All Philosophy Is Contextual, So Every Philosopher Must Be Read in Context

Last updated on: January 9, 2017 at 11:49 pm by Kyle Cupp

All Philosophy Is Contextual, So Every Philosopher Must Be Read in Context 2017-01-09T23:49:50-05:00 Kyle Cupp

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry reminds us that Descartes, when formulating his ontological argument for the existence of God, approached the matter as a mathematician and as a theist trained in the classical philosophical tradition. As a student of mathematics, “he understood that what is even conceivable in any given geometric universe is determined by the axioms that rule that universe.” As part of the classical philosophical tradition, he approached philosophy more as a process and a way of life than as a doctrine.

The underlying lesson here is an important one for students of philosophy (and any other intellectual discipline): all philosophy is contextual, so every philosopher must be read in context. To understand a philosopher, you can’t just look at what was said. Philosophers have specific agendas, tasks, desires, and motivations. They’re asking specific questions–and not others. Their courses of thought are established and limited by particular presuppositions and guided by particular methodologies.

However immaculate their logic, however focused they are on the pursuit of truth–philosophers reason in terms of the worlds in which they live. In philosophy, there is no truth apart from history. Descartes’ ontological argument is not Anselm’s, not only because the formulations were different, but was because each thinker was doing something different, with different reasons, and within different circumstances.

Your own interpretation of a philosopher will be contextual as well. Even if you reside more or less in the same time and place as the thinker you’re reading, you have your own agenda, your own presuppositions, and your own set of circumstances. You might succeed in putting on your Descartes hat or Nietzsche hat or Simone de Beauvoir hat, but it will always be you wearing it. This limits you, but on the plus side, it also means that you’re in a place to say something new. Not only can their worlds expand your own, you can bring your own world into theirs!

Follow Kyle Cupp on Facebook and Twitter.

Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry

Philosophy

Previous Post

January 1, 2015

How Mary Affirmed the Impossible

Next Post

January 5, 2015 Downplaying the Pope's Upcoming Encyclical on the Environment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Confessions Culture Current Events Family Life Hermeneutics Humor LEGO Sets Mindless Monday Question Personal Philosophy Policy Politics and Society Quotes Religion in Pop Culture Series Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2016 December 2015 August 2015 July 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city is known as the birthplace of Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jerusalem Nazareth Galilee Bethlehem