Baptist No More

Last updated on: September 30, 2021 at 1:25 am by Layne Wallace

Baptist No More 2021-09-30T01:25:06-04:00 Layne Wallace

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Baptist No More

An often-recurring discussion in the Southern Baptist Convention has focused on the denomination’s name. From time to time some will make a recommendation to change the name because “Southern” does not seem to fit. In truth, while most of the SBC’s 47,500 congregations are in the south, the denomination has 41 cooperating state conventions and partnerships with Baptists around the world. In thinking about the name, many SBC leaders have adopted the term, “Great Commission Baptists.” While “Great Commission Baptists” may reflect the denomination’s aspirations, it eliminates the wrong word. The problem in the SBC’s name is not the word “Southern.” It is the word “Baptist.”

Southern Baptists are often divided theologically. One can find Baptists who are Calvinists and Arminian. One can find Baptists who are Amillennial and Premillennial. One can find Baptists who are teetotalers and those who are not. Baptists have a common core of beliefs, to be sure, but there have always been disagreements on secondary issues. What has rarely been an issue in Baptist life until recently, however, is governance. Baptists are democratic to the core, believing that each member of the church should have a voice in governance. In keeping with democratic principles, the governance of the SBC was constructed so the Messengers, the representatives of local congregations, have the final authority of the direction of the Convention itself. To believe that has been a hallmark of SBC life, at least until now.

It is an odd thing to watch a body of a denomination quickly repudiate the whole denomination’s theological stance on governance. That, however, is exactly what is unfolding in Nashville, TN. The Executive Committee of the SBC (EC) has, for a second day in a row, refused to do what the messengers of the Convention voted for it to do. The Messengers meeting in this year’s Annual Convention directed the EC to have an investigation and waive-attorney client privilege. For the second day in a row, the EC has declined to follow the Messengers’ directive. Instead, they are pursuing “negotiations” with the Sexual Abuse Task Force and Guidepost Solutions, the firm hired to do the investigation.[1] Bruce Frank, Chairman of the Sexual Abuse Committee Task Force said, “I think we can stand up [and say to SBC messengers], while we didn’t get attorney-client privilege waived, you can believe this report….”[2] While Frank may be able to say with conviction the report generated without the waver of attorney-client privilege is a believable, he cannot say the EC has followed the directive of the Convention.

The problem has now moved from the trustworthiness of the EC to the power of the EC. Does the EC have the power to disregard the vote of the Convention, pursue an investigation in a different way than the messengers voted, and divine somehow the Messengers’ true intent? SBC President Ed Litton remained hopeful the EC would be convinced to follow the directives of the Messengers, but what should rattle SBC churches is that the EC somehow believes it has the right to do otherwise. The EC now believes it gets to decide whether it wants to do what the messengers have directed it to do or not.

If the EC has the power to disregard the Messengers, then the nature of the SBC has fundamentally changed. It is no longer a denomination led by the messengers, it is controlled by the EC. A denomination controlled by a small executive body who can run roughshod over the votes of the people cannot be thought of as being Baptist—at least in the way the SBC has used the term in the past. Why in the world would the EC act in this manner? This is deeply disturbing, and it looks like the EC is hiding behind legalese.

Whether EC is hiding information or not, the question is a question of power. Who has the power in the SBC? Power once resided in the people. Now, it looks like it resides in the EC. If the EC can flip the power structure, “Southern” is not the most misused word in “Southern Baptist Convention.”

[1] https://www.brnow.org/news/ec-again-extends-task-force-negotiations-regarding-investigation/

[2] Ibid

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 22, 2021

What Will the SBC Become?

Next Post

October 4, 2021 It Is Time for Them to Go

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Biblical Studies Mental Health and Religion News Philosophy of Religion Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 February 2025 January 2025 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 February 2024 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 April 2022 March 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 January 2018

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What qualification does Paul give for elders, saying they must be the husband of how many wives?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Two wives As many as he can support No more than three wives One wife