The SBC and Sexual Abuse: Two Years Later

Last updated on: February 9, 2021 at 6:39 pm by Layne Wallace

The SBC and Sexual Abuse: Two Years Later 2021-02-09T18:39:23-05:00 Layne Wallace

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Photo by Anete Lusina on Pexels.com

Two years ago, the Houston Chronicle published a shocking report of systematic sexual abuse within the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC). The series of articles documented 700 victims of abuse over 20 years.[1] At first, the report was treated with the gravity it deserved. The President of the Southern Baptist Convention, J.D. Greer, commissioned an advisory group to study the issue. The group noted several systemic issues: failure of training, using church autonomy to avoid taking action, failure to take care of the survivors, failure to disclose, failure to report to civil authorities, recommending suspected perpetrators to new jobs, and promoting leaders who glorify the mistreatment of women.[2]

Now, one year later, the question that must be raised is if the actions taken by the SBC are sufficient. In the 52-page report given by the committee, there are several positive recommendations about caring for victims and reporting. There are some recommended preventative measures about background checks, safety teams, and creating an atmosphere where the opportunities for sexual abuse are limited. All of these are good and important steps.

The problem, however, is that sexual predators in the clergy have long abused the loose SBC ordination process to hide their predilection toward evil. In order to be ordained as an SBC minister, one only needs to have a majority vote of a local congregation. Yes, most candidates for ordination use a process that engages the local association (a local group of SBC churches of like mind and thought) by creating an ordination council to interview the candidate and make recommendations. Even that small step is not required, however. A one vote majority vote in a church conference yields ordination, even if the association is not consulted. What would surprise most non-SBC Christians is that a church can vote to ordain a candidate even if the ordination council recommends against it. A majority vote=ordination, period. We call this church autonomy.

Once given a majority vote, there is no way to discipline or defrock a minister. If a minister has a worrisome pattern in his behavior, there is no way to compel him to change or leave the ministry. Worse, if a minister commits abuse and avoids arrest and prosecution, there is no way to track him. The minister can simply move along, leaving a trail of broken lives behind him. The ordination process has been this way for generations in SBC life, and it shows no signs of changing.

While background checks are good and every church should do background checks before hiring clergy, this suggestion alone is insufficient. Let’s face it, because SBC churches are notoriously anti-authoritarian it is impossible to get 100% of SBC churches to implement any particular policy. Universal background checks among SBC churches will likely not happen.

Even if it were possible to get 100% of churches to do background checks on clergy, the background checks themselves do not catch every abuser. Even the SBC report acknowledges this issue. So, the problem is then twofold: not enough background checks being completed and imperfections in the background check process. The SBC’s posture of simply encouraging background checks, therefore, will not prevent the kinds of systematic abuse we have seen.

The issue that must be faced is there seems to be no serious plan to keep predators out of the pulpit in the first place. There is no serious effort to reform the ordination process. There is still no process to discipline or defrock ordained ministers.

Lest my friends in the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship (CBF) think they and their churches are immune, remember the CBF uses the exact same ordination process the SBC uses. In fact, they typically use the same associations. Interestingly, because CBF candidates are more likely to get unfair treatment in associational ordination councils, CBF congregations often create their own ordination councils bypassing the association altogether. In short, the CBF ordination process is every bit as open to abuse as the SBC if not more. So, has the response to the Houston Chronicle report been sufficient? No, it has not. Until Baptists of all stripes are willing to tackle the thorny issues of ordination and discipline of ministers, we are putting our people at r

[1] https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/investigations/article/Southern-Baptist-sexual-abuse-spreads-as-leaders-13588038.php

[2] https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2019/june/sbc-caring-well-abuse-advisory-group-report.html

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 4, 2021

Wallace and Son's

Next Post

February 18, 2021 Somewhere Between Hope and Optimism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Biblical Studies Mental Health and Religion News Philosophy of Religion Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 February 2025 January 2025 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 February 2024 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 April 2022 March 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 January 2018

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who did Moses marry in Midian?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Rebekah Dinah Leah Zipporah