Are Evangelicals a Threat?

Last updated on: April 12, 2021 at 6:59 pm by Layne Wallace

Are Evangelicals a Threat? 2021-04-12T18:59:19-04:00 Layne Wallace

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Photo by Lukas on Pexels.com

Owing to their political leanings, the largest religious group in the United States, Evangelical Christians, have come under fire in recent years. In the latest volley, Dr. Curtis Freeman,[1] Director of the Baptist House of Studies at Duke University Divinity School, tweeted, “…Evangelical Christianity is the greatest threat to human existence today. It must be laid waste.” After he was challenged on his tweet, he deleted it, saying it was hyperbolic. Then, however, he reiterated his larger point. He wrote, “…I am concerned about the white evangelical culture that is focused on 5 fundamentals: guns are good, vaccines are bad, science is bunk, news is fake, & black lives don’t matter.” Describing his preferred version of the Faith, Freeman further attacked Evangelicals. “I am not an Evangelical Christian. I follow Jesus Christ. I affirm life. I accept science. I am not a know-nothing. Evangelical Christianity is a threat to human existence.”

To say that his words are appalling is not strong enough. Freeman’s words are incendiary. They border on slander. To see how unfortunate his words are, imagine if he had said them about some other group. Imagine if he had said, “Wahabi Islam is the greatest threat to human existence today. It must be laid waste.” Imagine if he had said, “Reform Judaism is the greatest threat to human existence today. It must be laid waste.” Imagine if he had said, “The Black Lives Matter movement (BLM) is the greatest threat to human existence today. It must be laid waste.” The first thing that would happen is that everyone would have recognized his words were a call to violence. How exactly is a religious or political group “laid waste?” Perhaps we should give Freeman the benefit of the doubt and suggest that he was not referring to people but to ideas. Perhaps we should allow that “laid waste” was an unfortunate choice of words—just a hyperbole gone wrong. We must note, however, if Freeman had used the exact same words about Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, BLM, or even Planned Parenthood few would give him the benefit of the doubt. I suspect he would have been fired summarily from Duke, his deletion of the tweet notwithstanding.

Freeman wisely deleted his first tweet, but the only part of it that he really disowned was the “laid waste” line. The problem, however, is he still argues Evangelical Christianity is the greatest threat to humanity. Governments and institutions are responsible for the health and safety of humanity, are they not? If something emerges that is a threat to human existence, must they not work to eliminate it? If Evangelical Christianity is a threat to human existence, must it not be eliminated? While backing off his “laid waste” language, the logic that leads up to it remains.

Freeman’s opinions are based on some of the crudest caricatures one will ever see coming from a trusted intellectual. Who in evangelical life is saying vaccines are bad? There are perhaps some, but I have not heard of them. In fact, the leader of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, Russell Moore, made it a point to argue it is morally permissible to take the Covid vaccine. Who are the Evangelicals against vaccines, exactly? Whoever Freeman has in mind, they hardly are representative of 90-100 million evangelicals many of whom prayed fervently for a vaccine to end the pandemic.

His crude caricatures continue. Evangelicals are anti-science. Evangelicals are know-nothings. Those caricatures are quite ill-informed. They so trite they are hardly worth critiquing. The worst of his caricatures, however, is his race slander. It must be rebutted. Freeman argues one of the five fundamentals of Evangelical belief is that black lives do not matter. This is untrue and outrageous. Again let’s play what if. What if he had said, “The BLM movement has as one of its pillars that Asian-American lives do not matter.” The comment would have rightly generated howls of outrage. To slander a group of 90-100 million people as believing black lives do not matter is unacceptable. No Evangelical leader has made that argument. None. It is true, many Evangelicals have concerns about the BLM movement. It is also true that many Evangelicals and others have issues with Critical Race Theory (CRT). Being concerned about the leadership of the BLM movement and the introduction of CRT (a theory based in Marxism) in our schools and military is not tantamount to denying the value of black lives. In short, black lives matter because black lives are created in the image of God. They are persons God has equipped for His Kingdom’s ends. Black lives matter because Jesus gave his life for them. Black lives matter because every human being is created in the image of God. Every. Last. One. I know of no Evangelical leader who differs on this point. Freeman’s language here is unacceptable.

The Evangelical faith is based not on Freeman’s frivolous and unscholarly “fundamentals.” The Evangelical faith is a broad-based movement, so it can be very difficult to define. If one were to ask evangelical leaders what they believe, however, a list like this would likely emerge: the cross of Jesus Christ reconciles people to God, conversion to Christianity is required for eternal life, those who have faith in Jesus Christ inherit eternal life, those who have faith in Jesus are required to share their faith, and the Scriptures are the final authority for faith and practice.

What Freeman has done is malign a group of people with accusations and innuendo. He has looked at a large and diverse group of people and labeled all of them. He may have a few examples of bad behavior in Evangelical life, but taking a few examples of bad behavior and arguing from them that a whole group is dangerous and a threat is exactly how racial prejudice works. It is how all prejudice works. It is wrong. It is not enough for Freeman to delete a tweet. It is enough for him to say his first tweet was hyperbole. He needs to repent.

[1] This article gives me no pleasure to write. I know Freeman. He has been helpful to me in my research in the past. Specifically, he pointed me to Baptist authors who use the term “sacrament” in discussing the Lord’s Supper, baptism, and preaching while I was researching for my Doctor of Ministry. He and I also shared the pulpit for the ordination his students. He is normally very friendly and thoughtful. I am disappointed in his words.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 30, 2021

A Massive Decline In Church Membership

Next Post

April 22, 2021 Inspiration

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Biblical Studies Mental Health and Religion News Philosophy of Religion Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 February 2025 January 2025 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 February 2024 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 April 2022 March 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 January 2018

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who prophesied against Tyre, predicting it would become a bare rock?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joel Ezekiel Daniel Amos