivalry for the woman. There is, after all, only one woman between us. Societies can degenerate into little more than a network of mimetic rivalries, and at that point they have reached what Girard calls a ?sacrificial crisis,?Ea time when ?love cools, friendship falls off, brothers divide. In cities, mutinies; in countries, discord; in palaces, treason; and the bond cracked twixt father and son,?Ewhen life is dominated by ?machinations, hollowness, treachery, and all ruinous disorders follow us disquietly to our graves?E( King Lear 1.2.106-109, 112-114).

Such a war of all against all can end in only two ways: either the society disintegrates completely, or the rivalries are defused through sacrifice. A society in the midst of sacrificial crisis reunifies and restores harmony by directing the violence of rivalry toward a scapegoat. Because every member of the society joins with others in abhorrence toward the ?outsider?Ewho serves as sacrificial victim, the slaughter of the sacrifice helps to restore order. Rivals are reduced to friends when they find a third party to attack together. For Girard, this sociological theory leads into a theory of religion: Ritual sacrifices are repeated regularly to avert dissolution and to maintain the order and unity of a religious community.

There is more to Girard?s theory, but this sketch is sufficient to indicate how Girard was led to embrace Christianity. In Girard?s view, though the gospels appear to endorse this sacrificial mechanism, they in fact undermine it. Jesus is made a scapegoat, but the gospels (unlike ancient myths) insist on his innocence and thereby expose the dynamics of sacrifice. Dissemination of the gospel and the gospels therefore unravels the dynamics of scapegoating that served as the basis for all previous societies, and open the possibility of another city, a society based not on victimization and slaughter but one based on love.

Despite its interest and in spite of Girard?s admiration for the gospels and Jesus, there are lingering questions. First, it is not clear that Girard?s theory requires anything like an orthodox Christology: Why is it necessary for the scapegoat to be the Son of God in flesh, or for there to be a god at all for that matter? Girard affirms in his most recent work that only the Son of God can bring an end to the scapegoat mechanism, but the whole theory was developed before Girard came to this confession. It appears that the incarnation is extrinsic to the atonement, something that cannot be the case. Second, in Girard?s theory redemption does not actually occur at the cross; instead, the story of the cross exposes the foundations of culture, and therefore the preaching of the gospel is the moment of redemption. True as this is in certain respects, in orthodox Christian doctrine the preaching of the gospel is the announcement of an accomplished event that objectively, apart from any response or announcement, changed the world.

Despite these weaknesses, at another level Girard?s theory poses questions that have been inadequately answered in traditional theories of the atonement. By placing the cross in the context of a cultural history of sacrifice, Girard shows with striking clarity why redemption had to take the form that it did ?Ethe sacrificial death of an innocent victim. And, Girard shows that there is an internal connection between the cross and the redemption of society. Girard, in short, insists on the sociological necessity of the cross, and if we cannot entirely accept his answers, at least we can appreciate the force of his questions.

II.
In addition to Girard and other anthropological studies, several developments in recent theology provide resources for exploring the sociological dimensions of the atonement. I will enumerate three, developing the last at somewhat more length. First, detailed and valuable work was done on Leviticus during the nineteenth century, and, inspired by the work of Jacob Milgrom, Mary Douglas, and others, study of the book of Leviticus has become a growth industry in Old Testament studies. This has produced a more nuanced and precise understanding of the nature of sacrifice in the Bible, which is essential background for grasping the significance of the sacrifice of Jesus.

Two points will illustrate how this might affect the theology of the atonement. Old Testament sacrifices were indeed expiations, cleansing sin through the death of a substitute, but that was only one moment of a larger sacrificial sequence. After being killed, the animal was transformed into smoke to ascend to heaven and its flesh was given to the worshiper as food, and that whole ritual comes under the rubric of sacrifice. Biblically, to speak of Jesus?Ework as ?sacrificial?Emeans not only that He was put to death for our sins; Christ?s ?sacrifice?Eembraces His resurrection, ascension, Pentecost, and even Eucharist. To speak of Christ?s sacrifice is to say that He achieved atonement by passing through death into the presence of His Father. Second, sacrifice is a liturgical act, and if the atonement was sacrificial, then it was an act of worship. How does an act of worship by the Incarnate Son atone for sin? Exploring this question may bring us close to Thomas Aquinas, who taught that Christ?s supreme act of reconciling obedience was a supreme and redeeming Eucharist. Jesus?Emain explanation of His death occurred at the Last Supper, and that may be more significant than Protestants, at least, have realized.

Turning to New Testament studies: since Krister Stendahl?s landmark article, ?Paul and the Introspective Conscience of the West,?ENew Testament scholars have recognized that Paul was not a theologian of the soul so much as a theologian of Israel and an apostolic herald of a counter-imperial gospel. Political theology is as central to Paul as the forgiveness of individual sins. Clearly, Paul is also a herald of the crucified Christ. If he is both a theologian of the cross and a theologian of Israel, Paul?s letters are central in any effort to explore the sociological dimensions of the atonement. Moreover, if Paul saw Jesus as the climax of the history of Israel, then that history must play a much larger role in our understanding of the atonement that it has traditionally done. Our theology of the atonement cannot bypass the Old Testament and move immediatel
y from Adam?s sin to the cross. Atonement theology must be to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.

Finally, and a bit more expansively, recent treatments of the Trinity are very relevant to this discussion. As Bonhoeffer said, the Who question is more fundamental than the How question. The question, Who is the Redeemer? shapes our answer to the question, How is redemption accomplished? And the New Testament?s answer to the ?Who?Equestion is, Father, Son, and Spirit. How does this figure into our understanding of the cross?

In the wake of Barth, most writers in Trinitarian theology emphasize that we must move from the economic to the ontological trinity, that is, from the history of redemption to our understanding of who God is in Himself. Theology proper must take its cues from the revelation of God in His dealings with Israel and in Jesus. Michael Ramsey put it succinctly: ?God is Christlike and in Him there is no unChristlikeness at all.?EIf we move in the opposite direction ?Efrom the ontological to the economic Trinity ?Ewe run the risk of formulating a generic doctrine of God that limits beforehand what God might possibly do, an apophatic theology that defines God without any reference to His actual words or works.

This suggests that the doctrine of the atonement should be consistent with, should ?fit,?Ewhat we know of the inner life of Father, Son, and Spirit, and that the atonement in fact is one of the main places where that inner life is unveiled. To fill out this point, we can borrow some insights from the French Catholic theologian Francois Xavier Durrwell. Two themes guide Durrwell?s Trinitarian theology. First, in Augustinian fashion, he focuses attention on the Spirit as the bond of unity of Father and Son and as the love in which the Father begets the Son. Second, following insights from Athanasius, he insists that the relations of Father and Son are reciprocal, mutually determining. The Father is as dependent for His Fatherhood on the existence of the Son as the Son is dependent on the Father for His Sonship. There is no Son without a Father, but it is also true that the Father is not Father unless He has a Son.

Durrwell?s way of making these points, however, is peculiarly illuminating. As summarized by Anne Hunt, Durrwell taught that ?The Holy Spirit . . . flows from the Father not just in a primordial or originating sense but in loving response to the Son. In other words we can understand that the Son?s love of the Father prompts the love of the Father for the Son.?EDurrwell himself stated the point this way: ?The Father fills the Son with his Spirit of Love and the love that takes over the Son elicits from the Father the gift of the Spirit in a perpetual round.?EThis conception of Trinitarian life is certainly evident economically, in the atoning work of the Incarnate Son. As Peter said in his Pentecost sermon, the Son who obeyed unto death was exalted by His Father and given the gift of the Spirit, which was then poured out on the gathered disciples. If we can reason from economy to ontology — on the assumption that God is as He has revealed Himself — then this is a revelation of the interTrinitarian life: The Father gives the Spirit to the Son, who, in the Spirit, offers Himself to the Father in love and obedience, which in turn elicits the outpouring of the Spirit from the Father to the Son. This is a round; or, as Catherine LaCugna put it, the Trinitarian life as eternal chiastic motion and exchange.

This gives us some insight into the structure of the atonement, as well as its sociological import. On the cross, the Son, incarnate in the likeness of sinful flesh and operating according to the demands of the fallen world, offered Himself to His Father in perfect obedience to death, and as a result elicited the gift of the Spirit from His loving Father. The sociological dimension immediately follows. The Spirit is the bond of communion, the Lord and giver of life, including social life. When the Spirit is poured out, the earth is renewed, the fruits of the Spirit flourish, the righteous decree of the law is fulfilled, and men worship and serve the Creator rather than the creature. The need for the redemption of society can be stated as a need for the outpouring of the Spirit, who is the unity of the society of Father and Son, and the Spirit is secured for us by the obedience of the Son to the Father. A Trinitarian theology of the atonement thus integrates the theological and sociological dimensions, and takes a step toward accounting for the sociological necessity of the cross. The Spirit is necessary for the redemption of society; the Son?s obedience on the cross secures the Spirit; and therefore the ?sacrifice?Eof Jesus is the necessary condition for the redemption of society.

A fine recent article by Kahled Anatolios, published in Pro Ecclesia , brings out another feature of a Trinitarian account of the atonement. Anatolios describes the Spirit as the immanent (within the Triune life) agent of the ?mutual love?Eof the Father and the Son and the Spirit?s economic work (God?s actions outside Himself) as the ?availability?Eof God to us. It is through the Spirit that we come to share in the inherently ?un-sharable?Esonship of the Eternal Son. This Trinitarian soteriology also takes on an ecclesial or social dimension. The Spirit, who is the agent of God?s availability to us, works to open us out in availability for others. As Anatolios puts it, ?By the Spirit, we experience, from within, the appeal to render available to others as much love as we ourselves receive as ?beloved,?Eso that the outward availability of this love, in the Spirit, becomes equal to our status as beloved, in the Son.?ESince mutual availability is the prerequisite of community, it is the Spirit, secured and given to us by and in the Son in His atonement, who is the bond of any true ?commonwealth.?E

III.
I have been discussing the theology and ?theory?Eof the atonement, and have grasped for ways to express this. But Robert Jenson is no doubt correct that a theory of the atonement is far less important than its enactment, and particularly its liturgical enactment. What will make the sociological necessity of the cross most obvious and persuasive are not a theologian?s puzzlings, but the joy and praise and self-sacrifice of a church that knows, worships, and serves Jesus, and Him Crucified.

Theology - Soteriology

Previous Post

January 24, 2005

Thoughts on Midsummer Night’s Dream

Next Post

January 25, 2005 “Plague All”: Timon of Athens

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 1 Corinthians 1-2 Samuel 1968 Abelard Abortion Abraham Acedia AD 70 Adam Smith Addiction Advent Advertising Aeneid Aesthetics Africa African Christianity African Church African religion Age Aging Agriculture Airline industry Alabama Alasdair MacIntyre Albania Alcohol Allegory Alms Alternative Medicine Ambrose America American Christianity American culture American economy American Evangelicals American Foreign Policy American history American Literature American Military American Politics American Religion American Revolution Anagogy Analytic Philosophy Anamnesis Ancient Egypt Ancient Greece Ancient history Ancient Near East Ancient Religion Angels Anglican Church Anglicanism Animism Anointing of the Sick Anselm Anthropology Anthropomorphism anti-Catholicism Antiquities Antonio Lopez apocalypse Apocalyptic Apocalyptic language Apostles Creed Aquinas Archeology Architecture Arianism Aristotle Ark of the Covenant Art Art History Ascension Aseity Assurance Athanasius Atheism Athens atonement Attention Attributes Augustine Austin Farrer Authority autonomy Avant-garde Awe Bach Ballooning Balzac Banking Bankruptcy Baptism Baptists Baseball Basketball Bavinck Beatitudes Beauty Behavioral Economics Being Benedict XVI Benjamin Benjamin Franklin Beowulf Berkeley Bernie Sanders Bertrand Russell Bestiary Bible Bible - criticism Bible - NT Bible - NT - 1 Corinthians Bible - NT - 1 John Bible - NT - 1 Peter Bible - NT - 2 Corinthians Bible - NT - 2 Peter Bible - NT - Acts Bible - NT - Colossians Bible - NT - Ephesians Bible - NT - Galatians Bible - NT - Gospels Bible - NT - Hebrews Bible - NT - James Bible - NT - John Bible - NT - Jude Bible - NT - Luke Bible - NT - Mark Bible - NT - Matthew Bible - NT - Paul Bible - NT - Philippians Bible - NT - Revelation Bible - NT - Romans Bible - NT - Thessalonians Bible - NT - Timothy Bible - OT Bible - OT - Amos Bible - OT - Chronicles Bible - OT - Daniel Bible - OT - Deuteronomy Bible - OT - Ecclesiastes Bible - OT - Esther Bible - OT - Exodus Bible - OT - Ezekiel Bible - OT - Ezra-Nehemiah Bible - OT - Genesis Bible - OT - Habakkuk Bible - OT - Hosea Bible - OT - Isaiah Bible - OT - Jeremiah Bible - OT - Job Bible - OT - Joel Bible - OT - Jonah Bible - OT - Joshua Bible - OT - Judges Bible - OT - Kings Bible - OT - Lamentations Bible - OT - Leviticus Bible - OT - Malachi BIble - OT - Micah Bible - OT - Nehemiah Bible - OT - Numbers Bible - OT - Pentateuch Bible - OT - Proverbs Bible - OT - Psalms Bible - OT - Ruth Bible - OT - Samuel Bible - OT - Song of Songs Bible - OT - Torah Bible - OT - Zechariah Bible - OT - Zephaniah Biblical Law Biblicism Billy Graham biography Biology Biololgy Biotechnology Blasphemy Blindness Blog news Blogging Blogroll Bloomsbury Group Bob Dylan Body Body symbolism Boethius Boko Haram Bonhoeffer Book of Common Prayer Books Botany Boundary Brexit Britain British History British Politics Bruce Springsteen Buddhism Bureaucracy Burial Business C. S. Lewis C. S. Peirce Calendars Caliphate Calvin calvinism Camille Paglia Canon Capitalism Cappadocians Carl Schmitt Catholic Social Teaching Catholicism Catholicity Causation cemeteries Cervantes Charism Charismata Charity Charles Dickens Charles Hodge Charles Simeon Charles Taylor Charles Williams Chaucer Chermistry Chess Chesterton Chiasm children China Chinese Exclusion Act Chivalry Chopin Chretien de Troyes Christendom Christian Democracy Christian reconstruction Christianity in Britain Christianization Christmas Christology Chronology Church church and state Church architecture Church Calendar Church history Church of England Church Year Cicero Circumcision Cities City of God Civil Religion Civil Society Civil War Civility Classical Theism Classics Climate Change Clothing Coleridge Colloquy of Marburg Colonialism Color Comedy Comenius Commodity Communio Communism Community Comparative religions Computer Science Confederacy Confessionalization Conflict Congregations consciousness Consecration Conservatism Constantine Constitution consumerism Contra Faustum Conversion Coriolanus Cormac McCarthy Cosmology Cosmopolitanism Council of Trent Counter-culture Counter-insurgency Courage Courtly love Covenants Crafts Craftsmanship Cranach Creation Creativity Creator-creature Credit Crime Crime and Punishment Crisis Critical scholarship Criticism Cross Cubism Cultural theory Culture Culture War Dance Daniel Dennett Dante Darwin Dave Eggers David David Foster Wallace David Hume David Jones Deadly sins Death Debt Dechristianization Decolonization Deconstruction Defoe Deja vu Democracy Denis de Rougemont Denominationalism Derrida Descartes Developmental psychology Devils Diocletian Discipleship Disenchantment Disgust Diversion Diversity Divine energies Divine Impassibility Divine Simplicity Divine Warrior Doctrine dogma Dominion Donald Trump Dostoevsky Douglas Campbell Douglas Farrow Dreams Dualism Durkheim Dystopia E.M. Forster Early Christianity Early Modern Europe Easter Eastern Europe Eastern Orthodoxy Ecclesiology Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Eden Edgar Allan Poe Edmund Spenser Education Egypt Election Elites Emergence Emma Emotion Empire England English History English Reformation Enlightenment Entertainment Entrepreneur environmentalism Envy Epic Epiphany Episcopals Epistemology Epistles Equality Erasmus Ernst Kantorowicz Eros Eschatology Eternity Ethics Eucharist Europe Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Catholics Together Events Evil Evolution Exile Face Fairie Queene Fairy Tales Faith family Family and Marriage Fantasy Farming Fashion Fasting Fatherhood Fear Femininity Feminism Fertility Fetishization Feud Feudalism Feuerbach Fiction Figs Film Finance Finland Fire Flag Flags Flannery O'Connor Flood myths Folly Food football Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy Foreknowledge Forgiveness Foucault Fracking France Francois Mauriac Franz Rosenzweig free will Freedom Freedom of God French Revolution Freud Funerals Future G. K. Chesterton Gambling Gaming Gay Marriage Gender gender identity Genealogy Geography George Berkeley George Eliot George Herbert; Poetry George Romanes Gerald Manley Hopkins Germany Gethsemane Gift Gifts Giorgio Agamben Global Christianity Global economics Globalism Globalization Glorious Revolution Gnosticism God's sovereignty Gods Goethe Golf Good Friday Gospel Gospels Gothic Gothic architecture Grace Grammar Gramsci Gratitude Greek Literature Greek Philosophy Greek Religion Greek Science Gregory of Nyssa Guillermo del Toro H. Richard Niebuhr Haiku hair Hamann Hamlet Handicap Handles Hands Hans Urs von Balthasar Happiness Harold Bloom Harper Lee Harvest healing Heaven Heavenly treasure Heavenly treasure Hebrew Bible Hebrew language Hegel Heidegger Hell Hellenism; Judaism; Revelation Henri de Lubac heresy Herman Dooyeweerd Hermeneutics Herod Heroic Heroism Hesiod Hidegard of Bingen Hierarchy Hieronymus Bosch Historicism Historiography History History - Early Modern History - Middle Ages Hoaxes Hobbes Holiness Holy Saturday Holy Spirit Home Homeless Homer Homosexuality Honor hope Horror Hospitality Housing Hugh of St. Victor Human Rights Humanism Humor hylomorphism Hymns Hypocrisy. Iago Iconoclasm Identity Ideology Idleness Idolatry Iliad Images Imagination Immigrant churches Immigrant Religion Immigration Imperialism Improvization Imputation Incarnation Incest India Individualism Indonesia Inequality Inerrancy Infant Baptism Infant mortality Infanticide Ingratitude Innovation Inspiration Institutions Insult Intellectual History Intellectuals Intelligent Design International Politics Internet Intimacy IQ Iran Iran-Iraq War Iraq Ireland Irony Islam Islamic State Islamism Ismail Kadare Israel Ivan Illich J. Gresham Machen J.N. Figgis Jacob Jacques Lacan James Bond James Jordan James Joyce James KA Smith James Wood Jane Austen Jane Jacobs Jealousy Jed Perl Jeff Koons Jeroboam Jesus Jewish War 66-70 AD Jihad Johann Georg Hamann Johannine Epistles John Ashbery John Behr John Bunyan John Calvin John Donne John Frame John Howard Yoder John Knox John Milbank John Milton John Owen John Rawls John Ruskin John Stuart Mill John the Baptist John Webster John Wesley John Williamson Nevin Jonathan Edwards Jorge Luis Borges Joseph Conrad Joseph Ratzinger Journalism Joy Judaism Judaize Judgment Judith Butler Jurgen Moltmann Justice Justification Kalevala Kant Karl Barth Karl Marx Karl Polanyi Karl Rahner Kazakhstan Kazuo Ishiguro Kenneth Lonergan Kierkegaard King Lear Kingdom of God Kitsch Knighthood Knowledge Korea Labor movement Lactantius Lamech Lament Landscape Language Latin America Laughter Law Law and Punishment Leftism Lent Les Murray Levi-Strauss Levites Leviticus Liber Mundi Liberal arts Liberal Theology Liberalism Light Lighthouse Linguistics LIstening Literacy Literary structure Literature Liturgics Liturgy Locke Logic Love Luther Lutheran Lutheranism Lying Lytton Strachey Macbeth Machiavelli Machines Madness Mainline Manhattan Manicheanism Manners Manufacturing Manuscripts Mao Zedong Maps Marcion Marilynne Robinson Marketing Marriage Martha Nussbaum Martin Bucer Martin Chemnitz Martyrdom Marx Marxism Mary Mary Douglas masculinity Mass Materialism Mathematics Maundy Thursday Max Weber Media Mediation Medication Medicine Medieval Church Medieval exegesis Medieval Literature Medieval theology Medieval Thought Medievalism Memory Merchant of Venice Mesopotamian Religion Messianic Metaphor Metaphysics Methodist Mexican-American War Michel de Montaigne Michel Faber Middle Ages Middle East Midwifery Mikhail Bulgakov Military Millennium Mind Miracles Miscellaneous Mission missionaries Mixed constitution Modern self modernism Modernity monasticism Monotheism Monroe Doctrine Monsters Montaigne's Essays Moral philosophy Mormonism Moses Mother Teresa Motherhood Motive Mount of Olives Movies Multiculturalism Murder Music Musicals Mutability Mutability Mystery Mysticism myth N. T. Wright Narrative Nation-State Nationalism Natural Law Natural-Supernatural Nature Nature and culture Nature and Grace Nazi Nazirite Necrophilia Nero Nestorianism Neuroscience Nevin Lectures New Atheism New Testament New York City Newbigin News NGOs Nibelungenlied Nicholas of Cusa Nicholas of Lyra Nietzsche Nigeria Nihilism Nobel Prize Nobility Nominalism Norbert Elias Norman MacCaig nostalgia Novels Numerology Obama Objectivity and subjectivity Occasionalism Odysseus Oil Old Testament Oliver O'Donovan Ontology Origen original sin Orthodoxy Othello Owen Barfield Pacifism Pactum salutis Paedocommunion Paganism Pain Painting Paleoconservatism Palm Sunday Pannenberg Parenting Pascal Passions Passivity Pastoral Care Pastoral theology Patrick Modiano Patristics Patronage Paul Peace of God Peace of Westphalia Penal substitution Pentecost Pentecostalism Perichoresis Pericles Persecution Person Peter Peter Enns Petrarch Philip K. Dick Philip Melanchthon Philosophy Philosophy of Action Philosophy of History Philosophy of language Philosophy of science Phone booth Photography Physics Pictures Pierre Bourdieu Place Planned Parenthood Plants plato Play Plot Plotinus Pluralism Pneumatology Poetics poetry Poetry & Stories Poland police Political Philosophy Political theology Political Theory Politics Pop Culture Pope Francis Popular Culture Populism Pornography Porphyry Post-Colonial Theory Post-Structuralism Postmodernism Postmodernity Potential Poverty Power Practice Pragmatism Prayer Preaching Predestination Prediction Prehistory Premillennialism Presbyterian Priesthood Prince Charles Prison Reform privacy Private Prodigal Son Progress Progressivism Property Prophecy Prophet Propitiation Prosperity gospel Prostitution Protectionism Protestantism Providence Prudentius psalms Pseudo-Dionysus Psychological Warfare Psychology Public intellectual Public Life Public Philosophy Public Theology Publishing Punk Rock Pure nature Puritanism Purity Pushkin Putin Pythagoreanism R.J. Rushdoony Race Racism Radical Orthodoxy Rape Rationality Reactionary reading Realism Reason Red State Blue State Reformation Reformational Catholicism Reformational Philosophy Reformed theology refugees reinhold niebuhr Relationality Relativism Relics Religion Religion and science Religions Religious Freedom Religious Liberty Religious Right Renaissance Rene Girard Republican Party Resurrection Resurrection. Revelation Revelations Revenge Revivalism Revolution rhetoric Richard Flannagan Richard II Richard III Richard Wagner Richard Wilbur Righteousness Ritual Robert Frost Robert Herrick Robert Jenson Robert Mugabe Robert Spaemann Robinson Crusoe Rock n' Roll Rod Dreher Rodin Roman Catholicism Roman Empire Roman Religion Romance Romanticism Rome Rootedness Rosenstock-Huessy Rousseau Rowan Williams Rural America Russia Russian literature Russian Orthodoxy Rusty Reno Rwanda S. Y. Agnon Sabbath Sacrament Sacramental theology Sacraments Sacred Sacred Space Sacrifice saints Salt Sam Harris Same-sex marriage Sanctuary Satan Satire Saudi Arabia Scapegoat Scarcity Schism Schleiermacher Scholarship Science Science and Theology Science Fiction Scopes trial Scotland Scott Adams Scott Cairns Scottish Reformation Scotus Scripture and tradition sculpture Sea Second temple Secularism Secularization Self-Help Self-trust Semiotics Semper reformanda separation of church and state Sermon on the Mount Sex Sex Trafficking Sexual abuse Sexual Politics Sexual Revolution Sexuality Shakespeare Shame Culture Shema Sherlock Shopping Silence Simone Weil Simplicity Simpsons Sin Sincerity Sixties Skepticism Slavery Slavoj Zizek Sleep Sloth Social capital Social change Social Imaginary Social Science Socialism Socialization Sociology Sociology of Knowledge Sociology of Religion Sola scriptura Sonnets Sophocles Soteriology Soviet Union Space Spain Speculation Spinoza Spirit Sport Sports Star Trek State State-formation Stephen Masty Steven Bannon Strangers Structuralism structure Subject-object Substitution Suburbs Suffering Suicide Super-Rich Superheroes Supersessionism Supplication Supreme Court Surveillance Symbol Synagogue Taberancle Tabernacle Tax Taxes Tears Technology Teens Teleology Television Temple Ten Commandments Terence Terrence Malick Terrorism Thanksgiving The South The West Theodore Roosevelt Theogony Theological Education Theological Language Theology Theology - Anthropology Theology - Christology Theology - Covenant Theology - Creation Theology - Ecclesiology Theology - Eschatology Theology - Liturgical Theology - Pneumatology Theology - Soteriology Theology - Trinity Theology proper Theopolis Theopolis Institute Theosis Theresa May Thomas A. Clark Thomas Aquinas Thomas Carlyle Thomas Mann Threshing Thucydides Time Tocqueville Tolerance Toleration Tolstoy Tom Wolfe Tools Torah Torture Toscanini Totalitarianism Trade Tradition Tragedy Transhumanism Translation Transubstantiation Travel Trees Trinitarianism Trinity Trinity House Tristan Troilus and Creysede Trump Trump Truth Turkey Twelfth Night Two Kingdoms Typology Ukraine Ulysses Uncanny Uncategorized Uniform Union with Christ United States Unity University Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Value Vatican II Vengeance Vico Victorian Age Victorian Literature Vienna Violence Virgil Virgin Birth Virginia Woolf Vladimir Nabokov Vladimir Solovyev Vladimir Solovyov W.H. Auden Walls Walt Disney Walt Whitman Walter Benjamin Walter Lippmann War Wars of Religion Washington DC Wealth Weddings Will William Carlos Williams William Gilpin William Golding Wine Wisdom wonder Word of God Wordsworth Work Works World Council of Churches World History World War I World War II Worldview Worship Wrath Writing Youth Youth Ministry Yuja Wang Yves Congar Zimbabwe Zwingli Zygmunt Bauman

Select a Month January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who opposed the rebuilding of the Temple and tried to discourage the Jews?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Their enemies/Samaritans Amalekites Philistines Moabites